Himachal Pradesh High Court
Gokal vs Time Of Inspection on 28 July, 2026
Author: Chief Justice
Bench: Chief Justice
Gokal vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.124 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18356 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18358 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant, is exempted
from filing requisite court fees. However, the same be filed
within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.124 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Tula Ram vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.123 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18352 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18351 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant, is exempted
from filing requisite court fees. However, the same be filed
within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.123 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Leela Dhar & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.122 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18347 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18346 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/appellants, are
exempted from filing requisite court fees. However, the
same be filed within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.122 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Hushan Lal vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.121 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18334 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18332 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant, is exempted
from filing requisite court fees. However, the same be filed
within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.121 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Leela Dhar & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.120 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18321 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18319 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/appellants, are
exempted from filing requisite court fees. However, the
same be filed within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.120 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Mehar Chand & anr. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.119 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18282 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18280 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/appellants, are
exempted from filing requisite court fees. However, the
same be filed within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.119 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Geeta Ram & anr. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.117 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18255 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18252 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/appellants, are
exempted from filing requisite court fees. However, the
same be filed within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.117 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Keli vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.116 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18235 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18234 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant, is exempted
from filing requisite court fees. However, the same be filed
within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.116 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Gian Chand vs Manmohan Sharma & Ors.
COPC No.608 of 2025
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan,Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.1 to 5.
of
Respondents No.6 to 8, present in person with
Mr. Paras Ram, Advocate vice Mr.B.R. Kashyap,
Advocate.
rt Fresh status report dated 28.07.2026, has been
filed on behalf of the Deputy Commissioner, Solan, District
Solan, H.P., the same be placed on record.
It has been mentioned in the status report that
as per the findings of the joint inspection report, no vehicle
was found parked on the Government land in dispute at the
time of inspection.
Respondents No.6 to 8, are present in person
and have furnished a joint affidavit by way of undertaking,
wherein they have undertaken not to park their vehicles on
the Government land and have also undertaken to abide by
all such terms deemed fit, proper and just under the
circumstances.
Therefore, in view of the undertaking furnished
by respondents No.6 to 8 and also in view of the status
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
report filed by the Deputy Commissioner, Solan, District
Solan, H.P., no further orders are required to be passed in
.
the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is
disposed of. However, respondents No.6 to 8, are directed
to abide by the undertaking, which they have furnished
of
today.
It is also made clear that if at any time,
rt
aforesaid respondents violate the undertaking furnished
today, the petitioners shall be at liberty to approach this
Court again by way of reviving the present contempt petition.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rajesh Chandel
& Ors.
.
FAO(MVA) No.55 of 2026
28.07.2026 Present: Mr.Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
Mr. Pankaj Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt CMP No.16570 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
states that pursuant to the directions passed by this Court on
17th March, 2026, the entire award amount alongwith up-to-
date interest, has been deposited before learned Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P.
Therefore, the Registry is directed to get the
amount transferred, so deposited before the learned tribunal
below, to the Registry of this Court.
As prayed, list on 19.08.2026.
In the meantime, learned counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant may also seek instructions/file reply to
the present application.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
RM, HRTC vs. Muskan & another
FAO No.107 of 2024
.
28.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
rt CMP No.18357 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to seek instructions
in the matter.
As prayed, list on 18.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Inder Singh vs. Rajinder Kumar & others
FAO(MV) No.164 of 2015
.
28.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1, 3(i) & 3(iii.
Name of respondent No.4, stands already
deleted.
of
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.
rt None for other respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellant, list on 28.08.2026.
In the meantime, Registry is directed to make a
report “as to whether all the respondents have been served
or not?”.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Purnima Singh & Ors. vs. Sunita Kumari & Anr.
RFA No.84 of 2025
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood,Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
rt
appellants, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. Nipun Jindal & Anr.
COPC No.1395 of 2025
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents, states that
respondents are intending to file LPA challenging the order
rt
under reference.
Therefore, at his request, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Meera Walia vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.63 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr.Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
tentative date for listing review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India, has been given for 31.07.2026.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the
said review petition is defective as the application for
condonation of delay, has not been filed along with the same
and in this respect, he has also placed on record latest
status report.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Man Singh vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.74 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr.Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
tentative date for listing review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India, has been given for 31.07.2026.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the
said review petition is defective as the application for
condonation of delay, has not been filed along with the same
and in this respect, he has also placed on record latest
status report.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Mohan Lal Chauhan vs. Sanjay Gupta &
another
.
COPC No.73 of 2026
28.07.2026 Present: Mr.Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
rt
tentative date for listing review petition before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India, has been given for 31.07.2026.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the
said review petition is defective as the application for
condonation of delay, has not been filed along with the same
and in this respect, he has also placed on record latest
status report.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Major General DVS Rana (Retd.) vs. Sanjay Gupta &
another
.
COPC No.72 of 2026
28.07.2026 Present: Mr.Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
rt
tentative date for listing review petition before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India, has been given for 31.07.2026.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the
said review petition is defective as the application for
condonation of delay, has not been filed along with the same
and in this respect, he has also placed on record latest
status report.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:25 :::CIS
Devesh Kumar & Ors. vs. M/s Lavanya Spirits
COPC No.80 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the petitioners.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
The present contempt petition has been filed by the
petitioners for non-compliance of the order dated 29.12.2025,
rt
passed by this Court in CWP No.17502 of 2025, titled as M/s
Lavanya Spirits vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
Reply to the petition, has been filed on behalf of the
respondent.
I have heard learned Additional Advocate General
as well as learned counsel for the respondent and also gone
through the record of the case.
A perusal of the record reveals that on 29.12.2025, a
Coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the order that arrears
shall be cleared by the respondent herein before 31.01.2026 with
the stipulation that if the respondent doesn’t clear the arrears
before 31.01.2026, then the State shall recover the same
alongwith interest @ 6% simple interest, as from the date due
and also Department shall be at liberty to proceed against the
respondent herein in accordance with law.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
In the reply filed on behalf of the respondent, it has
been averred that the petitioners have invoked the provision of
.
Excise Act of H.P. and H.P. Land Revenue Act and further they
have taken unilateral action, whereby the petitioners have
unilaterally corresponded with the Manager of the Bank, where
the respondent has got his account for the purpose of seizure
of
and stoppage of all transactions. It has further been mentioned
in the reply that CWP No.17502 of 2025, is still pending before a
rt
Coordinate Bench of this Court and the rights of the parties have
yet to be adjudicated in the same.
Since the Deputy Commissioner, State Taxes &
Excise, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. had already ordered the
seizure of the account being maintained/operated by Daulat
Ram, Partner M/s Lavanya Spirits, therefore, this Court is of the
opinion that the present contempt petition is not maintainable and
accordingly, the same is dismissed being not maintainable.
However, it is made clear that applicants/petitioners
are at liberty to recover the arrears from the respondent by taking
recourse to such legal remedy as available to them under law.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Harish Kumar vs. Prem Lata & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.98 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. T.R.Jain, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N.Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Respondent No.4, already ex parte.
of
Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
rtMs. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.
Admit.
Let post admission notice be issued to
respondent No.4, returnable within four weeks, on taking
steps within a period of two days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rekha Devi vs. Sudha Devi & Ors.
COPC No.923 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner,
states that he doesn’t want to press the present contempt
rt
petition as the judgment under reference has been duly
complied with.
In view of the above submissions, the present
petition is dismissed as not pressed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rameshwar Lal vs. Sushil Thakur
COPC No.929 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.Nandan Vasishta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sidhant Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Rangil Singh and Mr. Sidhant Negi,
Advocates, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively. They pray
rt
for and are granted two weeks’ time to file reply(ies)/to file
compliance affidavit(s).
As prayed, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Sheela Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.118 of 2026
.
28.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.18262 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal,
rt
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.18261 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant, is exempted
from filing requisite court fees. However, the same be filed
within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.118 of 2026
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Vikram Singh vs. Arvind Kumar Sharma & another
COPC No.511 of 2026
.
27.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Vide order dated 9th April, 2026, the Hon’ble Division
Bench of this Court, passed the following order:-
rt “Inter alia contends that on an earlier occasion,
respondent No.6 was held to be not a defaulter vide letterdated 25.03.2026 (Annexure P-4) by respondent No.4.
Petitioner had approached this Court by filing CWP
No.3709 of 2026, putting forth that the petitioner had madethe last bid of Rs.5,85,57,517/- and that the said private
respondent, through various entities, namely Amit
Enterprises and Bhavya Enterprises along with other firms,was also bidding, which was not permissible and
resultantly directions had been issued by this Court videorder dated 25.03.2026 directing the respondents to pass
a speaking order completing the entire process, on orbefore 30th March, 2026.
It is further pointed out from order dated 05.02.2026
(Annexure P-7), passed in CWP No.1676 of 2026 that M/s
Amit Enterprises had approached this Court, whereby
relief was limited to the effect that there had been demand
of penalty against him and the applicant therein had been
protected by restraining the official respondents to take
any coercive steps against him, in pursuance to notice
dated 08.01.2026.
It is further submitted that respondent No.2 thereafter
allowed the representation and came to the conclusion
that respondent No.1 was a defaulter and had directed
fresh e-Auction for Unit No.4, Nagwain-Kamand, District
Mandi. It is thus the case of learned Senior Counsel that::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
once the bid has already been in process and respondent
No.6 was a defaulter, he should have been awarded the.
contract, but instead of the award of the contract, e-
Auction proceedings were initiated on 31.03.2026
(Annexure P-10). The petitioner had then objected to the
same by issuing legal notice dated 31.03.2026 to stop thebid and suggested that the petitioner would only
participate under protest. Thereafter, another legal notice
dated 31.03.2026 (Annexure P-12) was also issued thatof
he was willing to pay the licence fee as last bid by
respondent No.6 was to the tune of Rs.5,86,57,517/- being
the only eligible participant. The said aspect was not
rt
considered and fresh bid continued, in which the petitioner
took part and offered Rs.6,27,57,517/-, which would beclear from Annexure P-14.
The learned Senior Counsel has further contended that
the auction was completed on 01.04.2026 at 12:30 a.m.,
which is clear from Annexure P-19 and the petitioner’s bidwas accepted. It is submitted that however the whole
process was thereafter reopened two days later on04.04.2026 and again bid was commenced leading to the
serving of the legal notice dated 03.04.2026 (Annexure P-
20), specifically pointing out that Amit Kaushal and his
family members, as such, were participating in the bidding
through ancillary firms.
Subsequently, legal notice dated 05.04.2026 (Annexure
P-21) was also served that in the resumed e-Auction
proceedings, he had made bids till Rs.8,24,57,517/-, but
the bid was again taken to Rs.8,25,57,517/- and thereafter
he had stopped bidding. It is thus the contention of learned
Senior Counsel that the bid now has been awarded in
favour of Kaushal family. Learned Senior Counsel submits
that his client is willing to stand by the bid of
Rs.8,24,57,517/-.
Notice, at this stage, confined to respondents No.1 to
5 only. Mr. Sidharth Jalta, learned Deputy Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 5/State.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
List on 30.04.2026. Let reply be filed by the
respondents/State, on or before the next date of hearing.
.
In the meanwhile, the award be not finalized. The
award is stayed and no award shall be given to any third
party. It is open to the State to award vends to the
petitioner keeping in view the above facts and
circumstances as fair offer has been given by learned
Senior Counsel”.
of
At this stage, it is fairly submitted by learned counsel
for the petitioner that aforesaid order has been vacated vide
rt
order dated 5th May, 2026.
Since the stay order dated 09.04.2026, has been
vacated, therefore, no further order is required to be passed in
the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is
dismissed being not maintainable.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Soma Devi & Ors.
FAO No.497 of 2015
.
27.07.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants.
Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. G.R.Palsra,
Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Heard further. List for continuation on 06.08.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Kusum & Ors. vs.Krishan Chand @ Kishan Singh & another
a/w connected matter
.
RFA No.84 of 2011 a/w RFA No.85 of 2011
27.07.2026 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Sunil Chauhan,
Advocate, for the appellants in both the appeals
except appellant No.2(a).
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Garima Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondents in
of
both the appeals.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
rt
appellant, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
IFFCO TOKIO GIC Ltd. vs. Geeta Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1219 of 2025
.
27.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shradha Karol, Advocate,for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for respondents
N.1 to 8.
of
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.9 & 10.
rt CMP No.16857 of 2025
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
HPFC vs. Lake View Hotel & Another
FAO No.498 of 2012
.
27.07.2026 Present: Mr. Surya Bhan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.L. Chauhdhary,Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
In terms of the previous order dated 19.03.2026,
list the present case in the month of September, 2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
HPFC vs. Lake View Hotel & Another
FAO No.498 of 2012
.
27.07.2026 Present: Mr. Surya Bhan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.L. Chauhdhary,Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
In terms of the previous order dated 19.03.2026,
list the present case in the month of September, 2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
M/s Tangnu Romai Power Generation Pvt. Ltd.
vs. Bana Dei & Ors.
.
RFA No.296 of 2019
24.07.2026 Present: Mr.Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
Ms. Kamlesh Kumari,Advocate vice Mr. H.S.
Rana, Advocate, for respondent No.2(a).
rtMr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for
respondents No.3 & 4.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.5/State.
Four weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
take steps on account of death of respondent No.1, Bana
Dei. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal & Ors. vs. Rahul Aggarwal &
Anr.
.
Civil Suit No.52 of 2025
24.07.2026 Present: Plaintiff No.1, present in person with Mr. Sumit
Sood, Advocate.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet
Singh Pal, Advocate, for the defendants.
of
Learned counsel for the defendants, states that
rt
written statement has been filed in the Registry today.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if
in order.
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file replication.
As prayed, list on 10.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Urmila Sharma & Anr. vs. Tata AIG General Insurance
Co. Ltd.
.
FAO No.203 of 2025
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
CMP(M) Nos. 802 & 803 of 2026
rtThe instant applications under Order 22, Rules, 3
of CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, have been filed
by the applicants/appellants for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased appellant No.2, Krishan
Sharma, who has expired on 28.10.2025, after setting aside
the abatement, if any.
As per the applicant, deceased appellant No.2,
Krishan Sharma, has expired on 28.10.2025, leaving behind
his only legal representative, as mentioned in Para-1 of the
application. However, the delay in filing the application as
occurred is neither willful nor intentional, but due to the
reasons, which were beyond the control of the applicant, as
such, the same deserves to be condoned and since right to
sue always survives in favour of the legal representative of
deceased appellant No.2, Krishan Sharma, there is no
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
impediment in bringing on record the aforesaid legal heir and
as such, the present application deserves to be allowed.
.
No reply to the application is intended to be filed
on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent and has no
objection, in case the same are allowed.
of
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that
the delay, as occurred, was beyond the control of the
rt
applicants and has been sufficiently explained in the
application, the same is hereby condoned.
As right to sue still survives in favour of the legal
representative of deceased appellant No.2, Krishan Sharma,
the legal representative, as mentioned in Para-4 of the
application, is ordered to be brought on record.
The applications stand disposed of.
RFA No.404 of 2019
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file amended memo of parties.
As prayed, list on 11.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Anr. vs.Santu @ Sant Ram
along with connected matter
.
CMP(M) No.1349 of 2025 a/w RFA No.97 of 2025
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
General, for the applicants /State in both
appeals.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for proposed LRs
of
No.1(b) & 1(c) in both appeals.
Proposed LRs No.1(a) & 1(d) to 1(g), already ex
rt parte.
CMP(M) No.1349 of 2025
Correct amended memo of parties, stands filed.
As prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
CMP(M) Nos.2237 & 2238 of 2025 in RFA
No.97 of 2025
As prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & another vs. Pawan Kumar & Ors.
CMP No.17081 of 2025 in RFA No.143 of 2018
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
General, for non-applicants/State.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.17081 of 2025
rt At the request of learned counsel for the
applicants/respondents, list the application for consideration
on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & another vs. Bangalu @ Daulat Ram
(deceased) through his LRs
.
CMP No.22057 of 2025 in RFA No.59 of 2018
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
General, for non-applicants/State.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.22057 of 2025
rtAt the request of learned counsel for the
applicants/respondents, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
M/s JPHCP vs. Narotam Singh & Ors.
RFA No.130 of 2018
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Nand Lal Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondents No.1,2(b) to 2(d).
Name of respondent No.2(a), already stands
of
deleted.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
rtGeneral, for respondents No.3 & 4/State.
CMP No.27321 of 2025
By way of last opportunity, three weeks’ further
time, as prayed, is granted to file rejoinder as well as fresh
correct amended memo of parties. List thereafter.
As prayed, list on 18.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Prem Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.66 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Nalneesh, Advocate vice Mr. Hamender
Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
rt Steps for the service of respondent No.4, have
not been taken. Learned counsel for the appellant, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to do the needful.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file Power
of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents, by way of
last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Akhil Mogta vs. Duni Chand & another
FAO(MV) No.79 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj
Chauhan, Advocate,for the appellant.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, states
of
that steps for the service of respondents No.1 & 2, have
been taken on 23.07.2026. Registry is directed to make a
rt
report in this respect.
As prayed, list on 27.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Harmanjeet Singh vs. Kamlesh & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.92 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Abehay Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. Aditya
Chouhan, Advocate,for the appellant.
Ms. Shabnam, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
of
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, states
that fresh steps for the service of respondent No.5, have
been taken. However, report of the Registry is to the
contrary. Learned vice counsel for the appellant is
directed to follow up with the Registry in this respect.
As prayed, list on 28.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
HP Beverages Ltd. vs. M/s Soolini Associates & another
CMP(M) No.279 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Aditya Sood, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.3.
of
Mr. Nalneesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.
rt
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ further time to file
correct addresses of respondents No.1,2 & 4. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Lakshmi Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.620 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rtCMP(M) No.620 of 2026
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
contesting respondents.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay of 38 days in filing the
present appeal, which in my considered view has sufficiently
been explained, is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admitted on the following substantial questions
of law:-
“a) Whether monthly salary of the deceased
was wrongly worked out by learned
commissioner and compensation payable to
the claimants on that basis alongwith
interest, thus, being contrary to statutory
provisions of the Act as well as law, are
liable to be suitably modified?
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
b) Whether the deceased-driver was not
.
holding valid and effective driving license in
as much as he was not possessing a valid
and effective driving licence to drive a truck
as his license had endorsement to drive PSV
Bus, If so, its effect?
Post admission notice.
of
Mr. Kamal Sharma and Mr. Hitesh Bali,
Advocates, appear and accept notice on behalf of respective
rt
respondents.
List for final hearing in due course.
CMP No.____of 2026
Be registered.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant,
states that the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-date
interest, has been deposited before the Court of learned
Commissioner below and in this respect, receipt issued by
the said Court has also been annexed.
Since the entire award amount alongwith up-to-
date interest amounting to Rs. 26,88,000/- stands deposited
before this Court, the execution and operation of award
dated 12.12.2025, passed by the learned Commissioner
under the Workmen’s Compensation Act-cum-Civil Judge,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Jhandutta, District Bilaspur, HP. in case titled Lakshmi Devi
& another vs. Kuljeet Singh & another, shall remain stayed
.
during the pendency of the present appeal.
The Registry is directed to get the amount
transferred, so deposited before the learned Commissioner
of
below, to the Registry of this Court.
Application stands disposed of.
rt Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Dev Kumar & anr.
CMP(M) No.605 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the applicants/appellants.
Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for
and is granted three weeks’ further time to take
rt
consequential steps on account of death of respondent
No.2. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Tulsia
CMP(M) No.611 of 2026
.
24.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the applicants/appellants.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for
of
and is granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential
steps on account of death of sole respondent. List
rt
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Asha Devi & Ors.
CMP No.8850/2026 in FAO No.126/2024
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Bodh Raj, Advocate, for
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3.
of
CMP No.8850/2026
The instant application has been filed on behalf
rt
of applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, namely, Asha Devi,
Suraj Kumar & Bharti, for release of award amount in their
favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of
money as have no source of income to meet out their day
to day expenses and as the main appeal is pending
adjudication before this Court, which may take some time
for its disposal, their prayer for release of amount of
compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for,
may be ordered to be released in their favour.
Learned counsel non-applicant/appellant,
stated that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
present application, but has opposed the application on
the ground that if the amount, as prayed, is released in
.
favour of the applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, it would
be difficult for them to recover the same in the event of
appeal being allowed, which would result into the
of
multiplicity of litigation between the parties. Hence, prayer
for dismissal of the application has been made.
.
rt Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the
affidavits of all the applicants and also in view of the fact
that the appeal may take sufficiently long time for its final
adjudication, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to
release 25% each of the award amount of compensation
in favour of applicants/respondent No.1 to 3, namely,
Asha Devi, Suraj Kumar & Bharti, after proper verification
and identification by remitting the same to their saving
bank accounts, detail whereof has been given in Para-5 of
the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject
to the final outcome of the appeal and in the event of
appeal being allowed, namely, Asha Devi, Suraj Kumar &
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Bharti,, will have to refund the amount, so released, with
interest.
.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Bishan Dass &
Anr.
.
FAO(MVA) No.18 of 2026
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for respondent
No.1/cross objector.
of
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
rtCMP(M No.941 of 2026
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and delay in refiling the cross
objections, is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Cross Objection No.07 of 2026.
Admit. List for final hearing along with main
appeal in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Hardev Singh vs. Purva Singh and another
Civil Suit No.22 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Advocate, for the
defendants.
of
OMP Nos. 719 & 720 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff,
rt
prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
Civil Suit No.22 of 2026 & OMP No.298 of 2026
Written statement to the present suit as well as
reply to the application stand filed.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file replication as well rejoinder.
List thereafter.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajeev Bazwaria & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & another
CMP(M) No.247 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the applicants, prays for and
is granted four weeks’ further time to file rejoinder.
rt List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector & Ors. vs. Inderjeet Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.881 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for
respondents No.1, 2(i) to 2(iii), 3 to 5.
of
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, has filed
memo of appearance on behalf of respondents No.1, 2(i) to
rt
2(iii), 3 to 5.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.6, has been received back unserved for want
of correct address. Learned Deputy Advocate General,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file fresh correct
address of respondent No.6. List thereafter.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1, 2(i) to 2(iii), 3 to 5, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.
CMP Nos.6227, 6228, 6229, 10453 & 10454 of 2026 in
.
FAO No.89 of 2011
23.07.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr.Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Four weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
rt
file supplementary affidavit. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Hari Dass & Ors.
CMP Nos.17342 & 17344 of 2026 in RFA No.576 of 2011
.
23.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vijay
Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP Nos.17342 & 17344 of 2026
rtLet notice be issued to the proposed LRs of
deceased respondent No.6(d), returnable within four weeks,
on taking steps within a period of three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Surinder Singh vs. LAC along with connected matters
CMP No.17015 of 2026 in RFA No.3 of 2012
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr.Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate,
for the non-
applicant/respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.17015 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed by the applicant/appellant, Surinder Singh, for release of
rt
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, so deposited by non-
applicant/respondent No.2, in his favour, as per his share.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent
No.2, stated that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the
application. He further stated that since the present appeal has
been decided by this Court vide judgment dated 06.04.2026 and no
further appeal or challenge has ever been preferred against the said
judgment, the same has attained finality, he has no objection in
case the prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 06.04.2026,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicant Surinder Singh, as per his share, after proper
verification and identification, by remitting the same to his saving
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
bank account, detail whereof has been mentioned in Para-5 of the
application.
.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
NTPC Ltd. vs. Fullan Devi & Ors.
CMP Nos.18105 & 18106 of 2026 in RFA No.4190 of 2013
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr.Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
5.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
of
respondent No.6.
rt CMP Nos.18105 & 18106 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply/ to seek
instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 11.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
M/s Himachal Sorang Power Ltd. vs. Suresh Bisht
CMP No.18109 of 2026 in RFA N.312 of 2018
.
23.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Srishti Verma,
Advocate, for the
applicant/respondent.
of
CMP No.18109 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to seek instructions in
rt
the matter.
As prayed, list on 12.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Shivek Mehta and others.
FAO(MVA) No.246 of 2025
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
of
Admit. Call for the records.
rtList for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Shangrash Samiti & another vs. Raj Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.23 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3 & 9.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
of
respondents No.4 to 8/State.
rtAt this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner,
states that he doesn’t want to press the present contempt
petition.
In view of the above submissions, the present
petition is dismissed as not pressed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Anita Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar and others
COPC No.882 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 13.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Amit Malhotra vs. Meena Malhotra and another
COPC No.889 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
list on 27.07.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Dr. Vikas Bharti & Ors. vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.892 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 13.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Union of India & anr. vs. Khekh Ram & another
CMP(M) No.1162 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India
with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate , for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
of
respondent No.2.
CMP No.18225 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal, is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1162 of 2026
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
contesting respondents.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 27 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post admission notice.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Mr. Maan Singh, learned counsel and Ms.Archana
Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General, appear and accept notice
.
on behalf of respective respondents.
Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 &
2, as prayed, be filed within four weeks.
