Sunita Kumari, vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Heard Mr. Sumeet Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the

    petitioners and the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The present application has been preferred for the

    following relief(s):

    “I. for quashing the process of
    acquisition published in the daily newspaper
    “Hindustan” dated 23.10.2021 (Annexure-P/19)
    under Section-11(1) of the Right To Fair
    Compensation And Transparency in Land
    Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act,
    2013 (hereinafter referred to as “RFCTLARR ACT,
    2013 for the sake of Brevity”) which has been
    initiated under the signature of the District
    Magistrate, Patna with regard to 50.5950 acres of
    land bearing Mauja-Pahadi, Revenue PS-Patna
    City, Thana No.-14, and 25.35 acres of land and in
    Mauja-Ranipur, in Revenue P.S. Patna city, Thana
    No.- 19, Circle-Patna Sadar, District-Patna and,
    altogether 75.96 acres of land is tentative to be
    acquired vide under Project Patna Metro (Rail
    Depot Corporation); on the ground that the
    Patna High Court CWJC No.15120 of 2025(3) dt.27-07-2026

    notification dated 23.10.2021 is incorrect, the
    process is without following the Social Impact
    Assessment (herein after referred as ” S.I.A. for the
    sake of brevity”), the action is in violation of
    Section-4, 6 & 7 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013, the
    notification is itself wrong as the same on the face
    of record states that there is no displacement of
    people and the S.I.A. report is totally contradictory
    stating there is displacement of people;



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here