Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

HomeBishan Lal Jangid S/O Khemchand Sharma ... vs State Of Rajasthan on...

Bishan Lal Jangid S/O Khemchand Sharma … vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. assisted by
Mr.Pankaj Gupta
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP
Mr.Neeraj Sharma

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

SPONSORED

Order

19/03/2026
Reportable

1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a

challenge has been made to the order dated 05.10.2018 passed

by the Additional Civil Judge & Metropolitan Magistrate No.24,

Bassi, Jaipur Metropolitan by which cognizance has been taken

against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 201, 308 &

120-B IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioner No.2 is founder member of Shri Shankar Seva Dham

Sansthan, a Society registered under the Rajasthan Societies

(Uploaded on 24/03/2026 at 03:43:44 PM)

(2 of 14) [CRLMP-316/2020]

Registration Act, 1959 and the same is run by a committee of

which the petitioner No.2 is the President. The Society provides

shelter homes to the mentally retarded, handicapped and

destitute persons. The said Society not only provides shelter to

the inmates but also provides all types of facilities including food,

cloths, medicines, treatments to these persons etc. The Society as

well as the petitioner No.2 is fully dedicated and devoted towards

the cause of “Sansthan” and welfare of the individuals residing

therein. Counsel further submits that the Society also has a

cremation ground attached to it for the purpose of cremation of

any persons, if they pass away while residing at the aforesaid

shelter home of the Society. Counsel further submits that several

renowned persons are Patrons and Trustees of the Society and

they have devoted their names and invaluable time towards the

upliftment of the destitute persons residing with the Society.

Counsel submits that on 12.06.2017, the petitioner No.1, being a

Driver, while providing his voluntary service to the Society, found

one Sitaram aged around 60 years in a very depleted and critical

condition on road. Under such circumstances, the petitioner No.1

took Sitaram in the ambulance and admitted him in the Society,

where he was treated. However, on account of severe weakness,

Sitaram could not survive and passed away due to

cardiopulmonary failure. Counsel submits that the treating Doctor

P.S. Kochar has also issued a certificate in this regard. Counsel

submits that thereafter, funeral of the dead body of the said

Sitaram took place at the Adarsh Nagar Mokshdham, Jaipur free of

cost. Counsel further submits that after a period of around two

months from the date of funeral, the complainant-respondent,

(Uploaded on 24/03/2026 at 03:43:44 PM)

(3 of 14) [CRLMP-316/2020]

who claims himself to be the brother of the deceased-Sitaram filed

a complaint against the petitioners levelloing allegation that his

brother Sitaram was in a healthy and sound condition before he

passed away and there is a possibility that the petitioners might

have taken out his organs and sold the same illegally, without

providing any information of Sitaram’s death to his brother, i.e.,

the complainant-respondent.



Source link