List for final hearing in due course.
of
CMP No.____of 2026
Be registered.
rt Heard.
Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith
up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today, the
execution of award dated 19.11.2025, passed by the Court of
learned District Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. in case titled as
Khekh Ram vs. Union of India & Ors., shall remain stayed during
the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Geetika & Ors. vs. Nisha
OMP No.705 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Shriyek Sharda, Advocate, for the
applicants/plaintiffs.
OMP No.705 of 2026
of
Notice. I have heard learned counsel for the
applicants-plaintiffs and also gone through the plaint,
rt
application as well as the documents filed alongwith the
plaint. Perusal of the same reveals that the applicants-
plaintiffs have got a strong prima-facie case and the balance
of convenience also lies in their favour. Moreover, the
applicants-plaintiffs will suffer an irreparable loss and injury, if
interim protection is not granted in their favour.
Therefore, in the interim, respondent/defendant,
is restrained from selling, transferring, alienating,
encumbering or creating any third party interest over the suit
property till the next date of hearing, subject to compliance of
Order 39, Rule 3 of CPC. Respondent-defendant is,
however, directed to show-cause as to why this order be not
made absolute during pendency of the present suit.
List alongwith the main suit on 19.08.2026, the
date already fixed.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
OMP No.706 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/plaintiffs, are exempted
.
from filing translated copy of Hindi documents. However, the
same be filed within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Bhagat Ram & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1153 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicants/State.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within four
weeks, on taking steps within a period of two days. List thereafter.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company vs. Chhavinder Lal & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1155 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Ms.Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within four
weeks, on taking steps within a period of two days. List thereafter.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Union of India & anr. vs. Kuldeep & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1161 of 2026
.
23.07.2026 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India
with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate , for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
of
respondent No.3.
CMP No.18221 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal, is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1161 of 2026
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
contesting respondents.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 27 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post admission notice.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Mr. Maan Singh, learned counsel and Ms.Archana
Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General, appear and accept notice
.
on behalf of respective respondents.
Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 &
2, as prayed, be filed within four weeks.
List for final hearing in due course.
of
CMP No.____of 2026
Be registered.
rt Heard.
Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith
up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today, the
execution of award dated 19.11.2025, passed by the Court of
learned District Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. in case titled as
Kuldeep and Another vs. Union of India & Ors., shall remain
stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & anr. vs. M/s Royal Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd.
CARAP(M) No.10 of 2026
.
22.07.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate, for the
applicants/petitioners.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajesh Tomar vs. Lal Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1144 of 2026
.
22.07.2026 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Radha Devi vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1158 of 2026
.
22.07.2026 Present: Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
July 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.Atima Kapila & Ors.
FAO No.333 of 2024
.
22.07.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, is stated to have expired.
Ms.Bheeshamlata, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder Saklani,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ further time to file fresh amended memo of
parties, in terms of order dated 26.06.2025. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr.
COPC No.877 of 2026
.
22.07.2026 Present: None for the petitioner.
Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list after two weeks.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Savina & Ors.
CMP Nos.9386 & 9387 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.132 of 2015
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
Upadhayay, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.9386 of 2026
of
The present application under Order 32 Rule 12 read with
Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.
rt
2 & 3, namely, Kehkashan & Kashish, for discharging their natural
guardian i.e. their mother Savina, as they have attained the age of
majority.
Learned Senior Counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, namely,
Kehkashan & Kashish, have now attained the age of majority, as is
evident from their Matriculation Examination Certificates, copies
whereof annexed with the application as well as their affidavits
annexed therewith, the present application is allowed and their mother
Savina, respondent No.1, is ordered to be discharged from their
guardianship; and they are permitted to pursue the case in their own
capacity.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No. 9387 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed by the applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, namely,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Kehkashan & Kashish, for release of award amount alongwith up-to-
date interest, in their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in
.
the Registry of this Court.
Learned Senior Counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
stated that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. She
further stated that since the present appeal has been decided by this
of
Court vide judgment dated 27.09.2019 and no further appeal or
challenge has ever been preferred against the said judgment, the
rt
same has attained finality, she has no objection in case the prayer
made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 27.09.2019,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, namely, Kehkashan &
Kashish, strictly, as per their shares, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to their saving bank accounts,
details whereof have been mentioned in photocopies of their pass
books annexed with the application (Annexure P-1, colly).
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
MD HPPCL & another vs. Ramanand & Ors.
RFA No.304 of 2016
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,3(a), 3(c), 3(d), 4 & 5.
Mr. Sumit Sood,Advocate, for respondents No.5(a) to
of
5(d) & 9(a) to 9(e).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
rtfor the respondents /State.
CMP(M) No.1138 & 1139 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the proposed LRs of
deceased respondent No.2, returnable within four weeks, on
taking steps within a period of three days. List thereafter.
CMP(M) No.1140 & 1141 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the proposed LRs of
deceased respondent No.12(a), returnable within four weeks, on
taking steps within a period of three days. List thereafter.
CMP(M) No.1142 & 1143 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the proposed LRs of
deceased respondent No.17, returnable within four weeks, on
taking steps within a period of three days. List thereafter.
CMPs No.17767 and 17768 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/appellants, are exempted
from filing translated copies of Annexure A-4 & Annexure A-6.
However, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants,
undertakes to file the same as and when occasion arises.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Applications stand disposed of.
.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railway vs. Mohinder & ors.
RFA No.183 of 2024
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate vice Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the appellant.
None for respondents o.1 to 4.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.5 & 6 /State.
of
PF alongwith correct addresses for the service of
respondents No.1 to 4, has been filed on 20.07.2026. Therefore,
rt
let notice be issued to aforesaid respondents, returnable within four
weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Bhagirath (deceased) through LRs vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.120 of 2017
.
21.07.2026 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
PF for the service of respondents No.5,6 & 8, has been
of
filed. Therefore, let notice be issued to aforesaid respondents,
returnable within four weeks.
rtLearned counsel for the appellant, states that an
application for deleting the names of respondents No.4,7,9 & 10,
has been filed in the Registry of this Court on 17.07.2026, however,
the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place
the same on record, if in order.
List as and when the said application is taken on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Kalgi Ram & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.20 of 2021 & RFA No.15 of 2022
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the appellantsin RFA
No.20 of 2021 and for the respondents I RFA No.15 of
2022.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents in RFA No. 20 of 2021 and for the
appellants in RFA No.15 of 2022.
of
RFA No.15 of 2022
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.1, by way of last opportunity.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Khyali Ram & Ors. vs. Aman Deep & Ors.
Civil Suit No.35 of 2022
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.261 of 2026
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/defendants,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply, by
rt
way of last opportunity List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Ram Dhan & Ors. vs. Roop Lal & Ors.
RFA No.52 of 2024
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. George, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Munish, Advocate vice Mr.Yuyutsu Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
of
Mr. J.K. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.4,5,6,
LRs. of respondent No.8 and respondent No.9.
rt Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondents No.12 &
13.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP
No.4365 of 2026
CMPs No.12872 & 4365 of 2026.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
stated that he doesn’t want to file any reply to the present
applications.
Learned counsel for respondents No.12 & 13, prays
for and is granted three weeks’ time to file replies. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Uma Kumari & anr.
FAO No.258 of 2025
.
21.07.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Karanveer Singh Thakur, Advocate, for
of
respondent No.2.
rt Learned counsel for respondent No.2, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file Power of Attorney, by
way of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Sat Pal vs. Gopal Beri
CMP No.28192/2025 in COPC No.817 of 2025
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 20.07.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that an LPA is being preferred on behalf of the State
rt
against the judgment dated 09.05.2025, passed by learned
Single Judge in CWP No.2150 of 2023.
Therefore, at his request, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar Vermani vs. Subhash Chand & Ors.
Civil Suit No.33 of 2026
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr.Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for defendants No.1,2,5
& 6.
Ms. Chehak, Advocate, for defendants No.3 & 4.
of
Civil Suit No.33 of 2026 & OMP No.482 of 2026
rt As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
defendant No.7, has been received back duly served, however,
there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, he is ordered to
be proceeded against ex parte.
Learned counsel for the contesting defendants, pray
for and are granted two weeks’ time to file written statement(s) to
the present suit as well as reply(ies) to OMP No.482 of 2026.
List thereafter.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Roshani Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.44 of 2026
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Upasna Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for
of
respondent No.3.
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.1 & 2, prays for
and is granted three weeks’ time to procure fresh Power of
Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents as Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, has now been designated as Senior
Advocate.
As prayed, list on 06.08.2026.
In the meantime, the Registry is directed to get the
amount transferred, so deposited before the learned Commissioner
below, to the Registry of this Court.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Meera Devi & Ors. vs. Krishna Devi & Ors.
FAO(MV) No. 88 of 2026
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Pritam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta,Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to
5.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
of
Mr. Pankaj Samant, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
FAO(MV) No. 88 of 2026
rtLearned counsel for respondent No.7, has filed memo
of appearance on behalf of aforesaid respondent. He prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney. List thereafter.
CMP No.9370 of 2026
Dismissed as not pressed, at this stage.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Jayanti Devi & Anr. vs. NIAC Ltd. & another
CMP(M) No.1044 of 2026
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Kulwant Gill, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Shakuntla Devi
FAO No.182 of 2024 & CO. No.12 of 2022
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3, already ex parte.
of
CMP No.10296 of 2026
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Shyam Lal vs. Janardhan Das & Ors.
RFA No.73 of 2025
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 7.
Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
of
Respondents No.4 to 6 & 8 to 13, already ex parte.
rtLearned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, has filed
memo of appearance on behalf of aforesaid respondents. He
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to procure fresh Power
of Attorney as Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, has now been
designated as Senior Advocate. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Shyam Lal vs. Janardhan Das & Ors.
RFA No.74 of 2025
.
21.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 7.
Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
of
Respondents No.4 to 6 & 8 to 13, already ex parte.
rtLearned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, has filed
memo of appearance on behalf of aforesaid respondents. He
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to procure fresh Power
of Attorney as Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, has now been
designated as Senior Advocate. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Shiv Kumar
RFA No.9 of 2018
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants.
Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish Sharma
and Srishti verma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Geeta & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.211 of 2017
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
of
list on 29.07.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Gopal Chadha vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.10 of 2018
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Kulbir Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
of
list on 06.08.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Lalit Chadda vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.11 of 2018
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Kulbir Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
of
list on 06.08.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Man Bahadur (deceased) through LRs & Ors
FAO No.311 of 2025
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shruty Dubey, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pavinder, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(e).
Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for
respondents No.2 & 3.
of
CMP No.17622 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
rt
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply/to seek
instructions in the matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
GM, Northern Railway vs. Mithu Ram & Ors.
CMPs No.17568 to 17572 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.344 of
.
2016
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
rt CMPs No.17568, 17569, 17570,17571 & 17572 of 2026
The present applications under Section 151 of CPC,
have been filed by the applicants/respondents No.2(a), 2(b), 2(d),
2(e) & 2(f), namely, Dalbeero, Rekha, Rajni, Shammi Kumar &
Nisha Devi, for release of award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest, in their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, for the non-
applicant/appellant, states that since the present appeal has been
decided by this Court vide judgment dated 26.07.2018 and no
further appeal or challenge has been preferred against the said
judgment till date and the same has attained finality, he has no
objection, in case, the prayer made in the application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 26.07.2018
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicants/respondents No.2(a), 2(b), 2(d), 2(e) & 2(f), namely,
.
Dalbeero, Rekha, Rajni, Shammi Kumar & Nisha Devi , strictly, as
per their shares, after proper verification and identification, by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof
have been mentioned in Para-3 of all the applications as well as
of
photocopies of pass books of the aforesaid applicants annexed with
the application (Annexure A-1, colly).
rt Applications stand disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. vs. Kharak Bahadur @ Kharak Singh (deceased) through LRs
& another
CMP No.17188 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.466 of 2012
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Hiesh Kapil, Advocate vice Mr. Manohar Lal
Sharma, Advocate, for applicants/respondents
No.1(a) to 1(d).
of
CMP No.17188 of 2026
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed by the applicants/respondents No. 1(a) to 1(d), namely,
Sunita, Anil, Chandni and Jyoti, for release of award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest, in their favour, as per their shares, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
stated that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. She
further stated that since the present appeal has been decided by this
Court vide judgment dated 25.09.2025 and no further appeal or
challenge has ever been preferred against the said judgment, the
same has attained finality, she has no objection in case the prayer
made in the application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 25.09.2025,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
aforesaid applicants/respondents, namely, Sunita, Anil, Chandni and
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Jyoti, strictly, as per their shares, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to their saving bank accounts,
.
details whereof have been mentioned in Para-5 of the application.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
of
July 20, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & anr. vs. Anand Mehta & Ors.
CMP No.15730 of 2026 in RFA No.228 of 2016
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
rnon-applicants/State.
Mr. Arch Chauhan,
Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.15730 of 2026
Further three weeks’ time, as prayed, is granted to
seek instructions in the matter.
rt
As prayed, list on 05.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Raj Kumar & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors.
RFA No.62 of 2025
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.4(a) to 4(e).
of
Correct amended memo of parties, stands filed.
Admit. Call for the records.
rt
List for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Sneh Love Care Rehabilitation & Welfare Society vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
FAO No.14 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Inderjit Singh Narwal, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Deepak Atwal & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.143 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.143 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt CMP No.17631 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award
amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four
weeks from today, the operation and execution of impugned
award dated 08.04.2026, passed by learned Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal-III, Shimla, H.P. in case titled as Deepak Atwal
vs. Mainpal Kumar & Ors., shall remain stayed during the
pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
SBI General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs Julfi Deen & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.144 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.144 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt CMP No.17632 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award
amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four
weeks from today, the operation and execution of impugned
award dated 20.03.2026, passed by learned Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. in case titled as
Julfi & ors. vs. Ram Rattan & Ors., shall remain stayed during
the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Bhuvneshwari vs. Reena Thakur & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.145 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Balwant Singh Thakur vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.837 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Chitranjan Sharma and Mr. Gopal Singh,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Yoginder Makhaik vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.838 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Chitranjan Sharma and Mr. Gopal Singh,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. Neeraj Gupta
COPC No.844 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Abheyendra Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.845 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Chitranjan Sharma and Mr. Gopal Singh,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Shriram Sharma vs. Rakesh Kanwar
COPC No.847 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, Advocate vice Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Virender Singh & Ors. vs. Shyam Bhagat Negi & anr.
COPC No.851 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Balkiya & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1127 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Durga & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1126 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Gurmeet Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1125 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Babu Ram & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1124 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Hari Ram(deceased) through his LRs. & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1123 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Anjana Devi vs. Ashish Singhmar & Ors.
COPC No.1342 of 2025
.
20.07.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, prays for and
of
is granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Aditya Tuli vs. Neeraj Tuli & Ors.
Civil Suit No.23 of 2024
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. R.S. Chandel,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for defendant No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rupali,
Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Banta,Advocate, for
defendants No.2 & 3.
of
Four weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to file
written statement to amended plaint.
rt As prayed, list on 24.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Abadi Deh (representation through Lachhi Ram)
CMP(M) No.933 of 2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants/appellants.
CMP(M) No.933 of 2026
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to the sole
of
respondent, has been received back duly served, however, there is
no representation on its behalf. Hence, it is proceeded against
ex parte.
rt
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 144 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.1161
RFA No._______of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Let post admission notice be issued to the sole
respondent, returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days. List thereafter.
CMP No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award
amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks
from today, the operation and execution of impugned award
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
dated 25.10.2025, passed by learned Additional District Judge,
Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. in case titled as Abadi Deh
.
(representation through Lachhi Ram) vs. State of Himacha
Pradesh & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the
present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
of
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
M/s Randhawa Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. M/s
Ropways and Rapid Transport & Anr.
.
C.S. No.05 of 2023
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate,for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
of
defendant No.2/State.
OMP No.399 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the Non-applicants/plaintiffs,
states that reply has been filed in the Registry of this Court on
17.07.2026, however the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
Learned counsel for applicant/defendant No.1, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Prabhu Nath (deceased) through his LRs vs. Om Parkash & another
FAO (ECA)No.98/2026
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate for the appellants.
FAO (ECA)No.98/2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable for
of
24.08.2026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
CMP No.17774 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
rt As per the receipt attached alongwith application, a
sum of Rs.6,45,590/-, has been deposited by the
applicants/appellants before the Court of learned Commissioner
Employees Compensation-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Court No.1, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P.
Therefore, in the interim, the execution of impugned
award dated 25.05.2026, passed by learned Commissioner,
Employees’ Compensation Act, court No.1, Mandi, in case titled Om
Parkash vs. Prabhu Nath (deceased through his LRs) &
another, shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.
List on 24.08.2026 along with main appeal.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kher Sinh & Ors.
FAO No.495/2009
.
20.07.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2,3, 5(b) to 5(d).
Names of respondents No.4 & 5 (a), stand deleted.
of
At the request of learned counsel for r espondents
No.1,2,3, 5(b) to 5(d), list after four weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Ganesh Dutt & Ors. vs. LAC(Railways) and another
RFA No.30 of 2012
.
20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General for
respondent No.1.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for
of
respondent No.2.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Tej Pratap Singh (deceased) through LRs Vs. Jasbir Singh
(deceased) through LRs a/w connected matters
.
RFA No. 238/2005 a/w RFAs No. 236, 237, 241 & 242/2005
RFA No. 238/2005
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vidur, Advocate vice Ms. Sanjivani Sood,
Advocate, for the appellants.
of
None for respondent No. 1(a).
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr.Nitin
rtThakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 4, 5(a), 5(b),
10, 11 and 12.
RFA No. 236/2005
Mr. Vidur, Advocate vice Ms. Sanjivani Sood,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 2, 3, 14 and
16.
None for the remaining respondents.
RFA No. 237/2005
Mr. Vidur, Advocate vice Ms. Sanjivani Sood,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4, 6 and
8.
None for the remaining respondents.
RFA No. 241/2005
Mr. Vidur, Advocate vice Ms. Sanjivani Sood,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No. 1(a).
None for the remaining respondents.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
RFA No. 242/2005
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr.Nitin
.
Thakur, Advocate, the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1(a) to 1(c).
Mr. Vidur, Advocate vice Ms. Sanjivani Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No. 7(a) to 7(f).
of
CMP No.12956 of 2026 in RFA No.238 of 2005
rt By way of filing the present application, the prayer
has been made to recognize the factum of LRs of deceased
respondent No.1, Jasbir Singh. However, the perusal of record,
reveals that till date legal representatives of deceased respondent
No.1, Jasbir Singh, have not been brought on record.
As regards, the prayer made with respect to allowing
CMP(M) No.818 of 2014, the same has already been allowed
vide order dated 12.08.2014 and legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.5, Baldev Kaur, has already brought on
record.
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to take consequential steps on account
of death of respondent No.1, Jasbir Singh. List thereafter.
CMP No.12962 of 2026 in RFA No.238 of 2005
The present application has been filed under
Section 151 of CPC, for deletion of name of deceased appellant
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
LR 1(a) Rajvinder Kaur, as her legal representatives are already
on record as appellant LR No.1(b) to 1(f) in the present appeal.
.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavit of appellant
1(b), Inder Pratap Singh as well as the fact that LRs of deceased
appellant LR 1(a) Rajvinder Kaur, are already on record, the
of
present application is allowed and the name of appellant LR 1(a)
Rajvinder Kaur, is ordered to be deleted from the array of the
rt
parties, subject to all just exceptions. Amended memo of parties
be filed within 10 days.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
HPSEBL s. M/s DV Steels & Ors.
Civil Suit No.45 of 2015
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Narvada, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate,
for the defendants.
OMP No.653 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the application for amendment of
rt
plaint, is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
OMP No.652 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/defendants,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Shemain Thakur & Ors. vs. Hari Ranjan Singh Thakur
Civil Suit No.101 of 2020
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet
Singh Pal, Advocate, for the defendant.
of
OMP No.406 of 2020 & OMP No.398 of 2023
Learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs, prays for
rt
an adjournment.
As prayed, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Kewal Singh vs. Tarsem Singh & Ors.
Civil Suit No.16 of 2023
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Advocate, for defendants
No.2(i)(a) to 2(i)(c).
of
OMP No.111 of 2023
No reply has been filed on behalf of respondent No.1,
rt
despite repeated calls, hence, right to file the same, stands closed.
Heard. In view of the avements made in the application
as well as taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of
the present case, interim order dated 03.04.2023, is made absolute
till the disposal of the present suit, however, subject to
alteration/vacation/modification on motion.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Narayan Dass Mahant vs. Lekh Ram and another
CMP(M) No.1376 of 2024
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, list
this application for consideration after three weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal & Ors. vs. Rahul Aggarwal & Anr.
Civil Suit No.52 of 2025
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vanshika
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet
Singh Pal, Advocate, for the defendants.
of
On the persuasive request made by learned counsel
for the defendants, one week’s further time, is granted to the
defendants to file written statement
rt As prayed, list on 24.07.2026.
However, it is made clear that if the written statement is
not filed within the stipulated period, then the defence of the
defendants, will be struck off.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. M/s Neeru Photostat & General Stationery Suppliers
RFA No.06 of 2026 a/w Cross Objection No.10 of 2026.
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent/cross
objector.
of
Cross Objection No.10 of 2026.
Admit. List for final hearing along with main appeal
as per its turn.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
M/s Vivek Enterprises vs. Rattanjeet Singh
RFA No.29 of 2026
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a),
1(b) & 2.
None for respondent No.3.
of
Respondent No.3, is being represented by Mr. Arun
Kumar,Advocate,however, his name is not appearing in the cause-
rt
list. Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Arun Kumar,
Advocate, for respondent No.3, in the cause-list, henceforth.
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh vs. Sukhwinder Singh Sukhu
Civil Suit No.31 of 2024
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Praneet Gupta and Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra,
Advocates, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Navlesh
Verma,Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.169 of 2026
of
The present application under Chapter VII, Rule 1 & 2
of Part-1 of the Rules and Orders of the High Court of Himachal
rt
Pradesh(Original side), has been filed by the applicant/defendant,
for bringing on record the documents annexed with the application.
However, on the oral request made by learned counsel for the
defendant, the present application is treated as one filed under
Order 8 Rule 1-A of the CPC along with Chapter VII, Rule 1 & 2 of
Part-1 of the Rules and Orders of the High Court of Himachal
Pradesh(Original side).
By means of the present application, the
applicant/defendant wants to produce on record documents as
mentioned in Para-2 of the present application, for the reasons that
the same could not be filed along with written statement as these
have been supplied to the defendant recently and prior to filing the
written statement, these were not in the possession of the
applicant/defendant.
Reply to the application has been filed wherein,
averments made in the same have been denied by making
preliminary submissions on the ground that the present application
lacks material particulars and silent about the provision under which
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
the same has been filed. On merits, it has been stated that the
defendant has failed to mention the dates when these documents
.
have been applied and on what date the same have been made
available to the defendant. It has further been stated that there is no
whisper, if any, in the written statement with regard to the
documents,which is now intended to be introduced or to be placed
of
on record by way of this application.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone
rt
through the record of the case.
The perusal of the material available on record,
reveals that the present suit is still at initial stages and shall now be
fixed for admission/denial of documents. Therefore, in the opinion
of this Court, no prejudice is going to be caused to the plaintiff, if the
documents, as mentioned in the application, are taken on record.
Hence, the present application is allowed and the documents, as
mentioned in Para-2 of the application, are ordered to be placed on
record. However, the same shall be proved by the defendant strictly
in accordance with law.
Application stands disposed of.
Civil Suit No.31 of 2024
Now, list the case for admission/denial of
documents before Additional Registrar (J) on 06.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
The CMD SJVNL & another vs. Santosha Devi & another
CMP(M) No.1008 of 2026
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
CMP(M) No.1008 of 2026
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, has filed memo
rt
of appearance on behalf of respondent No.1.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.2, has been received back duly served, however,
there is no representation on its behalf. Hence, it is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 171 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.____/2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Let post admission notice be issued to respondent
No.2, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondent No.1, be also filed.
.
CMP No.___ of 2026 (CMPST No.988/26)
Be registered.
Heard. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants
stated that a sum of Rs.5 lacs has already been paid to
of
respondent No.1.
rt Therefore, execution/operation of impugned award
dated 06.01.2026, passed by the learned Land Acquisition
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Kinnaur at Rampur
Bushahr, District Shimla, HP in case titled Santosha Devi vs.
The CMD, SJVNL & ors., shall remain stayed during pendency
of the main a0ppeal, subject to deposit of the remaining entire
awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest
within a period of four weeks.
Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion.
The application stands disposed of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
The CMD SJVNL & another vs. Sher Singh (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1010 of 2026
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(d), 2 to 6.
of
CMP(M) No.1010 of 2026
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, has filed memo
rt
of appearance on behalf of respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), 2 to
6.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.7, has been received back duly served, however,
there is no representation on its behalf. Hence, it is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 53 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.____/2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Let post admission notice be issued to respondent
No.7, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), 2 to 6, be also filed.
