― Advertisement ―

HomeOm Prakash vs State Of Haryana on 7 March, 2026

Om Prakash vs State Of Haryana on 7 March, 2026

The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panckhula while dealing

with a complaint, filed by the respondent-State through Drug Control Officer,

has observed that a prima facie case for framing of charge for the commission

of offence punishable under Sections 28, 27(b) (ii) and 28-B of Drug and

Cosmetics Act 1940 is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner is

aggrieved of the above mentioned order, hence the present petition under

Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of aforementioned order.

2. In nut-shell the facts emerging from record are that on 31.08.2015

the accused a team of police officials received a tip-off from a source that the

petitioner was carrying some narcotic substance. As per the case projected, by

the police acting upon the above mentioned information the accused was

apprehended along with a polythene bag and when the contents of the bag

were checked it was found that in the above mentioned polythene bag there

1 of 10

were narcotic drugs, currency notes and other medicines. According to the

case set-out by the prosecution during the course of above mentioned recovery

process/investigation, the petitioner-accused, hereinafter being referred to as

‘petitioner’ only, fled from the spot. In view of above mentioned happening

two cases were registered against the petitioner; one case was vide FIR No.175

dated 01.09.2015, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 22

of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, hereinafter being

referred to as NDPS Act, and the another was vide FIR i.e. FIR No.176 dated

02.09.2015 for the commission of offence punishable under Section 224, 225,

420 IPC and Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act.



Source link