Vipin Kumar Tripathi vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 11 March, 2026

    0
    41
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Delhi High Court – Orders

    Vipin Kumar Tripathi vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 11 March, 2026

    Author: Anup Jairam Bhambhani

    Bench: Anup Jairam Bhambhani

                              $~68
                              *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                              +    W.P.(CRL) 742/2026
                                   VIPIN KUMAR TRIPATHI                           .....Petitioner
                                                   Through: Mr. Surendra, Ms. Anchal Dubey,
                                                            Ms. M. Tyagi, Mr. Amit Tyagi, Ms.
                                                            Raksha Sharma and Mr. Manoj
                                                            Kumar, Advocates.
                                                            Petitioner in-person.
                                                   versus
    
                                   STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR                      .....Respondents
                                                 Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel
                                                            (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kumar and
                                                            Mr. Anjan Sachdeva, Advocates for
                                                            the State.
                                                            SI Tej Dutt, P.S.: Hari Nagar.
                                                            Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for R-
                                                            2.
                                                            R-2 in-person.
                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
                                                 ORDER
    
                              %                  11.03.2026
                              W.P.(CRL) 742/2026
    

    By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the
    Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
    Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner, who is the former husband of
    the complainant/respondent No. 2, seeks quashing of case FIR No.
    132/2025 dated 22.03.2025 registered under section 498A of the
    Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC‘) at P.S.: Hari Nagar, Delhi.

    2. The petition is premised on a Settlement Agreement dated 02.07.2025
    arrived at before the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Tis Hazari
    Courts, West District, Delhi; and Divorce Decree dated 30.01.2026 ,

    SPONSORED

    W.P.(CRL) 742/2026 Page 1 of 3

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2026 at 20:33:49
    which is the culmination of petitions under sections 13B(1) and
    13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, whereby the parties had
    sought dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent.

    3. The petition is supported by affidavits of the petitioner, as also of
    respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs.

    4. The petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 are present in court. Their
    credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by
    their respective counsel.

    5. The parties have confirmed that no child was born from the wed-lock.

    6. No appeal is stated to have been filed from the divorce decree.

    7. The court has queried Ms. Priyanka, respondent No. 2, who confirms
    that she has taken divorce by mutual consent; and that a settlement
    agreement has been entered into between the parties; and that in full-
    and-final settlement of all her claims including towards maintenance
    (past, present and future), stridhan, dowry articles, jewellery,
    permanent alimony, etc., she was to receive a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/-
    from the petitioner; out of which Rs. 2,75,000/- was paid earlier and
    Rs. 1,25,000/- has been paid in court today, in compliance of the
    terms of the settlement agreement. Respondent No. 2 confirms that all
    aspects of the settlement have now been performed.

    8. Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel confirms that the State has
    no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

    9. In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme
    Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012)
    10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &
    Anr.
    reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the

    W.P.(CRL) 742/2026 Page 2 of 3

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2026 at 20:33:49
    subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be
    quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement
    between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all
    subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not
    be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties.

    10. Accordingly, FIR No. 132/2025 dated 22.03.2025 registered under
    section 498A IPC at P.S.: Hari Nagar, Delhi is quashed. All
    proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

    11. Petition stands disposed-of.

    12. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

    ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
    MARCH 11, 2026/ak

    W.P.(CRL) 742/2026 Page 3 of 3

    This is a digitally signed order.

    The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
    The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2026 at 20:33:49



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here