Sunil Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Rambabu … vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 August, 2026

    0
    6
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

    Sunil Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Rambabu … vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 August, 2026

    [2026:RJ-JP:29992]
    
            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                        BENCH AT JAIPUR
    
            S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6974/2019
         CNR: RJHC020965902019 | URN: CRLMP / 12933U / 2019
    
    Sunil Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Rambabu Sharma, Aged About 32
    Years, R/o 3/114, Housing Board Colony, Badi Road, District
    Dholpur, Raj. 328001.
                                                                            ----Petitioner
                                          Versus
    1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
    2.       Director General Of Police, Jaipur.
    3.       Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur, Raj.
    4.       Sho Ps Nihalganj, Dholpur, Raj.
    5.       Investigation Officer In The F.i.r. Bearing No.360/2019,
             Registered At Ps Nihalganj, District Dholpur, Raj.
    6.       Ramprasad Sharma S/o Lt. Shri Ganeshilal Sharma, Aged
             About 71 Years, R/o Khirki Mohalla, Old City, Kotwali,
             District Dholpur, Raj.
                                                                         ----Respondents

    For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Chhavi Chaturvedi
    For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

    SPONSORED

    Order

    03/08/2026

    1. Considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties.

    2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a report dated

    05.03.2025 received from Police Station Nihalganj, District

    Dholpur. The report indicated that after concluding the

    investigation, a charge-sheet has already been filed against the

    petitioner under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of IPC. The

    petitioner is facing trial.

    (Uploaded on 05/08/2026 at 11:38:41 AM)
    (Downloaded on 05/08/2026 at 09:08:34 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:29992] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6974/2019]

    3. Having considered aforesaid, no case is made out for

    interference or invoking jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

    4.The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps under the

    BNSS (corresponding provision under the Cr.P.C.).

    5. In view of aforesaid, Cr. Misc. petition along with misc.

    application is hereby dismissed.

    (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

    45-ANAND

    (Uploaded on 05/08/2026 at 11:38:41 AM)
    (Downloaded on 05/08/2026 at 09:08:34 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here