Sandeep Sharma @ Sandeep Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2026

    0
    8
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Sandeep Sharma @ Sandeep Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2026

    Author: Purnendu Singh

    Bench: Purnendu Singh

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35037 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2024 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura
                     ======================================================
                     Sandeep Sharma @ Sandeep Kumar
    
                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                     The State of Bihar & Anr.
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :     Ms.Pooja Prasad, Advocate
                     For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    3   27-07-2026

    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

    petitioner and learned APP for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

    petitioner informs this Court that the petitioner and the

    informant are Gotia and due to trivial reason, they indulged into

    free fight. Learned counsel further informs that there is

    possibility of compromise between them, though the offence is

    not compoundable and in this regard, he has placed reliance

    upon a judgment of the Apex Court in case of Naushey Ali vs.

    State of U.P., reported in, (2025) 4 SCC 78, as from the very

    perusal of the FIR, no case is made out against the petitioner

    under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel

    points out that though the FIR was lodged on 31.05.2024 and

    after the effective date, the BNS and BNSS came into force and
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35037 of 2026(3) dt.27-07-2026
    2/2

    the allegation has been made under repealed Act IPC under

    Sections 341, 323, 354, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC,

    corresponding to Sections 126, 115(2), 74, 109, 303(2), 352,

    351(2) and 3(5) BNS. However, considering that the offence is

    against women, learned counsel finds it proper to implead the

    informant as O.P. No.2 in course of the day.

    3. Permission is granted.

    4. Issue notice to the newly added opposite party no.

    2 both by ordinary process, as also by registered post with A/D,

    for which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of 2

    weeks.

    5. Re-notify on 07.09.2026.

    (Purnendu Singh, J)
    Sanjay/-

    U      T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here