Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeHigh CourtAndhra Pradesh High Court - AmravatiV Devi vs The State Of Ap on 7 April, 2025

V Devi vs The State Of Ap on 7 April, 2025

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

V Devi vs The State Of Ap on 7 April, 2025

                                   1
                                                                         CGR, J.
                                                    W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch


APHC010175122024
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                 AT AMARAVATI             [3506]
                          (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
                    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                               PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN

                      WRIT PETITION NO: 8827/2024

Between:

D Satheesh&Ors.                                       ...PETITIONERS

                                 AND

The State of Ap and Others                     ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

   1. M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

   1. GP FOR SERVICES IV

   2. GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the following:

                      WRIT PETITION NO: 8852/2024

Between:

P Ashok Reddy                                            ...PETITIONER

                                 AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others         ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:
                                   2
                                                                 CGR, J.
                                            W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch



  1. M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

  1. GP FOR SERVICES IV

  2. GP FOR SERVICES I



                 WRIT PETITION NO: 10201/2024

Between:

G Suneetha                                       ...PETITIONER

                                 AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others     ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

  1. M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

  1. GP FOR SERVICES IV

  2. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP)

                 WRIT PETITION NO: 10218/2024

Between:

V Devi and Others                           ...PETITIONER(S)

                                 AND

The State Of Ap and Others                 ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

  1. M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):
                                  3
                                                                 CGR, J.
                                            W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch



  1. GP FOR SERVICES IV

  2. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP)

                 WRIT PETITION NO: 12044/2024

Between:

Y N R Prasad                                     ...PETITIONER

                              AND

The State Of Ap and Others                 ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

  1. M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

  1. GP FOR SERVICES IV

  2. GP FOR SERVICES I
                                             4
                                                                                       CGR, J.
                                                                  W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch



The Court made the following:

COMMON ORDER:

All these writ petitions relate to claim for regularization of

petitioners‟ services as Pharmacist Grade-II/ Lab Technician Grade-

II/Multi Purpose Health Assistant (Female)/ Female Nursing Orderly,

who have been selected on contract basis by following proper

selection process, in terms of the Andhra Pradesh Regularization of

Services of Contract Employees Act, 2023 (Act.No.30 of 2023) and

G.O.Ms.No.114, Finance (HR-I Plg. & Policy) Department, dated

21.10.2023. Except that the petitioners have been appointed to

different posts, as they all claim regularization, these writ petitions are

heard and disposed of by a common order.

2. The facts in W.P.No.8827 of 2024 are set-out hereunder:

3. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:

“….to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents
herein in not regularizing the petitioner’sservices Pharmacist Gr-ll on
par with other contract Pharmacist Gr-ll whose services were
Act.No.30/2023 dated 20.10.2023 andregularized following the
consequential G.O.Ms.No. 114, Finance HRI Plg and Policy
Department, dated 21.10.2023 and also vide G.O.Ms.No.30, HM and
FW Dept., dated 73 2024, as highly illegal arbitrary discrimination and
also in Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequentially
the Honble Court may pleased to declare that the petitioner herein also
entitle for regularization of his services as Pharmacist Gr-ll on par with
others w.e.f01.04.2024 with all consequential benefits and may pass
such order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of
the case.”

5

CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

4. In pursuance of a notification dated 20.07.2002, the petitioner,

having participated in regular selection process, being meritorious

came to be selected and appointed as Pharmacist Grade-II on contract

basis by the proceedings vide Rc.No.524/EA/2002, dated 19.08.2002,

issued by the 5th respondent. He came to be posted at Public Health

Centre (PHC), Gokavaram, Kurnool District. He came to be transferred

to Public Health Centre, Yallur, Kurnool District. The above selection

and appointment of petitioner was done by the 5th respondent at the

instructions and control of the 1st respondent. By G.O.Ms.No.209, HM

& FW Department, dated 15.08.2010, the State of A.P. has

established Community Health and Nutrition Clusters and later

modified as Community Health Centers.The existing Public Health

Centre (PHC), Yallur, came to be converted as Community Health

Centre (CHC), Yallur. Therefore, the petitioner continued to work at

CHC, Yallur. The Government has taken policy decision vide

G.O.Ms.No.124, Health Medical and Family Welfare (B1) Department,

Dated 13.10.2015, whereby, all Community Health Centers under the

control of Director of Public Health and Family Welfare were

transferred to Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhana Parishad (for short

