Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

Call for Papers | IILS Law Review [Volume XII, Issue 2 (September) 2026]: Submit by Apr 25

About the Indian Institute of Legal StudiesThe Indian Institute of Legal Studies, acknowledged as one of the best law colleges in India, was...
HomeUpendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on...

Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 19 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Patna High Court – Orders

Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 19 March, 2026

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38088 of 2024
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2023 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
           1.     Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Baijnath Sharma
                  Resident of Village and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S- Daudnagar , District-
                  Aurangabad
           2.    Ravi Ranjan Sharma @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Sharma @ Bablu Son of Sri
                 Chitlesh Sharma Resident of Village and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S-
                 Daudnagar , District-Aurangabad
           3.    Chitlesh Sharma @ Chitlesh Kumar Son of Late Baijnath Sharma Resident
                 of Village and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S- Daudnagar , District-Aurangabad
           4.     Rajeev Ranjan @ Raju Sharma Son of Chitlesh Sharma Resident of Village
                  and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S- Daudnagar , District-Aurangabad
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Roona, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-03-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of

SPONSORED

the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,

149, 341, 323, 307, 354(B) and 386 of the Indian Penal Code as

well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

petitioners no. 1, 3 and 4 are persons with clean antecedent and

petitioner no. 2 has antecedent of one case and the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
2/5

alleges that on 28.04.2023 she had gone to see the levelling of

the road near PACS godown carried out by the labourers without

her husband when petitioners along with five unknown accused

came variously armed and started abusing the labourers and the

driver of the tractor. It is next alleged that the accused persons,

from the date when the purchase of the land was made, were

demanding ransom and were denying the passage. Since the

petitioners were abusing the labourers and the driver of the

tractor, as such, the informant informed her husband’s elder

brother. It is further alleged that Ravi Ranjan torn the saree and

the blouse of the informant thereafter Upendra Sharma and

Manoranjan Sharma assaulted Nanku Pandey and Krishna

Pandey by iron rod and Ravi Ranjan along with unknown

accused made indiscriminate firing upon Nanku Pandey who

was trying to flee.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

the informant on account of dispute relating to land. It is further

submitted that the date of occurrence is 28.04.2023 and the FIR

came to be instituted on 08.05.2023 i.e. after a delay of more

than ten days of the occurrence without any plausible

explanation. It is next submitted that from the side of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
3/5

petitioners Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 249 of 2023 has been

instituted against the informant and her side, as such, the instant

FIR is a counterblast. It is also submitted that a dispute had

arisen and from the side of the informant firing was resorted to

which led to the death of the son of Upendra Sharma and even

Upendra Sharma received firearm injury in his leg. It is further

submitted that the police raided the house of the side of the

informant and recovered arms. It is next submitted that in order

to coerce the petitioners into submission so that they do not

pursue with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023, the instant

false case came to be instituted ten days after the occurrence

based on a written application of the informant. It is, thus,

submitted that if the instant FIR has been instituted based on the

written application of the informant, the same could have been

instituted promptly even but then was not done which also casts

an aspersion on the allegation as alleged in the FIR when in the

FIR instituted from the side of the petitioners, it is specifically

alleged that side of the informant resorted to firing causing

death of the son of Upendra Sharma on the spot.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
4/5

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

informant submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged

in the FIR, it would manifest that Upendra Sharma, Manoranjan

Sharma and others assualted Nanku Pandey and Krishna Pandey

leading to grievous injury on which learned counsel appearing

on behalf of the petitioners submits that what is not in disptue is

that son of Upendra Sharma was killed by the side of the

informant for which the aforesaid FIR was instituted. It is

reiterated and submitted that even Upendra Sharma received

firearm injury on his leg, as such, it does not appear probable

that after receiving firearm injury Upendra Sharma would have

resorted to assaulting the side of the informant. It is, thus,

submitted that the said allegation has been alleged by way of

afterthought only to coerce Upendra Sharma into submission so

that he does not pursue with the killing of his son made by the

side of the informant.

7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, let

the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or

surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released

on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
5/5

the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with

Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023, subject to the conditions

as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the

B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T
 



Source link