Anil Gupta vs State Of Haryana on 11 March, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Leave granted.

    SPONSORED

    2. Considering the nature of order we propose to pass

    in this appeal, we are not adverting to the details of

    the matter concerning the allegations and counter-

    allegations made by both the parties, for the reason

    that the same may affect the case of either of the

    parties before the High Court.

    3. Suffice it would be, to mention that in relation

    to the Collaboration Agreement executed in the year

    2012, and agreements subsequent thereto, the dispute

    arose between the parties, eventually compelling the

    appellant to lodge a complaint with the concerned

    Commissioner of Police, and when the FIR was not

    Reason: registered, appellant preferred an application under

    Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

    (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) together with a complaint under

    Sections 420, 406 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code,

    1860 (for short ‘IPC’).



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here