Patna High Court – Orders
Mohamamad Wasim @ Md. Wasim @ Md. Wasim … vs The State Of Bihar on 4 August, 2026
Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh
Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12180 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2303 Year-2023 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE District-
Siwan
======================================================
Mohamamad Wasim @ Md. Wasim @ Md. Wasim Siddiquee @ Wasim
Siddique S/o- Late Suleman Siddiqui @ Mohammad Suleman Resident of
Village - Sareya, Ward No. 01, P.S. - Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sabiha Khatoon W/o- Mohammad Wasim @ Md. Wasim @ Md. Wasim
Siddiquee, D/o- Md. Manzar Alam @ Wasim Siddique R/v-Sareya Ward no.
1, P.S. and Dist.-Gopalganj. At present R/v- Barasra Ps- Barharia Dist-
Siwan
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
Mr.Ajay Kr. Pandey, Adv.for OP-2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4 04-08-2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2,
apprehends his arrest in a complaint case for the offence under
Sections 498(A), 323, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act wherein cognizance has
been taken under Sections 323, 498(A), 406, 504, 506 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12180 of 2026(4) dt.04-08-2026
2/3
amicably through the process of mediation and both parties have
agreed to live together, as husband and wife. Petitioner also
undertakes to keep opposite party no. 2 with full respect and
dignity.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does
not dispute the aforesaid contention and confirms the fact
regarding the settlement entered into between the parties.
5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with
consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation &
Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the
possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been
resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with
Mediator’s report.
6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the
event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from
today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on
furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
S.D.J.M., Siwan in connection with Complaint Case No. 2303
of 2023, Trial No. 3838 of 2025, subject to condition as laid
down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482 of the
B.N.S.S. with condition that petitioner shall abide by all the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12180 of 2026(4) dt.04-08-2026
3/3
terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of
Agreement, failing which, the learned Court below would be
at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of petitioner.”
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay
U T
