State Of Chhattisgarh vs Sanjeev Dhawan @ Monu Dhawan And Anr on 10 March, 2026

    0
    43
    ADVERTISEMENT

    10/03/2026

    1. This acquittal appeal has been preferred by the appellant/State

    SPONSORED

    against the judgment dated 19.8.2013 passed by the learned 1 st

    Additional Sessions Judge, Durg, District-Durg, (C.G.), in S.T. No.

    86/2012 by which respondents herein has been acquitted of the

    charges punishable under Section 302/34 of IPC.

    2. Brief facts of the case, is that, the deceased Rajkumari Maggo,

    who was the grandmother of the accused Sanjeev Dhawan, was

    the head of the household and resided in her house situated at

    Mohan Nagar along with the other deceased persons, namely her

    son Ravi Maggo, her granddaughter Kumari Reema Maggo, and

    her grandson/ alleged deceased Deepak. The deceased

    Rajkumari had great affection for the accused Sanjeev Dhawan,

    who is the son of her daughter Kanchan, and owing to such

    affection, the accused frequently visited her from his village and

    spent time conversing with her. During the course of such

    interactions, the accused allegedly misled the deceased by

    weaving deceptive stories and induced her to part with a

    substantial amount of money on the pretext of establishing a

    source of employment. Believing the assurances given by the

    accused and trusting him as her grandson, the deceased

    Rajkumari agreed to his request and, in order to financially assist

    him, mortgaged/sold her plot and advanced a sum of

    approximately Rs. 18 lakhs to the accused Sanjeev Dhawan as a

    loan for the purpose of setting up a plant. It is alleged that with the

    said amount, the accused established a water pouch

    manufacturing factory and, in the initial stages, in order to

    maintain the confidence of the deceased and avoid any suspicion,

    he used to remit certain amounts into her bank account in the

    form of installments. However, subsequently, either due to a

    change in his financial circumstances, alleged losses incurred in

    the factory, or due to a dishonest intention developing on his part,

    the accused stopped sending any further payments and began

    contemplating ways to evade repayment of the loan amount.

    Meanwhile, the deceased Rajkumari had fixed the marriage of her

    granddaughter, the deceased Kumari Reema Maggo, and on

    account of the impending marriage she was in urgent need of

    money, due to which she repeatedly demanded that the accused

    Sanjeev Dhawan return the amount advanced to him. The

    accused, however, continued to avoid repayment by making

    various excuses. According to the prosecution, the accused

    apprehended that the deceased Rajkumari would continue to

    exert pressure upon him for the return of the money and that such

    persistent demands might ultimately expose the truth. With the

    intention of preventing the matter from coming to light and freeing

    himself from the liability of repayment, the accused allegedly

    conceived a plan to eliminate his grandmother. In furtherance of

    this plan, the accused Sanjeev Dhawan is stated to have involved

    his associate Ranjit Paswan in the conspiracy and persuaded him

    to assist in carrying out the act, and prior to the date of the

    incident, both of them allegedly proceeded from Dhanbad,

    Jharkhand, towards Durg with the intention of executing their plan.

    Before reaching Durg, the accused Sanjeev Dhawan

    telephonically contacted the deceased Kumari Reema Maggo and

    informed her that he would be arriving late at night, requesting her

    to keep the door open for him. It is alleged that the accused had

    brought with him a large quantity of sleeping pills which he mixed

    in a sliced edible substance or drink and, upon reaching the

    house, represented the same to the family members as prasad,

    thereby inducing them to consume it. After consuming the said

    mixture, all the family members fell asleep, however, none of them

    died. Soon after drinking the mixture, Deepak vomited, which

    aroused suspicion in the mind of the accused that the presence of

    an intoxicating or poisonous substance in the drink might be

    discovered. Consequently, on the date of the incident, i.e.,

    02.09.2011 at about 6:30 a.m., the accused sent his cousin

    Deepak Maggo to a nearby shop and thereafter, in his absence,

    both the accused persons jointly committed the murder of

    Rajkumari Maggo, Kumari Reema Maggo and Ravi Maggo by

    slitting their throats one by one with a knife. After committing the

    murders, co-accused Ranjeet Paswan broke the lock of the back

    door with a pair of scissors and threw the same into a water tank

    in order to conceal the evidence. Thereafter, both the accused

    wrapped the blood-stained mattress covers and pillow covers,

    along with the knife used in the commission of the offence, and

    disposed of them by throwing them into a drain situated near the

    Gurudwara. Subsequently, both the accused proceeded towards

    Rajendra Chowk where they waited for a bus and from there

    telephonically called Deepak Maggo and summoned him.

