Page No.# 1/2 vs Santosh Kumar on 6 March, 2026

    0
    46
    ADVERTISEMENT

    06.03.2026
    (M. Zothankhuma, J)

    1. Heard Mr. H. Gupta, learned counsel for the appellants, i.e., Union of India
    and Mr. D. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent (writ petitioner).

    SPONSORED

    2. The impugned common judgment and order dated 06.03.2025 passed in
    WP(C) Nos. 350/2023, 360/2023 is under challenge by way of this appeal.

    Page No.# 4/21

    3. The learned Single Judge, vide the impugned judgment and order dated
    06.03.2025, has directed the appellants not to conclude the three inquiry
    proceedings initiated against the respondent, until and unless the alleged
    mental illness of the respondent is examined by the Composite Hospital, CRPF,
    Guwahati, comprising of a qualified psychiatrist and such other qualified medical
    professionals as deemed necessary. The learned Single Judge held that after the
    Medical Board of the Composite Hospital, CRPF, Guwahati, undertakes a proper
    medical examination of the respondent and makes its decision, in terms of
    Section 20 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (hereinafter
    referred to as the Act), the petitioner should be allowed to file his
    reply/representation to the 3 Inquiry Reports in relation to the three Inquiry
    Proceedings, before the Disciplinary Authority.

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here