Rahul Purohit & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal &Anr on 17 March, 2026

    0
    36
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. The instant Application has been preferred by the petitioner for

    quashment of G.R Case no 6529 of 2024 arising out of Liluah P.S Case no.

    SPONSORED

    668 of 2024 dated 21.12.2024 on the ground that the said FIR is the second

    FIR in connection with self-same facts and self-same allegations and in

    connection of which the other criminal proceeding being Jorabagan P.S Case

    no. 214 of 2024 dated 20.12.2024 has already been initiated.

    2. Being aggrieved by the present proceeding, learned counsel for the

    petitioner submits that on perusal of the Jorabagan police station case no.

    214 of 2024 along with Liluah P.S case no. 668 of 2024,it transpires that

    the defacto complainant and the accused persons are the same. It is alleged

    in Jorabagan P.S case that the date and time of occurrence is in between

    11.30 P.M. on 19.12.2024 and 2.00 A.M. on 20.12.2024 whereas date and

    time of occurrence in connection with Liluah P.S is in between 11.05 P.M.

    on 19.12.2024 and 1.30 A.M. on 20.12.2024 . However while the

    information in connection with Jorabagan P.S was received on 20.12.2024

    at 16:10 Hrs, the information received in connection with Liluah P.S case is

    on 21.12.2024 at 21:05 Hrs. Therefore it is clear that Jorabagan P.S Case

    no. 214 of 2024 was initiated prior to the instant Liluah P.S case no. 668 of

    2024.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here