Shri. Romius Dkhar vs State Of Meghalaya Through on 1 April, 2026

    0
    50
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    Shri. Romius Dkhar vs State Of Meghalaya Through on 1 April, 2026

    Author: W. Diengdoh

    Bench: W. Diengdoh

                                                            2026:MLHC:288-DB
    
     Serial No. 07
     Regular List
    
    
    
                            HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                AT SHILLONG
    
    Crl.M.C.No.44 of 2026                            Date of Order: 01.04.2026
           Shri. Romius Dkhar, Aged about 28 years
           S/o (L) Michael Law
           R/o Mowtyrshiah B Village,
           Jowai West Jaintia Hills, District, Meghalaya
                                                        .....Applicant
                              -VERSUS-
    
           State of Meghalaya through
           Superintendent of Police
           Jowai West Jaintia Hills, District, Meghalaya
                                                        .....Respondent
    
    Coram:
                     Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
                     Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
    
    Appearance:
    For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)   : Ms. S. Nongsiej, Legal Aid Counsel
    
    For the Respondent(s)             : Mr. R. Gurung, GA
    
    
    i)     Whether approved for reporting in                    Yes/No
           Law journals etc.:
    ii)    Whether approved for publication                     Yes/No
           in press:
    
    
    
    
                                                                         Page 1 of 2
                                                                                     2026:MLHC:288-DB
    
                       Per W. Diengdoh, (J):
    
                                                JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

    1. Heard Ms. S. Nongsiej, learned Legal Aid Counsel, who has
    submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court,
    against the impugned judgment dated 24.09.2025 and related order of
    sentence dated 26.09.2025 passed by the Court of learned District and
    Sessions Judge, West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai in Sessions Case No.6
    of 2022.

    2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 122 days has
    occurred, the reason being that the applicant is a laborer and he and his
    family could not afford to appoint a private counsel, as such, he could not
    prefer an appeal within the statutory period. Thus, legal aid was sought
    for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid
    Counsel. It is therefore, prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal
    be admitted.

    SPONSORED

    3. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State-respondent has
    no objection to the prayer for condonation of delay.

    4. On consideration of the submission made, we find that there are
    good grounds for the appeal to be heard on merits. Accordingly, the delay
    of 122 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

    5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission
    after 1 (one) week.

    6. Misc.Case disposed of.

                              (B. Bhattacharjee)                                    (W. Diengdoh)
                                   Judge                                                Judge
    
    
                       Meghalaya
                       01.04.2026
                        "Shrity,PS"
    Signature Not Verified
    Digitally signed by SHRITY
    CH MOMIN
    Date: 2026.04.01 18:05:27 IST
                                                                                               Page 2 of 2
    



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here