Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
B.V. Bhaskar Reddy, vs The State on 9 April, 2025
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV
WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
:PRESENT:
tr -_.Nry}
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7246, 7444, 7452 & 7454 OF 2024
CRIMINAL PETITION No: 7246 OF 2024 :
Between:
B.V. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. B.P. Krishna Reddy, aged about 53 years,
OccPresidneVCorrospondent, Sir C.V.Raman Educational Institutions, R/o.
Door No.15/1236, 2nd Road, S-anjeevanagar, Tadipathri, Ananthapur
District
Petitioner/Accused 9
AND
The State, S.H.O., Tadipathri Town P.S., Rep, by its Public Prosecutor at
High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi.
Respondent/Complainant
petition under section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal petition,
the High Court may be pleased to direct the lst respondent to enlarge the
petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection vA-th the Case in Crime
No. 209 of 2024 on the file of Tadipathri Town P.S., which was registered for
the alleged offences under sections 147,148, 506,188, 324, 427, 307 r/w 149
of lPC
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the
affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated
21.10.2024] 05.ll.20241 ll.ll-2024, 20.12.20241 21.12.2024110.01-20251
20.02.2025 & 03.04.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
SRI G L NAGESWAR RAO Advocate for the Petitioner, PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR for the Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7444 OF 2024 :
Between : ,,
1. V. Muraliprasad Reddy, S/o.Suryanarayana Reddy, Aged about 53 yrs,
R/o. D.No.1-22, Kandikapula Village, Putlur (M), Anantapuram Dist.
(A4).
2. G. Rameswara Reddy AIuru @ Gosu Rameswara Reddy, S/o.Gosu
Ramachandra Reddy, aged 53 years, R/o.D.No. 1-147, Aluru Village,
Tadipatri MandaI, Ananthapuramu District.I A5]
3. Karate Baba, @ Shek Babafakruddin, S/o.Shek Kullaiah Saheb, age 39
years, D.No.15/773-5,Bhagath Singh Nagar, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu
District. [A7]
4. Janardhana Reddy @ meesaluleni Janardhan, @ Reddamma Gari
Janardhan Reddy, S/o.Reddamma Gari Obu'Ia Reddy, Aged about 53
yrs, R/o.D.No. 1/579-3, Nandyal Road, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu
District. [A8]
5. .Venkata reddy PaIIi Pulla Reddy @ Chavva Pulla Reddy, S/o.Chavva
Narayana Reddy, Age 65 years, R/o.D.No.2-17, Venkata reddyPalli
Village, Tadipatri Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. [A10]
6. Sajjaladinne Raju @ Pasaluru Nagaraju, S/o.Late P.Peddanna, age 38
Years, R/o.D.No.1-76,Sajjaladinne Village, Tadipatri Mandal,
Ananthapuramu District. [A11]
7. Mallela Prabhakar @ ~Prabhakar YCP Social media co-ordinatior, Age
34 years, C/o.M Chandra Sekhar, R/o.D.No.7/84, Kovaramguttapalle,
Simhadripuram(M), Cuddapah Dist.
8. .Gangulak`unta Kesava reddy @ Gangalakunta, Kesavardhana Reddy,
S/o.Gangalakunta Narayana Reddy, Aged 34 years, R/o.D.No.4/4,T
Koduru, R.S.Kondapuram Mandalam, Cuddapah District. [A13]
'9. K.Narasimha Reddy @ Kosine PaIIi Narasimha Reddy, C/o.Kosinepalli
Kodanda Rami Reddy, age 40 years, R/o.D.No. 3/706-23,Tailors
Colony-Main Road, Near Vivekananda Schoo,Tailors Colony, Tadipatri,
Ananthapuramu District. [A14]
10- pandirlapalle surya Teja Reddy @ Teja Reddy, S/o. Pandirlapalle
chenna Reddy Late, Age 33 years, R/o.D.No.1/39, RegadipaIIe, R S
Kondapuram MandaI, Cuddapah District. [A15]
ll. .Sayad Javid Hussen @ S.Zaveed Hussain, S/o. Sayyed
Abubakar, age 34 years,. R/o.D.No.14/86-7, HospuitaI Palem, Tadipatri,
Ananthapuramu District. [A16]
12. Chakala Geeri bombayi Sayyed @ D S Shameer, S/o.Dhurgam
Abdul Ajees, age 43 years, R/o.D.No.6-293 Gajula Pa'em, Tadipatri,
Ananthapuramu District. [A17]
13. Karanj Beedi jubhed @ Akula Syed Mohammed Zuber Ahamed,
s/o.Akula Sayed Shashavali, age 32 years, R/o.D.No.4-686-1, Karinja
street, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu District. [A18]
14. .Buradagunta Hah Krishna Prasad @ Gold Hari, S/o.Buradagunta
Krishna Prasad, age 40 years, D.No. 3-286, Reddy Vari Palem,
Tadipatri, AnanthaPuramu District. [A19]
15. .S Mahammad Rafi, @ Auto RafI', (Nandalapadu Auto mechanic)
s/o.shaik Assan, age 26 years, R/o.D.No. 16-782, Nandalapadu,
Tadipatri, AnanthaPu-ramu District. [A20]