.
CMP No.___ of 2026 (CMPST No.988/26)
Be registered.
Heard. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants
stated that a sum of Rs.5 lacs has already been paid to
of
respondent No.1.
rt Therefore, execution/operation of impugned award
dated 20.11.2025, passed by the learned Land Acquisition
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Kinnaur at Rampur
Bushahr, District Shimla, HP in case titled Sher Singh & ors.
vs. The CMD, SJVNL & ors., shall remain stayed during
pendency of the main appeal, subject to deposit of the remaining
entire awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date
interest within a period of four weeks.
Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion.
The application stands disposed of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Depot Manager of Dehradoon Roadways vs.Suman Devi & Ors.
CMP Nos.13914, 13916, 13917 & 12043 of 2026 in FAO (MV) No.36 of 2016
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for applicants/respondents
No.1 to 4.
CMP Nos.13914, 13916, 13917 & 12043 of 2026
of
The present applications under Section 151 of CPC,
have been filed by the applicants/respondents No. 1 to 4, namely,
rt
Suman Devi, Komal, Nitin Kumar & Kamla Devi, for release of
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, in their favour, as per
their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents, under
their instructions, states that since the present appeal has been
decided by this Court vide judgment dated 07.11.2025 and no
further appeal or challenge has been preferred against the said
judgment till date and the same has attained finality, as such, the
prayer made in the application may be allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 07.11.2025
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicants/respondents No. 1 to 4, namely, Suman Devi,
Komal, Nitin Kumar & Kamla Devi, strictly, as per their shares, after
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their
saving bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in
.
Para-3 of the CMP No.13914 of 2026 and Para-2 of CMPs
No.13916, 13917 & 12043 of 2026 as well as photocopies of the
pass books of aforesaid applicants annexed with the application
(Annexure A-1, colly).
of
Applications stand disposed of.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kushla Devi & Ors.
CMP Nos.16031, 16035, 16036 & CMP No.17224 of 2026 in FAO No.429 of 2009
.
17.07.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
CMP Nos.16031, 16035 & 16036 of 2026
of
The present applications under Order 32 Rule 12 of CPC,
have been filed by the applicants/respondents No. 2,3 & 4, namely,
rt
Anjana Devi, Ajay Kumar and Vishal Singh, for discharging their
natural guardian i.e. their mother Kushla Devi, as they have attained
the age of majority.
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
applications and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2,3 & 4,
namely, Anjana Devi, Ajay Kumar and Vishal Singh, have now attained
the age of majority, as is evident from their Matriculation Examination
Certificates, copies whereof annexed with the applications as well as
their affidavits annexed therewith, the present applications are allowed
and their mother Kushla Devi, respondent No.1, is ordered to be
discharged from their guardianship; and they are permitted to pursue
the case in their own capacity.
The applications stand disposed of.
CMP No. 17224 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed by the applicants/respondents No. 2,3 & 4, namely, Anjana
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Devi, Ajay Kumar and Vishal Singh, for release of award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest, in their favour, as per their shares, as
.
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
stated that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. She
further stated that since the present appeal has been decided by this
of
Court vide judgment dated 04.03.2016 and no further appeal or
challenge has ever been preferred against the said judgment, the
rt
same has attained finality, she has no objection in case the prayer
made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 04.03.2016,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicants/respondents No. 2,3 & 4, namely, Anjana Devi, Ajay
Kumar and Vishal Singh, strictly, as per their shares, after proper
verification and identification, by remitting the same to their saving
bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in
photocopies of their pass books annexed with the application
(Annexure A-4, colly).
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Gokali Devi
CMP Nos.16142 & 16143 of 2026 in FAO No.158 of 2013
.
17.07.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.16142 of 2026
The present application under Order 32 Rule 12 of CPC,
has been filed by the applicant/respondent No. 3, Sonia, for
rt
discharging her natural guardian i.e. her mother Gokali Devi, as she
has attained the age of majority.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicant/respondent No. 3, Sonia, has now
attained the age of majority, as is evident from her Matriculation
Examination Certificate, copy whereof annexed with the application as
well as her affidavit annexed therewith, the present application is
allowed and her mother Gokali Devi, respondent No.1, is ordered to be
discharged from her guardianship; and she is permitted to pursue her
case in her own capacity.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No. 16143 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed by the applicant/respondent No.3, Sonia, for release of
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, in her favour, as per her
share, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
stated that she doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application.
.
She further stated that since the present appeal has been decided
by this Court vide judgment dated 21.10.2021 and no further appeal
or challenge has ever been preferred against the said judgment,
the same has attained finality, she has no objection in case the
of
prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
rt
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 21.10.2021,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicant Sonia, as per her share, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to her saving bank account,
detail whereof has been mentioned in Para-3 of the application.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Manager M/s Salson Styeel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Sharif Mohammad
FAO No.345 of 2025
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Naveen Awasthi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.16859 of 2026
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to seek instructions in
the matter.
rt
As prayed, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors.
CMP No.17382 of 2026 in COPC No.66 of 2025
.
17.07.2026 Present: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.17382 of 2026
of
Issue notice. Ms. Archana Negi, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. She prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 05.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
IFFico Tokio Ins. Co. vs. Reshma & Ors. a/w
connected matter
.
FAO No.486 of 2016 a/w FAO No.232 of 2018
FAO No.486 of 2016
16.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shilpa Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Samant, Advocate vice Mr. Sunil Kumar,
of
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
FAO No.232 of 2018
rtMr. Pankaj Samant, Advocate vice Mr. Sunil Kumar,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Shilpa Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
State of H.P. & anr. vs. Rajeev Bazwaria & Ors.
RFA No.387 of 2017
.
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
of
At the request of learned counsel for respondents
No.1 to 3, list on 11.08.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajinder Sharma vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.407 of 2018
.
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan,Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 to 3/State.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Anand Modgil vs. R.D. Nazeem
COPC No.819 of 2026
.
16.07.2026 Present: Petitioner present in person through (video
conferencing).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent.
of
Heard. Respondent is directed to supply copy of
paper book to the office of Advocate General, within a period of
rt
one week. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Lotika Chauhan vs. Rakesh Kumar & another
COPC No.821 of 2026
.
16.07.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 04.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Hima Thakur vs. Sudha Devi & another
COPC No.825 of 2026
.
16.07.2026 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1.
Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate vice Ms. Kiran
of
Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt CMP No.17362 of 2026
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the present petition, is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
COPC No.825 of 2026
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, appear
and waive service of notice on behalf of the respondents. They
pray for and are granted two weeks’ time to file reply/to file
compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 04.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
M/s Royal Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of H.P. & another
CARBC No.81 of 2026
.
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate,for the respondents.
Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate, has filed memo of
of
appearance on behalf of the respondents. He states that Power
of Attorney shall be filed during the course of the day.
rt As prayed, list after four weeks.
In the meantime, records of the learned Arbitrator, be
also called for.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Marthand Singh & another
Civil Suit No.42 of 2026
.
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
OMP No.646 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents/defendants,
of
returnable for 14.08.2026, on taking steps within a period of
three days.
rt In the meantime, respondents/defendants are
directed to maintain status quo qua nature and possession of the
suit property till the next date of hearing, subject to compliance of
OMP No.647 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/plaintiff is exempted from
filing typed English vernacular copies of documents in question.
However, learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff undertakes to
file the same as and when occasion arises.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma & Ors. vs. Bhushan Lal & Ors.
a/w connected matter.
.
RFA No. 272/2003 a/w RFA No. 276/2003
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants in
RFA No. 272/2003 and for respondent No. 5 in RFA
No. 276/2003.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shagun
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants No.2 & 3 in
of
RFA No. 272/2003 and for respondent No. 5 in RFA
No. 276/2003.
None for respondent No.1 in both the appeals.
rt
Mr. Aupam Anzranni, Advocate, for respondents No.
2(a) to 2(c) in RFA No. 272/2003 and for
respondents No. 2 & 3 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Respondent No. 3 in RFA No. 272/2003 already
ex parte.
Respondent No. 4 in RFA No. 276/2003, already
ex parte.
Learned counsel for respondents No. 2(a) to 2(c) in
RFA No. 272/2003 and for respondents No. 2 & 3 in RFA No.276
of 2003, prays for adjournment on the ground that he has
recently been engaged in this case and has to inspect the
record.
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
.
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Deep Chand Sharma vs. Roshan Lal alias Daulat Ram & Ors.
a/w connected matter
.
FAO No.230 of 2010 a/w FAO No.231 of 2010
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant(s) in both the
appeals.
Name of respondent No.1, stands already deleted.
of
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent
No.2 in both the appeals.
rt None for respondent No.3.
Though on the last date of hearing, respondent No.3,
Ramesh Chand, was present in person before Additional
Registrar(J), however, today none has appeared on his behalf.
Hence, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Since service in both the appeals are complete, list
the same for final hearing as per their turn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Raminder Pal Singh vs. Sharmila & Ors.
RFA No.20 of 2024
.
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
Mr. Raman Prashar, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list
rt
before another Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Raminder Pal Singh vs. Sharmila & Ors.
RFA No.20 of 2024
.
16.07.2026 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
Mr. Raman Prashar, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list
rt
before another Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh (deceased) through LRs vs. Hira Lal & Ors.
CMP(M) No.2259 of 2025
.
15.07.2026 Present: None for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Nikhil Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
CMP(M) No.2259 of 2025
Since none has appeared on behalf of the
rt
applicants/appellants despite repeated calls, therefore, the present
application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Dr. Vijay Prasher & Ors. vs. Amarjeet K. Sharma
CMP No.28186 of 2025 in COPC No.948 of 2024
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the
applicants/petitioners.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners, prays
for adjournment.
rtAs prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Rajan Dhir & another vs. Rohit Singh Katwal
Civil Suit No.17 of 2026
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manik Sethi,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
Civil Suit No.17 of 2026
of
Replication stands filed.
As prayed, list on 10.08.2026.
rtOMP No.237 of 2026
Rejoinder stands filed.
At the request of learned counsel for the non-
applicant/defendant, list this application for consideration on
10.08.2026 along with main suit.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
OMP No.544 of 2026
Reply stands filed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/defendant, prays for
and is granted three weeks’ time to file rejoinder.
List alongwith main suit on the date already fixed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
The CMD SJVNL & another vs. Jawahar Lal & another
CMP(M) No.1009 of 2026
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Hemant Kumar Thakur and Mr. Vidush Chauhan,
Advocates, for the applicants/appellants.
CMP(M) No.1009 of 2026
of
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondents No.1 & 2, has been received back duly served,
rt
however, there is no representation on their behalf. Hence, they
are ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 105 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.____/2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Let post admission notice be issued to respondents
No.1 & 2, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days. List thereafter.
CMP No.___ of 2026 (CMPST No.988/26)
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Heard. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants
stated that a sum of Rs.5 lacs has already been paid to
.
respondent No.1.
Therefore, execution/operation of impugned award
dated 03.11.2025, passed by the learned Land Acquisition
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Kinnaur at Rampur
of
Bushahr, District Shimla, HP in case titled Jawahar Lal vs. The
CMD, SJVNL & ors., shall remain stayed during pendency of the
rt
main appeal, subject to deposit of the remaining entire awarded
amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest within a
period of four weeks.
Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion.
The application stands disposed of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
The CMD SJVNL & another vs. Sanjay Kumar & another
CMP(M) No.1011 of 2026
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Hemant Kumar Thakur and Mr. Vidush Chauhan,
Advocates, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Archana Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
CMP(M) No.1011 of 2026
Mr. Archana Negi, Advocate, has filed memo of
rt
appearance on behalf of respondent No.1.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.2, has been received back duly served, however,
there is no representation on its behalf. Hence, it is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 38 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.____/2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Archana Negi, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent\s No.1.
Let separate notice be issued to respondent No.2,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
three days. In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondent No.1, be also filed.
.
CMP No.___ of 2026 (CMPST No.988/26)
Be registered.
Heard. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants
stated that a sum of Rs.5 lacs has already been paid to
of
respondent No.1 and this fact has been duly acknowledged by
learned counsel for respondent No.1.
rt Therefore, execution/operation of impugned award
dated 10.10.2025, passed by the learned Land Acquisition
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Kinnaur at Rampur
Bushahr, District Shimla, HP in case titled Sanjay Kumar vs.
The CMD, SJVNL & ors., shall remain stayed during pendency
of the main appeal, subject to deposit of the remaining entire
awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest
within a period of four weeks.
Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion.
The application stands disposed of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Vinod Devi & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.118 of 2025
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2/Cross-Objectors.
Respondents No.3 & 4, already ex parte.
of
CMP No.11136 of 2026
rtThe present application under Section 151 of CPC,
have been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, namely,
Vinod Devi alias Binod Kumari and Raj Kumar, for release of
awarded amount in their favour, as per their shares, as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly
supported with affidavits of both the applicants.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release
of amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
Reply to the application stands filed. However, learned
counsel for the non-applicants/appellants has opposed the
application on the ground that if the amount, as prayed, is released
in favour of the aforesaid applicants/respondents, it would be
difficult for it to recover the same in the event of appeal being
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the application has been
made.
.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of aforesaid
applicants/respondents and also in view of the fact that the appeal
may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this Court
of
finds it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of the
awarded amount of compensation in favour of
rt
applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, namely, Vinod Devi alias Binod
Kumari and Raj Kumar alongwith up-to-date interest, as per their
respective shares after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, detail whereof
has been given in Para-3 of the application.
Needless to say that the release of amount will be
subject to the final outcome of the appeal and in the event of
appeal being allowed, aforesaid applicants/respondents, will have
to refund the amount, so released in their favour, with interest.
Application stands disposed of.
F406
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
Savitri Devi vs. HPSEBL
FAO No.406 of 2011
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Anuj Bali,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellants, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:26 :::CIS
SBI & Ors. vs. Krishana Dhingra & Ors.
RFA No.369 of 2015
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Upasna Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate
General, for respondent No.4/State.
of
None for respondents No.5 & 6.
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, prays for
and is granted three weeks’ time to procure fresh Power of
Attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 as Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, has now been designated as Senior
Advocate. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Satya Dilta vs. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. & another
FAO No.417 of 2015
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sameer Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1, already ex parte.
Mr. Davinder Singh Nainta, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and another vs. Fateh Chand and another
RFA No.4 of 2018
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellants, list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary (I & PH) & Anr. vs. M/s Hill Construction & Engineering company
CARBC No.72 of 2026
.
15.07.2026 Present: Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General,
for the petitioner/State.
Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Seniior Advocate with
Ms.Ritu Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 12.08.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Bahar Murtaza Fazal Ali & Ors. vs. Rohini Wani @ Roohani
Civil Suit No.4084 of 2013
.
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik and Mr.Rajat Awasthy,
Advocate vice of Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for
plaintiff No.1(d).
Ms. K.B.Upadhya, Kalpna and Ms. Anu Tuli,
Advocates, for plaintiffs No.2 & 3.
of
Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the defendant.
rtOMP No.1630 of 2025
Arguments heard. Order reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
RGIC Ltd. vs. Jitender Kumar & Ors. a/w
connected matters.
.
FAO(MV)No.192/2016 a/w FAOs No.244/2016, 55,57
& 374 of 2018
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant(s) in all the appeals.
Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3
in FAO No.244/2016.
of
Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2
in FAOs No.55 56 & 374 of 2018.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellants(s), prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is pre-occupied in
another Court.
As prayed, list next week.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Rekha Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
FAO No.97 of 2026
.
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Aseem Chaudhary, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr.
Amit Jagga, Advocates, for the appellant.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5.
of
Caveat Petition No.249 of 2026
rtDischarged.
FAO No.97 of 2026
Learned counsel for the appellant, undertakes to
remove the objections raised by the Registry within a period of
one week. Subject to the removal of the objections by the
appellant, let notice be issued to the respondents.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, learned Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, appear and waive
service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondents
No.2 to 5, respectively.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.6,
returnable for 27.07.2026, on taking steps within a period of two
days.
CMP No.17194 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
Reply (ies), by appearing respondents, as prayed, be
filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 27.07.2026 along with main appeal.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
In the meantime, parties are directed to maintain
status quo qua nature and possession of the agricultural land
.
comprising 3 Biswas in Khasra No.287/206, Village Ogili, Tehsil
Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. till the next date of hearing.
CMP No.17195 of 2026
The application is disposed of with a direction to the
of
applicant/appellant to file certified copy of the Annexures, within
a period of four weeks.
rt
CMP No.17197 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant is exempted from
filing English translation of Hindi documents
(Annexure P-9 & P-12). However, learned counsel for the
applicant/appellant undertakes to file the same as and when
occasion arises.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s Ranger Hotel Pvt. Ltd. vs. LAC and others a/w connected
matters
.
RFA No.327 of 1997 a/w RFA Nos. 105 of 1994 and
45 of 1999
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun Garla, Advocate, for the appellant in RFA
No.327 of 1997.
Ms. Shradha Karol and Ms. Rupali Sharma, Advocates,
for the appellants in RFA No.105 of 1994.
of
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants, in RFA No.45 of 1999 and for
respondents No.1, 3 and 4 in RFA No.105 of 1994 and
rtfor respondents No.1 to 3 in RFA No.327 of 1997.
Mr. Janak Raj, Central Government Counsel, for the
respondent-Union of India.
CMP No.7735 /2026 in RFA No.327/1997
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
CMP No.17156 /2026 in RFA No.45/1999
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sanjiv Kumar & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors. a/w connected matter.
RFA No.15/2010 a/w RFAs No.16/2010 & 57/2014
.
RFAs No.15 & 16 of 2010
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 24 except respondents
of
No.5 and 10(b).
Mr. Sunil Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.5(a) to 5(c).
rt Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5,
7 to 17 and 19 to 27 in RFA No.57 of 2014.
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.25 to 45.
Respondents No.5(d) 7(b), 9(a) to 9(c) and 13(b) &
proposed LR No.10(b)(i) to 10(b)(iii), already ex
parte.
RFA No.57 of 2014
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1.
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4, 7 to 14, 16, 17, 19 21
to 27.
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for adjournment
on the ground that he has to procure the fresh Power of Attorney as Mr.
Dheeraj K. Vashist, Advocate, who was earlier representing the
appellants, is no more in the land of living.
Therefore, at his request, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
GM NR vs/ Raman Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.144 of 2017
.
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Janak Raj, Central Government Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate for respondents No.1
to 13.
Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, for proposed LR
of
No.8(a) & 8(c).
Mr. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.15/State.
rt As per report of the Registry, notice issued to proposed
LR No.8(b), has been received back duly served, however there is
no representation on his behalf. Hence, he is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Learned counsel for proposed LRs No.8(a) & 8(c), has
filed memo of appearance. He prays for and is granted two weeks’
time to file Power of Attorney. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Jagjit Singh & Usha Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.96 of 2024
.
14.07.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1, already ex parte.
Respondents No.1 to 3, are ex parte.
Respondent No.4, is stated to have expired.
of
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.5 &
6.
rtMr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.
Learned counsel for respondent No.7, states that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent has been filed
in the Registry on 13.07.2026, however the same is not on record.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order.
Now list this application for consideration after two
weeks.
In the meantime, reply(ies) on behalf of the contesting
respondents, if not already filed, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Secretary (PW) vs. Rai Singh Diwan (deceased)
through LRs & Ors.
.
RFA No. 101 of 2025
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellant/State.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c).
of
Ms. Meenakshi Sharma and Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma,
Advocates, for respondents No.3 & 4.
Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
rt
Power of Attorney(s) on behalf of respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c) and respondent No.5, be filed within two weeks.
List thereafter.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Ms. Kiran
Lata Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4, in the cause-
list, henceforth.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs. Brahm Vasudev (deceased)
through his LRs & Ors.
.
RFA No. 21 of 2024
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vanshika
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) & 2
to 6.
of
None for respondents No.7, 8(a) to 8(d), 9 & 10.
Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.11.
rt Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.12.
CMP No.14044 of 2024
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list this application for consideration on 05.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
GM, Northern Railway Vs. Balbir Singh (deceased) through
LRs & Anr. a/w connected matters
.
RFA No. 61 of 2021 a/w RFAs No. 60 & 62 of 2022
RFA No. 61 of 2021 a/w RFA No.60 of 2022
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India
with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate , for the appellant,
in both the appeals.
of
Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a)
to 1(d), in both the appeals.
rt Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No. 2/State, in both the appeals.
RFA No. 62 of 2022
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Ms. Vidhushi
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a) to 1(c)
though proceeded against ex parte.
RFA No. 61 of 2021 a/w RFA No.60 of 2022
Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, prays for
and is granted two weeks’ further time to file correct amended
memo of parties, by way of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Rohit Diwan vs. Barlazoo & Ors.
FAO No.212 of 2025
.
14.07.2026 Present: Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Ms. Shivani Tegta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt CMP No.14332 of 2025
At this stage, learned counsel for the
applicant/appellant, under instructions, seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw the present application.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
FAO No.212 of 2025
Admit. Call for the records.
List for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar Verma vs. Shashi Kala & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1340 of 2025
.
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Upasna Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Respondents No.6 & 7, already ex parte.
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ time to procure fresh Power of
Attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 as Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, has now been designated as Senior
Advocate. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Anr. vs.Santu @ Sant Ram
CMP(M) No.1349 of 2025
.
14.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the
applicants /State.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for proposed LRs No.1(b)
& 1(c).
Proposed LRs No.1(a) & 1(d) to 1(g), already ex parte.
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, states that correct
amended memo of parties, shall be filed during the course of the
rt
day today. Registry is directed to place the same on record.
List as and when the said amended memo of parties, is
available on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Anr. vs.Santu @ Sant Ram
CMP(M) No.1349 of 2025
.
14.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the
applicants /State.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for proposed LRs No.1(b)
& 1(c).
Proposed LRs No.1(a) & 1(d) to 1(g), already ex parte.
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, states that correct
amended memo of parties, shall be filed during the course of the
rt
day today. Registry is directed to place the same on record.
List as and when the said amended memo of parties, is
available on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Rahul Thakur and ors.
FAO(MVA) No.192 of 2025
.
14.07.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Oshin Anand Chawla, Advocate vice Ms.
Priyanka Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.16708 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 03.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Pushpender Thakur & another vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.445 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vidush
Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file counter to the compliance
affidavit.
rt
As prayed, list on 03.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Bhago Devi vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain and ors.
COPC No.531 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Today also, learned Additional Advocate General
of
states that an LPA has been filed, assailing the judgment under
reference, which is still pending consideration before the Hon’ble
rt
Division Bench of this Court.
Therefore, at his request, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Chanchal Thakur & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.662 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Ms.Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that an
of
SLP has been filed before the Hon’ble Apex Court assailing the
order dated 25.04.2026, passed in CWP No.3361 of 2025 under
rt
“The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment & Conditions of Service of
Government Employees, Act, 2024”, whereby the said Act, has
been quashed.
Therefore, at his request, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kuldeep Dhiman vs. Kamlesh Kumar Pant & Ors.
COPC No.666 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Gaurav Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1,2,4 & 5/State.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
compliance affidavit has been filed on 10.07.2026 in the Registry
rt
of this Court, however, the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 29.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Shivani Sharma vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.710 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 10.07.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that the consolidated budget demand for the
rt
1st installment of arrears of the total arrears, as per the Finance
Department instructions dated 07.01.2012, has been sent to the
Government vide letter dated 10.07.2026 for providing the
requisite budget. The amount shall be disbursed to the petitioner
as soon as the budget is received under the Charged Head.
Therefore, at the request of learned Additional
Advocate General, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kamal Joshi & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.711 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 10.07.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that the consolidated budget demand for the
rt
1st installment of arrears of the total arrears, as per the Finance
Department instructions dated 07.01.2012, has been sent to the
Government vide letter dated 10.07.2026 for providing the
requisite budget. The amount shall be disbursed to the petitioner
as soon as the budget is received under the Charged Head.
Therefore, at the request of learned Additional
Advocate General, list on 07.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ashi Sood vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.746 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Two weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to file
of
reply/to file compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 03.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Babli and others
FAO(MV) No.136 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.136 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt CMP No.16881 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award
amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four
weeks from today, the operation and execution of impugned
award dated 07.03.2026, passed by learned Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. in case titled as
Babli & ors. vs. Surnder Kumar & another, shall remain stayed
during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Amara Devi and
others
.
FAO(MV) No.137 of 2026
13.07.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.137 of 2026
of
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
rt
List thereafter.
CMP No.16817 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award
amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four
weeks from today, the operation and execution of impugned
award dated 07.01.2026, passed by learned Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal-1, Sirmaur, District at Nahan H.P. in case titled
as Amara Devi & ors. vs. Vipan Sharma & another, shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pooja & Ors.
.
FAO(MV) No.138 of 2026
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.138 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
for 05.08.2026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
rt CMP No.16917 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award
amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four
weeks from today, the operation and execution of impugned
award dated 10.04.2026, passed by learned Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal-1, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. in case titled as
Pooja vs. Shiv Raj & ors., shall remain stayed during the
pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Pawan Kumar vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
.
