Virendra Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    0
    55
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Virendra Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

    Author: Sandeep Kumar

    Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24379 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE
                                                        District- Gopalganj
                     ======================================================
                     Virendra Bhagat son of Ramakant Bhagat village- Chainpur, Ps- Hathua, Dist-
                     Gopalganj
    
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar
               2.    Priyanka Devi wife of Virendra Bhagat village-Madholaal Mathiya, Ps-
                     Hathua, Dist- Gopalganj
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Shubhesh Pandey
                     For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    6   09-03-2026

    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

    learned counsel for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

    with Complaint Case No. 131 of 2024 filed for the offence

    under Sections 323, 504, 498A, 494/34 of the Indian Penal

    Code.

    3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

    others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for

    demand of dowry.

    4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

    petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

    implicated in this case.

    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24379 of 2025(6) dt.09-03-2026
    2/3

    5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the

    application of the petitioner.

    6. Considering the submission of the parties and in

    light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

    case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8

    SCC 273, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is

    allowed.

    7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

    arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four

    weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

    bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

    the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M,

    Gopalganj/concerned Court below in connection with

    Complaint Case No. 131 of 2024 subject to the conditions laid

    down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

    1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS and with further condition that:

    (I). The petitioner is directed to pay
    a maintenance amount of Rs. 7000/- from the
    month of March 2026 to the
    complainant/informant. The maintenance for the
    month of March 2026 shall be paid to the
    complainant/informant within ten days from
    today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount
    shall be paid to the complainant/informant
    every month before the 10th day of each month.

    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24379 of 2025(6) dt.09-03-2026
    3/3

    (II). It is clarified that the
    complainant shall appear in the Court below
    and provide her bank account details, and
    thereafter the petitioner shall make the
    maintenance payments directly into the
    complainant’s account.

    8. It is made clear that the order of maintenance

    passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the

    maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court

    concerned, if any.

    9. Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide

    by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State

    shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the

    learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted

    to the petitioner.

    10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

    Principal District & Sessions Judge, Gopalganj through FAX for

    its compliance forthwith.

    (Sandeep Kumar, J)
    Shishir/-

    U       T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here