Ramanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2026

    0
    32
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court

    Ramanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2026

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36134 of 2022
               Arising out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2018 Thana- MORKAHI District- Khagaria
         ======================================================
         Ramanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh, Son of Late Chaturanand
         Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Sabalpur, P.S.- Morkahi, District - Kha-
         garia.
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
    1.    The State of Bihar
    2.    Randhir Kumar, Son of Aklu Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Sabalpur,
          Patralay - Madar, Ward No.- 09, P.S.- Morkahi, District - Khagaria.
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
         ======================================================
         Appearance :
         For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
                                          Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate
         For the Opposite Party/s:        Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
         ======================================================
         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                              ORAL JUDGMENT
          Date : 16-03-2026
    
                         Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned senior coun-
    
         sel for the petitioner assisted with Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, learned
    
         counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned Additional
    
         Public Prosecutor for the State.
    
                      2. Petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance
    
         dated 24.11.2021 passed in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No.
    
         30 of 2018 (G.R. No. 854 of 2018) whereby and whereunder the
    
         learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria has taken
    
         cognizance of the offence under Sections 323, 354, 376, 406, 420,
    
         494 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
    
                      3. The prosecution case is that the complaint was filed
    
         by one Randhir Kumar on 07.09.2017 before the learned Chief Ju-
                   Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36134 of 2022 dt.16-03-2026
                                      2/3
    
    
    
    
    dicial Magistrate, Khagaria, thereafter, the Complaint under Sec-
    
    tion 156(3) Cr.P.C. was sent for registering the FIR and the FIR
    
    was lodged on 05.04.2018. It was alleged that Aklu Singh used to
    
    commit rape upon his mother namely Sita Devi in absence of his
    
    father. It is further alleged that petitioner continued physical rela-
    
    tionship with his mother for last about 5-6 years upon which the
    
    present informant was born. It was narrated to the informant after
    
    becoming major that his father is Aklu Singh, therefore, the infor-
    
    mant has claimed his legal right by declaring the informant as le-
    
    gal heir.
    
                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
    
    sample has been taken for paternity test but there is no indication
    
    as to whether report has been received. The filing of complaint
    
    case by son against his father of raping his mother stating that he is
    
    legitimate son is absurd. Moreover, claim of the informant is that
    
    he wanted social recognition, love of his father and legal right in
    
    property that is why the present complaint has been filed. He fur-
    
    ther submits that the complaint has been filed only to settle a dis-
    
    pute taking recourse of criminal case. It is also submitted that the
    
    matter has been proceeded for FSL Report but the petitioner will
    
    get his legal right in property after succeeding in paternity suit and
    
    upon receiving of the FSL Report in his favour.
                                       Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36134 of 2022 dt.16-03-2026
                                                          3/3
    
    
    
    
                                  5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has
    
                        vehemently opposed the quashing of the order of cognizance dated
    
                        24.11.2021.
    
                                  6

    . In such situation, the present prosecution is nothing

    but an abuse of the process of law, therefore, this Court exercising

    SPONSORED

    its inherent power conferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. corre-

    sponding to Section 528 BNSS as well as in view of the judgment

    passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of State of

    Haryana & Ors. vs. Chaudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors reported in

    AIR 1992 SC 604 quash the order of cognizance dated 24.11.2021

    passed in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2018 (G.R.

    No. 854 of 2018) whereby and whereunder the learned Sub-divi-

    sional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria has taken cognizance of the

    offence under Sections 323, 354, 376, 406, 420, 494 and 506 of

    the Indian Penal Code so far as the petitioner is concerned.

    7. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.

    (Ansul, J)
    Vikash/-

    AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
    CAV DATE                  N/A
    Uploading Date
    Transmission Date
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here