COPC No.790 of 2026
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 03.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Neelam vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
.
COPC No.792 of 2026
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 03.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s R.B. Enterprises vs. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
.
CARBC No. 73 of 2026
13.07.2026 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, for the respondent.
Issue notice. Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
rtIn the meantime, records of the learned Arbitrator,
be also called.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s R.B. Enterprises vs. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
.
CARBC No. 74 of 2026
13.07.2026 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, for the respondent.
Issue notice. Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
rt
list on 20.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Jagdish (since deceased) through LRs. vs. H.P. State Electricity Board & others
CMP(M) No.1093 of 2026
.
13.07.2026 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Nalneesh, Advocate vice Mr. Hamender Singh
of
Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
rt Issue notice. Mr. Dhananjay Sharma and Mr.
Nalneesh, Advocates, appear and waive service of notice on
behalf of the respective respondents.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.4
& 5, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Rita Guleria s. M/s Sudha Devi
COPC No.683 of 2026
.
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Y.K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 09.07.2026, wherein three weeks’
further time has been prayed to convene the meeting of DPC.
rt Therefore, at the request of learned Deputy
Advocate General, three weeks’ further time is granted to
convene the meeting of DPC.
As prayed, list on 05.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Shimla Valley Nursing College vs. Ms. Pushpa Panwar
COPC No.764 of 2026
.
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms.Tanu Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Reply stands filed.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder.
rt As prayed, list on 29.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Neelam Kumari vs. Rahul Kumar & another
COPC No.780 of 2026
.
10.07.2026 Present: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Akshay Negi vs. Ritesh Chauhan & Ors.
COPC No.787 of 2026
.
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anil K. God, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sunil Verma vs. Kiran & Ors.
CMP No.13224 of 2026 & CMP(M) No.902 of 2026
.
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Deva Nand Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
CMP No.13224 of 2026 & CMP(M) No.902 of 2026
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
of
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kushal Chand vs. Jagdish Chand a/w connected matter
FAO No.441 of 2015 a/w FAO No.384 of 2017
.
FAO No.441 of 2015
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jai Dev Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2.
of
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
FAO No.384 of 2017
rt Mr. Jai Dev Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.7617 of 2017 in FAO No.384 of 2017
Learned counsel for respondent No.2, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sangita Anand vs. Sandhya Tomar a/w connected matter
FAO No.148 of 2016 a/w FAO No.229 of 2016
.
FAO No.148 of 2016
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Verender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ganesh
Barowalia, Advocate,for respondent No.2.
rtMr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
FAO No.229 of 2016
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Verender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ganesh
Barowalia, Advocate,for respondent No.3.
At the request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 21.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sunita Devi & Ors.
FAO No.409 of 2016
.
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anil Tomar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Nalneesh, Advocate vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for respondent
No.1, list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Roshan Justa vs. State of H.P.
RFA No.313 of 2017
.
10.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Munish
Datwaila, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Anr. vs. Arun & Anr.
RFA No.281 of 2016
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. Mukesh Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Heard for some time.
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate General,
rt
list for continuation on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Jaypee Himachal Cement Project vs. Sita Ram and Ors.
RFA No.372 of 2017
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondents No.4 & 5/State.
of
CMP No.27730 of 2025
rt Two weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to file
reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Prem Singh & Ors. vs. Babu Ram & Ors.
RFA No.37 of 2020
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Manget, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh K.
Tomar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rupinder Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
None for remaining respondents.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellants, list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
GMNR Vs. Harbans Lal & Ors. A/w connected
matters
.
RFA No. 152 of 2021, RFA Nos. 192 of 2019, 250 of
2019, CO No. 25 of 2020, RFA Nos. 251 and 252 of
2019, CO No.63 of 2019, RFA Nos. 253 to 262, 377 of
2019, 1 of 2020, 155, 181, 189 of 2021,31, 69, 84, 92,
95, 104, 106 and 119 of 2022R
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant(s) in all the appeals and for non-cross objector
of
in C.O. No. 63 of 2019 in RFA No. 252 of 2019 & C.O.
No. 25 of 2020 in RFA No. 250 of 2019.
Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for private respondents
rt in RFAs No. 152 & 377 of 2019.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the private
respondents in remaining matters and for cross-objector
in C.O. Nos. 63 of 2019 and 69 of 2022.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for private respondents in remaining matters
and for cross-objector in C.O. Nos. 63 of 2019 & 25 of
2020.
Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for respondent No. 1 in
RFA No. 69/2022.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent-State.
CMP No.19971 of 2023
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Mela Ram vs. Satya Pal (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
RFA No.100 of 2003
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), already ex parte.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondents
No.2(a) to 2(d) and 3 to 5.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
list after two weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kamla Devi (deceased)through LRs & anr. vs. Arvind Kumar &
Ors.
.
RFA No.494 of 2012
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
At this stage, learned counsel for contesting
of
respondents, states that respondent No.6, has expired.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
rt
appellants, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take
consequential steps on account of death of respondent No.6.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
contesting respondents, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Savita Thakur vs. Kirpa Ram & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.135 of 2013
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1, has filed
of
memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No.1. She prays for
and is granted three weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney, by way
rt
of last opportunity.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.4. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Chander Kant vs. Jai Kishan & Ors.
FAO No.391 of 2014
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/State.
of
Proposed LRs. No.13(a),13(d) to 13(f), are already
ex parte.
CMP(M) No.1118 of 2024
rt The instant application under Order 22, Rules, 4 & 9
of CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, has been filed by the
applicant/appellant for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased respondent No.13, Satya Devi, who
has expired on 30.06.2014, after setting aside the abatement, if
any.
As per the applicant, deceased respondent, Satya
Devi has expired on 30.06.2014, leaving behind her legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
However, the delay in filing the application as occurred is neither
willful nor intentional, but due to the reasons, which were beyond
the control of the applicant, as such, the same deserves to be
condoned and since right to sue always survives in favour of the
legal representatives of deceased respondent, Satya Devi there
is no impediment in bringing on record the aforesaid legal heirs
and as such, the present application deserves to be allowed.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
behalf of the non-applicants/respondents and have no objection,
.
in case the same are allowed.
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that the
delay, as occurred, was beyond the control of the applicant and
has been sufficiently explained in the application, the same is
of
hereby condoned.
rt As right to sue still survives in favour of the legal
representatives of deceased respondent, Satya Devi, the legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-4 of the application, are
ordered to be brought on record.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.391 of 2014
Amended memo of parties,as prayed, be filed within
a period of one week.
As prayed, list on 20.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Nivedita Sood vs. Maya Kirti & Ors.
Civil Suit No.6 of 2015
.
09.07.2026 Present: Ms. Narvada, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate,
for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for defendants No.1(a) to 1(c), 2 & 5.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
of
Sood, Advocate, for defendants No.8 to 10.
OMP No.423 of 2026
rt The present application under Order 7 Rule 14 read
with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs,
for placing on record the additional documents, i.e. revenue
documents etc. reflecting the name of Sukarma Devi.
Learned counsel for the defendants, state that they
have no objection, in case, the present application is allowed and
additional documents, as prayed, may be ordered to be taken on
record, but subject to all just exceptions.
Therefore, in view of the averments made in the
application as well as in view of the no objection of the defendants,
the present application is allowed and additional documents, i.e.
revenue documents etc. reflecting the name of Sukarma Devi, are
ordered to be taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
However, the relevance and admissibility of the said documents,
shall be seen at the time of leading evidence by the
applicants/plaintiffs.
Application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Civil Suit No.6 of 2015
.
Now list the present suit on 13.07.2026 before the
Additional Registrar (J), for fixing the date of evidence of plaintiffs,
in terms of the order dated 13.05.2026.
However, it is made clear that if the plaintiffs fail to
of
produce their evidence on the date to be fixed before the Additional
Registrar (J), then the suit will be dismissed for want of prosecution
rt
and no further opportunity shall be granted to them in this respect.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sudesh Kumari vs. Suraj Thakur & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1394 of 2024
.
09.07.2026 Present: Ms. Abhidha Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Mr. Surya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, is stated to have expired.
of
Ms. Sangeeta Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Tomar,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for the appellant,
list for consideration after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Balbir Singh Kataik vs. State of H.P.
Civil Suit No.34 of 2025
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the defendant.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, states that two
of
applications, i.e. under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and under Order 6
Rule 17 CPC, have been filed on 08.07.2026 in the Registry of
rt
this Court, however, the same are not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
List as and when the aforesaid applications are
available on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Jagdish Tomar vs. Assistant Conservator of Forest & Ors.
FAO No.261 of 2025
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr Avinash Gupta, Advocate (through V.C), for
respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
of
proforma respondents No.6 to 9.
rt CMP No.9729 & CMP(M) No.663 of 2026 & CMP
No.10652/2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file replies. List
thereafter.
CMP No.23458 of 2026
As prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.120 of 2025
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2.
Ms. Shivani, Advocate vice Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
CMP No.11993 of 2026
rt Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and ex parte order dated
09.12.2025, is ordered to be set aside and respondents No.1 & 2,
are allowed to join the present proceedings.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO(MVA) No.120 of 2025
Since the present appeal stands already admitted, list
for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Usha Sharma alias Kushala & Ors. vs. Krishan Lal
Negi (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
.
CMP(M) No.2433 of 2025
09.07.2026 Present: Ms. Preeti,Advocate vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a), 1(b) & 2.
CMP(M) No.2433 of 2025
of
No reply is intended to the filed to the present
application.
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 70 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.____/2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No.1(a),
1(b) & 2.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.3 &
4, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Abhishek Sharma vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.3065 of 2025
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Parth Sagar, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
of
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kapil Sood vs. Rajinder Malhotra
Civil Suit No.9 of 2026
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Banta, Advocate,for the plaintiff.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel for the defendant, states that
of
written statement alongwith counter-claim, shall be filed during
the course of the day today.
rt Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ time to file replication to the written
statement as well as written statement to counter-claim.
As prayed, list on 06.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sunil Sanyal vs. State of H.P.
CMP(M) No.445 of 2026
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
of
list on 16.07.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Kana Singh (deceased)
through his LRs and others.
.
CMP(M) No.739 of 2026
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
respondents No.1 to 2(i), 2(iii), 3, 5 & 6, have been received back
rt
duly served, however, there is no representation on their behalf.
Hence, they are ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Respondent No.4, unserved with the report that she
has died.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted four weeks’ time to take consequential steps on
account of death of aforesaid respondent No.4. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Purshotam Dev & Anr.
CMP No.8573 of 2026 in FAO No.409 of 2018
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the non-applicants/appellants.
Mr.Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted three weeks’ further time to file reply. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
UIC Ltd. vs. Wandna Kumari & Ors.
CMP No.11990 of 2026 in FAO No.481 of 2017
.
09.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.5.
CMP No.11990 of 2026
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, prays
rt
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Jagdish & Ors.
RFA No.39 of 2025
.
09.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
CMP No.12870 of 2026
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file reply. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Ors. vs. Amrik Singh & Ors.
RFA No.17 of 2026
.
09.07.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants.
Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.13141 of 2026
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to deposit the entire amount in
rt
question by means of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 03.08.2026.
However, it is made clear that if the entire amount in
question is not deposited within the stipulated period, then the
interim order dated 10.03.2026, shall stand vacated.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
NIC vs. Shyam Devi & Ors. a/w connected matter
FAO No.156 of 2016 a/w FAO No.140 of 2017
.
FAO No.156 of 2016
08.07.2026 Present: Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate vice Mr. Pushpinder
Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
of
FAO No.140 of 2017
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
rtMr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate vice Mr. Pushpinder
Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
At the request of learned counsel for the contesting
parties, list on 22.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Nand Kishore & anr. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors.
along with connected matter
.
FAO Nos. 250 & 545 of 2016
FAO No.250 of 2016
08.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Nimish Gupta,Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
of
2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rtFAO No.545 of 2016
Mr. Nimish Gupta,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
None for proforma respondent No.4.
FAO Nos. 250 & 545 of 2016
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Pawan Vikrant vs. Neena & Ors.
FAO No.271 of 2016
.
08.07.2026 Present: Mr. C.N. Singh, Dr. Nidhi Singh, Mr. Anshul Gandhi
and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Advocates, for the
appellant.
None for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Harpeet Singh vs. C. Paulrasu & Ors.
COPC No.1503 of 2025
.
08.07.2026 Present: Ms. Chehak Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Tejinder Singh and other vs. Govinder Singh and another
RFA No.36 of 2026
.
08.07.2026 Present: Ms.Sanjivini Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for Caveator/
respondent No.1.
RFA No.36 of 2026
of
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.2, has been received back duly served, however,
rt
there is no representation on her behalf. Hence, she is ordered
to be proceeded against ex parte.
CMP No.8735 of 2026
Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder.
As prayed, list on 29.07.2026.
Interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Vikram Singh vs. Arvind Kumar Sharma & another
COPC No.511 of 2026
.
08.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to seek further instructions in the matter.
rt As prayed, list on 27.07.2026.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Advocate
General, in the cause list henceforth.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Hari Mohan & Ors.
FAO No.54 of 2026
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr.Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Ms.Richa,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arthav
Jharaik, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2 &
of
3.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.
rtRespondents No. 5 & 6, already ex parte.
FAO No.54 of 2026 & CMP No.4605 of 2026
Heard for some time.
Let record of the learned trial court, be called for.
List on 05.08.2026.
Interim to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sadhu Ram vs. Dr. Richa Verma & another
COPC No.57 of 2026
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vishan Bindra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankit Kaloti, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that rejoinder
of
has been filed on 06.07.2026 in the Registry of this Court.
However, the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace
rt
and place the same on record, if in order.
List as and when the aforesaid rejoinder is available
on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Kanta Devi & Ors.
FAO(ECA) No.94 of 2026
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 3.
of
Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate,for respondent No.5.
rt
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1, stated that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent, has been filed
a week back in the Registry of this Court, however the same is not
on record. Learned counsel is directed to follow up with the
Registry in this respect.
List this appeal for hearing on admission on
23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Vishal Karwal vs. Aditya Karwal & Ors.
Civil Suit No.26 of 2026
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Ms. Rashi Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
of
Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Civil Suit No.26 of 2026 & OMP No.338 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for defendant No.3, states that an
application for setting aside ex parte order, has been filed in the
Registry of this Court on 17.06.2026, however, the same is not
on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record, if in order.
Written statement to the present suit as well as reply
to OMP No.338 of 2026, filed on behalf of defendant No.2, are
stated to be lying under objection. Learned counsel for the
aforesaid defendant, undertakes to remove the same within a
period of three weeks.
List on 03.08.2026.
Interim order to continue.
Counter Claim No. 34/2026,OMP No.499/2026 &
OMP No.500/ 2026
Learned counsel for the non-counter-
claimant/plaintiff, prays for and is granted three weeks’ further
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
time to file written statement to Counter Claim as well as replies
to OMP No. 499 of 2026 & OMP No.500 of 2026.
.
List alongwith main suit.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s Guru Kripa vs. Shree Ram General Insurace Co. Ltd.
CMP(M) No.1055 of 2026
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within
four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Barfi Devi vs. Kaushalya Devi
FAO No.346 of 2014
.
07.07.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate,
of
for respondent No.3.
CMP No.13523 of 2026
rt
Since none has appeared on behalf of the
applicant/appellant, in the interest of justice, list after two
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Jai Gopal vs. Collector, Land Acquisition, HPSEB
RFA No.857of 2012
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
Upadhayay, Advocate, for the respondent.
While dictating the judgment, it has come to the
of
notice of this Court that sale deed Ext. PW-6/C, is not on
record. rt
Learned counsel for the respondent, states that the
said sale deed is annexed along with the Reference Petition
No. 01 of 2006, titled as Mohan Lal & Ors. vs. collector
Land Acquisition & another, decided on 31.10.2011 by the
Court of learned District Judge, Mandi, H.P.
Therefore, let the record of aforesaid Reference
Petition, be called for and list this appeal for final hearing on
10.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Gulaba (deceased) through LRs vs. Sangeeta
(deceased) through LR & Ors.
.
RFA No.02 of 2014
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants
except deceased appellant No.1(a).
None for respondent No.1(a).
Mr.Prashant Manhans, Advocate vice Mr. Shiv Pal
of
Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No. 2.
Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta,Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt
CMP No.30832 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellants, list for consideration on 24.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar & Anr. vs. Amar Singh & Ors.
.
RFA No.166 of 2014
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder
Saklani, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Appeal against respondent No.3, stands already
abated.
rtMs. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.4/State.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Surjeet Singh & another vs. Harbans Singh
FAO (MV)No. 192 of 2014
.
07.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan,Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.10647 of 2026
rt Four weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
BBMB & another vs. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.116 of 2010
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 6,
9, 11 to 13, 15 to 18, 19(a) to 19(g), 20, 22(a), 27,
28(a) to 28(c).
Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Parv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.7 and respondents
of
No.8(a), 8(f) & 8(g).
Mr.Prashant Manhans, Advocate vice Mr. Shiv Pal
rt Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.
29.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No. 30/State.
Respondents No. 8(c) to 8(e) and 22(c), already
ex parte.
CMP No.11634 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by applicants/respondents No.8(a), 8(f) & 8(g), namely,
Sampuran Singh, Sanjeev Kumar and Bimla Devi, respectively, for
release of the awarded amount, in their favour as lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money to
meet out their day to day expenses. Therefore, it is prayed that
entire awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date
interest, falling in their respective shares, be released in their
favour. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants has
placed on record communication dated 02.07.2026, wherein
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
approval of Chairman, BBMB, is hereby conveyed to implement the
judgment dated 04.12.2025, passed by this Court and to pay the
.
interest amount, i.e. Rs. 1,20,82,637/- for the period from 1974 till
the date of Notification, i.e. 07.01.2000 @ 9% per annum, as per
caluclation sheet attached therewith. He further submitted that non-
applicants/appellants have no objection in case the amount, as
of
prayed, is released in favour of the applicants/respondents as no
appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 04.12.2025
rt
passed by this Court and the same has attained finality.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavits of applicants
and also in view of the fact that the judgment passed by this Court
has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to
release the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date
interest, falling in the respective shares of applicants/respondents
No.8(a), 8(f) & 8(g), namely, Sampuran Singh, Sanjeev Kumar and
Bimla Devi, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court,
after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to
their respective bank accounts, details whereof have been given in
para-4 of the application.
The application stands disposed of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s Bikram Kochar & anr. Vs. LAC & ors. a/w connected matter
RFAs No.35 & 191 of 1998
.
RFA No.35 of 1998
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate,
for appellant No.2.
Appeal qua appellant No.1 abated.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
RFA No.191 of 1998
rtMr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate,
for the LRs of deceased respondent No.1.
Learned vice counsel for appellant No.2 as well as
LRs of deceased respondent No.1, prays for adjournment on the
ground that arguing counsel is pre-occupied in another Court.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar and another
COPC No.1436 of 2025
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record instructions dated 04.07.2026 along with Office Order
dated 03.07.2026.
rt Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner, submits that consequential benefits have not been
given to the petitioner as yet.
In view of the above, learned Additional Advocate
General, prays for and is granted six weeks’ time to seek further
instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 14.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ms Elecmech Engineers)P) Ltd. vs. The Principal Secretary
(PW) & another
.
CARBC No.65 of 2026
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma,Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Sunil Dutt Vasudeva, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Guddi & Ors.
FAO No.38 of 2016
.
06.07.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr.Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 6.
of
Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP No.13524 & 13526 of 2026
rt
The present applications under Order 32 Rule 12,
read with Section 151 of CPC, have been filed by the
applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, namely, Minakshi and
Rajani, for discharging their natural guardian i.e. her mother
Guddi (respondent No.1), as they have attained the age of
majority.
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, submitted that she doesn’t intend to file
any reply to the present applications and has no objection, in
case, the same are allowed.
Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3,
namely, Minakshi and Rajani, have now attained the age of
majority, as is evident from their Matriculation Examination
Certificates, copy whereof annexed with the applications as
well as their affidavits annexed therewith, the present
applications are allowed and their mother Guddi, respondent
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
No.1, is ordered to be discharged from their guardianship; and
they are permitted to pursue their case in their own capacity.
.
The applications stand disposed of.
CMP Nos.13525 & 13527 of 2026
At this stage, learned counsel for the
of
applicants/respondents, seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw the present application.
Accordingly, the present applications are dismissed
rt
as withdrawn.
FAO No.38 of 2016
Now list the present appeal for final hearing
alongwith FAO Nos. 53 of 2016, 72 of 2016 & FAO No. 67 of
2017 in the month of August, 2026.
In the meantime, amended memo of parties, be
also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Purnima Singh & Ors. vs. Sunita Kumari & Anr.
RFA No.84 of 2025
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood,Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list
on 28.07.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Roshan Lal & Ors.
RFA No.38 of 2009 a/w Cross Objection No.340 of 2009
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for appellants No.1 to 3/State.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
appellant No.4.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr.Sunil
of
Kumar, Advocate, for respondents N. 1 to 6, 8(a),
8(e) to 8(i), 8(n) to 8(p), 8(r) to 8(t), 8(v), 9 to 15, 17
to 21, 23 & 24.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for
respondents N. 1 to 6, 8(a), 8(e) to 8(i), 8(n) to 8(p), 8(r) to 8(t),
8(v), 9 to 15, 17 to 21, 23 & 24, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Nirmal Malakar v. La Risa Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Civil Suit No.33 of 2024
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aditi
Rana, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the defendants.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, states that an appeal
of
against the order dated 01.06.2026, passed in OMP No.1084 of
2025, shall be filed during the course of the day.
rt Therefore, at his request, list the case on 04.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kusum & Ors. vs.Krishan Chand @ Kishan Singh & another
a/w connected matter
.
RFA No.84 of 2011 a/w RFA No.85 of 2011
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants in
both the appeals except appellant No.2(a).
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondents in both the
appeals.
of
Notice issued to appellant No.2(a), Harpal Singh,
has been received back duly served, however, there is no
rt
representation on his behalf.
Since service in both the appeals are complete and
the same are already admitted, list for final hearing as per their
turn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kamla Devi (deceased) through LRs & Anr. vs. Arvind Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.494 of 2012
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Udit Shouya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
respondents, list on 09.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ram Pyari vs. Prem Lal Bhagat & Ors.
FAO No.31 of 2025
.
06.07.2026 Present: Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Anirudh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Chander Shekhar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.6.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No.7
to 9.
rtCMP No. 12751 of 2026
The present application under Order 5, Rule 20 read
with Section 151 of CPC has been filed for substituted service of
respondents No.2 & 4, namely Mamta Rahi & Pradeep Kumar.
Heard. In view of the averments, which are duly
supported with affidavit of Ram Piari (appellant), the present
application is allowed and aforesaid respondents No.2 & 4, are
ordered to be served through publication in daily newspaper ‘Amar
Ujala, Chandigarh Edition’. Process fee and publication charges
be deposited within a period of two weeks and thereafter, let the
case be listed before the additional registrar (J) on 22.07.2026, for
passing further orders for the service of aforesaid respondents,
namely, Mamta Rahi & Pradeep Kumar.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Ankit Sankhyan & Ors. a/w connected matter.
FAO(MV) No.153/2025 a/w FAO(MV) No.336/2024
.
06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant in
FAO(MV) No.153/2025 and for respondent No.2 in
FAO(MV) No.336/2024.
Mr.Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1,
2(a) to 2(d) in FAO(MV) No.153/2025 and for
respondent No.1 in FAO(MV) No.336/2024.
of
Ms. Dhanvanti Devi, Advocate, for respondent No.3
in FAO(MV) No.153/2026 and for the appellants in
rt FAO(MV) N.336/2024.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.4 in FAO(MV) No.153/2025 and for respondent
No.3 in FAO(MV) No.336/2024.
FAO(MV) No.153/2025 a/w FAO(MV) No.336/2024
Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No.(a) to
2(d), stands filed in FAO(MV) No.153/2025.
Since service in both the appeals are compete and
both the appeals are already admitted, list the same for final
hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Shashi Kant vs.Onkar Sharma & another
COPC No.387 of 2024
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 24.06.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that the respondents have been advised by the Law
rt
Department to agitate the case by filing SLP in the Hon’ble Apex
Court.
Therefore, at his request, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Richa Mishra vs. C. Paulrasu & another
COPC No.880 of 2025
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Vikrant, Advocate vice Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate,
for the applicants/proposed intervenors in CMP
No.10252 of 2026.
Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
of
ManishSharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/proposed intervenors in CMP No.10240 of
2026.
rt
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General, for the respondents.
Let record of CWP No.10122 of 2025, be called for
and list the present contempt petition for consideration after four
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Roshan Lal & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.3 of 2026
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondents No.2 to 4.
of
Three weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
rt
file reply, by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 31.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Praveen Kumar vs. Kamlesh Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.776 of 2026
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted one
week’s time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 14.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Vinay Bhushan vs. Vishal Rana & Ors.
Civil Suit No.98 of 2021
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to
3.
Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate vice Mr.Nimish Gupta,
Advocate, for defendants No.4 to 8.
of
As per report of learned Mediator, though disputes
rt
between the parties stand amicably settled, but the written terms
after implementation have yet to be again reduced into writing.
Therefore, in view of the report of learned Mediator
and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, three
weeks’ further time is granted to learned Mediator to complete
the mediation proceedings.
Parties/their respective counsel, are directed to
appear before the learned Mediator on 10.07.2026.
To await the report of learned Mediator, list the case
before this Court on 30.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Meena Sharma vs. Rajesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.748 of 2026
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
One week’s further time, as prayed, is granted to file
of
compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 08.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & another vs. Surinder Paul
RFA No.133 of 2016
.
02.07.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish Sharma
and Srishti verma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 21.07.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
July 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sahil Pagrotra vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors.
COPC No.01 of 2025
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr.Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
CMP No.29350 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner, fairly
submits that judgment under reference, stands duly complied
rt
with and, therefore, he doesn’t intend to press the present
application.
Accordingly, in view of the above, the present
application is dismissed, as not pressed and the present matter
is closed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
TATA AIG GIC Ltd. & another vs. Satya Devi & another
CMP No.805 of 2026 in FAO No.158 of 2024
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Ms. Tamanna Rana, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.805 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 of CPC,
have been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, namely
rt
Satya devi and Ramesh Chand, for release of awarded amount in
their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court. The application is duly supported with affidavits of both
the applicants.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release
of amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
Reply to the application stands filed. However, learned
counsel for the non-applicants/appellants has opposed the
application on the ground that if the amount, as prayed, is released
in favour of the aforesaid applicants/respondents, it would be
difficult for it to recover the same in the event of appeal being
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the application has been
made.
.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of aforesaid
applicants/respondents and also in view of the fact that the appeal
may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this Court
of
finds it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of the
awarded amount of compensation in favour of
rt
applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, namely Satya devi and
Ramesh Chand alongwith up-to-date interest, as per their
respective shares after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, detail whereof
has been given in Para-5 of the application, however the same
shall be subject to their furnishing security to the satisfaction of
the Registrar (Judicial).
Needless to say that the release of amount will be
subject to the final outcome of the appeal and in the event of
appeal being allowed, aforesaid applicants/respondents, will have
to refund the amount, so released in their favour, with interest.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Amitesh Sharma & Ors. vs. Sh. Sandeep Kadam Vasant &
another
.
COPC No.722 of 2025
25.06.2026 Present: Mr.Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
COPC No.722 of 2025
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
rt
sur-rejoinder to the counter affidavit, filed by the petitioners, has
been filed in the Registry on 16.06.2026, however, the same is
not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same
on record if in order.
As prayed, list on 14.07.2026, on which date, matter
shall be heard finally.
CMP Nos.14963 & 14962 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/petitioners,
prays for and is granted 10 days’ time to file reply(ies).
List along with main petition.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Anand Moudgil vs. Rajesh tomar, Chairman
State Transport Appellate Tribunal, H.P. & Ors.
.
COPC No.143 of 2026
25.06.2026 Present: Petitioner Anand Modgil present in person through
(V.C).
Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
of
respondents No.2,3 & 4.
rt As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
respondents No.6 & 7, have not been received back either
served or unserved. Therefore, let fresh notices be issued to
aforesaid respondents, returnable for 27.07.2026, on taking
steps within a period of two days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Jaypee Himachal Cement Project vs. Nandu Ram & Ors.
RFA No.371 of 2017
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Surjeet, Advocate vice Mr. Rohit Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 & 3.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
rt
appellant, list on 06.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. vs.Gauri Thakur & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.119 of 2026
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MVA) No.119 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents,
of
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period
of three days. List thereafter.
rt CMP No.14102 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today, the
operation and execution of impugned award dated 26.02.2026, passed by
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.
in case titled as Gauri Thakur & Ors. vs. Shubham & ors., shall remain
stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ashi Sood vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.746 of 2026
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
CMP No.13338 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the present petition, is hereby
condoned.
rt
Application stands disposed of.
COPC No.746 of 2026
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 13.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
UIIC Ltd. Vs. Sheela Devi & Ors.
FAO No. 75/2014
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 & 2.
Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.
of
CMP(M) Nos.982 & 983 of 2026
rt Let notice be issued to proposed LRs of deceased
respondent No.3, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps
within a period of two days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
LAC & another vs. Kalyan Singh & Ors.
RFA No.178 of 2007
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for proposed
respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
None for remaining respondents.
of
CMP(M) Nos.991 & 992 of 2026
rt
Let notice be issued to proposed LRs of deceased
respondent No.5(a)(i)(d), returnable within four weeks, on taking
steps within a period of three days.
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that an
application for deletion of name of respondent No.5(a)(i)(b), has
been filed in the Registry of this Court, however, the same is not
on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record if in order.
List as and when the said application is available on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
H.P. Housing and urban Development Authority and another
vs. Sikh Ram and others a/w connected matters
.
RFA No.53 of 2013 a/w RFA Nos.54 to 56, 4079 of
2013 and 225 of 2014
RFA No.53 of 2013
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1
of
to 5.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
rt for respondent No.6.
RFA No.54 of 2013
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.2.
RFA No.55 of 2013
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.2.
RFA No.56 of 2013 & C.O. No.33 of 2015
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants/non-
cross objector.
Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate for respondents
No.1/cross-objector.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.2.
RFA No.4079 of 2013
None for the appellants.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.3.
RFA No.225 of 2014
None for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1
of
and 2.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
rtfor respondent No.3.
RFAs No. 53, 54 & 55/2013
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No. 4 in RFA No. 53/2013 and
respondent No. 1 in RFA No. 55/2013. List thereafter,
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
GMNR Vs. Harbans Lal & Ors. A/w connected
matters
.
RFA No. 152 of 2021, RFA Nos. 192 of 2019, 250 of
2019, CO No. 25 of 2020, RFA Nos. 251 and 252 of
2019, CO No.63 of 2019, RFA Nos. 253 to 262, 377 of
2019, 1 of 2020, 155, 181, 189 of 2021,31, 69, 84, 92,
95, 104, 106 and 119 of 2022R
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant(s) in all the appeals and for non-cross objector
of
in C.O. No. 63 of 2019 in RFA No. 252 of 2019 & C.O.
No. 25 of 2020 in RFA No. 250 of 2019.
Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for private respondents
rt in RFAs No. 152 & 377 of 2019.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the private
respondents in remaining matters and for cross-objector
in C.O. Nos. 63 of 2019 and 69 of 2022.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for private respondents in remaining matters
and for cross-objector in C.O. Nos. 63 of 2019 & 25 of
2020.
Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for respondent No. 1 in
RFA No. 69/2022.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent-State.
At the request of learned Senior Panel Counsel, list all
the appeals for arguments on 09.07.2026.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney(s) on behalf of the
respondents by their respective learned counsel, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Tara Devi & Ors.
FAO No.181 of 2024
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
5.
Respondents No.6 to 9, already ex parte.
of
CMP Nos.9144, 9145,9146, 9390 & 9726 of 2026
The present applications under Section 151 of CPC,
have been filed by the applicants/respondents, namely Tara devi,
rt
Dega Nand, Shabbu, Gyani Devi and Yama Nand, for release of
awarded amount in their favour, as per their shares, as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court. The applications are duly
supported with affidavits of all the applicants.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release
of amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
Reply(ies) to the applications stand filed. However,
learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has opposed the
applications on the ground that if the amount, as prayed, is
released in favour of the aforesaid applicants/respondents, it would
be difficult for it to recover the same in the event of appeal being
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the applications has
been made.
.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of
aforesaid applicants/respondents and also in view of the fact that
the appeal may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication,
of
this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of
the awarded amount of compensation in favour of
rt
applicants/respondents namely Tara devi, Dega Nand, Shabbu,
Gyani Devi and Yama Nand alongwith up-to-date interest, as per
their respective shares after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof
have been given in Para-6 of all the applications.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, aforesaid applicants, will have to refund the amount, so
released in their favour, with interest.
Applications stand disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s Deventure Hotel and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.
Civil Suit No.23 of 2023
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr.Prashant Manhans, Advocate vice Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for defendant No.1.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
of
Advocate, for defendants No.2 & 3.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
rtMr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
defendants No. 5 & 6 /State.
Learned counsel for the parties, pray for and are
granted four weeks’ further time to explore the possibility of
amicable settlement inter se parties with respect to the application
filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Raghav Kuthiala and another vs. Sarit Bhateja and others
Civil Suit No.32 of 2024
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Banta, Advocate,for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr.Deepak Gupta,
Advocate,for defendant No.1.
of
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for defendants No.2 to
6.
rt Civil Suit No.32 of 2024
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file replication. List thereafter.
OMP No.393 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file rejoinder.
List along with main suit.
OMP No.903 of 2025
As prayed, list for consideration after four weeks
along with main suit.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Suman vs. NIC & Another a/w connected matter
FAOs No. 226 & 288 of 2025
.
FAO No.226 of 2025
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
FAO No.288 of 2025
of
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
rt Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
FAO No.226 of 2025
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.2, has not been received back either served or
unserved. Therefore, let fresh notice be issued to respondent
No.2, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of two days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Rakesh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1548 of 2025
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants/appellants.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
Mr. Surender Chauhan, Advocate, for proposed
LRs. No.3(a) to 3(c).
of
CMP(M) Nos.296 & 297 of 2026
rtThe instant applications under Order 22, Rules, 4 &
9 of CPC read with Section 151 CPC and Section 5 of the
Limitation Act, have been filed by the applicants/appellants for
bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.3, Jeet Ram, who has expired on 22.02.2023,
after setting aside the abatement, if any.
As per the applicants, deceased respondent, Jeet
Ram has expired on 22.02.2023, leaving behind his legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
However, the delay in filing the application as occurred is neither
willful nor intentional, but due to the reasons, which were beyond
the control of the applicants, as such, the same deserves to be
condoned and since right to sue always survives in favour of the
legal representatives of deceased respondent, Jeet Ram, there is
no impediment in bringing on record the aforesaid legal heirs and
as such, the present application deserves to be allowed.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
behalf of the non-applicants/respondents and have no objection,
.
in case the same are allowed.
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that the
delay, as occurred, was beyond the control of the applicants and
has been sufficiently explained in the application, the same is
of
hereby condoned.
rt As right to sue still survives in favour of the legal
representatives of deceased respondent, Jeet Ram, the legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-4 of the application, are
ordered to be brought on record.
The applications stand disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1548 of 2025
As prayed, list for consideration on 07.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Roopak Tanwar vs. Anita Verma & Ors.
FAO No. 92 of 2026
.
25.06.2026 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran,
Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
of
FAO No. 92/2026 & CMP No.12818/2026
Learned counsel for the appellant, is directed to
rt
place on record the entire copy of paper book of the civil suit
as well as miscellaneous applications.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
list the case for hearing on admission on 15.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Rikhi Ram & Ors. vs. HPPCL and another
RFA No.08 of 2024
.
25.06.2026 Present: Ms. Dhanvanti, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
Upadhayay, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.15097 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
the same is allowed and the Legal Heirs Certificate of late
rt
Rikhi Ram alongwith documents annexed therewith, are
ordered to be taken on record.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.15098 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/appellants are exempted from
filing English translation of Annexure A-4.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.308 of 2026
As prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Sarita Devi & Ors.
FAO (MVA)No. 192 of 2013
.
20.06.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh,Advocate, for respondents No.1,2
3(i) & 3(ii).
Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
UIIC vs. Prem Lata & Ors.
FAO (MV)No. 34 of 2014
.
20.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Pranshul Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
of
list on 01.07.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sheela Devi & Ors.vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors.
FAO (MVA)No. 188 of 2014
.
20.06.2026 Present: Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Shyam
Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.3.
rt At the request of learned counsel for the
appellants, list on 01.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Surjeet Singh & another vs. Harbans Singh
FAO (MV)No. 192 of 2014
.
20.06.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.10647 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the contesting respondents,
pray for and are granted two weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 07.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.398 of 2026
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.07.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kamal Singh Dhaulta vs. CBI a/w connected matters
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015 a/w Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
.
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish Sharma
and Srishti verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2015
of
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
rt Cr. Appeal Nos. 8,11 & 12 of 2015
Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bhairav
Gupta and Ms. Swati Sharma, Advocates, for the
appellants, in all the appeals.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeals No.23, 8 & 12 of 2015
Arguments on behalf of learned Central Govt. Counsel,
for the respondent/CBI concluded.
For rebuttal, to come up on 03.07.2026.
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2015
Registry is directed to prepare the paper book and copy
of the same, be supplied to learned counsel for the parties on usual
charges.
List on 03.07.2026.
Cr. Appeal No.11 of 2015
List along with Cr.Appeal No.5 of 2015 on the date fixed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Ranjeet Singh Mankotia & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.396 of 2026
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 16.06.2026, wherein it has been
stated that in compliance to this Court order dated 22.05.2026, the
rt
budget has been allocated to the concerned Principals and will be
disbursed to the petitioners shortly.
Therefore, now list the petition for consideration on
29.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector HPPWD & Anr. vs. Prakash Kaur & Ors.
RFA No.75 of 2026
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Proposed legal heirs 1(a) to 1(e) and 2(i) to 2(iii), already ex
parte.
Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
RFA No.75 of 2026
Admit.
rt Post Admission Notice.
Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No. 3 & 4.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.1(a) to 1(e)
and 2(i) to 2(iii), returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days.
CMP No.11010 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today, the
operation and execution of impugned award dated 23.03.2023, passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. in case
titled as Prakash Kaur & Ors. vs. LAC & another, shall remain stayed
during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar Sharma vs. Dr. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.752 of 2026
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted two weeks’
rt
time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 07.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
M/s Puran Chand Satya Paul Khanna vs. The Adidas India Marketing India Ltd.
Civil Suit No.4085 of 2013
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Dev Raj, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Singh
Pal, Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.428 of 2026
of
Reply stands filed.
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs/non-applicants, prays
rt
for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Raj Mohammad Khan vs. Anupama Jain & Ors. a/w
connected matters
.
Civil Suit No.106 of 2021 a/w Civil Suits No.44 & 45 of 2024.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Prem Chand Verma, Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr.
Aakash Thakur, Advocates, for the plaintiff in Civil Suit
No.106/2021 and for defendant No.2 in Civil Suit No.45
of 2024.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the plaintiff(s) in
of
Civil Suit No.44 & 45 of 2024 an for defendant No.4 in
Civil Suit No.106 of 2021.
Ms. Shradha Karol, Advocate (through VC) and Ms.
rt Suchita Kaintura, Advocates, for defendants No.1 to 3
in Civil Suit No.106/2021 and for defendants No.1(a) to
1(c) in Civil Suit No.44/2024.
OMP No.526 of 2021 in Civil Suit No.44/2024 & OMP
No.762/2021 in Civil Suit No.45 of 2024
Arguments heard. Order reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Vikram Singh vs. Arvind Kumar Sharma & another
COPC No.511 of 2026
.
19.06.2026 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Reply stands filed.
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
rt
today due to bereavement in his family.
As prayed, list on 08.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Executive Engineer & Ors. vs. Kedar Nath and another
RFA No.355 of 2015
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
Upadhayay, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Srishti Negi,
Advocate as Legal Aid Counsel, for proposed LRs of
of
deceased respondent No.2.
CMP(M) Nos.2011 & 2012 of 2025
rt Two weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to file
reply(ies). List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
LAC vs. Savitri Devi & Ors.
RFA No.242 of 2016
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr.. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellant/State.
Ms.Vandana, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)(i) to 1(a)(iv) &
1(c).
of
None for respondent No.1(b).
Respondent No.1(d), already ex parte.
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted three weeks’ further time to take consequential steps
on account of death of respondents No.1(b) & 1(c). List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
GM Northern Railway vs. Ram Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.115 of 2017
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr.Prashant Manhans, Advocate vice Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
of
for respondent No.3/State.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for and
is granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.1. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Tilli Ram vs. State of H.P. & Ors. a/w connected matter
RFAs No.361 & 362 of 2019
.
RFA No.361 of 2019
19.06.2026 Present: Mr.Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 & 2/State.
of
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
RFA No.362 of 2019
rt Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP(M) Nos.760 & 761/2026 in RFA No.361 of 2019
Learned counsel for the non-applicants, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ further time to file reply. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Keshav Dutt Shreedhar vs. Nishant Sharma
Civil Suit No.03 of 2024
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant Nishant Sharma, present in person through
Video Conferencing.
of
OMP No.507 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff, prays
rt
for and is granted one week’s time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 30.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Chhatar Singh vs. Shamsher Singh & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.198 of 2024
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Priyanka, Advocate vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Dhanwanti,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Ms.Shruti Dubey, Advocate vice Mr. Sambhav
of
Bhashin, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt CMP No.14205 of 2026
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and respondent No.1, is ordered to
be served through affixation, on his last known address, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Chatro Ram & Ors.
FAO No.361 of 2024
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Anchal Sharma and Ms. Vijayani Sharma,
Advocates, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Hakam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 3.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3, stated
rt
that Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents, has
been filed on 08.04.2026, however the same is not on record.
Learned counsel is directed to follow up with the Registry in this
respect. Thereafter, list the case before Additional Registrar(J) for
the said purpose after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd. vs. Kushaal Chand & Another
FAO(MVA) No.23 of 2025
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preeti, Advocate vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon
Vema, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.1094 of 2025
of
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/respondent No.2, prays for and is granted four weeks’
rt
further time to file reply, by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list for consideration on 02.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Monika Verma vs. Jaihri Ram & Ors.
Civil Suit No.31 of 2025
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 9.
Civil Suit No.31 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to file replication.
rt As prayed for, list on 23.07.2026.
OMP No.906 of 2025
Reply stands filed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file rejoinder.
List alongwith main suit.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Pause Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. s. Jitender Singh Thakur
Civil Suit No.56 of 2025
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the defendant.
Civil Suit No.56 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to file replication.
rt As prayed for, list on 30.07.2026.
OMP No.1620 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ further time to file rejoinder.
List alongwith main suit.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
Counter Claim No.30 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-counter-
claimant/plaintiff, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file
written statement.
List alongwith main suit.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Sarla Devi & Ors. vs. Shrawan Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.122 of 2025
.
19.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Prashar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Y.P. Sood,Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Kusum Lata,Advocate vice Ms. Seema K.
Guleria, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
rt
account of death of respondent No.2. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Shyam Singh Katoch vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors.
COPC No.31 of 2024
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
As per report of the Registry, PF along with correct
of
address of respondent No.4, has been filed.
rt Therefore, let notice be issued to respondent No.4,
returnable for 10.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Lal Chand Negi vs. Avinash Negi & anr.
COPC No.561 of 2024
.
18.06.2026 Present: Ms. Ranjana, Advocate vice Ms. Suman Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State along with Mr. Anirudh
Chauhan, Senior Mountaineering Supervisor, who is
present with record.
of
The record has been produced by the learned
rt
Additional Advocate General. However, learned vice counsel for
the petitioner, prays for adjournment on the ground that original
counsel is not available today.
As prayed, list on 14.07.2026, on which date,
respondent No.2, is directed to produce the original record
including the daily attendance register as well as attendance
marked by Incharge for bill purpose.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Start a Fresh Drug Counseling and Rehabilitation Centre vs. State of H.P.
.
FAO No.206 of 2025
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State along with Mr. Anil Verma, DEO,
H.P. SMHP, who is present with record.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
rt
after obtaining the stay order from this Court by the
appellant, the premises in question has not been inspected
by the respondent/State.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
appellant, states that he has no objection, in case, the
premises in question is inspected by the respondent/State.
Therefore, in view of the no objection made by
learned counsel for the appellant, the respondent/State is at
liberty to inspect the premises in question in accordance with
law by issuing proper notice to the appellant.
Now to await the inspection report, list on
05.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Kanishk Swaroop vs. Varun Kumar Sharma
.
COPC No.11 of 2026
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India
with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Learned DSGI, states that reply has been filed in the
Registry of this Court on 17.06.2026, however, the same is not
rt
on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record if in order.
As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, list
this petition for consideration on 08.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Joginder Singh &
Ors.
.
FAO No.59 of 2026
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Jiya Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2
of
& 3.
FAO No.59 of 2026 & CMP No.5792 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to file response to the
explanation filed by learned Presiding Judge.
As prayed, list on 22.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Devesh Kumar & Ors. vs. Harish Kumar
COPC No.79 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the petitioners/State.
Mr. Narender Guleria, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Narender Guleria, Advocate has put in appearance
of
on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted four
weeks’ time to file reply.
rt As prayed, list on 21.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Satish Kumar Mittal vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.493 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 & 2/State.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents
No.3 & 4.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that
judgment under reference has not been complied with in its letter
rt
and spirit.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4, is
directed to comply with the judgment under reference in its letter
and spirit, within a period of four weeks, failing which, aforesaid
respondents,shall remain present in person, on the next date of
hearing.
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Janak Raj Balhotra vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.509 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 & 2/State.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents
No.3 & 4.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that
judgment under reference has not been complied with in its letter
rt
and spirit.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4, is
directed to comply with the judgment under reference in its letter
and spirit, within a period of four weeks, failing which, aforesaid
respondents,shall remain present in person, on the next date of
hearing.
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Anita Vohra vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.506 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 & 2/State.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents
No.3 & 4.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that
judgment under reference has not been complied with in its letter
rt
and spirit.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4, is
directed to comply with the judgment under reference in its letter
and spirit, within a period of four weeks, failing which, aforesaid
respondents,shall remain present in person, on the next date of
hearing.
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Shiv Kumar Sharma vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.505 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 & 2/State.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents
No.3 & 4.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that
judgment under reference has not been complied with in its letter
rt
and spirit.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4, is
directed to comply with the judgment under reference in its letter
and spirit, within a period of four weeks, failing which, aforesaid
respondents,shall remain present in person, on the next date of
hearing.
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
Manju Parti vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.503 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 & 2/State.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents
No.3 & 4.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that
judgment under reference has not been complied with in its letter
rt
and spirit.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4, is
directed to comply with the judgment under reference in its letter
and spirit, within a period of four weeks, failing which, aforesaid
respondents,shall remain present in person, on the next date of
hearing.
As prayed, list on 23.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:27 :::CIS
IndusInd General Insurance Company Ltd. vs.Prem Lata &
others.
FAO(ECA) No.95 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur,Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(ECA) No.95 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
CMP No.14157 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the appellant, states that the entire
awarded amount alongwith up-to-date interest, has been deposited
before the Court of learned Commissioner below and in this respect,
receipt issued by the said Court has also been annexed.
Since the entire award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest stands deposited, the execution and operation of award dated
30.03.2026, passed by the learned Commissioner under the
Employee’s Compensation Act, Anni, District Kullu, HP. in case titled
Prem Lata & Ors. vs. Rajesh Kashyap & Ors., shall remain stayed
during the pendency of the present appeal.
The Registry is directed to get the amount transferred, so
deposited before the learned Commissioner below, to the Registry of
this Court.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sheetal Thakur &
another
.
FAO(MV) No.121 of 2026
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur,Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.121 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt CMP No.14160 of 2026
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 26.02.2026, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
in case titled Sheetal Thakur vs. Rakesh Kumar & another, shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kiran Thakur &
another
.
FAO(MV) No.122 of 2026
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur,Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.122 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt CMP No.14162 of 2026
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 28.02.2026, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
in case titled Kiran Thakur vs. Rakesh Kumar & another, shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Virender Singh &
another
.
FAO(MV) No.123 of 2026
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur,Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.123 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt CMP No.14173 of 2026
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 01.04.2026, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
in case titled Virender Singh vs. Rakesh Kumar & another, shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Suni Devi & another
FAO(MV) No.120 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur,Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MV) No.120 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
CMP No.14158 of 2026
rt Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 12.03.2026, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
in case titled Suni Devi vs. Rakesh Kumar & another, shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shimla Valley Nursing College vs. Ms. Pushpa Panwar
COPC No.764 of 2026
.
18.06.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms.Tanu Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Issue notice. Ms.Tanu Sharma, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. She
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply as well as
rt
Power of Attorney.
As prayed, list on 10.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Nishat & another vs. Vinesh Kumar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1568 of 2025
.
17.06.2026 Present: None for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate,
for respondent No.3.
Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate,for respondent
No.4.
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of the
rt
applicant/appellant despite repeated calls, in the interest of
justice, list on 18.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Vishal Karwal vs. Aditya Karwal & Ors.
Civil Suit No.26 of 2026
.
17.06.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Ms. Rashi Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
of
None for respondent No.3, though served.
Civil Suit No.26 of 2026 & OMP No.338 of 2026
rt As per report of the Registry, defendant No.3, has
been duly served, but there is no representation on her behalf.
Hence, she is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Written statement as well as reply to OMP No.338 of
2026, stands filed on behalf of defendant No.1.
