Santosh Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand …. Opposite … on 23 March, 2026

    0
    35
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Santosh Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand …. Opposite … on 23 March, 2026

    Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

    Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                                                                           2026:JHHC:8213
    
    
    
    
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
                               A.B.A. No. 1313 of 2026
                                                 ----
    

    Santosh Kumar Yadav, aged about 37 years, son of Dip Narayan
    Yadav, resident of village – Govindpur, PO and PS – Pirpainti,
    District – Bhagalpur, Bihar …. Petitioner

    — Versus —

    SPONSORED

    The State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party

    —-

    CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

    For the Petitioner :- Mrs. Savita Kumari, Advocate
    For the State :- Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Advocate

    —-

    02/23.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well

    as the learned counsel appearing for the State.

    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with

    Mirzachowki P.S. Case No.18 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. Case

    No.150 of 2017 for the alleged offences registered under Sections

    147, 148, 149, 336, 337, 332, 333, 353, 307, 504, 506 and 379 of

    Indian Penal Code and Section 54 of M.M.D.R. Act, pending in the

    Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj.

    3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

    the petitioner is the owner of one of the truck and the allegations

    are made that stone chips were being carried on the said truck in

    absence of any valid challan. She further submits that other co-

    accused persons have already been provided the privilege of

    anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.3820 of 2020, 6299 of 2020, 2758 of

    2022, 6785 of 2022, 90 of 2024, 744 of 2024, 3254 of 2024 and
    –1– A.B.A. No. 1313 of 2026
    2026:JHHC:8213

    494 of 2026 respectively. She then submits that the petitioner has

    got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.12 of the

    petition.

    4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer

    and submits that illegally the stone chips were being carried in the

    truck.

    5. Considering that the petitioner is the owner of one of the

    truck in question and several other co-accused persons have already

    been provided anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABAs and further

    the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in

    paragraph No.12 of the petition and in that view of the matter the

    petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within

    two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on

    such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may

    deem fit and proper.

    (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
    Dated 23.03.2026
    Sangam/

    –2– A.B.A. No. 1313 of 2026



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here