― Advertisement ―

National Level Seminar by DILS, Durgapur, West Bengal

About the Organizer Durgapur Institute of Legal Studies (DILS), located in Durgapur, West Bengal, is a reputed institution affiliated with Kazi Nazrul University and...
HomeState Of Chhattisgarh vs Sanjeev Dhawan @ Monu Dhawan And Anr on...

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Sanjeev Dhawan @ Monu Dhawan And Anr on 10 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

10/03/2026

1. This acquittal appeal has been preferred by the appellant/State

SPONSORED

against the judgment dated 19.8.2013 passed by the learned 1 st

Additional Sessions Judge, Durg, District-Durg, (C.G.), in S.T. No.

86/2012 by which respondents herein has been acquitted of the

charges punishable under Section 302/34 of IPC.

2. Brief facts of the case, is that, the deceased Rajkumari Maggo,

who was the grandmother of the accused Sanjeev Dhawan, was

the head of the household and resided in her house situated at

Mohan Nagar along with the other deceased persons, namely her

son Ravi Maggo, her granddaughter Kumari Reema Maggo, and

her grandson/ alleged deceased Deepak. The deceased

Rajkumari had great affection for the accused Sanjeev Dhawan,

who is the son of her daughter Kanchan, and owing to such

affection, the accused frequently visited her from his village and

spent time conversing with her. During the course of such

interactions, the accused allegedly misled the deceased by

weaving deceptive stories and induced her to part with a

substantial amount of money on the pretext of establishing a

source of employment. Believing the assurances given by the

accused and trusting him as her grandson, the deceased

Rajkumari agreed to his request and, in order to financially assist

him, mortgaged/sold her plot and advanced a sum of

approximately Rs. 18 lakhs to the accused Sanjeev Dhawan as a

loan for the purpose of setting up a plant. It is alleged that with the

said amount, the accused established a water pouch

manufacturing factory and, in the initial stages, in order to

maintain the confidence of the deceased and avoid any suspicion,

he used to remit certain amounts into her bank account in the

form of installments. However, subsequently, either due to a

change in his financial circumstances, alleged losses incurred in

the factory, or due to a dishonest intention developing on his part,

the accused stopped sending any further payments and began

contemplating ways to evade repayment of the loan amount.

Meanwhile, the deceased Rajkumari had fixed the marriage of her

granddaughter, the deceased Kumari Reema Maggo, and on

account of the impending marriage she was in urgent need of

money, due to which she repeatedly demanded that the accused

Sanjeev Dhawan return the amount advanced to him. The

accused, however, continued to avoid repayment by making

various excuses. According to the prosecution, the accused

apprehended that the deceased Rajkumari would continue to

exert pressure upon him for the return of the money and that such

persistent demands might ultimately expose the truth. With the

intention of preventing the matter from coming to light and freeing

himself from the liability of repayment, the accused allegedly

conceived a plan to eliminate his grandmother. In furtherance of

this plan, the accused Sanjeev Dhawan is stated to have involved

his associate Ranjit Paswan in the conspiracy and persuaded him

to assist in carrying out the act, and prior to the date of the

incident, both of them allegedly proceeded from Dhanbad,

Jharkhand, towards Durg with the intention of executing their plan.

Before reaching Durg, the accused Sanjeev Dhawan

telephonically contacted the deceased Kumari Reema Maggo and

informed her that he would be arriving late at night, requesting her

to keep the door open for him. It is alleged that the accused had

brought with him a large quantity of sleeping pills which he mixed

in a sliced edible substance or drink and, upon reaching the

house, represented the same to the family members as prasad,

thereby inducing them to consume it. After consuming the said

mixture, all the family members fell asleep, however, none of them

died. Soon after drinking the mixture, Deepak vomited, which

aroused suspicion in the mind of the accused that the presence of

an intoxicating or poisonous substance in the drink might be

discovered. Consequently, on the date of the incident, i.e.,

02.09.2011 at about 6:30 a.m., the accused sent his cousin

Deepak Maggo to a nearby shop and thereafter, in his absence,

both the accused persons jointly committed the murder of

Rajkumari Maggo, Kumari Reema Maggo and Ravi Maggo by

slitting their throats one by one with a knife. After committing the

murders, co-accused Ranjeet Paswan broke the lock of the back

door with a pair of scissors and threw the same into a water tank

in order to conceal the evidence. Thereafter, both the accused

wrapped the blood-stained mattress covers and pillow covers,

along with the knife used in the commission of the offence, and

disposed of them by throwing them into a drain situated near the

Gurudwara. Subsequently, both the accused proceeded towards

Rajendra Chowk where they waited for a bus and from there

telephonically called Deepak Maggo and summoned him.

