Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY AT ELF PARTNERS

About the FirmELF Partners is a specialist legal finance consultancy advising on complex, cross-border disputes across multiple jurisdictions. The firm works at the...
HomeDistrict CourtsBangalore District CourtDr Kumaresh P Nelavigi vs Mysore Education Society on 18 February, 2026

Dr Kumaresh P Nelavigi vs Mysore Education Society on 18 February, 2026


This appeal is filed by the appellant under Section 92(1)

of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, challenging the

termination of his services by the respondents and seeking

arrears of salary, notice pay and interest.

2. The brief facts of the case, as pleaded by the

appellant, are that he was appointed as an Assistant Professor

in Statistics by the first respondent Society and was posted at

second respondent college under Appointment Letter dated

05.06.2018. He was placed on probation for a period of two

years. According to him, he discharged his duties satisfactorily

and by January 2020, he was drawing a monthly salary of

₹43,358/- inclusive of allowances. He further contends that on

12.10.2019, he met with a road accident, underwent surgery

and was advised rest. The respondents treated 81 days as loss

of pay and thereafter, withheld his salary for April, May and part

of June 2020. It is his case that, during COVID-19 lock-down,

though the Institution remained closed, he was willing to work,

but was orally instructed not to attend duties on the basis of

certain complaints allegedly made by the Head of Department.

He asserts that no suspension order, charge-sheet or enquiry

was ever initiated against him. Ultimately, on 20.11.2021, he

received an e-mail communicating Termination Notice dated

16.07.2021, whereby his services were terminated

retrospectively with effect from 31.07.2020. He contends that

termination is illegal, retrospective in nature, without notice,

without enquiry and contrary to the terms of appointment.

Hence, this appeal.



Source link