AIRRNEWS

Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeHigh CourtPatna High Court - OrdersVikash Paswan @ Yuvraj Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 3...

Vikash Paswan @ Yuvraj Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 3 June, 2025

Patna High Court – Orders

Vikash Paswan @ Yuvraj Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 3 June, 2025

Author: Partha Sarthy

Bench: Partha Sarthy

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20856 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2024 Thana- MAIRWAN District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Paswan @ Yuvraj Paswan S/o Krishna Paswan R/o Village- Karchui,
                 P.S.- Mairwa, District- Siwan
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar                              ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with

Mairwan P.S. Case no.158 of 2024, registered under sections 307,

147, 341, 342, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section

27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the orders of

Tribhuwan Tiwari, it is stated that Lakki Tiwari fired on the

informant from a pistol in his hand which hit the informant in the

rear portion of his head. It is further stated that Mukesh Pamdey

and the petitioner also fired, however the informant was

somehow saved.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No such

occurrence as alleged in the F.I.R. has taken place. The manner of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20856 of 2025(2) dt.03-06-2025
2/2

occurrence is other than what has been narrated by the informant

in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that the case of the petitioner

stands on a better footing to that of a co-accused Lakki Tiwari

who has been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated

28.2.2025 (Annexure-3) passed in Cr. Misc. no.85219 of 2024.

The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by

learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in

the F.I.R. and especially the grant of anticipatory bail to the

co-accused Lakki Tiwari vide aforesaid order dated 28.2.2025, in

the facts of the case it is directed that the petitioner, above named,

in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court

below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory

bail in connection with Mairwan P.S. Case no.158 of 2024 on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Siwan.

(Partha Sarthy, J)
avinash/-

U      T
 



Source link