Thereafter, accused Sanjeev Dhawan sent Deepak Maggo to

Raipur on a motorcycle along with Ranjeet Paswan while he

himself travelled to Raipur by bus, and from there all three

proceeded towards Sambalpur. However, before reaching their

destination they alighted from the bus and travelled by auto-

rickshaw to the Samlai Temple where they sat near a canal

located behind the temple. At that point, Sanjeev Dhawan

received a phone call from his brother and during the course of

the conversation Deepak Maggo became suspicious, whereupon

he was allegedly pushed into the canal and his body was carried

away by the flowing water. Meanwhile, Dharam Singh (PW-1),

who was residing in the house of the deceased as a tenant, woke

up at about 7:00 a.m. on the morning of the incident for his daily

routine and went to use the bathroom, where he noticed that

Kumari Reema Maggo was lying covered with a sheet and

appeared to be sleeping while no other member of the family was

visible. Dharam Singh and his mother regularly used the bathroom

belonging to their landlord, the deceased Ravi Maggo. After about

fifteen to twenty minutes he left for his work and returned around

2:00 p.m., when he again opened the lock of the channel gate and

went to wash his hands and face in the bathroom, at which time

he observed that the back door of the house was open. At that

moment a girl named Soni, also known as Chandni (PW-4), who

lived nearby, arrived and informed him that as no one was present

in the house of Ravi Maggo the milkman had left their milk there,

whereupon she entered the kitchen and began heating the milk.

After closing the back door, both of them locked the channel gate

and left the premises. Later in the evening at about 8:00-8:30

p.m., when Dharam Singh returned from work, it was noticed that

none of the members of Ravi Maggo’s family had been seen

throughout the day. The channel gate outside was locked,

whereas none of the internal doors were locked. Thereafter,

Chandni alias Soni (PW-4), Dharam Singh (PW-1) and his mother

Baljit entered the house after opening the channel gate lock.

During this time Chandni removed the curtain from the window

and noticed a person’s leg lying on the bed, which raised

suspicion. Consequently, neighbours were gathered and Dharam

Singh informed the police. On the basis of this information, the in-

charge of Mohannagar Police Outpost, Aditya Sharma (PW-15),

recorded the First Information Report at 21:30 hours as Exhibit

P-1 and registered Crime No. 491/2011 under Section 302 of the

Indian Penal Code, initially expressing suspicion against Deepak

Maggo. On the same night, merg numbers 34, 35 and 36 were

also registered and an inquiry into the cause of death was initiated

under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the

investigation, witnesses were summoned and the bodies were

identified, and upon inspection of the scene of occurrence it was

found that the house of Ravi Maggo, situated about 100 metres

behind the Gurudwara in Durg city, contained three rooms

occupied by the family, while Dharam Singh resided as a tenant in

the first room. In one room the body of Rajkumari was found lying

on a double bed with a blood-stained bedsheet and a visible injury

mark on the neck, while an iron almirah was found open with

clothes scattered and three jewellery boxes lying empty. In

another room the body of Kumari Reema was found lying on a

wooden sofa with blood stains and a similar injury mark on the

neck, while the almirah in that room remained untouched and the

kitchen nearby contained used tea leaves after straining tea. In a

third room the body of Ravi Maggo was found lying on a double

bed with blood-stained bedding and a similar injury mark on the

neck, and the room contained a sofa set, two centre tables, a

dining table with five chairs and a television on a stand.

Significantly, no signs of struggle were found in any of the rooms.

During the inquest proceedings the investigating officer seized a

glass containing a small quantity of tea from the centre table in

Ravi Maggo’s room as per seizure memo Exhibit P-26, and also

seized the tea-making bowl, strainer and used tea leaves from the

kitchen platform as per Exhibit P-27. Considering the

circumstances, the three bodies were sent to the District Hospital,

Durg for post-mortem examination, where Dr. Yashwantrao

Dumde (PW-10) opined that the throats of the deceased had been

cut with a sharp-edged weapon and that death had occurred due

to shock resulting from excessive bleeding caused by the cutting

of the windpipe and major blood vessels. The post-mortem

examination conducted on 03.09.2011 between 2:30 p.m. and

4:30 p.m. indicated that the deaths had occurred within the

preceding 24 to 36 hours and were homicidal in nature. During

further investigation statements of various witnesses were

recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

and on the basis of the memorandum statement of accused

Sanjeev Dhawan a steel knife measuring approximately six inches

in length, bearing blood stains and sharp on one side, was

recovered as per seizure memo Exhibit P-11, while a large pair of

scissors concealed in the water tank was recovered at the

instance of co-accused Ranjeet Paswan as per Exhibit P-12, after

which both accused were arrested. The accused further disclosed

that the mattress and pillow covers along with a knife had been

thrown into a drain, and although the drain was searched on

17.12.2011 nothing could be recovered due to excessive mud and

filth and a panchnama was prepared accordingly. During further

investigation, statements of witnesses from Jharkhand and other

places were recorded, a Videocon mobile phone was seized from

Madhu alias Madha which had been obtained from a person

named Kargil who claimed to have found it near a river bank, and

site maps of relevant places including the canal near Sambalpur

where Deepak had allegedly been drowned were prepared. On

19.12.2011, the accused Sanjeev Dhawan produced from his

house at village Lodna, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand, an SBI

passbook in the names of the deceased Rajkumari and Ravi

Kumar along with other documents including a post office

passbook, an ICICI Bank ATM card, PAN cards, a rexine purse

and a Nokia mobile handset, all of which were seized. The seized

articles including the steel knife, tea remnants, tea leaves, clothes

and bedsheets of the deceased and their viscera were sent for

chemical examination, which revealed the presence of blood on

the clothes but no chemical poison in the tea remnants, tea leaves

or viscera.



Source link