Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Amit Fatehpuria S/O Mr. Chouthmal … vs Ganesh Ram Bajiya S/O Mr. Todaram … on 25 February, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:8688]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 82/2026
1. Amit Fatehpuria S/o Mr. Chouthmal Fatehpuria, Aged
About 47 Years, R/o 5/203, Kamal Apartment 2, Ram
Mandir Ke Pass, Banipark, Jaipur, Dist. Jaipur Rajasthan.
2. Mohammed Amin Khokar S/o Mr. Yusuf Khokar, Aged
About 49 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Near Azad School,
Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Ganesh Ram Bajiya S/o Mr. Todaram, R/o Dhani
Bajiyawali, Santhiliya Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.
2. Firm M/s Raj Build Homes, Address 108, Paris Point,
Collectrate Circle, Banipark, Jaipur, Rajasthan Through
Partner Mr. Rajveer Singh S/o Mr. Amar Singh And Mr.
Ganesh Ram Bajiya, S/o Mr. Todaram.
3. Mr. Rajveer Singh S/o Amar Singh, R/o 296, Officers
Campus, Sirsi Road, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Nagarpalika Srimadhopur, Through Chairman
Nagarpalika, Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
5. Sub Registrar, Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s) :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
25/02/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some
length, upon instructions from his clients, submits that due to an
unforeseen and bona fide inadvertance, the present revision
petition has been filed under Section 115 of CPC instead of a writ
(Uploaded on 27/02/2026 at 05:59:54 PM)
(Downloaded on 02/03/2026 at 08:55:53 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:8688] (2 of 2) [CR-82/2026]petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, therefore, he
seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition with
liberty to challenge the impugned order by filing a writ petition
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. Accordingly, the present civil revision petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
4. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
5. Further, the Registry is directed to return the Vakalatnama
and certified copy of the impugned order to the learned counsel
for the petitioners, after retaining a photocopy of the same on
record.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
DEEPA-6
(Uploaded on 27/02/2026 at 05:59:54 PM)
(Downloaded on 02/03/2026 at 08:55:53 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)