Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT CHAMBERS OF AAYUSH SHANKAR

About the FirmThe Chambers of Aayush Shankar is engaged in litigation and independent legal practice, primarily appearing before the Supreme Court of India....
Home23.03.2026 vs The State Of Meghalaya on 23 March, 2026

23.03.2026 vs The State Of Meghalaya on 23 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Meghalaya High Court

Date Of Decision: 23.03.2026 vs The State Of Meghalaya on 23 March, 2026

Author: W. Diengdoh

Bench: W. Diengdoh

                                                              2026:MLHC:260-DB




     Serial No. 05
     Regular List



                         HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                             AT SHILLONG

Crl.M.C. No. 37 of 2026
                                                 Date of Decision: 23.03.2026
Md. Atwar Ali
S/o (L) Abdul Rahman,
R/o Dakinhatichula Village,
P.O Barovidya, P.S. Chaigoan,
District: Kamrup, Assam.
Presently lodged in District Jail, Nongpoh.
                                               ........... Applicant/Petitioner
                                  -Vs-

1.       The State of Meghalaya, represented by
         The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya,
         Home (Police), Shillong.

2.       The Superintendent of Police,
         Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh,
         Meghalaya.

                                               ............ Opposite Parties
Coram:
                 Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
                 Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge

Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Applicant(s)   :      Mr. S. Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)             :      Mr. R. Gurung, GA.
                                         Mr. H. Abraham, GA.

i)       Whether approved for reporting in                    Yes/No
                                                             2026:MLHC:260-DB




       Law journals etc.:

ii)   Whether approved for publication
      in press:                                             Yes/No

Per W. Diengdoh, (J):

                   JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. S. Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, who has

submitted that the applicant has filed an appeal before this Court, being

SPONSORED

aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 16.10.2025 and related order of

sentence dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge,

Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Sessions Case No. 156 of 2015 under Section

376(1) IPC.

2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 90 days has

occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant,

since he is an illiterate and poor person, as such, he could not prefer an appeal

within the prescribed period of limitation. It is therefore prayed that the delay

be condoned and the appeal be admitted.

3. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has

no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.

4. On consideration of the submission made, we find that there are

good grounds for the appeal to be heard on merits. Accordingly, the delay of

90 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

2026:MLHC:260-DB

5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission on

01.04.2026.

6. Misc. Case disposed of.

                      (B. Bhattacharjee)                                     (W. Diengdoh)
                            Judge                                                Judge




Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
DARIKORDOR NARY
Date: 2026.03.23 20:20:13 IST



Source link