― Advertisement ―

HomeVirendra Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

Virendra Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

Patna High Court – Orders

Virendra Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

Author: Sandeep Kumar

Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24379 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE
                                                    District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Virendra Bhagat son of Ramakant Bhagat village- Chainpur, Ps- Hathua, Dist-
                 Gopalganj

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Priyanka Devi wife of Virendra Bhagat village-Madholaal Mathiya, Ps-
                 Hathua, Dist- Gopalganj

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Shubhesh Pandey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   09-03-2026

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

with Complaint Case No. 131 of 2024 filed for the offence

under Sections 323, 504, 498A, 494/34 of the Indian Penal

Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for

demand of dowry.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24379 of 2025(6) dt.09-03-2026
2/3

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the

application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submission of the parties and in

light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8

SCC 273, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is

allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four

weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M,

Gopalganj/concerned Court below in connection with

Complaint Case No. 131 of 2024 subject to the conditions laid

down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS and with further condition that:

(I). The petitioner is directed to pay
a maintenance amount of Rs. 7000/- from the
month of March 2026 to the
complainant/informant. The maintenance for the
month of March 2026 shall be paid to the
complainant/informant within ten days from
today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount
shall be paid to the complainant/informant
every month before the 10th day of each month.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24379 of 2025(6) dt.09-03-2026
3/3

(II). It is clarified that the
complainant shall appear in the Court below
and provide her bank account details, and
thereafter the petitioner shall make the
maintenance payments directly into the
complainant’s account.

8. It is made clear that the order of maintenance

passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the

maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court

concerned, if any.

9. Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide

by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State

shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the

learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted

to the petitioner.

10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

Principal District & Sessions Judge, Gopalganj through FAX for

its compliance forthwith.

(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T
 



Source link