„APVVP‟). Under the aforesaid G.O., all FRUs/CHCs shall function

under the control of Commissioner, APVVP.However, all the service

matters and seniority will be maintained and looked after as usually by
6
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

the Director of Public Health and Family Welfare only. The Community

Health Centre, Yallur, where the petitioner was working also notified

under the aforesaid transfer orders. The aforesaid order came to be

implemented by proceedings vide R.C.No.2661/G2/2015, Dated

07.05.2018, issued by the 5th respondent, by which the petitioner came

to be transferred on deputation basis to APVVP, until the issuance of

options for absorption into APVVP. The Government has come up with

a legislation i.e., the Andhra Pradesh Regularization of Services on

Contract Employees Act, 2020 (Act.No.30 of 2023) for the purpose of

regularizing various persons appointed on contractual basis subject to

fulfillment of criteria specified therein. The said enactment specified

the departments in which various persons, who were working on

contractual basis, were sought to be regularized. In pursuance of the

same, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.114, Finance (HR-I Plg. &

Policy) Department, dated 21.10.2023, specifying that services of

those contractual employees appointed as on 02.06.2014 in various

Government Departments and continuing as such subject to the

conditions laid down therein, will be entitled for regularization, and all

the departments were requested to examine such of those cases for

regularization of services with reference to the conditions laid therein

and to submit the same for scrutiny and clearance of the Government

in Finance Department for issuance of orders for regularization of
7
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

services. The Public Health and Family Welfare Department, which is

enlisted at serial No.62 of Schedule to Act.No.30 of 2023, has

undertaken such exercise and recommended 1562 candidates, who

are eligible and satisfying the criteria laid down for regularization of

services.Basing on the same, the Government has issued

G.O.Ms.No.30 Health Medical & Family Welfare (G.2) Department,

dated 07.03.2024, regularizing the services of aforesaid persons,

working on contractual basis, against their regular sanctioned posts

with effect from 01.04.2024. Petitioner though is eligible and satisfying

the criteria laid down under Act.No.30 of 2023 read with

G.O.Ms.No.114, dated 21.10.2023, his case was not considered for

regularization,despite persons, who were similarly situated as that of

petitioner, appointed on contractual basis by the 5th respondent under

the control of the 1st respondent, were considered and

regularized.Difference being only that the said candidates continued to

work under aforesaid Departments unlike the petitioner, who has been

transferred on deputation to APVVP. The petitioner made a

representation on 17.10.2023, even before G.O.Ms.No.30, dated

07.03.2024, came to be issued, seeking for regularization of his

services in terms of above legislation. The 3rd respondent,vide

proceedings Rc.No.Spl/E4C/2024, dated 14.03.2024, has prepared a

list of contract employees working in APVVP, who were eligible and
8
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

entitled for regularization as per the guidelines mentioned in terms of

G.O.Ms.No.114, dated 21.10.2023, which included the name of the

petitioner at serial No.10.However, no orders are passed so far for

regularizing the services of petitioner.

5. The facts in other writ petitions are more or less similar to one

stated above.As the facts are not in dispute in any of these writ

petitions i.e., the mode of selection, working conditions and place of

working and that all petitioners have been recommended for

regularization by the 3rd respondent,the details of all those cases are

not dealt with separately.

6. The 1st respondent filed counter affidavit inter alia, stating that

as per the list furnished by the Directorate of Secondary Health vide

proceedings dated 07.02.2024 proposing regularization of services of

203 contract employees (including 46 contract employees who were

transferred on deputation from DPH & HW to APVVP along with 127

CHS) appointed as on 02.06.2014 and continuing to work as such, the

matter has been referred to Finance Department for final decision, who

is competent to decide in terms of G.O.Ms.No.114, dated 21.10.2023,

and as matter lies there, subject to clearance necessary steps would

be taken for regularizing the services of petitioners. The Respondents

have also taken a stand that the petitioners since working as contract
9
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

employee in APVVP, which is autonomous body, since it was not

included in the schedule to the Act.No.30 of 2023, their services were

not regularized though others who were selected and appointed along

with petitioners at relevant point of time, came to be regularized as

they were working in Government Departments.

