Pristine Estates Villa Owners … vs Sri B. Srinivas Rao on 2 April, 2026

    0
    35
    ADVERTISEMENT

    (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.M.Mohiuddin)

    Heard Sri M.S.Srinivasa Iyengar, learned Senior Counsel

    SPONSORED

    representing Sri Hirendernath, learned counsel for the appellant;

    Sri K.Vivek Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing

    Sri Kondaparthy Kiran Kumar, learned counsel appearing for

    respondent Nos.1 and 2; Ms.B.Mohana Reddy, learned Government

    Pleader for Cooperation appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4;

    Sri Pranav Munigela, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5,

    Sri T.P.S.Harsha, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6

    to 14.

    2. This writ appeal, preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters

    Patent, assails the order dated 26.02.2026 passed by the learned

    Single Judge in W.P.No.18220 of 2025. By the said order, the learned

    Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2

    herein (hereinafter referred to as “promotors”) and set aside the

    registration of the Pristine Estates Villa Owners Maintenance

    Mutually Aided Co-operative Society Limited (hereinafter referred to as

    “the Appellant Society”), which was registered under the Telangana

    Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred

    to as “TMACS Act”), and directed respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein to

    draft bye-laws in accordance with the provisions of the TMACS Act

    and to submit an application for registration in terms thereof. It was

    further directed that the funds collected by appellant society shall be

    kept in a suspense account and shall be returned to the contributors

    after due deduction of the expenses already incurred therefrom.

    Factual matrix



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here