Learned counsel for defendant No.2, stated that
written statement has been filed on 15.06.2026, however the
same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the
same on record if in order. She prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply to OMP No.338 of 2026.
List on 07.07.2026.
Interim order to continue.
Counter Claim No.____/2026,OMP No.499/2026 &
OMP No.500/ 2026
Be registered.
Learned counsel for the non-counter-
claimant/plaintiff, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
written statement to Counter Claim as well as replies to OMP No.
499 of 2026 & OMP No.500 of 2026.
.
List alongwith main suit.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. vs.Gauri Thakur & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.119 of 2026
.
17.06.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Since none has appeared on behalf of the appellant
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list on
of
25.06.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Babu Ram and Ors.
RFA No.158 of 2019
.
17.06.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the respondents.
As prayed, list on 21.07.2026.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
M/s Regent Energy Ltd. vs. NIAC Ltd. & Anr.
Civil Suit No.27 of 2016
.
17.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan,Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.899 of 2025
of
Arguments heard. Order reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Puneet Gupta & Anr. vs. Nirmat Verma
Civil Suit No.22 of 2024
.
17.06.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr.Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the defendant.
Replication stands filed.
of
Now list the case for admission/denial of documents
before Additional Registrar (J) on 06.07.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Jagjit Singh & Usha Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.96 of 2024
.
17.06.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1, already ex parte.
Respondents No.1 to 3, are ex parte.
Respondent No.4, is stated to have expired.
of
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.5 &
6.
rt Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.
Learned counsel for respondent No.7, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file Power of Attorney on behalf
of aforesaid respondent. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Banshi Ram & Ors. vs. Naina & Ors.
Civil Suit No.46 of 2025
.
17.06.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for defendants
No.1,2, 4 to 8.
Defendant No.3, already ex parte.
of
Civil Suit No.46 of 2025 & OMP No.1403 of 2025
Learned counsel for the contesting defendants, stated
rt
that Power of Attorney on behalf of defendants No.4 to 8, has been
filed on 18.03.2026, however the same is not on record. Learned
counsel is directed to follow up with the Registry in this respect. He
further stated that written statement(s) as well as reply(ies) to OMP
No.1403 of 2025, have been filed on 18.03.2026, but the same are
stated to be under objections. He undertakes to remove the same
within a period of two weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
TATA AIG GIC Ltd. & another vs. Satya Devi & another
CMP No.805 of 2026 in FAO No.158 of 2024
.
16.06.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants.
Ms. Tamanna Rana, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.805 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-
rt
applicants/appellants, prays for adjournment on the ground that
original counsel is not available today.
Therefore, at her request, list on 25.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Jai Chand & Ors. vs. Gaurav Dwivedi & Ors.
COPC No.523 of 2025
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh
Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Reeta Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioners, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder to the reply.
rt As prayed, list on 03.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar Sharma vs. Dr. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.752 of 2026
.
16.06.2026 Present: None for the petitioner.
Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list on 19.06.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Nand Lal vs. Neeraj Gupta
COPC No.753 of 2026
.
16.06.2026 Present: None for the petitioner.
Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list on 19.06.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. LAC & Ors. A/w connected matter
RFA No. 4029/2013 a/w RFA No. 11/2014
.
RFA No. 4029/2013
16.06.2026 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishal Bindra,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 1 to 3/State.
of
None for respondents No. 4(a)(i) to 4(a)(iii).
RFA No. 11/2014
rtMr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondents No. 14 to
17, 31(a) to 31(e) and 38(a) to 38(h).
Respondents No.1 to 29, 30(a)to 30(g) & 32 to 37, 39
to 49, already ex parte.
RFA No. 4029/2013
As per report of the Registry, respondents
No.5,6,8,9,11,13,15,17,18,19 & 20, have been served, but there is
no representation on their behalf. Hence, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellants, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
GM, Northern Railway vs. Prem Mohan & Ors.
RFA No.337 of 2014 a/w
.
Cross Objections No.66 of 2018
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 12.
of
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.13 & 14/State.
rt At the request of learned Senior Panel Counsel for the
appellant, list on 02.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
GM, Northern Railway vs. Subhash Chander & anr.
RFA No.08/2015 a/w CO. 84/2016
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
of
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned Senior Panel Counsel for the
rt
appellant, list on 02.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Kapoor Singh & Ors.
RFA No.159 of 2015
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Akshay Katoch, Advocate, for respondents No.1,
3(a) to 3(c), 4 & 5.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Jaswant Singh vs. Dalip Chand & Ors.a/w connected matter
RFA No.497 of 2015 a/wRFA No.498 of 2015 &
.
RFA No.83 of 2017
16.06.2026 Present: Mr.Avinash Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s) in
RFA Nos.497 & 498 of 2015.
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii) in
RFA No.498 of 2017.
of
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1
in RFA Nos. 497 of 2015 & 83 of 2017.
rt
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Learned vice counsel for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii)
in RFA No.498 of 2017, prays for adjournment on the ground that
arguing counsel is not available today due to bereavement in his
family.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kawaljeet Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.56 of 2016
.
16.06.2026 Present: Ms. Ruma Kaushik and Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik,
Advocates, for the appellant.
Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition (HPPWD) & Ors. vs.
Dhebe Ram & Ors.
.
RFA No.227/2017 a/w RFA No.158/2017
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants in both the appeals.
Mr.Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
respondents in both the appeals.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. vs. S.K. Vij
RFA No.6 of 2021
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Banta, Advocate,for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Banta,Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 02.07.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
M/s Swati Storewel Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Research
Development Corporation Ltd.
.
RFA No.281 of 2005
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate vice Mr.Dushyant
Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender
Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Respondents No.2 & 3(a), already ex parte.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, under
rt
instructions received from the original counsel Mr.Dushyant
Dadwal, Advocate, submits that the appellant-company has already
been amalgamated with M/s Sturdy Industries Limited and Mr.
Anurag Goel, has been appointed as the Interim Resolution
Professional of M/s Sturdy Industries Limited, who has taken over
the charge of the Company. He further submits that despite various
communications, the appellant is not responding and,therefore, this
Court may pass appropriate order in this respect.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also
gone through the record of the case.
The present appeal has been filed by M/s Swati
Storewel Pvt. Ltd. under Section 96 read with Order 21 Rule 103 of
CPC against the judgment and order passed by the Additional
District Judge (Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court), Solan, District
Solan, H.P., whereby the objections filed by the appellant, have
been dismissed.
Since, the appellant-company has already been
amalgamated with M/s Sturdy Industries Limited and there is no
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
one to pursue the present appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
.
Interim order dated 19th September, 2005, stands
vacated.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed
of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sham Lal vs. State of H.P. & others
RFA No.277 of 2013
.
16.06.2026 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Ms. Bhavya, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 8.
of
Consequential steps on account of death of respondent
No.4, not taken.
rt Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.4.
At this stage, learned counsel for respondents No.4 to
8, submits that respondent No.6, has also died.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is also
granted four weeks’ time to take consequential steps on account of
death of respondent No.6. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Anju @ Hemlata vs. Mukesh Kumar
FAO No.127 of 2015
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vijay Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
As per report of learned Mediator, mediation
of
proceedings have been adjourned for 22.06.2026.
Therefore, in view of the pendency of the present
rt
matter before learned Mediator, two months’ further time, is granted
to him to complete the mediation proceedings.
Now list the case before this Court for the report of
learned Mediator on 20.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Joginder Singh & Ors.
RFA No.69 of 2020
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 to 4.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
of
granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.1. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
M/s Infallible Pharma Pvt. Ltd. vs. Canara Bank
and others.
.
Civil Suit No.7 of 2023
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar,Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay
Dalmia,Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.407 of 2026
of
The present application under Order 7 Rule 14 of
CPC, read with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the
rt
applicant/plaintiff for placing on the record certain documents.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants/defendants. Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicants/defendants, under instructions, stated that he has no
objection, in case the present application is allowed.
Therefore, in view of the averments made in the
application, which is supported with the affidavit of Rajender Prasad
Sani and also in view of the no objection made by learned counsel
for the non-applicants/defendants, the present application is
allowed and the documents filed along with the application are
ordered to be taken on record.
Application stands disposed of.
Civil Suit No.7 of 2023
Now list the case before Additional Registrar (J) after
two weeks for fixing the date of evidence of plaintiff.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Mamta & another vs. Ashok Kumar
Civil Suit No.69 of 2024
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through video
conferencing) and Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, for
the plaintiff.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Bhan Singh, Advocate, for the defendant.
of
OMP No.915 of 2024
Heard. Interim order dated 24.10.2024, is made
rt
absolute during the pendency of the present suit, however,
subject to alteration/vacation/modification on motion.
Application stands disposed of.
Civil Suit No.69 of 2024
Now list the case for admission/denial of documents
before Additional Registrar (J) on 02.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal & Ors. vs. Rahul Aggarwal & Anr.
Civil Suit No.52 of 2025
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet
Singh Pal, Advocate, for the defendants.
Learned counsel for the defendants, submits that
of
Power of Attorney has been filed in the Registry today itself. He
prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file written
rt
statement by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 17.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.Atima Kapila & Ors.
FAO No.333 of 2024
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, is stated to have expired.
Ms.Bheeshamlata, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder Saklani,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
As per report of the Registry, fresh amended memo of
rt
parties filed by the appellant, but the same is not in order.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file amended memo of parties, in
terms of order dated 26.06.2025. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sudesh Kumari vs. Suraj Thakur & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1394 of 2024
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Abhidha Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr Azmat Hayat Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, is stated to have expired.
of
Ms. Sangeeta Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Tomar,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt Record of the learned tribunal below has been
received.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment in order to inspect the record.
Therefore, at his request, list on 09.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Bano & Ors.
FAO No.278 of 2025
.
16.06.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1,2 & 4.
Ms. Anita, Advocate vice Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for
respondent No.5.
CMP(M) No.756 of 2026
of
The present application has been filed under Order 22,
Rule 2 of CPC, for deletion of name of deceased respondent No.3-
rt
Raisa as her legal representatives are already on record as
respondents No.1,2 & 4 in the present appeal.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavit of the Pooja
Papwal, wife of Sh. Shamsher, In-charge, Legal Hub, Oriental
Insurance Company as well as the fact that LRs of deceased Raisa,
are already on record, the present application is allowed and the name
of respondent No.3- Raisa, is ordered to be deleted from the array of
the parties, subject to all just exceptions. Amended memo of parties be
filed within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.278 of 2025
As per report of the Registry, PF for the service of
respondent No.6, has been filed. Therefore, let notice be issued to
aforesaid respondent, returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Vikas & another vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.571 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,for the
respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
of
increments have been granted to the petitioners. However,
learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the arrears have
rt
still not paid.
Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate
General, prays for and is granted three weeks’ further time to pay
the arrears.
As prayed, list on 09.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kajal Mehta vs. Ms.Sudha Devi & another
COPC No.599 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh
Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
of
compliance affidavit has been filed on 12.06.2026 in the Registry
of this Court, however the same is not on record. Registry is
rt
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 29.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Santosh Kumari vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.602 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Ms. Sarita Rana, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rajput,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
of
is granted two weeks’ further time to file compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 01.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Gulab Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.607 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
of
is granted two weeks’ further time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 01.07.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Surender Sharma & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.744 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
rt
three weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 08.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sanjay Kumar vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.745 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Nikhil Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
rt
three weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 08.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Ashi Sood vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.746 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Ms. Sarita, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rajput , Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
of
petitioner, list next week.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Bhikham Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.747 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
rt
three weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 08.07.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Raman vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M) No.1024 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
rt
weeks’ time to file status report.
As prayed, list on 29.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sita Kaur & another vs. Jaspal Singh and ors.
CMPMO No.227 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms.Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2.
Caveat Petition No.179 of 2026
of
Discharged.
rt CMPMO No.227 of 2026
Issue notice.
Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.3
to 5, returnable for 09.07.2026, on taking steps within a period of
two days. List thereafter.
CMP No.11186 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
Reply, as prayed, be filed by the appearing
respondents on or before the next date of hearing.
List alongwith main petition.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar vs. Sunita Devi & another
FAO No.86 of 2024
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms.Rekha Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta,
Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Respondents No.6(a) to 6(c), already ex parte.
rt CMP No.12752 of 2026
The present application under Order 5, Rule 17 CPC
has been filed for service of respondents No.7 & 8 by way of
affixation.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also
gone through the record of the case.
Since respondent No.8, is minor, therefore, she cannot
be served through affixation.
In view of the averments made in the application, the
same is partly allowed and respondent No.7, is ordered to be
served through affixation, on her last known address, returnable for
20.07.2026, on taking steps within a period of four days.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Poornima Kumari & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.266 of 2025
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,for the
respondents/State.
Learned vice counsel for the petitioners, prays for
of
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today. rt
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Ankush Lata vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.743 of 2026
.
15.06.2026 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,for the
respondents/State.
Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner
of
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list for
consideration next week.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shankri (deceased through LRs) vs.Mela Ram & Ors.
RFA No.389 of 2006
.
15.06.2026 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms.Rachna
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1,2
and 4 to 10.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
rt
today due to bereavement in his family.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Meena Kumari vs. Bala devi & Ors.
FAO No.102 of 2013
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr.Raman Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
of
Upadhayay, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Satish Kumar vs. Anita & another
RFA No.82 of 2015
.
15.06.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. S.C. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arvind
of
Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt As prayed, list on 30.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Yoginder Chand a/w connected
matter
.
RFA No.454 of 2018 a/w RFA No.382 of 2018
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate
General, for the appellant(s)/State.
Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent in
RFA No.454 of 2018.
of
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent in
RFA No.382 of 2018.
rt Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sanjay Verma vs. Ajay Verma and another
Cr. Revision No.26 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Petitioner present in person with Mr. Manohar Lal
Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Ruchirangad Singh, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
of
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.2 /State.
rt Respondent No.1, is not present. However, learned
counsel for the petitioner, submits that a demand draft in the sum
of Rs.65,000/-, shall be deposited in the Registry of this Court
during the course of the day today.
Now, list the present revision petition for further
orders on 24.06.2026, before the appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Vishal Singh and Anr. vs. M/s Be My Guest
Tour and Travels and Ors.
.
COMS-5 of 2026
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Abhinav Mohan Goel, Advocate, for defendants
No.1 to 4.
of
COMS-5 of 2026 & OMP No.280 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the defendants No.1 to 4,
submits that the reply shall be filed during the course of the day.
As prayed, list on 17.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Vishal Singh and Anr. vs. Alok Pathania
COMS-6 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Abhinav Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the
defendant.
of
COMS-6 of 2026 & OMP No.284 of 2026
Learned counsel for the defendant, submits that the
rt
reply shall be filed during the course of the day.
As prayed, list on 17.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Deepanshu Sharma vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M )No.795 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
of
Status report stands filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
rt
granted one week’s time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 16.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Parikshit Sharma vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M )No.888 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
of
Status report stands filed.
rt Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 18.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Suresh Singh vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M )No.906 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Janmajai Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted one week’s further time to file status report.
rt As prayed, list on 18.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Trilok Kumar Mandal vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M )No.916 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
ASI Sunil Kumar, P.S. Bhawarna, District Kangra,
of
H.P. present with record.
rt Status report stands filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 18.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kulwant Singh vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M )No.919 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Thakur and Mr. Parath Sagar, Advocates
vice Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
of
Status report stands filed.
rt Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 19.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Aditya @ Golu vs. State of H.P.
CRMP(M )No.920 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr.Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
of
Status report stands filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 19.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Anuj @ Sajan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CRMPM No.936 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Chander Shekhar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshu, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.1/State.
ASI Sandeep Singh, I.O, Police Station Paonta
of
Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. present with record.
rt Status report stands filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 17.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rinku Kumar vs. State of H.P.
CRMPM No.938 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Kapil Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vijender
Katoch, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
ASI Ajay Kumar, I.O, Police Station Baijnath, District
Kangra, H.P. present with record.
rt Status report stands filed.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner, prays for and is granted one week’s time to go through
the same.
As prayed, list on 16.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar vs. Rakesh Kumar
Cr. Revision No.713 of 2025
.
05.06.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties, jointly pray for and
of
are granted four weeks’ time in order to explore the possibility of
amicable settlement inter se parties.
rt As jointly prayed, list on 09.07.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Karam Singh vs. Lal Singh
Cr. Revision No.95 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Chandresh Pal, Advocate vice Mr.Suneet Verma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner
of
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list this petition
for consideration on 17.06.2026, before the appropriate Bench.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kundan Lal Sharma vs. Bhupender Sharma
Cr. Revision No.172 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, has filed memo of
of
appearance on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney.
rt As prayed, list on 25.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kundan Lal Sharma vs. Kiran Sharma
Cr. Revision No.173 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, has filed memo of
of
appearance on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney.
rt As prayed, list on 25.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kundan Lal Sharma vs. Kiran Sharma
Cr. Revision No.174 of 2026
.
05.06.2026 Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocate, has filed memo of
of
appearance on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney.
rt As prayed, list on 25.06.2026, before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
June 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kher Sinh & Ors.
FAO No.495/2009
.
29.05.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2,3, 5(b) to 5(d).
Names of respondents No.4 & 5 (a), stand deleted.
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of the appellant,
rt
despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list on
22.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Prem Singh vs. Raj Kumar
RFA No.270 of 2013
.
29.05.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Trigun
Singh Negi, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.10695 of 2024
of
Reply stands filed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays
rt
for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Deepak & Ors.
FAO Nos. 4176 & 4020 of 2013
.
FAO No.4176 of 2013
29.05.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
rt FAO No.4020 of 2013
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No.11989 of 2026
Before any further orders are passed in the present
application, let record of the Registering and Licensing Authority,
Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., with respect to DL
No.HP3620020024049, issued in the name of Kamal Singh, son of
Shri Kartar Singh, be called for 24.06.2026.
Registry is also directed to annex the copy of Annexure
A-1, filed alongwith this application alongwith letter to RLA, Dehra
for the purpose of summoning the relevant record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Piar Chand (deceased) through LRs vs. LAC & Anr.
RFA No.248 of 2014
.
29.05.2026 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Beas Valley Power Corporation vs. Kiran Sharma
& Ors.
.
CMP(M) No.1535 of 2025
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
Upadhayay, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Suneel Awasthy, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
of
Respondents No.4 & 5, already ex parte.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder to the
reply filed by respondent No.6.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondent No.6, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shimla Jal Prabandhan Nigam Ltd. vs. Rakesh and others.
RFA No.123 of 2025
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8.
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No. 9 to 11.
of
Admit. Call for the records.
List for final hearing in due course.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Satya Nand & Ors. vs. M. Sudha & Anr.
COPC No.357 of 2026.
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 26.05.2026 and stated that in
connected matters, SLP has been filed and in the present matter
rt
also, State intends to file SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India.
Therefore at his request, list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kamal Kumar vs. Harish Gajju & Ors.
COPC No.678 of 2026.
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Narender Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.3 & 4/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Narender Thakur, Advocate and Mr.
Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate General, appear
rt
and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective
respondents. They pray for and are granted two weeks’ time to
file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 24.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rahinder Singh vs. Govind Mohan & Ors.
.
COPC No.332 of 2026
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Vishal Verma,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India
with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
Learned DSGI, has placed on record Office Order
dated 26.05.2026, wherein it has been stated that judgment
rt
under reference has duly been complied with and the case of
the petitioner has been considered.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to seek
further instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh vs. Govind Mohan & Ors.
.
COPC No.334 of 2026
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Vishal Verma,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India
with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
Compliance affidavit by the respondents, stands
filed, wherein it has been stated that judgment under reference
rt
has duly been complied with and the case of the petitioner has
been considered.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to seek
further instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Manjeet Singh Vs. LAC & Anr. a/w connected matter
.
RFA Nos. 84 & 88 of 2015
27.05.2026 Present: Mr.Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant(s) in both the appeals.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant(s), prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is pre-occupied
rt
in another Court.
As prayed, list on 29.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. Vs Anil Sharma & ors. a/w connected matter
FAO No.4088 of 2013 with FAO No.8 of 2014
.
FAO No.4088 of 2013
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Shikha Rajta and Ms. Arushi Chauhan, Advocates
of
vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.2
to 4.
FAO No.8 of 2014
rtMr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Shikha Rajta and Ms. Arushi Chauhan, Advocates
vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Heard further. List for continuation on 30.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sagar Singh & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.301 of 2014
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 6.
of
Ms. Shilpa Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
rtAt the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamla Devi
(deceased) through LRs and others
.
FAO No.358 of 2016
27.05.2026 Present: Ms. Shilpa Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1(i) and 1(ii), already ex parte.
Mr.Ajit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
of
Ms. Manisha Thamta, Advocate vice Mr. Prashant
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
rt At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kamal Singh Dhaulta vs. CBI a/w connected matters
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015 a/w Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
.
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Rajinder Thakur,
CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
of
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2015
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
rt Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Rajinder Thakur,
CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
Mr. Varun Chauhan,Advocate, for the appellants in all
the appeals.
Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Rajinder Thakur,
CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeals No.23, 8 & 12 of 2015
Learned vice counsel for the respondent-CBI, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today due to his ailment.
As prayed for, list on 03.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Mahinder Singh & another vs. Devi Ram & Ors.
RFA No.111 of 2015
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Parveen Kumar Chandel,Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 & 3.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellants,prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today.
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Bohchali Co-Op. Society Ltd. & Ors.
RFA No.64 of 2010
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate Genera, for
the appellants.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vijay
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 7 & 9 to
13.
of
Respondents No.8(a) to 8(f), already ex parte.
Appeal against respondent No.14, already stands
abated.
rt
CMP(M) Nos. 690 & 691 of 2026
At this stage, learned Additional Advocate
General, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the
present applications due to formal defect with liberty to file
afresh.
In view of the above, the present applications are
dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh within a
period of two weeks.
Applications stand disposed of.
RFA No.64 of 2010
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
M/s Regent Energy Ltd. vs. NIAC Ltd. & Anr.
Civil Suit No.27 of 2016
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.899 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the defendants , prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list on 17.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. & anr. vs. Man Singh (deceased)
through his LRs & Ors.
.
CMP(M) Nos. 2425 & 2428 of 2025 in RFA No.133 of 2004
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
non-applicants/State.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents, prays
for and is granted three weeks’ further time to place on record the
rt
Legal Heir Certificate. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Gur Avtar
RFA No.107 of 2025 a/w Cross-Objections No.4 of 2026
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants.
Ms. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent/Cross-objector.
of
Cross-Objections No.4 of 2026
Appropriate application in terms of the previous order,
rt
has not been filed.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to do the needful. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Surinder Singh vs. LAC a/w connected matters
CMP No.12288 of 2026 in RFA No.3 of 2012
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for applicant/respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.12288 of 2026
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
rt
same is allowed and applicant/respondent No.2, is permitted to
deposit the enhanced amount of compensation in the Registry of
this Court .
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC & another vs. Raj Kumar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1756 of 2025
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Fresh steps for the service of respondents No.4 & 7,
have not been taken, as yet.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to furnish correct address of
rt
aforesaid respondents No.4 & 7. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC & another vs. Himi Devi
CMP(M) No.1757 of 2025
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Fresh steps for the service of sole respondent, have
not been taken,as yet.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to furnish correct address of the
rt
sole respondent. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shyam Singh Katoch vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors.
COPC No.31 of 2024
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate vice Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
of
As per report of the Registry, respondent No.4,
unserved for want of correct address.
rt Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to furnish correct address of aforesaid
respondent.
As prayed, list on 18.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of H.P. & another vs. Suresh Kumar & Others
RFA No.30 of 2026
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
5.
of
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5.
As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
rt
respondents No.6 to 11, have been duly served, however, there
is not representation on their behalf. Hence, they are ordered to
be proceeded against ex parte.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post admission notice.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.6 to
11, returnable within six weeks, on takings steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 5, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar vs. Devesh Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.88 of 2026.
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Prem Chand Verma, Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr.
Aakash Thakur, Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
A perusal of the judgment under reference dated
01.04.2025 reveals that the case of the petitioner was
recommended for the post of Peon by the Administrative
rt
Department. The relevant portion of the aforesaid judgment/order
reads as under:-
“3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited
attention to letter dated 10.03.2025(AnnexureP-15) and submits that case of the petitioner
has not been decided as yet, even though his
case was recommended for the post of Peonby the Administrative Department.
4. In view of limited grievance of the petitioner,
this writ petition is disposed of by directing
respondent No.2/competent authority toconsider the case of the petitioner for
employment on compassionate ground in
accordance with law within a period of six
weeks from today. The order so passed be
also communicated to the petitioner.”
However, according to learned counsel for the
petitioner, despite recommendation, the petitioner has not been
considered for the post of Peon by the respondents.
Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate
General, prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to comply
with the aforesaid order in its letter and spirit, failing which,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
respondents No.1 & 2, shall remain present in person, on the next
date of hearing.
.
As prayed, list on 29.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Suneel Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar & ors.
COPC No.217 of 2026.
