Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

HomeYuvrajsinh Rajendrasinh Rathod vs State Of Gujarat on 12 March, 2026

Yuvrajsinh Rajendrasinh Rathod vs State Of Gujarat on 12 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

1 The present application is filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment
of the FIR being No.I-11199050220914 of 2022 dated
12.09.2022, registered with Valiya Police Station,
District Bharuch, for the offences punishable under
Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the

NEUTRAL CITATION

SPONSORED

R/CR.MA/18984/2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 12/03/2026

undefined

Indian Penal Code, against four accused persons,
wherein the present applicants are arraigned as
accused Nos.2 and 3, being the son and wife of the
main accused No.1. As per the allegations made in
the FIR, which was lodged at the instance of Kersi
Dorabji Harmasji Variyava (Parsi), it is stated that the
agricultural lands namely (1) Khata No.255 (Old Block
No.233A, New Block No.075) admeasuring Hec. R.A. Sq.
Mtrs. 04-98-61, (2) Khata No.277 (Old Block No.233B,
New Block No.074) admeasuring Hec. R.A. Sq. Mtrs. 00-
37-46 and (3) Khata No.277 (Old Block No.007, New
Block No.350) admeasuring Hec. R.A. Sq. Mtrs. 00-41-
05, situated at Village Itakala, Taluka Valiya, District
Bharuch, originally belonged to Bhikhaji Ardesar
Bharucha, who was the maternal uncle of the
complainant. It is alleged that accused No.1, in
connivance with the Talati-cum-Mantri of Village
Itakala, took wrongful advantage of the absence of
the complainant’s maternal uncle and produced a
fabricated revenue receipt (pawti) dated 30.09.1986
before the revenue authority, and thereby obtained
agricultural rights over the aforesaid lands vide
mutation entry No.1096 dated 06.08.1991.



Source link