For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Praksh Verma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singhal, Adv.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Judgment
27/01/2026
1- vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu
vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] Øe&2]
dksVk ¼jktLFkku½ ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k
tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&415@2017 ¼236@2015½] eukst eh.kk
cuke jktdqekj o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 07-08-2019 ¼ftls vkxs
^vk{ksfir fu.kZ;^ ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ
gSA
2- vihykFkhZ }kjk fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k] eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk esa Lo;a
ds vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 43]27]000@& #i;s {kfriwfrZ jkf’k
izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk tfj;s laj{kd firk }kjk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA
fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, ;kph dks
dqy 8]40]335@& #i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 7-5 izfr’kr lkykuk
(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 03:30:59 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:6975] (2 of 10) [CMA-5845/2019]
dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls
O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf’k esa c<+ksrjh
fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA
3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fo}ku
vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh uks’kuy okf”kZd vk; 30]000@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr
dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh xbZ gS] tcfd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ dks dq’ky
Jfed dh Js.kh esa j[kk tkdj mldh ekfld vk; dh x.kuk visf{kr FkhA
nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds ‘kjhj ij dbZ lk/kkj.k o xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gSa]
ftlds QyLo:i mldk ,d iSj ?kqVus ds Åij ls dkVk tk pqdk gSA
vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds lkewfgd izHkko ls mlds ‘kjhj ij dqy
80 izfr’kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ
dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo”; esa gksus okyh
lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa dksbZ jkf’k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gS rFkk
‘kkjhfjd o ekufld ihM+k o vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;f/kd de jkf’k fnyokbZ
x;h gS] ftuesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy
Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf’k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA
4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls
mijksDr rdkZsa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf”V fd;s
tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s
tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA
5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
6- ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ lk/kkj.k o xaHkhj pksVksa
ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds ‘kjhj ij dqy 80 izfr’kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk
ik;k x;k gS] tSlk fd LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk izek.k i= izn’kZ&15 ds voyksdu
ls Li”V gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds
lanHkZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`”Vkar Anant Son
of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap Son of Zhampannappa
(Uploaded on 19/02/2026 at 03:30:59 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:6975] (3 of 10) [CMA-5845/2019]
Lamzane & Anr. reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases
450, esa fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&
“12. In case of motor accidents leading to
injuries and disablements, it is a well settled
principle that a person must not only be
compensated for his physical injury, but also
for the non-pecuniary losses which he has
suffered due to the injury. The claimant is
entitled to be compensated for his inability to
lead a full life, and enjoy those things and
amenities which he would have enjoyed, but
for the injuries.
