Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

Limitation of Rights vs. Limitation of Claims: Enforceability of Time Caps in M&A transaction documents  – DSK Legal : True Value, True Values

Authors: Ms. Mala Mehto (Principal Associate) and Ms. Sumedha Tewari (Associate) In M&A transaction documents such as share purchase agreements (“SPAs”), the parties generally allocate...
HomeHigh CourtRajasthan High Court - JodhpurJulie Badla vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37795) on 22 August, 2025

Julie Badla vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37795) on 22 August, 2025


Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Julie Badla vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37795) on 22 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:37795]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4156/2025

Julie Badla W/o Dipak Kumar Badala, Aged About 49 Years, R/o
Dayalshah Road, Raj Nagar, Tehsil Raj Nagar, Dist. Rajsamand
(Raj.)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.         State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.         The   Station   House       Officer,      Police       Station   Kankroli,
           Rajsamand, Rajsthan.
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Dilip Kawadia a/w Mr. Nishant
                                 Bora and Ms. Nidhi Singhvi.
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. HS Jodha, PP assisted by Mr.
                                 Hansaram, CI, SHO, PS Kankroli,
                                 Rajsamand.



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

22/08/2025

1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed under

Section 528 BNSS / 482 Cr.P.C. praying that a direction be issued

to the respondents to conduct fair, proper, impartial and

expeditious investigation in case arising out of FIR No.107/2025,

Police Station Kankroli, District Rajsamand for the offence under

Sections 318(2), 319(2), 336(2), 338, 339, 316(2) and 61(2) of

BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite

disclosing commission of cognizable offence no heed is being paid

by the Investigating Agency as till date no effective action has

(Downloaded on 26/08/2025 at 09:41:39 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:37795] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4156/2025]

been taken under the influence of the accused party. He seeks fair,

impartial and expeditious investigation in this matter.

3. Seeking fair impartial and expeditious investigation is a

fundamental right of a person, be he/she a complainant/victim or

the accused.

4. In this view of the matter, it is directed that the petitioner

shall submit a representation to the concerned Superintendent of

Police along with all documents on which she places reliance. The

concerned Superintendent of Police is expected to consider the

averments made in the representation and shall instruct the

Investigating Officer of this case to conduct fair and impartial

investigation and submit the result of the investigation as

expeditiously as possible.

5. Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition is disposed of.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
216-/Jitender//-

(Downloaded on 26/08/2025 at 09:41:39 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link