Communication Components Antena Inc vs Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik Gmbh … on 30 March, 2026

    0
    30
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Prathiba M. Singh, J.

    SPONSORED

    Sr. No. INDEX Para No.
    A. BACKGROUND OF THE PARTIES 3-8
    B. FACTUAL BACKGROUND OF IN 240893 (IN’893) 9-16
    C. PATENT APPLICATIONS IN FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS 17-21
    D. ENFORCEMENT OF SUIT PATENT 22-38

    Proceedings In CS(Comm.) 977/2016 – First Suit
    Proceedings In CS(Comm.) 1072/2016 – Second Suit
    Proceedings In CS(Comm.) 1222/2018 – Third Suit
    E. CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF & CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN 39-52
    THE PARTIES
    F. PROCEEDINGS IN THE PRESENT SUIT 53-71
    G. (I) SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF 72-147
    (II) PER CONTRA: SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE
    DEFENDANTS
    (III) REJOINDER SUBMISSIONS BY THE PLAINTIFF
    H. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 148-265

    ISSUE I: WHETHER THE SUIT PATENT IN’893 IS LIABLE TO
    BE REVOKED?



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here