7. Heard Sri M.R. Tagore, learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Assistant Government Pleaders for Services I & IV appearing

for the respondents.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners

satisfythe criteria laid down in Act.No.30 of 2023 read with

G.O.Ms.No.114, dated 21.10.2023 and therefore, they are entitled to

be considered for regularization. He further contended that petitioners

were originally appointed by the 5th respondent under the control of the

1st respondent and are continuing to be governed by the service

conditions laid down and attached to the said respondent.The transfer

on deputation made in pursuance to G.O.Ms.No.124, dated

13.10.2015, by which Community Health Centers, under the control of

Department of Public Health and Family Welfare, came to be

transfered to APVVP also clearly specified that persons, who have

been transferred thereunder, shall continue to be under the control and

jurisdiction of the Director of Public Health and Family Welfare. For all
10
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

practical purposes, the petitioners were under the control and

regulation of Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, as they

were never absorbed into services of APVVP at any point of time. He

further contended that persons appointed along with petitioners, as

they continued in services with 5th respondent without there being

deputed on transfer unlike the petitioner, came to be regularized under

G.O.Ms.No.30, dated 07.03.2024. Therefore, the petitioners being

similarly situated are entitled for the same benefit claiming parity with

such persons. Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention

to person by name Machari Krishna.He was originally appointed on

19.08.2002, as a Pharmacist Grade-II at PHC, Chippagiri, by the 5th

respondent, who latter came to be regularized by aforesaid G.O.

standing at serial No.809, and therefore, the petitioners are also

entitled to be regularized and given such benefit with effect from the

date on which all those persons came to be regularized i.e.

01.04.2024.

9. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, while reiterating the

contents in the counter affidavit, submitted that since the transfer of

the petitioners on deputation to APVVP is governed by Service

Conditions and regulations of the said autonomous body, and APVVP

not being part of Schedule to Act.No.30 of 2023, their cases were not

considered. However, after APVVP being merged into the State
11
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

Government by Act.No.44 of 2023, Head of the Department i.e.

Directorate of Secondary Health has recommended various persons,

who were earlier working with APVVP on contractual basis, which

included the petitioners herein as well, for regularization and such

recommendation is pending with the competent authority i.e., Finance

Department for issuing necessary orders. Once the Finance

Department issues necessary orders for regularization of services,

they would be regularized, and such exercise is going on which is

likely to be decided soon.

10. Perused the record and considered the rival submissions.

11. All the petitioners herein were selected by proper Selection

Committee in pursuance of the respective public notifications. They

were all subjected to selection process and upon drawing the merit list,

being meritorious, were issued appointment orders. They have been

selected and appointed by the District Medical and Health Officer of

various Districts under the control of 1st respondent. But, for the policy

of the Government to transfer Community Health Centers from the

control of Directorate of Public Health and Family Welfare to APVVP,

all those persons would have continued to work under the control and

jurisdiction of the District Medical and Health Officers and Director of

Secondary Health. By G.O.Ms.No.124, dated 13.10.2015, in
12
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

pursuance of policy of the Government, various Community Health

Centers were transferred to APVVP, which, thereafter started

administrating those centers. Even the said G.O. has categorically laid

down that all service matters and seniority of persons, who were

working at various CHS‟s, will be maintained and looked after by the

Directorate of Public Health only. Paragraph No.5 of the said G.O.,

reads thus:

“5. Hereafter all the above FRUs/CHCs will be functioning under
the control of Commissioner, AP Vaidya Vidhana Parishad. All
the service matters and seniority will be maintained and looked
after as usually by the Director of Public Health and Family
Welfare only.”

12. Subsequent implementation of orders dated 07.05.2018, issued

by the 5th respondent in case of the petitioner in W.P.No.8827 of 2024,

by which, the petitioner was transferred from the control of the 5th

respondent to APVVP, specifically maintained that the said transfer on

deputation is made until issuance of options for absorption into

APVVP. Said order reads thus:

“In pursuance of the Govt. Orders and references cited
above, the headquarters posts of the following 16 CHCs as per
the CHC pattern along with the employees those who are
working in the said posts as mentioned in the CHC wise
annexures enclosed herewith are hereby transferred from the
13
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

control of DM&HO, Kurnool (DPH&FW control) to the control of
DCHS, Nandyal (APVVP control) in the District, on deputation
basis until the issue of options to the absorption into APVVP.”

