Manipur High Court
Smt. Likmabam Nivedita Devi vs Vrs on 17 February, 2026
Author: Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Bench: Ahanthem Bimol Singh
KABORA Digitally signed
MBAM byKABORAMBAM
SAPANA SAPANA CHANU
Date: 2026.02.17
Item Nos. 58
CHANU 16:04:07 +05'30'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 94 of 2026
Smt. Likmabam Nivedita Devi ...Petitioner/s
Vrs.
State of Manipur & Anr . ...Respondent/s
-B E F O R E-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
17.02.2026
[1] Heard Mr. M. Rendy, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the
respondents.
At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if the
present writ petition is disposed of by directing the Director of
Education(S), Government of Manipur, to consider the
representation dated 11.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner on its
own merit and strictly in terms of applicable rules and to dispose of
the same by issuing a speaking order within a stipulated period.
[2] Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the
respondents fairly submitted that as the prayer made on behalf of
the petitioner is confined to the consideration and disposal of the
representation submitted by the petitioner, he has no objection in
disposing of this writ petition as prayed for by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner.
Page 1
[3] Taking into consideration, the submission advanced by
the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is of the
considered view that it will be in the interest of justice to issue the
following directions:-
1) The Director of Education (S), Government of
Manipur is hereby directed to consider the
aforesaid representation dated 11.04.2025
submitted by the petitioner on its own merit and
strictly in terms of applicable rules and to dispose
of the same by issuing a speaking order.
2) The whole exercise should be completed within a
period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order.
3) It is made clear that the aforesaid directions have
been issued without considering the merit of the
present writ petition.
[4] With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition
is disposed of.
JUDGE
Sapana
Page 2
