Rambabu Chauhan vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Rambabu Chauhan vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 2026

    Author: Sandeep Kumar

    Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73847 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE
                                                         District- Nawada
                     ======================================================
                     Rambabu Chauhan Son of Sir Jairam Prasad Chauhan Resident of Village -
                     Sondiha, P.S.- Sarmera, District - Nalanda, at present R/o 2071/A-10 New
                     Kanchanpur Adhartal, P.S. - Adhartal, Dist. - Jabalpur(Madhya Pradesh).
    
                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                           Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar
               2.    Smt. Sarita Kumari D/o Sonelal Chauhan and W/o Rambabu Chauhan
                     Present R/o Tetariya Beldari, P.O. - Akauna Bazar, P.S. - Muffasil, Dist. -
                     Nalanda.
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s       :      Mr.Rabindra Kumar, Advocate
                     For the State              :      Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP
                     For the O.P. No. 2         :      Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    4   10-03-2026

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

    APP for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

    connection with Complaint Case No. 116 of 2024 registered for

    the offence under Sections 323, 307, 379, 504, 498(A) of I.P.C.

    3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged

    to have tortured his wife.

    4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

    the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

    been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that petitioner

    is ready to stay with his wife and child. Petitioner has clean
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73847 of 2025(4) dt.10-03-2026
    2/2

    antecedent.

    5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that

    the victim is also ready to stay with the petitioner.

    6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application

    is allowed.

    7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

    arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four

    weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

    Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

    amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.-1st,

    Nawada / concerned Court below in connection with Complaint

    Case No. 116 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in

    Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 /

    Section 482 of the BNSS.

    8. This is also subject to the condition that at the time

    of surrender in the court below, he will stay with his wife and

    child. If the wife has any grievance, she may file an appropriate

    application in the court below.

    (Sandeep Kumar, J)
    tusharika/-

    U       T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here