Rajasthan Public Service Commission … vs Surajmal Meena on 3 April, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Supreme Court – Daily Orders

    Rajasthan Public Service Commission … vs Surajmal Meena on 3 April, 2026

    Author: Dipankar Datta

    Bench: Dipankar Datta

         ITEM NO.1                                 COURT NO.5                   SECTION XV
    
                                        S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                                RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    
                                     MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No.20015/2026
    
         [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-04-2026
         in D.No.19461/2026 passed by the Supreme Court of India]
    
         RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AJMER                                Petitioner
    
                                                            VERSUS
    
         SURAJMAL MEENA                                                           Respondent
    
         I.A. No.101842/2026-MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER
    
         Date : 03-04-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
    
         CORAM :
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
    
    
         For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Adv.
                             Ms. Neha Amola, Adv.
                             Mr. Tilak Vaid, Adv.
                             Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR
    
                                              Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Addl. Adv. General
                                              Ms. Saubhagya Sundriyal, Adv.
                                              Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR
    
         For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv.
                             Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv.
                             Mr. Harender Neel, Adv.
                             Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Adv.
                             Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, AOR
    
    
                                  UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                     O R D E R
    

    1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer 1 has applied for modification

    of the order passed by us yesterday, i.e., 2nd April, 2026, whereby we allowed a

    SPONSORED

    miscellaneous application of the opposite party, Surajmal Meena 2, permitting
    Signature Not Verified

    Digitally signed by
    rashmi dhyani pant
    Date: 2026.04.03
    17:07:42 IST
    Reason:

    1 RPSC
    2 Meena
    him to participate in the recruitment examination scheduled on 5 th April, 2026,

    provisionally, and without creating any equity. It was also directed that other

    similarly placed job aspirants like Meena, willing to participate, may also be

    provisionally permitted.

    2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the RPSC as well as learned

    counsel appearing for Meena. Apart from Meena, no other job aspirant

    approached this Court seeking permission. In compliance with the order of this

    Court, admit card has been issued in favour of Meena. On appreciation of the

    logistical problems and difficulties projected in the present application that are

    likely to arise if all other job aspirants have to be issued admit cards within such

    a short time, we are of the considered opinion that the said order dated 2 nd

    April, 2026 ought to be suitably modified. Accordingly, we direct deletion of

    paragraphs 5 and 6 thereof. We also modify paragraph 7 by observing that it

    shall be restricted only to Meena and not to any other job aspirant.

    3. Since the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur,

    is yet to pronounce its judgment on the appeals pending before it, we also

    observe that this order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the

    parties before the said Division Bench. In the event the Division Bench directs

    RPSC to hold a further examination, any private party may reap the benefit

    thereof while any party aggrieved thereby may approach the appropriate court

    in accordance with law.

    4. The miscellaneous application stands disposed of, on the above terms.

    5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

    (RASHMI DHYANI PANT)                                    (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
    ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                   COURT MASTER (NSH)
    



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here