Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeSupreme Court of IndiaK K Sharma @Krishna Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh...

K K Sharma @Krishna Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 20 February, 2026


Supreme Court – Daily Orders

K K Sharma @Krishna Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 20 February, 2026

                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                             CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.                        OF 2026
                                      (@ SLP(CRL.) No 196/2026)

                          REKHA                                    APPELLANT(S)

                                                VERSUS

                          THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH               RESPONDENT(S)



                                                  O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has been arraigned as an accused

and seeks regular bail in connection with FIR

No.192/2020 registered at Police Station –

Chaubepur, District – Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh for

the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,

149, 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act,

1932.

3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for

the appellant and the respondent.

4. Admittedly, the appellant is a lady. The

specific overt act attributed against her is to
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by the effect that she was shouting, pursuant to
SWETA BALODI
Date: 2026.02.23
17:53:14 IST
Reason:
the presence of Police Officers, in a manner so

1
to as instigate the other accused to commit the

offence. She has been under incarceration for

more than 5½ years and is the mother of two

minor children.

5. Taking into consideration the above, we are

inclined to set aside the impugned order passed

by the High Court and grant bail to the

appellant.

6. Accordingly, the impugned order stands set

aside, and the appellant is granted bail,

subject to the terms and conditions that may be

imposed by the concerned Trial Court.

7. The appeal is allowed, accordingly.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

……………………………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]

………………………………………………………………………J.
[NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH]

NEW DELHI;

20th FEBRUARY, 2026

2
ITEM NO.2 + 13 COURT NO.4 SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No(s). 15211/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 11-08-2025 in CRMBA No. 25402/2025 passed
by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

K K SHARMA @KRISHNA KUMAR
SHARMA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s)

IA No. 312138/2025 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN
FILING THE SPARE COPIES

WITH
ITEM 13
SLP(Crl.) No(s). 196/2026

Date : 20-02-2026 These matters were called on for
hearing today.

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rishabh Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Naresh Taneja, Adv.

Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR

Mr. Ayush Sachan, Adv.

Mr. Arif Ali, Adv.

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, Adv.
Mr. Anurag Tandon, AOR
Ms. Alisha Luthra, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made
the following

3
O R D E R

SLP (Crl.) No.15211/2025:

We have heard the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner and the learned counsel

appearing for the respondent.

The petitioner has been charged in FIR

No.192/2020, registered at Police Station –

Chaubepur, District – Kanpur Nagar for the

offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149,

302, 307, 504, 506, 353, 332, 333, 396, 412, 120B,

34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 7 of

the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 and Sections

3, 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

Taking into consideration the allegations

specifically leveled against the petitioner,

coupled with the stage at which the trial is

placed, as of now, we are not inclined to grant

bail to the petitioner at this stage.

However, as it is submitted by the learned

counsel appearing for the respondent – State that

28 out of 35 witnesses have been examined, we

direct the Trial Court to complete the trial

4
within a period of four months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

If the trial is not completed within the

said period of four months, liberty is granted to

the petitioner to file a fresh bail application,

in which case the impugned order and the order

passed by the Trial Court will not stand in the

way of the petitioner.

The Special Leave Petition stands disposed

of, accordingly

Pending application(s), if any, shall also

stand disposed of.

SLP(CRL.) No 196/2026:

Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed in terms of the

signed order.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed order in SLP(CRL.) No 196/2026 is placed
on the file)

5



Source link