Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025 (employment law reform)

The modern world has witnessed a radical change in the nature of work. With the advent of smartphones, laptops, instant messaging services, emails,...
HomeIndian Journal of Law and TechnologySupreme Court raps NCERT over Class 8 textbook reference to ‘Judicial Corruption’

Supreme Court raps NCERT over Class 8 textbook reference to ‘Judicial Corruption’


Supreme Court dismisses plea for SIT probe into misuse of Electoral Bonds by political parties


The Supreme Court of India has taken serious exception to content in a newly introduced Class 8 Social Science textbook published by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), which refers to corruption within the judiciary. The Court observed that it would not permit any attempt to tarnish or undermine the credibility of the judicial institution.

Taking note of the issue, a Bench led by the Chief Justice voiced concern over the manner in which the judiciary was portrayed in educational material meant for young students. The Court indicated that references suggesting corruption in the judicial system, without proper context or balance, risk eroding public confidence in a constitutional pillar.

During the hearing, senior members of the Bar highlighted that the chapter introduces middle-school students to allegations of judicial misconduct. It was argued that while discussions on accountability are important, selectively spotlighting corruption in the judiciary—without similar treatment of other organs of the State could create a skewed perception.

Members of the Bench also remarked that the framing of the content appeared inconsistent with constitutional principles, particularly the doctrine that safeguards the independence and integrity of the judiciary as part of the Constitution’s basic structure.

The textbook chapter reportedly discusses issues such as case backlogs, shortage of judges, and systemic challenges. However, the Court’s intervention underscores its position that educational content must handle sensitive institutional subjects with care, ensuring that critical discussion does not cross into institutional disparagement.

The matter has now assumed constitutional significance, with the Court making it clear that the dignity and authority of the judiciary must be protected, especially in materials shaping young minds.



Source link