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Reshav Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
of
the LPA against the judgment under reference has still not been
listed.
rtTherefore, at his request, the matter is adjourned for
30.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Dr. Rahul Sharma & Anr. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.673 of 2026.
.
27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
of
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents. He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file
rt
reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 24.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Major General DVS Rana (Retd.) vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.72 of 2026.
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that a
review petition has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
rt
India on 25.05.2026.
Therefore, at his request, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Mohan Lal Chauhan vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.73 of 2026.
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that a
review petition has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
rt
India on 25.05.2026.
Therefore, at his request, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Man Singh vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.74 of 2026.
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that a
review petition has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
rt
India on 25.05.2026.
Therefore, at his request, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Pradeep Singh Chauhan vs. Sanjay Gupta & Ors.
COPC No.111 of 2026.
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that a
review petition has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
rt
India on 25.05.2026.
Therefore, at his request, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Meera Walia vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.63 of 2026.
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that a
review petition has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
rt
India on 25.05.2026.
Therefore, at his request, list on 19.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand Sharma vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.281 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
of
granted two weeks’ further time to seek instructions/to file
compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Pankaj Thakur vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.292 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, submits that
of
compliance affidavit has been filed in the Registry on
23.05.2026, however the same is not on record. Registry is
rt
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 17.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Pawan Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.294 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
of
granted two weeks’ further time to seek instructions/to file
compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Anita Dogra vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain and ors.
COPC No.321 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
of
granted two weeks’ further time to seek instructions/to file
compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Chanchal Thakur and Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.662 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Manorma Devi and Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.671 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Ritu Goel and Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.667 of 2026
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Gopal Krishan & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors.
RFA No.232 of 2014
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General , for
the respondents No. 1 to 3/State.
Mr. Abhinav Mehta, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today due to her ailment.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Subhadra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.474 of 2015
.
26.05.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Suneel Awasthy, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
Respondent No.5, already ex parte.
Learned counsel for respondent No.4, prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today.
As prayed, list on 24.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Thakur Singh & Ors. vs. Bhanu Pratap Chowfla & Ors.
.
RFA No. 360 of 2012
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish Gupta,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today.
As prayed, list on 29.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sant Ram Thakur & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
RFA No. 226 of 2014
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Harshit
of
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3(a), 3(b),
4(a) & 4(b).
rt Heard further. List for continuation on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Hans Raj & Ors. vs. Ram Gopal & Ors. a/w connected matter
RFA Nos. 203 & 204 of 2015
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants in
both the appeals.
Mr. Vipin Pandit,Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
14.
Names of respondents No.15,17 to 21, 23 & 50 in both
of
the appeals, stand deleted.
Mr.Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for respondent No.52.
rtLearned counsel for the appellants, stated at Bar that
respondent No.33, Rakhu and respondent No.36, Guddi Devi,
have died. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take
consequential steps on account of death of aforesaid
respondents. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamal Kishore and ors.
FAO No.214 of 2015
.
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Gunjan Sharma, Advocate vice Ms.Shilpa Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Varun Rana, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. H.C. Sharma,Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5.
of
Name of respondent No.6, stands deleted.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file fresh memo of parties.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Hoslama
and ors. a/w connected matter.
.
FAO(MVA) No.247 of 2015 a/w CMP(M) No.917 of 2015
FAO(MVA) No.247 of 2015
26.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 4.
of
Mr. Arthav Jharaik, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Nemo for respondent No.6.
rtCMP(M) No.917 of 2015
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.5
& 6.
Nemo for respondents No.1 to 4.
CMP(M) No.917 of 2015
Steps for the service of respondent No.7 by
substituted means, have not been taken.
Learned counsel for the applicant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to do the needful.
As prayed, list on 18.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Jyoti Devi & Ors. vs. HRTC & Anr.
CMP No.10643 of 2026 in FAO No.419 of 2010
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Anuj Bali,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Abhijeet Singh vice Mr.Raman Jamalta,
Advocate, for the non-applicants/respondents.
Learned vice counsel for the non-
of
applicants/respondents, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time
to seek instructions in the matter.
rt As prayed, list on 02.06.2026.
Registry is also directed to reflect the name of Mr.
Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents, in the cause-list,
henceforth.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Bhunger Ram Bhatia vs. Jagdish & Ors.
RFA No.4030 of 2013
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1,2,3(a), 4,5 & 6, already ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
of
list on 18.06.2026.
In the meantime, Registry is directed to make a
report “as to whether all the respondents are served or not?”
rt
Registry is also directed not to reflect the name ofMr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, on behalf of the respondents in
the cause-list, henceforth.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Hari Mohan & Ors.
FAO No.54 of 2026
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr.Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Ms.Richa,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arthav
Jharaik, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2 &
of
3.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.
rt Respondent No.6, already ex parte.
FAO No.54 of 2026
As per report of the Registry, respondent No.5, has
been duly served, however, there is no representation on her
behalf. Hence, she is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
List after four weeks.
CMP No.4605 of 2026
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ further time to file reply. List thereafter.
Interim to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Harpeet Singh vs. C. Paulrasu & Ors.
COPC No.1503 of 2025
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Reply(ies) on behalf of contesting parties, are stated
to have been filed today in the Registry. Registry is directed to
rt
place the same on record, if in order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sunita Devi & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.149/2014
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Mamta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 4.
Respondent No.5(a), already ex parte.
of
None for respondent No.6.
As prayed, list on 25.06.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Liaq Ram Dogra vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.395 of 2017
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
list after four weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Kesri Devi & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.293 of 2016
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General
with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Hira Gaha & Ors.
FAO No.435 of 2016
.
25.05.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondents
No.1 & 2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents
No.3 & 4, despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be proceeded
rt
against ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel for respondents
No.1 & 2, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Neelam Kumari and others vs. Ishwar Dev and others
FAO No.473 of 2016
.
25.05.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Umesh
Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Tamanna Rana, Advocate vice Mr. P.P.
Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2.
Respondent No.3, already ex parte.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
rt
today due to bereavement in his family.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
National Insurance Company vs. Nomi Devi and others
CMP Nos.10458 & 10459 of 2026 in FAO No.139 of 2013
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.10458 of 2026
The present application under Order 32 Rule 12, read
with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the applicant/respondent
rt
No. 5, Sushma, for discharging her natural guardian i.e. her mother
Nomi Devi, as she has attained the age of majority.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicant/respondent No. 5, Sushma, has
now attained the age of majority, as is evident from her Matriculation
Examination Certificate, copy whereof annexed with the application as
well as her affidavit annexed therewith, the present application is
allowed and her mother Nomi Devi, respondent No.1, is ordered to be
discharged from her guardianship; and she is permitted to pursue her
case in her own capacity.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.10459 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed by the applicant/respondent No.5, Sushma, for release of
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, in her favour, as per her
share, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
stated that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He
.
further stated that since the present appeal has been decided by this
Court vide judgment dated 20.07.2018 and no further appeal or
challenge has ever been preferred against the said judgment, the
same has attained finality, he has no objection in case the prayer
of
made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
rt
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 20.07.2018,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicant Sushma, as per her share, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to her saving bank account,
detail whereof has been mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
State of HP & ors. Vs. Ranjeet Singh & ors. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.345 of 2009 & RFA No.343 of 2009
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants-State in both the appeals.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate (through VC), for
respondents No.1 to 3 and LRs of deceased
respondents No.4 to 7 and 9 in RFA No.345 of 2009
of
and for respondents No.1 and 3 in RFA No.343 of
2009.
Mr. Shivom Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Anirudh
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) to 2(d) in
rtRFA No.343 of 2009.
Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for respondents
8(a) to 8(d). in RFA No.345 of 2009.
CMP No.16112 of 2025 in RFA No.345 of 2009
Learned counsel for respondents No.8(a) to 8(d)
stated at the bar that a demand draft of Rs.50,000/- shall be
deposited in the Registry of this Court during the course of the
day today. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time
to pay/deposit remaining amount.
As prayed, list on 03.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and Ors. vs. Sunita and Ors.
RFA No.298 of 2019
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for
respondents No.1,2, 3(i) to 3(iv) and 4 to 7.
Ms. Pritiksha Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
of
No.3(v), 5(a), 5(d),6(a) to 6(e) & 6(g).
As per report of the Registry, an application for
rt
bringing on record the LRs of deceased respondent No.6(f), is
lying under objection.
Learned Additional Advocate General, undertakes to
remove the same within a period of one week. He also prays for
and is granted one week’s further time to take appropriate steps
for representation of minor respondents No.5(b) & 5(c).
As prayed, list on 03.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Virendra Pal Singh & another vs. Ezra James Shaw &
another
.
Civil Suit No.83 of 2022
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Sushant Vir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for defendant
No.1.
Defendant No.2, already ex parte.
of
Learned counsel for defendant No.1, prays for and is
rt
granted three days’ further time to file written statement to the
amended plaint, by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Anjna Thakur vs. Ashutosh Kaushal & another
Civil Suit No.90 of 2022
.
22.05.2026 Present: Dr. Amit K. Vaid, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms.Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashista, Advocate, for defendants No.1 & 2.
None for defendant No.3.
of
OMP Nos.508 & 509 of 2024
Learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, submits
rt
that rejoinder in OMP No.508 of 2024, has been filed today itself
in the Registry. Registry is directed to place the same on record,
if in order. He further submits that he doesn’t intend to file any
rejoinder in OMP No.509 of 2024.
As prayed, now list both the applications for
consideration on 02.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. Rakesh Kanwa & Ors.
COPC No.444 of 2026
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
On persuasive request made by learned Additional
Advocate General, one week’s further time is granted to file
rt
detailed reply, failing which, respondent No.1, shall remain
present in person, on the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 01.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shankar (deceased) through Lrs.vs. LAC & Ors.
.
RFA No.126 of 2015
22.05.2026 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
rt Since none has appeared on behalf of the
appellants, despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list
after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Jai Singh vs. Ajay Kumar & Ors.
FAO (MVA) No.313 of 2024
.
22.05.2026 Present: Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
CMP No.11881 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and Mr. Anhishek Nagta and Mr. Kunal Mehta,
Advocate, who are representing respondent No.1, are permitted to
withdraw their Power of Attorneys.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO (MVA) No.313 of 2024 & CMP No.19686 of 2024
Now, let court notice be issued to respondent No.1,
returnable for 24.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Urmila Sharma & Anr. vs. Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.
FAO No.203 of 2025
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Reeta Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) Nos. 802 & 803 of 2026
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply(ies). List
thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Lt. vs. Byasa Devi & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.210 of 2025
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tarun Garla, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate, for respondents
No.4(i) to 4(vi).
of
CMPs No.8843 & 8838 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted three weeks’ further time to file reply(ies).
As prayed, list on 08.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Tara Devi vs.Sanjay Pathania (deceased) through LRs. &Anr.
CMP(M) No.1475 of 2025
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c).
Mr. Pawan Gautam,Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents, pray for and are
granted two weeks’ further time to file replies as well as Power of
rt
Attorneys, by way of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Minu Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.2280 of 2025
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, submits
of
that an application for discharging the guardianship of
respondent No.2, has been filed in the Registry on 20.05.2026,
however the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace
rt
and place the same on record, if in order.
As per report of the Registry, steps for the service of
respondent No.3, have been taken.
Now, let notice be issued to respondent No.3,
returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Rawal Variety Construction Ltd. & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kumar
RFA No.17 of 2023 a/w C.O. No.12 of 2023
.
RFA No.17 of 2023
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
None for respondent No.2.
C.O. No.12 of 2023
rtMr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the cross-objector.
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
None for respondent No.4.
CMP No.6108 of 2026 in RFA No.17 of 2023
At the request of learned counsel for respondent
No.1/ cross-objector, list for consideration on 01.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Pr. Secy.(PWD) & Ors. vs. Jai Gopal & Ors.
CMPs No.9327 to 9335 & 8937 to 9349 of 2026 in RFA No.307 of 2012
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the non-applicants/appellants.
Ms. Kalpana Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Anubhuti
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
of
Learned vice counsel for the
applicants/respondents, prays for adjournment.
rt As prayed, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Anu Bala vs. Bimla Devi & Ors.
FAO No.284 of 2024
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
As prayed, list on 29.06.2026.
rt In the meantime records of the learned Appellate
Court, be also called for.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Brig Brijesh Virmani (Retd.) vs. Suryavir Singh
RFA No.120/2025
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Gunjan Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Atrul Jhingan,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No. 30996 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the non-
applicants/respondents, prays for adjournment on the ground that
rt
arguing counsel is pre-occupied in another Court.
As prayed, list for consideration on 30.06.2026.
In the meantime record of the learned trial court be
also called for.
Interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Jasveer Singh & Ors. vs. Inderjeet Singh & anr.
RFA No.14 of 2026
.
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivom
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
RFA No. 14 of 2026
Admit. Call for the records.
rtPost Admission Notice.
Mr. Shivom Sharma, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of the respondents.
CMP No.3922 of 2026
Reply to the application stands filed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also
gone through the record of the case.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the present
case, the execution of judgment and decree passed by learned
Additional District Judge, Paonta Sahib for specific performance of
agreement dated 06.07.2022, is stayed during the pendency of the
present appeal. Further, all the appellants are also restrained from
alienating, creating any kind of charge, mortgage, gift etc. over the
suit land during the pendency of present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Sneh Love Care Rehabilitation & Welfare Society
vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
FAO No.14 of 2026
22.05.2026 Present: Mr. Bhisham Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is in the
hospital.
rt
Therefore, at his request, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Sona Kumar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.280 of 2026
.
21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Rakesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
CMP(M) No.280 of 2026
Reply to the application stands filed, wherein, averments
rt
made in the application are totally denied and it is stated that if the
same is allowed, it would cause serious prejudice to the respondents.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of Er. Rattan
Kumar Sharma, Superintending Engineer, NH Circle, HPPWD Shimla,
the same is allowed and delay of 27 days in filing the present appeal
is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Rakesh K. Thakur, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of the respondents.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 19.03.2025,
passed by learned Additional District Judge, Nalagarh, District
.
Solan, H.P. in case titled as Sona Kumar & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors.,
shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
HPSEB & Ors. vs. Murat Singh (deceased)
through LRs.
.
CMP No. 3038 of 2026 in RFA No.8 of 2017
21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Digvinay Singh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr.
Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr.Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
As per report of the Registry, an application filed for
rt
bringing on record the LRs of deceased respondent No.1, is lying
under objection. Learned counsel for the applicant, undertakes to
remove the same within a period of one week.
List as and when the aforesaid application is taken on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd vs. Ram Dayal &
Ors.
.
CMP No.10466 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.187 of 2024
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Varun Panwar and Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocates,
for the applicant/respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Respondent No.3 (a), already ex parte.
rt Appeal against respondents No.3(b) to 3(d), stands
already dismissed.
CMP No.10466 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 1, Ram Dayal, for
release of award amount of compensation, as per his share, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, he is suffering from 27%
permanent physical disability, due to which, he is in dire need of
money and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this
Court, which may take some time for its disposal, his prayer for
release of the awarded amount of compensation, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court may be accepted and the amount, as
prayed for, may be ordered to be released in his favour.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company has opposed the prayer made in the application on the
ground that in the event of appeal being allowed, it would be difficult
for the non-applicant/Insurance Company to recover the amount.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
.
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release Rs. 3
lacs out of the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court alongwith up-to-date interest, in favour of
applicant/respondent No. 1, Ram Dayal, after proper verification
of
and identification by remitting the same to his saving bank account,
detail whereof has been given in Para-9 of the application.
rt However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, applicant/respondent No. 1, Ram Dayal, will have to refund
the amount, so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
LAC vs. Nand Lal
CMP No.11594 of 2026 in RFA No.231 of 2014
.
21.05.2025 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Paresh Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/respondent.
of
CMP No.11594 of 2026
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file reply/to seek instructions in the
matter.
As prayed, list on 04.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
GM Northern Railway vs. Bihari Lal (deceased) through his
LRs
.
CMP No.11662 of 2026 in RFA No. of 2010
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel for the
non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Surya Bhan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.11662 of 2026
rt The present application has been filed under Order
1, Rule 10, CPC read with Section 151 CPC for deletion of name
of respondent No.16- Kamlesh Devi as her legal representatives
are already on record.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, namely, Arun Kumar as well as the fact that LRs of
deceased Kamlesh Devi, are already on record, the present
application is allowed and the name of respondent No.18-
Kamlesh Devi, is ordered to be deleted from the array of the
parties, subject to all just exceptions. Amended memo of parties
annexed with the application, is ordered to be taken on record.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
BBMB & another vs. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.116 of 2010
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to
6, 9, 11 to 13, 15 to 18, 19(a) to 19(g), 20, 22(a), 27,
28(a) to 28(c).
Mr. Parv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.7 and
of
respondents No.8(a), 8(f) & 8(g).
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel for
rt respondent No. 29.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No. 30/State.
Respondents No. 8(c) to 8(e) and 22(c), already
ex parte.
CMP No.11634 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply/to seek
instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 17.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Satpal & another vs. Niranjan Singh
COPC No.607 of 2025
.
21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he
of
intends to move an appropriate application for converting the
present contempt petition to the application under Order 39 Rule
rt
2-A CPC and prays for time to do the needful.
As prayed, list on 04.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar Sharma and Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.93 of 2026
.
21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 02.05.2026, wherein it has been
stated that an LPA has been filed against the judgment under
rt
reference, which is pending adjudication before learned Division
Bench of this Court.
Therefore, at his request, list on 03.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Dev Kala vs. Ashish Singhmar
COPC No.248 of 2026
.
21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
petitioner has to file the Income Certificate before the competent
authority.
rt
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner, submits that Income Certificate, shall be filed before
the competent authority within a period of two weeks.
As prayed, list on 23.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Shyam Lal vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.386 of 2026
.
21.05.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 20th May, 2026 along with Office
Order dated 20th April, 2026, wherein, it has been stated that the
rt
representation of the petitioner has been decided by the Deputy
Director of School Education, Sirmour and he has been
transferred from Govt. Centre Primary School Sarsoo, Education
Block Narag to Govt. Centre Primary School, Thana Kasoga,
Education Block, Nahan against vacancy.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner, submits that at present, petitioner is posted at a place
which is 80 K.M. away from his native place, whereas, by means
of this representation, he has been transferred to a place, which
is 60 K.M.away from his native place. He further submits that at
this stage, he may be granted liberty to move a fresh
representation before the Competent Authority to transfer the
petitioner at some nearby place.
Therefore, in view of the above, prayer made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed and liberty is granted
to him to move a fresh representation before the competent
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
authority within a period of two days and the said representation
shall be decided by the competent authority within a period of
.
two weeks thereafter.
Now, list this petition on 22.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
May 21, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
Amar Nath (deceased) through his LRs vs. State of H.P. a/w
connected matters.
.
RFA No.79 of 2010 a/w RFA Nos.80 to 82 and 120
to 123 of 2010.
RFA Nos. 79 to 82 of 2010
20.05.2026 Present: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant(s) in all appeals.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State in all appeals.
rt Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondent No.4 in all appeals.
RFA Nos. 120 to 123 of 2010
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
appellants No.1 to 3/State in all appeals.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Mr. Bhupender Singh
Kanwar and Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocates, for the
respective respondents in all appeals.
RFA No.79 of 2010 & RFA Nos.80 to 82 and 121
to 123 of 2010.
Heard further. For continuation, list on 04.06.2026.
RFA Nos. 120 of 2010
Registry is directed to make a report “as to whether
all the LRs of deceased respondent No.7, Shadi Ram, have
been served or not and and all of them are being represented by
their counsel?”. Thereafter, list this case before this Court on
04.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:28 :::CIS
HP HUDA & anr. vs. Deepak & anr. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.235 of 2014 a/w RFA No.234 of 2014
20.05.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the appellants in both
appeals.
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate for the respondents
in both appeals.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents, prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel,Mr. Sanjeev
Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, is not available today due to ailment
of his mother.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Krishan Lal
RFA No.413 of 2014
.
20.05.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Arun Kumar,Advocate vice Mr. D.P. Chauhan,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Madhu & Ors.
FAO No.36 of 2015
.
20.05.2026 Present: Mr.Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 3.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 26.05.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Shyam Chauhan &
Ors.
.
FAO No.440 of 2015
19.05.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr.Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Navishek Kashyap, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
None for remaining respondents.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for
respondent No.1, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Reena Devi & Ors.
.
FAO(MVA) No.348 of 2025
19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr.Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Sharma,
of
Advocate for respondents No.5(a) to 5(e).
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.5(a) to 5(e),
states that Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents
has been filed, but the same is not on record. Learned counsel is
directed to follow up with the Registry in this respect.
Let notice be issued to respondent No.4, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Yashwant vs. Devesh Kumar and Ors.
COPC No.370 of 2025
.
19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
of
respondent No.1, Devesh Kumar, is not the Principal Secretary
(Forest) to the Government of H.P. and he has been wrongly
rt
impleaded as party.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file correct
memo of parties.
As prayed, list on 03.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
M/s Swati Storewel Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Research
Development Corporation Ltd.
.
RFA No.281 of 2005
19.05.2026 Present: Mr.Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender
Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3(a), already ex parte.
of
Mr. Aryan Manta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Navneet
Gupta, Resolution Professional.
rtAt the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Shamsher Singh (decesed) through his Rs & Ors.
vs. Ram Murti & Ors.
.
RFA No.152 of 2010
19.05.2026 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms.Rachna
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No.1 & 2.
Respondents No.4 & 6 to 9, already ex parte.
of
CMPs No.3482 & 3483 of 2026
rt None has appeared on behalf of the applicants despite
repeated calls. On the last date of hearing also, none had appeared
on their behalf. Hence, both the applications are dismissed for
want of prosecution.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Subhadra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.474 of 2015
.
19.05.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Suneel Awasthy, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Mr. Ravinder Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
of
Respondent No.5, already ex parte.
rtHeard in part. For continuation, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Karam Chand & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.171 of 2016
.
19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Arun Kaushal,Advocate vice Mr. Arsh Rattan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Respondent No.3, already ex parte.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate,for respondents No.4 & 5.
rt Mr.Deepak Bhasin,Senior Advocate with
Mr.Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Learned vice counsel for respondent No.2, prays for
adjournment on the ground that today his file has misplaced.
Therefore, at his request, list on 25.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Suresh Chand vs. Amar Nath
RFA No. 362 of 2012
.
19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Navishek Kashyap, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
respondent, list on 17.06.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Vipin Kumar vs. Managing Director HRTC & Ors.
FAO No.4244 of 2013
.
19.05.2026 Present: Mr.Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raman Jamalta,Advocate,for respondents No.1
& 2.
None for respondent No.3.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Joginder Singh & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Another
RFA No.267 of 2016
.
19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for
of
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today. rt
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors. vs. Jagtar Singh a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.40/2017 a/w RFAs No.41 to 48/2017.
19.05.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State in all the appeals.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur,Advocate, for the
respondent(s) in all the appeals.
of
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate General,
list on 02.06.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Surinder Pal Singh vs. Puspa & Ors.
RFA No. 346 of 2005
.
19.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Mr. Abhinav Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.9.
Respondents No.7(b)(i) & 7(c)(i), already ex parte.
of
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment.
rt As prayed for, list for final hearing after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pinki & Ors.
.
FAO(EC) No.84 of 2026
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1 to 4, already ex parte.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondents
No.5(a) to 5(c).
of
FAO(EC) No.84 of 2026
rt
Admitted on the following substantial questions of
law:-
“a)Whether finding of learned Commissioner
Chamba,District Chamba, H.P. is sustainable onthe issue of employee-employer relationship
between the deceased Vicky @ Vikas Kumar and
Vivek Dutta/owner/ respondent No.2?
b) Whether finding of learned Commissioner
Chamba, H.P. is sustainable regarding the alleged
accident took place out of and during the course
of employment in the absence of framing thespecific issue?
c) Whether the finding of learned Commissioner
Chamba, H.P., is sustainable on the issue of
fastening the liability on the appellant company
despite of giving the finding that the deceased
was under the influence of liquor and his blood
sample detected 272.51 mg% alcohol?
d) Whether the finding of learned Commissioner
Chamba, H.P., is sustainable on the issue of
fastening the liability on the appellant company on
the quantum/monthly income of the deceased in
the light of reply of owner/respondent No.2?
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
e) Whether the findings of learned Commissioner on
the issue of applying the factor at the age of 32
instead of admitted age of 33 is sustainable?”.
.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate, appears and
waives service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents
of
No.5(a) to 5(c).
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.1 to
rt
4, returnable with six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, record of the learned
Commissioner below, be called for.
CMP No._____of 2026
Be registered.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, stated
that entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-date interest has
been deposited before the Court of learned Commissioner below.
Therefore,the execution of the impugned award dated
26.04.2023, passed by learned learned Commissioner under
Employees Compensation Act, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. in
case titled Pinki & others vs. Shri Ram General Insurance
Company Ltd. & anr., shall remain stayed during the pendency
of the present appeal.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
The Registry is directed to get the amount
transferred, so deposited before the learned Court below, to the
.
