― Advertisement ―

HomeBrijendra vs State Of U.P. on 9 March, 2026

Brijendra vs State Of U.P. on 9 March, 2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.

2. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant Brijendra seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.200 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 B.N.S., Police Station Panvari, District Mahoba.

3. Tersely, as per the allegation contained in the FIR seven accused persons, who are named in the FIR are involved in fraudulently taking crop insurance of land which was not covered under the Pradhanmantri Fasal Bima Yojna.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused-applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is languishing in jail since 15.11.2025. It is submitted that applicant is not named in the FIR but during the course of investigation his name came into light on the basis of statement of co-accused person. It is further submitted that applicant has neither taken any benefit from the insurance policy nor received any amount in his account in this case. It is argued that no incriminating article was recovered from the possession of applicant. It is further argued that co-accused Arjun Singh, Indrapal Singh, Smt. Archana having similar role have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 15.12.2025, 17.12.2025, 9.1.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.43225 of 2025, 44512 of 2025, 45030 of 2025 respectively and parity is sought in the matter. It is next argued that applicant has no criminal antecedents to his credit. Submission is that the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.



Source link