Patna High Court – Orders
Vinod Ray @ Vinod Kumar Ray vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 2026
Author: Ashok Kumar Pandey
Bench: Ashok Kumar Pandey
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12030 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai
======================================================
Vinod Ray @ Vinod Kumar Ray Son of Ram Prakash Ray Resident of
Village- Narharipur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 10-03-2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection
with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025 registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2),
109(1), 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 corresponding to
Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that in the
background of land dispute, the petitioner and other co-accused
persons assaulted the family members of the informant. Main
allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted with
farsa on the head of Jaikrishna Rai.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12030 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
2/3
petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
case. He also submits that from perusal of the order of the
learned trial court, it transpires that the learned trial court has
recorded that on perusal of the injury report, it was found that
injured Jaikrishna Rai had two stitched wounds and the NCCT
brain shows injuries over the forehead and its nature was
grievous. He further submits that a similar nature of allegation
was against Gautam Ray, who has been granted bail by the
learned coordinate bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 85655
of 2025. He further submits that the petitioner and the informant
are agnates. There is a land dispute, and in the scuffle, both
parties have received injuries, though there is no countercase.
Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition
that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing
in judicial custody since 03.01.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12030 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
3/3
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District
and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Begusarai in connection with
Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U T