16. T.K.Khaleed @ Tappala Karuru Mohammed Khalid, S/o.Tappala
Karuru Ayazuddin, Age 24 yrs, R/o.D.No.14-110a, Hospital Palyam,
TadI-Patri, AnanthaPuramu District. [A21 I
17. NandalaPadu Shakeer @ Shaik Mahammed Shakeer, S/o.
s.Munaf, aged about 34 years, R/o.D.No. 16/275_205,
sreenivasapuram, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu District. [A22]
18. ThoIIa Mahammad @ Tholla Mahammad RasooIH S/o.Tholla
Rahman Shareef, Age 40 years, R/o. D.No. 13-775-2, Kalva gadda
veedhi, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu District. [A23]
19. T.Haji Basha(Kaalesa) @ Lalesahebgari Haji Basha, S/o.Lalesha
Mahaboob Basha, age 36 years, R/o.D.No. 5-273-2, AIIabakash Street,
Tadipatri, AnanthaPuramu District. [A24]
+
20. vemulapadu Yaseen Basha @ Yasheen, C/o.Vemulapadu lsmail
sab, Aged about 24 yrs,J'R/o.D.No.14/203, Hospital Palem, Tadipatri,
Ananthapuramu District, [A25]
21. s.Jaakeer Basha @ Chikkepalli Jakeer, S/o.Shaik Haajivali, Aged
32 years, R/o. D.No. 3/743-1, KrishnaPuram 6th Road, Tadipatri,
Ananthapuramu District.- [A26]
22. T.K.Salavudd'ln@ (Bongulodu), S/o,Tapalkarur Sultan, Age 31
years,R/o.D.No. 13/855, Kaalava, Gadda Street, Tadipatri,
Ananthapuramu District. [A27]
23. shaik shamshuddin @ Gold Shammu, (Javid Batch), S/o. Late
Gooty Shaik Jeein, age 36 years, R/o.D.No.3/799-14, Krishnapuram 9th
Road, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu District.I A28]
24. Yaldandla Javeed Hussain @ J.D Javeed, S/o. Yaladandia
Hassain Saheb, age 43 years, R/o.D.No.12-415-1, Padamati Geri,
Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu District. [A29]
25. shaik Thameem, @ Mohammed Abdul Tanzeem,
s/o.Mohammad Abdul Aleem, age 33 years, R/o.D.No. 5-135-1,
Allabakash Street, Tadipatri Ananthapuramu District. [A30]
... petitioners/Accused
AND
The State, S.H.O., Tadipathri Town P.S., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor at
High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravath-I.
...Respondent/Complainant
petition under section 482 of B.N.S.S.,23 , praying that in the
circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the
criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased tO direst the respondent to
enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event Of their arrest in COnneCtiOn With the
case in crime No.209 of 2024 on the file of Tadipatri Town P.S., which was
registered for the alleged offences under sections 147,148, 506, 188, 324,
4271307 r/w.149 of IPC .
The petit'lon coming on for hearing, upon
perusing the petition an-d,, the grounds filed in support thereof
and the order of the High Court dated 24.10.2024, ll.ll.2024,
20.12.2024 , 21.12.2024 ,10.01.2025 & 03.04.2025 made herein and upon
hearing the arguments of Sri G L NAGESWAR RAO Advocate for the
Petitioners, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate for the Respondent
CRIIVIINAL PETITION NO: 7452 OF 2024 :
Betwee n :
Javeed Khadri @ Syed Javeed Khadri, S/o.Syed Peer Pasha Khadri, aged
about 43 years, R/o. D.No. 5-159-2, Alla bakash Veedhi, i-adipatri,
Ananthapuramu District.
...Petitioner/Accused No|6
AND
The Station House Officer, Tadipathri Town Police Station Ananthapur District,
rep. by its Public Prosecutor at High Court ofAndhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances
stated in the grounds filed in support. of the Criminal Petition, the High Court
may be pleased to direct the lSt respondent to enlarge the petitioner on bail in
the event of his arrest in connection with the case in Cr.No.209 of 2024 for the
alleged offence under sections 147,148, 506,188,32.4,427,307 I/w 14-9 of lPC.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
grounds filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated
24.10.2024 & ll.ll.2024,10.01.2025 , 20.02.2025 & 03.04.2025 made herein
and upon hearing` the arguments of Sri V MAHESWAR REDDY, Advocate for
the Petitioner and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent
Between : -'
1. Kethireddy Pedda Reddy @ K.Pedda Reddy, S/o.Kethireddy
Ramireddy, Ex-MLA, Tadipatri. Aged about 59 years, D.No.7/157,
ThimmampaIIi Village Yellanur Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. (A1 )
2. K Harshavardhan Reddy, S/o.K.Peddareddy, Aged about 32 years,
R/o.D.No.7/157, ThimmampalliIV), YeIIanur Mandal, Ananthapuramu
District. (A2)
3. K. Sai Prathap Reddy, S/o.K.Peddareddy, Aged about 30 years,
R/o.D.No.7/157, ThimmampaIIi IV), Yellanur MandaI, Ananthapuramu
District. (A3)
...Petitioners/Accused
AND
The Station House Officer, Tadipathri Town Police Station, Ananthapur
District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor at High Court of Andhra Pradesh
at Amaravati .
