Mr. Aniruddha Mitra, Sr.Adv.
Mr. B. Mukherjee, Adv.
…for auction purchaser
The Court: The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated September 19, 2025
passed in WPO 737 of 2025. By the order impugned the learned Single Judge did not
grant the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition, upon holding that the petitioner had
approached the Court long after the sale had been concluded in favour of the respondent
no. 7/auction purchaser upon a successful auction being held on July 23, 2025 in
respect of certain immovable property. The sale notice was published on June 16, 2025.
The date of auction was fixed on July 23, 2025. The sale certificate was issued on
August 5, 2025 and the writ petition was filed on September 16, 2025. These dates are
referred to by us, in order to arrive at a finding that the learned Single Judge did not
commit any error in holding that the writ petition was belated and the conduct of the
appellant did not demonstrate a serious interest or desire to participate in the bidding
process. It was found that the conduct was neither genuine nor bona fide one.
