Kyrshanskhem Kharumnuid vs State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 24 March, 2026

    0
    36
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Mr S. Sengupta, Addl PP
    Mrs S. Laloo, GA
    Ms N. Chyrmang, Adv. [for R4]

    Heard learned counsel for the parties.

    SPONSORED

    2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the

    FIR/proceeding under the POCSO Act with the consent of the

    petitioner (accused) and the respondent No. 4 (victim).

    3. The petitioner, at the relevant time was 18 years of age

    and the respondent No. 4 was 17 years of age. According to the

    petitioner and the respondent No. 4, they were in a romantic

    relationship and that the relationship between the two was

    consensual. It further appears that from the said physical

    relationship, the respondent No. 4 became pregnant and

    delivered a baby boy on 19th May, 2023. It further appears that

    the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 got married on 2nd

    September, 2025 on attaining the age of majority.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here