...Respondent/Complainant
petition under Section 482 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances
stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition,
the High Court may be pleased to direct the lst respondent to enlarge the
petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the case in
cr.No.209 of 2024 for the alleged offence under sections 147,148,
506,188,324,427,307 r/w 149 of IPC
The Petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the
memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier order Of the
High Court dated 24.10.2024 & ll.ll.2024, 24.12.2024, 10.01.2025
20.02.2025 & 03.04.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments Of
SRI S DUSHYANTH REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioners, and of PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the Court made the following
JrJ
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NOs
and 7454 of 2024
COMMON ORDER:
–
since these criminal Petitions are filed, under Section 482 of
BNSS, seeking to grant anticipatOry bail, by the Petitioners herein in
same crime viz. crime No.209 of 2024 of Tadipa{hri Town -Police
station, Ananthapuram District, registered for the OffenCeS Punishable
under sections 147, 148, 188, 506, 323 and 307 read with 149 lPC,
they are being taken up together for disposal by way of this Common
Order.
2, Case of the prosecution, in brief, iS that On 14.05.2024, atabout
5:00 p.m., at college ground J.C.Asmith Reddy House, Tadipatri town,
all ,the accused criminally assembled unlawfully, armed With deadly
weapons, and began hurling stones and sticks. During the incident, the
I defacto complainant sustained dumb injury over his body. Due to
political rivalry with the ysRCP leaders, the defaCtO COmPIainant feared
for his safety and, as a result, did not report the matter to the police
‘station directly. Instead, he sent a report through registered post.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned
Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the .respondent/State.
Perused the record.
±E± –
`…`
~/
4. . A perusal of the material on record goes to ,show that’the
incident in question is said to have occurred on.14.05.2024 and the
petitioners herein belonged ®to two leading political parties- one, the
then ruling party, the other, the then opposition party. The incident in
question said to have taken place in connection with Assembly and
Parliament Elections held on 14.05.2024. ln the present crime, the
investigation officer has recorded the statements of material witnesses.
As seen from the record, the crime was registered on 09.10.2024 and
some of the victims have sent their grievances through registered post
to the S.H.O. who registered three separate crimes. It appears that
based on the same incident different crimes have been registered.
However, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the victims
are totally different. ln the said facts of the case, the incident in
question took place long back and therefore, this Court finds that best
part of investigation is over and any custodial interrogation does not
I
Seem necessary.
5. Learned counsel for, the petitioners submits that the petitioners
had permanent abode and there is no possibility of their fleeing away
from the justice and most of the petitioners are the breadwinners of
their families.
` c\
rr
6. lt is evident from the record that this court has already granted
interim protection to the petitioners, directing the state not to take any
coercive steps against them, and the said order has been in force until
today. lt is not the ‘case of the prosecution that the petitioners have
v]’olated any of the conditions imposed by the court
7`.I ln view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of{he case, this
court finds that most of the investigation might have been completed
by this time and granting of anticipatory bail to the petitioners may not
adversely affect the prosecutionjs case and herice, this court is
inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein, however, on
conditions.
8. Accordingly, in the even-t of their arrest in the above saI’d Crime,
the petitioners herein shall be released on bail on executing a personal
bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) each
with two sureties each for the ‘Iike sum to the satisfaction of the
arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioners shall
make the’mselves available for lnvestiga-lion Officer as and when
required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or
promise to the prosecution witnesses. .
9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition Nos.7246, 7444, 7452 and
7454 of 2024 are allowed.
cEffff-
r.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petit`ions, if any, Pending
in these Criminal Petiti.ons shall stand closed. -`~ ±i#veng*\tRE£\set&EL RE5se\RE®Le,_
-. SDJ-U sRl .DEvl-
I BAR
ASSIS-TAN+
/ITRUE COPY// SEC+lON~OFFICER
To7 1 The StatlOn House OffLCer, TadlPathrl Town Police StatlOn,
AnanthaPur D'lstr'lct,
2 OAnneanthca\ouTsD£\T=\+_ +.A_G^\=?^#RRFRnADOy %==:= i%=\=\
3 One CC to SF\l V MAHESWAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
4 One CC to SKI S DUSHYANTH REDDY Advocate LOPUC] 4′
54 TOwnoecCcCs \\oo pSuR=LISc upuR®Ol==%+TOR` H\gh Court Of A P\Ou”
6. One SPare COPY
3c- r-±B
–\i
\\
I
\
aHIGH COURT
TMR,J
DATE D.. 09/04/2025
BAIL ORDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7246, 7444, 7452 & 7454 OF 2024
ALLOWED