    Thereafter, accused Sanjeev Dhawan sent Deepak Maggo to

    Raipur on a motorcycle along with Ranjeet Paswan while he

    himself travelled to Raipur by bus, and from there all three

    proceeded towards Sambalpur. However, before reaching their

    destination they alighted from the bus and travelled by auto-

    rickshaw to the Samlai Temple where they sat near a canal

    located behind the temple. At that point, Sanjeev Dhawan

    received a phone call from his brother and during the course of

    the conversation Deepak Maggo became suspicious, whereupon

    he was allegedly pushed into the canal and his body was carried

    away by the flowing water. Meanwhile, Dharam Singh (PW-1),

    who was residing in the house of the deceased as a tenant, woke

    up at about 7:00 a.m. on the morning of the incident for his daily

    routine and went to use the bathroom, where he noticed that

    Kumari Reema Maggo was lying covered with a sheet and

    appeared to be sleeping while no other member of the family was

    visible. Dharam Singh and his mother regularly used the bathroom

    belonging to their landlord, the deceased Ravi Maggo. After about

    fifteen to twenty minutes he left for his work and returned around

    2:00 p.m., when he again opened the lock of the channel gate and

    went to wash his hands and face in the bathroom, at which time

    he observed that the back door of the house was open. At that

    moment a girl named Soni, also known as Chandni (PW-4), who

    lived nearby, arrived and informed him that as no one was present

    in the house of Ravi Maggo the milkman had left their milk there,

    whereupon she entered the kitchen and began heating the milk.

    After closing the back door, both of them locked the channel gate

    and left the premises. Later in the evening at about 8:00-8:30

    p.m., when Dharam Singh returned from work, it was noticed that

    none of the members of Ravi Maggo’s family had been seen

    throughout the day. The channel gate outside was locked,

    whereas none of the internal doors were locked. Thereafter,

    Chandni alias Soni (PW-4), Dharam Singh (PW-1) and his mother

    Baljit entered the house after opening the channel gate lock.

    During this time Chandni removed the curtain from the window

    and noticed a person’s leg lying on the bed, which raised

    suspicion. Consequently, neighbours were gathered and Dharam

    Singh informed the police. On the basis of this information, the in-

    charge of Mohannagar Police Outpost, Aditya Sharma (PW-15),

    recorded the First Information Report at 21:30 hours as Exhibit

    P-1 and registered Crime No. 491/2011 under Section 302 of the

    Indian Penal Code, initially expressing suspicion against Deepak

    Maggo. On the same night, merg numbers 34, 35 and 36 were

    also registered and an inquiry into the cause of death was initiated

    under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the

    investigation, witnesses were summoned and the bodies were

    identified, and upon inspection of the scene of occurrence it was

    found that the house of Ravi Maggo, situated about 100 metres

    behind the Gurudwara in Durg city, contained three rooms

    occupied by the family, while Dharam Singh resided as a tenant in

    the first room. In one room the body of Rajkumari was found lying

    on a double bed with a blood-stained bedsheet and a visible injury

    mark on the neck, while an iron almirah was found open with

    clothes scattered and three jewellery boxes lying empty. In

    another room the body of Kumari Reema was found lying on a

    wooden sofa with blood stains and a similar injury mark on the

    neck, while the almirah in that room remained untouched and the

    kitchen nearby contained used tea leaves after straining tea. In a

    third room the body of Ravi Maggo was found lying on a double

    bed with blood-stained bedding and a similar injury mark on the

    neck, and the room contained a sofa set, two centre tables, a

    dining table with five chairs and a television on a stand.

    Significantly, no signs of struggle were found in any of the rooms.

    During the inquest proceedings the investigating officer seized a

    glass containing a small quantity of tea from the centre table in

    Ravi Maggo’s room as per seizure memo Exhibit P-26, and also

    seized the tea-making bowl, strainer and used tea leaves from the

    kitchen platform as per Exhibit P-27. Considering the

    circumstances, the three bodies were sent to the District Hospital,

    Durg for post-mortem examination, where Dr. Yashwantrao

    Dumde (PW-10) opined that the throats of the deceased had been

    cut with a sharp-edged weapon and that death had occurred due

    to shock resulting from excessive bleeding caused by the cutting

    of the windpipe and major blood vessels. The post-mortem

    examination conducted on 03.09.2011 between 2:30 p.m. and

    4:30 p.m. indicated that the deaths had occurred within the

    preceding 24 to 36 hours and were homicidal in nature. During

    further investigation statements of various witnesses were

    recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

    and on the basis of the memorandum statement of accused

    Sanjeev Dhawan a steel knife measuring approximately six inches

    in length, bearing blood stains and sharp on one side, was

    recovered as per seizure memo Exhibit P-11, while a large pair of

    scissors concealed in the water tank was recovered at the

    instance of co-accused Ranjeet Paswan as per Exhibit P-12, after

    which both accused were arrested. The accused further disclosed

    that the mattress and pillow covers along with a knife had been

    thrown into a drain, and although the drain was searched on

    17.12.2011 nothing could be recovered due to excessive mud and

    filth and a panchnama was prepared accordingly. During further

    investigation, statements of witnesses from Jharkhand and other

    places were recorded, a Videocon mobile phone was seized from

    Madhu alias Madha which had been obtained from a person

    named Kargil who claimed to have found it near a river bank, and

    site maps of relevant places including the canal near Sambalpur

    where Deepak had allegedly been drowned were prepared. On

    19.12.2011, the accused Sanjeev Dhawan produced from his

    house at village Lodna, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand, an SBI

    passbook in the names of the deceased Rajkumari and Ravi

    Kumar along with other documents including a post office

    passbook, an ICICI Bank ATM card, PAN cards, a rexine purse

    and a Nokia mobile handset, all of which were seized. The seized

    articles including the steel knife, tea remnants, tea leaves, clothes

    and bedsheets of the deceased and their viscera were sent for

    chemical examination, which revealed the presence of blood on

    the clothes but no chemical poison in the tea remnants, tea leaves

    or viscera.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here