M/S Kamal Autotech Private Limited vs Rajasthan State Industrial … on 30 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 31.03.2022 passed

    by the learned Commercial Court, whereby, in exercise of jurisdiction

    SPONSORED

    under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short

    “the Act of 1996”), the objections preferred by the respondent-

    Corporation were allowed and the arbitral award dated 12.02.2018

    made by the learned Sole Arbitrator was set aside.

    2. The appellant company applied to the Rajasthan State Industrial

    Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO) for allotment of

    (Uploaded on 07/08/2026 at 10:49:00 AM)

    [2026:RJ-JP:29646-DB] (2 of 16) [CMA-1170/2022]

    an industrial plot for establishing a unit for “Service Station & Body

    Building of Executive CC”. By allotment letter dated 14.12.2011, RIICO

    allotted Plot No. SP-2033(B), admeasuring 4834.35 square metres,

    situated at Ramchandrapura, EPIP, Sitapura Industrial Area, Jaipur,

    under Rule 3(W) of the RIICO Disposal of Land Rules, 1979 (for short

    “the Rules of 1979”). The allotment obliged the appellant to complete

    construction and commence commercial production within the stipulated

    period, and to raise construction in conformity with the approved site

    plan and the applicable building bye-laws. Possession of the plot was

    delivered on 09.04.2012, and a lease deed for a period of ninety-nine

    years was executed between the parties on 27.09.2012.

    2.1 Even before taking possession, the appellant, by its letter dated

    20.12.2011, pointed out discrepancies in the original site plan, stating

    that the setbacks depicted therein rendered the project unviable. RIICO

    thereupon issued a revised site plan on 31.08.2012, modifying the

    setbacks. The industrial area was subsequently declared a “Developed

    Area” by RIICO vide office order dated 07.08.2013. In the interregnum,

    RIICO addressed communications to the appellant regarding progress of

    construction, including letters dated 08.11.2012 and 17.04.2013, while

    the appellant’s request for extension of time made by letter dated

    30.05.2013 was declined by RIICO on 15.07.2013.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here