Ajay Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opp. Party on 17 March, 2026

    0
    38
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Ajay Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opp. Party on 17 March, 2026

    Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

    Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                                                                            2026:JHHC:7199
    
    
    
    
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                               ABA No.1092 of 2026
    
                Ajay Kumar, aged about 53 years, son of Bhupendra Kumar Sinha,
                Resident of Bhokra, P.O. & P.S.-Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur,
                State- Bihar.                               .... Petitioner
                                           Versus
                 The State of Jharkhand                     ...     Opp. Party
                                        --------
    

    CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

    ——

    SPONSORED
                 For the Petitioner     :       Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate
                                                Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :       Mr. Someshwar Roy, APP
                                        ------
    2/17.03.2026       Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and
    
    

    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with

    Mirzachowki P.S. case No. 18 of 2017, for the offence registered

    under Sections 147, 148, 149, 336, 337, 332, 333, 353, 307, 504, 506

    and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 54 of the

    M.M.R.D Act, pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional

    Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj.

    3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the

    FIR has been registered against unknown truck drivers and helpers.

    He then submits that the petitioner is the owner of the truck bearing

    number BR06G5149 and only due to that the petitioner has been

    made accused. He then submits that other co-accused persons have

    already provided privilege of anticipatory bail in ABA No.3820 of

    2020, 6299 of 2020, 2758 of 2022, 6785 of 2022, 90 of 2024, 477 of

    2024, 744 of 2024, 3254 of 2024 and in ABA No. 5472 of 2025. He

    also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as

    disclosed in paragraph number 17 of the petition.

    1

    2026:JHHC:7199

    4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and

    submits that illegally stone chips were being carried in the said truck.

    5. Considering that the petitioner is owner of one of the truck and

    several other co-accused persons have been provided privilege of

    anticipatory bail in aforementioned ABAs, further, the petitioner is

    having no criminal antecedents as disclosed in paragraph 17 of the

    petition, in that view of the matter, the petitioner above named is

    directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and

    the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and

    condition and sureties, as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.

    (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
    17.03.2026
    R.Kumar

    2



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here