Page No.# 1/4 vs The State Of Assam on 11 March, 2026

    0
    25
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gauhati High Court

    Page No.# 1/4 vs The State Of Assam on 11 March, 2026

                                                                             Page No.# 1/4
    
    GAHC010040192026
    
    
    
    
                                                                      undefined
    
                                  THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
       (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
    
                                    Case No. : Bail Appln./578/2026
    
                UJJWAL MANDAL AND ANR
                S/O LT. BHABESH MANDALR/O VILL- GANGANARAYANPUR
                P.O. RAMNAGAR
                P.S. KALIACHAK
                DIST. MALDA, WEST BENGAL.
    
                2: AMAL MANDAL
                 S/O ARUN MANDAL
                VILL- SUKHDEVPUR
                P.O. AND P.S. BAISHNABNAGAR
                 DIST. MALDA
                 WEST BENGA
    
                VERSUS
    
                THE STATE OF ASSAM
                TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
    
    
    
    Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A AHMED, MISS. P M AHMED
    
    Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
    
    
    
    
                                       BEFORE
                         HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
    
                                               ORDER
    

    Date : 11.03.2026
    Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.
    Page No.# 2/4

    Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam.

    SPONSORED

    2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with
    Special NDPS Case No. 74/2025 arising out of Badarpur GRPS Case No. 35/2025
    registered under Section 21(C)/29 of Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic
    Substances Act, 1985.

    3. The FIR dated 22.10.2025 reveals that on information that 4 Nos. of drug
    peddlers were transporting narcotic substance from Badarpur Railway Junction
    and were boarding the train the police officials rushed to the said railway station
    and apprehended the said 4 Nos. of suspected persons. Amongst whom, 2 Nos.
    of petitioners are before this Court, namely: Ujjwal Mandal and Amal Mandal.

    4. It is further alleged that on a spot verification the narcotic substances
    were found to be Heroin.

    5. Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
    petitioners had themselves stated before the Police personnel that they were
    given Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only each for transporting the said
    drugs from Badarpur Railway junction. He further submits that the Arrest Memo,
    which was given to the petitioners wherein violation of Section 36 of the BNSS
    Act, 2023 inasmuch as the signature of the witness was not present.

    6. Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State
    of Assam check the original Arrest Memo from the case record and he also
    found that the signatures of atleast one witness being a family member or
    locally known person was not there.

    7. In view of the same for violation of Section 36 of the BNSS Act, 2023,
    Page No.# 3/4

    which results in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court
    deems it fit that the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of
    Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) only each with one local surety of like
    amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, NDPS, Sribhumi under the
    following conditions:-

    1. That the petitioners will appear before the
    Investigating Officer within 7(seven) days and co-

    operate in the investigation as and when required;

    2. The petitioners will not leave the territorial
    jurisdiction of the police station, without prior written
    permission from Officer-in-Charge, Badarpur Police
    Station.

    3. That the petitioners will not hamper or tamper with
    the investigation in any manner; and

    4. That the petitioners will not, directly or indirectly,
    make any inducement, threat or promise to any
    person/witness acquainted with the facts of the case so
    as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the
    Court or to any police officer in connection to this Police
    Station Case.

    8. If any of the conditions are found to be violated then the Investigating
    Officer shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the bail granted to the
    petitioners.

    Page No.# 4/4

    9. Bail application is accordingly allowed.

    10. Returned the Case Diary.

    JUDGE

    Comparing Assistant



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here