Ningthoujam Ningol Kananbala Devi vs Naoroibam Rajmani Singh on 3 August, 2026

    0
    15
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Manipur High Court

    Ningthoujam Ningol Kananbala Devi vs Naoroibam Rajmani Singh on 3 August, 2026

    Author: A. Guneshwar Sharma

    Bench: A. Guneshwar Sharma

                                                                  Item no. 40-41
    
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                           AT IMPHAL
                             RSA No. 4 of 2024 with
                             MC(RSA) No. 19 of 2025
    
    Ningthoujam Ningol Kananbala Devi
                                                                 ... Appellant
                                     - Versus -
    
    Naoroibam Rajmani Singh
                                                              ... Respondents
    
                           BEFORE
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
    
                                    ORDER
    

    03.08.2026

    [1] Present Mr. MI Sharma, learned counsel for appellant and
    Mr. T. Rajendra, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Bikash Sharma,
    learned counsel on behalf of respondent.

    SPONSORED

    [2] In the present second appeal filed under Section 100 of
    CPC, at the time of filing of appeal, no decree was prepared by First
    Appellate Court for appellate judgement dated 22.12.2023 and there was
    confusion about preparation of decree. Later on, First Appellate Court
    clarified that no decree was prepared. Subsequently, a decree was
    prepared by subsequent Presiding Officer of First Appellate Court and
    appellant filed MC(RSA) No. 19 of 2025 for bringing on record a copy of
    decree on the file of pending regular second appeal being RSA No. 4 of
    2024.

    [3] Mr. MI Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant, submits
    that application may be allowed and will not cause any change on the merit
    of the pending appeal before this Court.

    [4] Mr. T. Rajendra, learned senior counsel for respondent,
    submits that application may be allowed with preservation of the right of
    respondent to raise the question of maintainability of second appeal in the
    present form.

    [5] This Court has considered the fair submissions of learned
    senior counsel for respondent. From record, it is seen that decree was not
    prepared by First Appellate Court and subsequently, incumbent Presiding
    Officer prepared decree and the same is sought to be brought on record.
    Accordingly, MC(RSA) No. 19 of 2025 is allowed. Decree is taken on record.
    [6] It is clarified that respondent’s right to raise maintainability of
    the present second appeal in the present form is preserved.

              [7]                 List RSA No. 4 of 2024 on 28.08.2026.
    
    
    
    
                                                                                       JUDGE
    
    
    
              Kh. Joshua Maring
    
    
           Digitally signed
    KH.    by KH. JOSHUA
    
    JOSHUA MARING
           Date:
    
    MARING 2026.08.05
           09:51:45 +05'30'
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here