13. Meaning thereby, the petitioners were transferred on deputation

to work at APVVP, but they were never absorbed into the services of

APVVP, which then was an autonomous body by itself. Though the

petitioners were working under the control of APVVP, for all purposes,

their services are regulated by the Directorate of Public Health and

Family Welfare, which Department is included at serial No.62 of

Schedule of Act.No.30 of 2023. The petitioners were equally eligible

and entitled to be considered for regularization of services in terms of

aforesaid legislation. It is not in dispute that the petitioners fulfill the

criteria stipulated at Para Nos.3 & 5 of Act.No.30 of 2023 read with

Para-5 of G.O.Ms.No.114, dated 21.10.2023. The fact that the 4th

respondent vide proceedings dated 14.03.2024 has shortlisted the

names of various persons, who are eligible for promotion, which

included the names of the petitioners, suffice their entitlement for

regularization. When persons, who were working under the control and

jurisdiction of Public Health and Family Welfare Department in

particular 10562 candidates were regularized by G.O.Ms.No.30 dated

07.03.2024, petitioners were also legally entitled for such

consideration, as they are qualified and meet the criteria for such
14
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

regularization. Even otherwise as per the respondents, persons

working under APVVP have now been recommended for regularization

including petitioners working on deputation, so eligibility and

entitlement is not in issue.

14. This Court is unable to accept the submission that the

petitioners have been absorbed into services of APVVP, so are

governed by its service conditions, inasmuch as the very transfer

orders dated 07.08.2024, itself clearly specifies that the transfer on

deputation wasaffected until proper options were called for, from such

candidates for absorption into APVVP. Unless proper exercise is

undertaken for such absorption, petitioners continued to remain as

regular employees under the control of Public Health and Family

Welfare rather than APVVP. They are merely posted on deputation to

APVVP. Therefore, petitioners are entitled for the benefit that was

extended to other persons, working under the control of said

department who have been regularized by GO.Ms.No.30, dated

07.03.2024.

15. Petitioners in W.P.No.12044 of 2024 have claimed that persons,

who have been appointed as Lab Attendants/Lab Technicians Grade-

II/Pharmacists Grade-II etc., on contractual basis in the Medical

Education Department, like petitioners, have been regularized vide
15
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

G.O.Ms.No.32, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (G.2) Department,

dated 08.03.2024. Similarly, persons, who have been working as

Multi-purpose Health Assistants (Female) on contractual basis in

Family Welfare Department, have been regularized vide

G.O.Ms.No.41 Health, Medical & Family Welfare (G.2) Department,

dated 13.03.2024, and G.O.Ms.No.50 Health, Medical & Family

Welfare (G.2) Department, dated 15.03.2024. When respondents

have applied uniform yardstick to all aforesaid contractual appointees,

who were recruited more or less on same terms and conditions

through regular selection process having found to be eligible and

meeting the criteria laid down in terms of Act 30 of 2023, respondents

are bound to regularize the services of petitioners which otherwise

clearly amounts to discrimination and is hit by Article 14 of the

Constitution of India. This Court has come across various

Government Orders issued by respondents regularizing the services of

the contractual appointees, who were initially appointed by District

Medical and Health Officers in pursuance to respective selection

notifications, all aforesaid contractual appointees continued to work

under the jurisdiction of original appointees i.e., District Medical and

Health Officers under the control of the 1st respondent, only exception

being to that of the petitioners in these writ petitions who have been

deputed to APVVP. As this Court has expressed that posting
16
CGR, J.

W.P.No.8827 of 2025 & batch

petitioners on deputation to work with APVVP does not amount to

absorption of their services with APVVP and that they continue to

remain and governed by the service conditions of the original

appointee, petitioners are equally entitled to be considered for

regularization on par with others.

16. In view of the aforesaid reasons, these writ petitions are

allowed, holding that the petitioners are entitled to be considered for

regularization on par with the other contract employees, who came to

be regularized in terms of G.O.Ms.No.30, dated

07.03.2024;G.O.Ms.No.32, dated 08.03.2024; G.O.Ms.No.40, dated

13.03.2024; G.O.Ms.No.41, dated 13.03.2024, G.O.Ms.No.49, dated

15.03.2024; and G.O.Ms.No.50, dated 15.03.2024, with effect from

01.04.2024. The 2nd respondent is directed to issue necessary orders

regularizing their services, keeping in view of the said observations,

within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if

any, in these cases shall stand closed.

______________________________
CHALLA GUNARANJAN,J.

Date: 07.04.2025
ANS



Source link