Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeHigh CourtRajasthan High Court - JaipurNishant Ojha Son Of Shri Sharad Ojha vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:8879)...

Nishant Ojha Son Of Shri Sharad Ojha vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:8879) on 26 February, 2026


Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Nishant Ojha Son Of Shri Sharad Ojha vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:8879) on 26 February, 2026

                                   [2026:RJ-JP:8879]

                                           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                       BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                           S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4598/2019

                                   Nishant Ojha son of Shri Sharad Ojha, Resident Of Plot No. 17,
                                   Infront Of N.B.C. Mohan Kutir, P & T Colony, Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                                                      Versus
                                   1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
                                   2.       Sushil Parwani son of Shri Arjun Parwani, Resident Of 17,
                                            Kailash Path, Sooraj Nagar West, Civil Line, Jaipur, Police
                                            Station Ashok Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                                                                   ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijeta Sharma
Mr. Nishant Ojha
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
Mr. Parth Sharma for
Mr. Sudhir Jain

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order

26/02/2026

1. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the report dated

25.02.2026, sent by SHO, P.S. Jalupura, Jaipur North, wherein, it

is stated that an FR has been submitted in the concerned Court.

2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that he does not want to press the present petition as the matter

has become infructuous.

3. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as

having become infructuous.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

PUNEET KUMAR/18

(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 03:16:28 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:58:01 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link