Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

DEMYSTIFYING THE NOTICE OF MOTION IN INDIA

INTRODUCTIONIn the Indian legal system, a Notice of Motion (NoM) plays a pivotal role in seeking interim or urgent relief by initiating interlocutory...
HomeHigh CourtOrissa High CourtDillip Kumar Sahoo vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ......

Dillip Kumar Sahoo vs State Of Odisha And Others …. Opposite … on 20 February, 2026

——————————————————————————-

Date of Hearing and Judgment: 20th February, 2026

——————————————————————————-

HARISH TANDON, CJ.

1. We are not unmindful nor oblivion of the rampant illegal

mining activities across the country and whenever any action is

taken by the authorities, approach is made to the Court assailing their

actions on the perceived arbitrariness, non-adherence of the

provisions of law and above all, the exercise of powers beyond the

conferment under the statutory provisions.

2. A public spirited person highlighted such issues by filing a

writ petition before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the

Constitution of India and the apex Court took serious note of the

same and delivered a judgment on 2nd August, 2017 in Common

Cause v. Union of India, reported in (2017) 9 SCC 499. An

argument was advanced before the said Constitution Bench at the

behest of the mining operators that illegal mining cannot be

presumed nor can be said in this regard, if the mining activities are

within the geographical limits of a mining lease area.



Source link