Ankita Pandey vs Anurag Mishra on 25 March, 2026

Allahabad High Court

Ankita Pandey vs Anurag Mishra on 25 March, 2026

Author: Alok Mathur

Bench: Alok Mathur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC-LKO:21458
 

 
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
LUCKNOW 
 
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1368 of 2026   
 
   Ankita Pandey    
 
  .....Petitioner(s)   
 
 Versus  
 
   Anurag Mishra    
 
  .....Respondent(s)       
 
   
 
  
 
Counsel for Petitioner(s)   
 
:   
 
In Person   
 
  
 
Counsel for Respondent(s)   
 
:  
 
  
 
     
 
 Court No. - 5
 
   
 
 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.      

1. Heard Smt. Ankita Pandey, petitioner in person.

2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with.

SPONSORED

3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to the Additional Principal Judge, Room No. IV, Family Court, Lucknow for expeditious disposal of Case No. 2082 of 2025 – Ankita Pandey Vs. Anuraga Mishra, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case Additional Principal Judge, Room No. IV, Family Court, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Case No. 2082 of 2025 – Ankita Pandey Vs. Anuraga Mishra, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court concerned shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of.

(Alok Mathur,J.)

March 25, 2026

A. Verma