Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeSupreme Court - Daily OrdersAnkit vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 23 February, 2026

Ankit vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 23 February, 2026

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Ankit vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 23 February, 2026

                                           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.                 OF 2026
                                       (@ SLP(CRL.) No.10346/2025)


                               ANKIT                              APPELLANT(S)

                                                    VERSUS

                               STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)


                                                        O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant seeks bail in connection with FIR

No.87/2023, registered at Police Station –

Babri, District Shamli, Uttar Pradesh, for the

offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 and

376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short,

‘the IPC’) along with Sections 3 and 4 of the

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,

2012 (for short, ‘the POCSO Act’).

3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for

the appellant and the learned counsel appearing

for the respondent-State.

Signature Not Verified

4. During the course of arguments, learned counsel
Digitally signed by
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2026.02.24
17:10:08 IST appearing for the respondent-State submitted
Reason:

that the charges in entirety have been dropped

1 SLP(CRL.) No.10346/2025
qua three co-accused persons, and insofar as the

appellant is concerned, the charges for the

offences punishable under Section 376D of the

IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, which

were added subsequently, have been dropped.

5. The appellant has been under incarceration for

more than 2 years and 6 months. We also take

note of the facts as recorded above.

6. In such view of the matter, we are inclined to

set aside the impugned order and grant bail to

the appellant.

7. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set

aside, and the appellant is granted bail,

subject to the terms and conditions that may be

imposed by the concerned Trial Court.

8. The appeal is allowed, accordingly.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

……………………………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]

………………………………………………………………………J.
[NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH]
NEW DELHI;

23rd FEBRUARY, 2026

2 SLP(CRL.) No.10346/2025
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No(s). 10346/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 16-04-2025 in CRMBA No. 46479/2024 passed by
the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

ANKIT Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 240010/2025 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 23-02-2026 This matter was called on for
hearing today.

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Himanshu Sharma, AOR
Mrs. Aditi Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Digvijay Singh Raghav, Adv.
Ms. Kamlesh, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.

Ms. Anjali, Adv.

Ms. Richa Attrey, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR
Ms. Arushi Singh, Adv.

Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv.

Mr. Anurag Pandey, Adv.

Ms. Munisha Anand, Adv.

Dr. Bharpur Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made
the following

O R D E R

3 SLP(CRL.) No.10346/2025
Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed order is placed on the file)

4 SLP(CRL.) No.10346/2025



Source link