Manipur High Court
Mr. Taleta Hepuni Thouvei vs M/S N.M Construction Having Its … on 5 August, 2026
2026:MNHC:155
S. Item No. 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
Arb.P. No. 1 of 2026
Mr. Taleta Hepuni Thouvei, aged about 30 years, S/O. TN. Hepuni, a
permanent resident of Koide Makha Village, Maram, Purul Sub-
Division, Senapati District, Manipur at present residing at Type - III,
51 Langol Housing Complex, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel Imphal West District,
Manipur - 795004.
.... Petitioner
-versus-
1. M/s N.M Construction having its registered office address at
Chingamathak Nameirakpam Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur
represented by its Managing Partner, Shri Ngangbam Rana Singh,
aged about 59 years, S/O Ng. Meghachandra Singh, a resident of
Chingamathak Nameirakpam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Singjamei, Imphal
West District, Manipur - 795008.
2. Ruby Ngangbam, aged about 27 years, D/O. Ngangbam Rana
Singh, a resident of Chingmakha Nameirakpam Leikai, P.O. & P.S.
Singjamei, Imphal West District, Manipur - 795008.
3. Riya Ngangbam, aged about 22 years, D/O. Nganbam Rana Singh,
a resident of Chingmakha Nameirakpam Leikai, P.O. & P.S.
Singjamei, Imphal West District, Manipur - 795008.
.... Respondents
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR
For petitioner: Mrs. G. Pushpa, Advocate along with
Ms. Helly Ch., Advocate
Date of Order: 05.08.2026
(ORDER)
[1] When the matter was taken up Ms. G. Pushpa, learned counsel along
with Ms. Helly Ch., learned counsel on record for arbitration petition petitioner was
before this Court.
Page 1 of 2
2026:MNHC:155
[2] It came to light that some inadvertent errors have crept in.
[3] Faced with the above situation, learned counsel for arbitration
petition petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned arbitration
petition but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the arbitration
petition petitioner to file another petition with similar/same prayer on the same
issue after making requisite course corrections. To be noted, this course is being
adopted as it is less cumbersome compared to filing an amendment application.
[4] A scanned reproduction of the endorsement made by learned
counsel on record for arbitration petition petitioner in the case file is as follows:
[5] In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned arbitration petition is
disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions
of the arbitration petition petitioner in the manner stated above. When the
arbitration petition is filed afresh after making course corrections, instant order
shall be annexed as an annexure. There shall be no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Indrajeet
Page 2 of 2
Digitally signed by
LAIRENMAYU LAIRENMAYUM
M INDRAJEET INDRAJEET SINGH
Date: 2026.08.06
SINGH 14:39:55 +05’30’