Registry of this Court.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar and another
COPC No.1436 of 2025
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 14.05.2026, wherein, it has been
mentioned that SLP filed by the Department has been dismissed on
rt
08.05.2026. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid communication, he
prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Rajender Kumar vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & another
COPC No.1549 of 2025
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, prays for and
is granted three weeks’ further time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sukhdev & Ors. vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & another
COPC No.392 of 2025
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners,
of
list after eight weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Vijay Kumr & another
CMP No.10865 of 2026 in RFA No.59 of 2025
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the applicants/appellants.
Respondents are already ex parte.
CMP No.10865 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the applicants/appellants are permitted to
rt
deposit the amount in question, within a period of four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Jai Dei & Ors.
CMP No.10873 of 2026 in RFA No.65 of 2025
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Rishab Negi, Advocate vice Mr.Aman Parth
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
CMP No.10873 of 2026
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the applicants/appellants are permitted to
rt
deposit the amount in question, within a period of four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Jagit Singh & Usha Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.96 of 2024
.
15.05.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1, already ex parte.
Respondents No.1 to 3, are ex parte.
Respondent No.4, is stated to have expired.
of
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.5 &
6.
rt Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.
Pleadings are complete.
Now, list the application for consideration on
17.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Om Nath & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.346 of 2025
.
15.05.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1, already ex parte.
Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
of
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, states that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents has been
filed on 10.04.2026, however the same is not on record. Registry is
rt
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate, appears and waives service of
post admission notice on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3.
Let separate notice be issued to respondent No.1,
returnable with six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three
days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. Rakesh Kanwa & Ors.
COPC No.444 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anubhuti
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted one week’s further time to file reply/compliance affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Karan Singh vs. Nipun Jindal & another
COPC No.569 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Issue notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He
has placed on record instructions dated 15.01.2026, wherein, it has
been stated as under:-
rt”After considering th factual matrix in this case
along with relevant rules and judicial precedence, it
can be concluded that the case of the petitioner
fulfills all requisite criteria for grant of pensioneryad other retiral benefits. The Finance and Pension
branch of the Corporation is directed to do the
needful in terms of release of such benefits to thepetitioner at the earliest.”
In view of the aforesaid instructions placed on record,
learned counsel for the respondents, prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to release all admissible benefits to the petitioner.
As prayed, list on 04.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Shyam Lal vs. Nipun Jindal & anotherCOPC No.570 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Uday Singh, Advocate vice Mr. V.S. Kanwar,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Issue notice. Mr. Uday Singh, Advocate, appears and
of
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He has
placed on record instructions dated (nil), wherein, it has been
rt
stated that the retiral benefits, i.e. Gratuity and leave encashment,
have been released to the petitioner. He prays for and is granted
two weeks’ further time for the payment of interest.
As prayed, list on 04.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Vikas & another vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.571 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Aafreen Kaushal, Advocate vice Ms. Anuja Mehta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 15.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Rajinder Singh & Anr.
CMP(M) No.708 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
CMP No.10383 of 2026 & CMP(M) No.708 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Kana Singh (deceased)
through his LRs. and ors.
.
CMP(M) No.739 of 2026
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Leela Dhar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.715 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Abhishek Kaistha, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Mr. Abhishek Kaistha, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna
Kuthiala, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the
respondents. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file
rt
Power of Attorney as well as reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Leela Dhar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.714 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Abhishek Kaistha, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Mr. Abhishek Kaistha, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna
Kuthiala, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the
respondents. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file
rt
Power of Attorney as well as reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Gita Ram & Anr.
CMP(M) No.713 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Mehar Chand & Anr.
CMP(M) No.712 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Gokal
CMP(M) No.711 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Tula Ram
CMP(M) No.710 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Hushan Lal
CMP(M) No.709 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Nardev Dev & Ors.
RFA No.68 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
RFA No.68 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rtCMP No.10381 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 25.10.2025,
passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sundernagar, District
Mandi, H.P in case titled Nardev & others vs. State of H.P. &
Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present
appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Molak
CMP(M) No.746 of 2026
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Brij Lal vs. LAC & Ors. a/w connected matters
RFA No.421 of 2015 a/w RFA Nos. 424 to 440 of
.
2012, 131 and 132 of 2016
RFA Nos. 421 of 2015, 131 and 132 of 2016
15.05.2026 Present: Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
of
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Mohinder Verma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt RFA Nos. 424 to 440 of 2012,
Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Mohinder Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, prays for and is granted
three weeks’ further time to move an appropriate application in
terms of the order dated 21.04.2026. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Charanjit Singh & Ors. vs. LAC & anr. a/w connected matter.
RFA Nos.348 to 350 of 2014
.
15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Abhijeet Singh vice Mr.Raman Jamalta,
Advocate, for the appellant(s) in all the appeals.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant(s), states
of
that appellant Charanjit Singh in RFA No.348 of 2014 has
died. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take
rt
consequential steps on account of death of aforesaid
appellant. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 15, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
D.N. Lakhanpal vs. Chief Secretary & Ors.
Civil Suit No.58 of 2023
.
14.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for defendants No.1 to 3.
Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for defendants No. 4 to 6.
of
OMPs No.294 & 295 of 2025
rt Arguments heard. Order reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Monika Verma vs. Jaihri Ram & Ors.
Civil Suit No.31 of 2025
.
14.05.2026 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 9.
Civil Suit No.31 of 2025
of
As per report of learned Mediator, mediation has
failed. rt
Learned vice counsel for the plaintiff, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file replication.
As prayed, list on 19.06.2026.
OMP No.906 of 2025
Learned counsel for non-applicants/defendants
No.1 to 9, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file
reply.
List this application along with main suit.
In the meantime, Interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
GM Northern Railway vs. Kishori Lal & Ors.
CMPs No.24182 & 23255 of 2025 in RFA No.491 of 2012
.
14.05.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate,for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMPs No.24182 & 23255 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents,
rt
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder(s).
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Devesh Kumar & Ors. vs. Harish Kumar
COPC No.79 of 2026
.
14.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the petitioners.
Notice issued to the sole respondent, has been
received back duly served, however, none has appeared on his
of
behalf.
Therefore, let respondent be summoned through
rt
bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety
in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
arresting/executing officer, returnable for 18.06.2026 on
taking steps within a period of two days.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 14, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Neelam Kumari vs. Kamaljeet Kaur & Ors.
CMP(M) No.371 of 2024
.
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal,Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 3.
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
of
Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rt At the request of learned counsel for the
applicant/appellant, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sunita Devi & Ors. vs. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.543 of 2026
.
13.05.2026 Present: Ms. Shivani, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
of
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted
rt
two weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 02.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority vs. Shakuntla
Devi (deceased) through her LRs. & ors.
.
RFA No.363 of 2012
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c).
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
of
No.3(a) to 3(c), 4,7,8(a) to 8(e).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
rt for respondent No.9/State.
CMP No. 10523 of 2026
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
contesting respondents.
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and the name of respondent
No.6, Hardeep Kaur, is ordered to be deleted from the array of
the parties subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.363 of 2012
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file amended memo of parties. List
thereafter.
CMP No. 10543 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/appellant, is exempted from
filing English translation of vernacular documents. However,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
learned counsel for the applicant/appellant undertakes to file the
same as and when occasion arises.
.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority & another vs.
Pritam Singh @ Pritem & Ors. a/w connected matters
.
RFA No.4092 of 2013 a/w RFA Nos.4090, 4091 of 2013, 219 of
2014 & 263 of 2015
RFA No.4092 of 2013
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.Aditya Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/State.
rt RFA No. 4091 of 2013
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.Aditya Thakur, for respondent No.1, 2 and 4.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.5/State.
RFA No. 4092 of 2013
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.Aditya Thakur, for respondent No.1, 2 and 3(a).
None for respondent No. 3(b).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/ State.
RFA No. 219 of 2014
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
and 2.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.3/State.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
RFA No. 263 of 2015
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.
.
Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.3/State.
of
CMP No. 10565 of 2026 RFA No.4092 of 2013
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
rt
contesting respondents.
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and the name of
respondent No.3(a) Prito Devi, is ordered to be deleted
from the array of the parties subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.4092 of 2013
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file amended memo of parties.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Ankush Dass Sood vs. Arvind Sood and others
Civil Suit No.18 of 2021
.
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocates, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
None for proforma defendants No.4 to 7, 10 & 12.
of
Proforma defendants No.8,9 & 11 are ex parte.
rt OMP No. 957 of 2024
As prayed for, list for consideration on 01.06.2026.
Civil Suit No.18 of 2021
Learned counsel for defendant No.2, states that written
statement has been filed on behalf of aforesaid defendant after
removal of the objections only on 12.05.2026. Registry is directed
to place the same on record, if in order.
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs, states that though
replication to the written statement on behalf of defendant No.2,
was filed, but the same was returned by the Registry with some
objections. He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to refile the
same.
As prayed, list on 01.06.2026.
Counter Claim No.78 of 2024
Learned counsel for the plaintiff/non-counter-
claimant, states that written statement has been filed on
21.04.2026, but the same was returned by the Registry with some
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
objections. He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to refile the
same.
.
As prayed, list on 01.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Boehringer Ing. Pharma & another vs. Forgo Pharmaceutical
Civil Suit No.31 of 2021
.
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Manoj Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
of
A perusal of the plaint reveals that the same has
been filed under Ordinary Original (Commercial) Jurisdiction.
rt Therefore, list the present case before the
appropriate Bench after obtaining necessary approval from
Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Rawal Variety Construction Ltd. & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kumar
RFA No.17 of 2023 a/w C.O. No.12 of 2023
.
RFA No.17 of 2023
13.05.2026 Present: Ms. Monika Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh K.
Vashishta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
C.O. No.12 of 2023
rtMr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the cross-objector.
Ms. Monika Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh K.
Vashishta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
CMP No.6108 of 2026 in RFA No.17 of 2023
As per report of the Registry, an amount of
Rs.8,26,000/- has been deposited on behalf of the appellants.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1/ cross-
objector, prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing
counsel is not available today.
As prayed, list for consideration on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Aditya Tuli vs. Neeraj Tuli & Ors.
Civil Suit No.23 of 2024
.
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. R.S. Chandel,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for defendant No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rupali,
Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Banta,Advocate, for
defendants No.2 & 3.
of
OMP No.176 of 2026
rt At this stage, learned counsel for the
applicants/defendants No.2 & 3, seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw the present application with liberty reserved to take all
the objections as made in the application, in the written
statement.
In view of the aforesaid, the present application is
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
OMP No.396 of 2024
As prayed for, list the application for consideration on
02.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sewa Singh & Ors. vs. Gurdev Kaur & Ors.
RFA No.36 of 2024
.
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No.1, 2(i) to 2(vi), 3(i) to 3(iii), 4
& 5.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.6(i)
to 6(vi), 6(viii) & 6(x).
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.7/State.
rt Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.3(i). List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Tara Devi & Ors.
FAO No.181 of 2024
.
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 5.
Respondents No.6 to 9, already ex parte.
of
CMP No.9389 of 2026
The present application under Order 32, Rule 12
rt
read with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the
applicant/respondent No. 3, Shabbu, for discharging her natural
guardian i.e. his mother Tara Devi as she has attained the age of
majority.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicant/respondent No. 3, Shabbu,
has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from her Birth
Certificate, copy whereof annexed with the application (Annexure
A-1) as well as her affidavit annexed therewith, the present
application is allowed and her mother Tara Devi, respondent No.1,
is ordered to be discharged from her guardianship; and she is
permitted to pursue her case in her own capacity.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
CMP Nos.9144, 9145,9146, 9390 & 9726 of 2026
.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file replies.
As prayed, list on 02.06.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs. Brahm Vasudev (deceased)
through his LRs & Ors.
.
RFA No. 21 of 2024
13.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) & 2
to 6.
None for respondents No.7, 8(a) to 8(d), 9 & 10.
of
Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.11.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
rt respondent No.12.
CMP No.14044 of 2024
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is pre-
occupied in another Court.
As prayed, list on 29.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Soma Devi & Ors.
FAO No.497 of 2015
.
11.05.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants.
Mr. G.R.Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
Heard in part. List for continuation on 14.05.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
May 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Poonam Devi vs. Surjeet Singh
FAO No.85 of 2013
.
11.05.2026 Present: Mr. Verender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ganesh
Barowalia, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
CMP Nos.10872 & 11703 of 2025
rt Learned counsel for non-applicant/respondent No.1,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Ram Chand vs. Mahinder Singh & Ors. along
with connected matter.
.
FAO No.209 of 2025 a/w CMP(M) No.1749 of 2025
FAO No.209 of 2025
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rtCMP(M) No.1749 of 2025
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
FAO No.209 of 2025
Learned counsel for respondent No.2,states that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent, has been
filed in the Registry today. Let the same be placed on record.
Admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-
“a) Whether in view of admitted position that
respondent No.2, was the principal employer,
appellant could be imposed penalty under Section
4-A of the Act, jointly and severally with respondent
No.2?
b) Whether in the absence of any proof that appellant
had the knowledge of accident, could he be
imposed penalty under Section 4-A of the Act?
c) Whether the impugned order is bad in law, as the
petition was not maintainable for want of::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
impleadment of M/s Balaji O & M Services Private
Limited, to which the work was subletted by the
employer on the spot?”.
.
Call for the records.
List for final hearing in due course.
CMP No.18790 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, stated
of
that entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-date interest has
been deposited. Therefore, Interim order dated 08.08.2025, is
rt
made absolute during the pendency of the present appeal,
however, subject to alteration/vacation/modification on motion.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1749 of 2025
Learned counsel for respondent No.3, states that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent, has been
filed in the Registry today. Let the same be placed on record.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
contesting non-applicants/respondents and have no objection, in
case, the present application is allowed.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 96 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO(MVA) No.____/2026
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-
“1. Whether the learned Commissioner below has erred
.
in directing the appellant to pay the compensation in
the absence of privity of contract between the
appellant and respondent No.3?
2. Whether the labour supplier i.e. respondent No.2,
can be considered as employer of the
respondent/petitioner that too when salary/wagesof
were being paid by respondent No.3 and as such in
the absence of employee and employer relationship
between the respondent/petitioner and respondent
rt No.2, the appellant being insurer can be directed to
pay compensation?
3. Whether appellant being insurer is liable to pay
compensation on the basis of Rs.8000/- when the
premium has been charged @ Rs.5,500/- wages of
the unskilled worker?
4. Whether the maximum cap of Rs.8,000/- as
provided under the Notification No.S.O. 1258 (E)dated 31.05.2010, issued by Central Government to
be treated as base amount for the grant ofcompensation?
5. Whether the appellant is liable to pay interest on the
compensation amount for the lapse of
respondent/petitioner that too when he has not led
evidence for about 8 years?
6. Whether the learned Commissioner below has
misinterpreted and mis-construed the evidence led
by the parties and the law applicable to the facts of
the case?”
List for final hearing in due course along with FAO
No.209 of 2025.
CMP No._______/2026
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Since the applicant/Insurance Company has already
deposited the awarded amount, as is evident from the receipt of
.
deposit, appended with the appeal, before the learned Court
below, therefore, the operation and execution of impugned
award/order dated 26.03.2025, passed by learned Commissioner
under Workmen’s Compensation Act, Lahaul and Spiti at Kullu,
of
District Kullu, H.P., in case titled as Mohinder Singh vs. Ram
Chand & Ors., shall remain stayed during pendency of the main
rt
appeal.
Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion.
The Registry is directed to get the amount
transferred, so deposited before the learned Court below, to the
Registry of this Court.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & ors. Vs. Paramjeet Singh & ors.
CMP No.8362 of 2026 in RFA No.100 of 2016
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for applicant/
respondent No.6.
Mr. Ankush Chauhan, Manager, HDFC Bank, Branch
of
the Mall Shimla, present in person alongwith Mr.
Digvijay Singh, Advocate.
rt Pursuant to the directions passed by this Court, the
Branch Manager, HDFC, Bank, Shimla, has tendered apology.
The amount in question, has also been released in favour of the
claimant. The apology is accepted with the direction to the
Manager to remain careful in future.
Since the amount stands released in favour of the
claimant, no further order is required to be passed in the present
application and the matter is closed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
State of HP & ors. Vs. Ranjeet Singh & ors. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.345 of 2009 & RFA No.343 of 2009
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants-State in both the appeals.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3 and LRs of deceased respondents No.4 to 7 and
9 in RFA No.345 of 2009 and for respondents No.1
of
and 3 in RFA No.343 of 2009.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.2(a) to 2(d) in RFA No.343 of 2009.
rtMr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for respondents
8(a) to 8(d). in RFA No.345 of 2009.
CMP No.16112 of 2025 in RFA No.345 of 2009
Learned counsel for respondents No.8(a) to 8(d)
stated at the bar that remaining amount could not be paid as the
daughter of Pawan Kumar is admitted at IGMC, Shimla.
Therefore, at his request, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Usha Devi
& Ors. Along with connected matters.
.
FAO No.270 of 2015 along with FAO Nos. 424 of
2014 and 100 of 2015.
FAO No. 270 of 2015.
08.05.2026 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
of
to 4.
Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
rt Ms. Abhidhi Bhardwaj,Advocate vice Mr. Sambhav
Bhasin, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
FAO No. 424 of 2014.
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Ms. Abhidhi Bhardwaj,Advocate vice Mr. Sambhav
Bhasin, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.7(i),
though already proceeded ex parte.
Name of respondents No.8(i) & 8(ii), stand already
deleted vide order dated 24.06.2025.
FAO No. 100 of 2015
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for appellant No.1.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for appellant No.2.
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Abhidhi Bhardwaj,Advocate vice Mr. Sambhav
Bhasin, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5 (i).
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent
.
No.6.
Name of respondent No.7, stands already deleted.
CMP(M) No.672 of 2026 in FAO No.270 of 2015
Learned counsel for respondent No.5(i), prays for
of
and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.
rt As prayed, list on 03.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Prabha Sarin & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors. a/w
connected matter.
.
RFA No.269 of 2018 a/w RFA No.270 of 2018
RFA No.269 of 2018
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
of
for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Yug Singhal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt RFA No.270 of 2018
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellant/State.
Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, respondents No.1 to 3, 5, 6 & 8.
Mr. Yug Singhal, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
CMP(M) No.674 & 675 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the legal representatives of
deceased appellant No.4, returnable within four weeks, on taking
steps within a period of two days. List thereafter.
RFA No.269 of 2018
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of appellant No.6 as well as respondent No.3
and also for the service of respondents No.4 to 6. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
GM, Northern Railway Vs. Balbir Singh (deceased) through
LRs & Anr. a/w connected matters
.
RFA No. 61 of 2021 a/w RFAs No. 60 & 62 of 2022
RFA No. 61 of 2021 a/w RFA No.60 of 2022
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.
of
1(a) to 1(d), in both the appeals.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
rt for respondent No. 2/State, in both the appeals.
RFA No. 62 of 2022
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Ms. Vidhushi
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1(a) to 1(c)
though proceeded against ex parte.
RFA No. 61 of 2021 and RFAs No. 60 & 62 of 2022
Amended memo has been filed, however the same
is not in order.
Learned Senior Panel counsel, for the appellant(s),
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file correct
amended memo of parties. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma & Ors. vs. Bhushan Lal & Ors.
a/w connected matter.
.
RFA No. 272/2003 a/w RFA No. 276/2003
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants in RFA No.
272/2003 and for respondent No. 5 in RFA No.
276/2003.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shagun
of
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants in RFA No.
276/2003 and for respondents No. 2(a) to 2(c) in
RFA No. 272/2003.
rt Mr. Amrit, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate,
for respondent No. 1 in both appeals.
Respondent No. 3 in RFA No. 272/2003 already
ex parte.
Respondent No. 4 in RFA No. 276/2003, already
ex parte.
Sh. Shyam Morari Sharma, appellant No.2 in RFA
N.276/2003, who was present on the last date of hearing, is not
present today. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the matter is
adjournment for 29.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Raj Kumar & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.1523 of 2025
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
of
is granted four weeks’ further time to pay the arrears to the
petitioners.
rt As prayed, list on 05.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Surinder Singh vs. Neelam & Ors.
FAO No.273 of 2024
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jai Ram
Sharma and Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocates, for the
appellant.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3, already ex parte.
of
Arguments heard for some time.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case and in
rt
order to explore the possibility of amicable settlement inter se
parties, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the
Tehsildar (Urban), Chamba is appointed as Local Commissioner in
the present case to carry out the final partition in terms of the
preliminary decree passed by the Court of the then learned Senior
Sub Judge, Chamba, dated 3rd September, 1996.
The parties/their counsel, are directed to appear before
the Tehsildar, Chamba on 21.05.2026 at 10 A.M.
The Tehsildar shall submit his report before this Court
on or before 12.08.2026 and he is at liberty to take assistance of
any authority for the aforesaid purpose. The parties are also
directed to cooperate with the Tehsildar for the said purpose.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the Tehsildar,
Chamba (Urban), immediately.
List this case before this Court on 20.08.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Aditya Tuli vs. Neeraj Tuli & Ors.
Civil Suit No.23 of 2024
.
08.05.2026 Present: Ms. Sarita, Advocate vice Mr. R.S.
Chandel,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rupali,
Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Banta,Advocate, for
of
defendants No.2 & 3.
OMP No.176 of 2026
rt Learned counsel for the applicants/defendants No.2
& 3, states that rejoinder has been filed in the Registry on
05.05.2026, however, the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed by learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/plaintiff, list for consideration on 13.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Shehnaz Akhter & Ors. vs. Vinesh Kumar & Ors.
FAO No.197 of 2025
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Asbhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondents No.1 to 3, already ex parte.
Mr. Surajal Kumar Advocate vice Mr. Naresh K.
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
Dr. Rajesh K. Parmar, Advocate, for respondents
No.5 & 6.
rt Steps for the service of respondents No.1 to 3, have
not been taken as yet.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted one week’s further time to do the needful.
As prayed, list on 20.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Sumitra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.321 of 2025
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ravi Patial, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Anamik, Advocate vice Mr.Rajesh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 6.
of
CMP No.4696 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
rt
states that reply has been filed in the Registry on 07.05.2026,
however, the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace
and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Rajan Dhir & another vs. Rohit Singh Katwal
Civil Suit No.17 of 2026
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manik Sethi,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
of
Civil Suit No.17 of 2026 & OMP No.237 of 2026
Learned counsel for the defendant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file written statement to the present suit
rt
as well as reply to OMP No.237 of 2026.
As prayed, list on 26.05.2026.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Rubia @ Rubina and
another
.
CMP(M) No.46 of 2026
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Shabnam, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
CMP(M) No.46 of 2026
rt No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
contesting non-applicant/respondent and has no objection, in case,
the present application is allowed.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 32 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO(MVA) No.____/2025/FAOST No.62179/2025
Be registered.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post admission notice.
Ms. Shabnam,, Advocate, appears and accepts notice
on behalf of respondent No.1.
Let separate notice be issued to respondent No.2,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of one
week. List thereafter.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
CMP No.____/2025/CMPST No.62189/2025
Heard.
.
Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith
up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today, the
execution of award dated 09.07.2025, passed by the Court of
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P.
of
in case titled as Rubia vs. Rakesh Kumar & another, shall remain
stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
rt Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Santi Devi(deceased) her LRs & Ors.
CMP No.448 of 2026 in RFA No.488 of 2015
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the non-applicants /State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to ascertain the status of SLP filed
before the Hon’ble Apex Court. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Hem Raj vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.588 of 2026
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for
of
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today. rt
As prayed, list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sukh Dev vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.587 of 2026
.
08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for
of
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today. rt
As prayed, list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Gopal & others
CMP No.9129 of 2026 in FAO No.4021 of 2013
.
08.05.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak
Gupta,Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
Ms. Navishek Kashyap, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Mr. Surila Sangam,Advocate vice Mr. Inder Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.5.
CMP No.9129 of 2026
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
which is duly supported with an affidavit of Pooja Tapwal,
Divisional Manager, O/o near ISBT Building, Tutikandi,Shimla,
H.P., the same is allowed and excess amount deposited by the
applicant/Insurance Company, in the Registry of this Court
alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be refunded to it after
proper verification and identification by remitting the same to its
bank account, detail whereof has been given in Para-2 of the
application.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Suresh Chand &
Ors.
.
FAO (MVA) No.336 of 2025
07.05.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Ms. Priyanka Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Dhiraj
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 6.
of
FAO (MVA) No.336 of 2025
rt Admit.
CMP No.10091 of 2026
Learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file supplementary
affidavit. List thereafter.
CMP No.10096 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 3, Sunila Devi, for
release of award amount of compensation, as per her share, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, she is in dire need of money and
as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court, which
may take some time for its disposal, her prayer for release of the
awarded amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court may be accepted and the amount, as prayed
for, may be ordered to be released in her favour.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company has opposed the prayer made in the application on the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
ground that in the event of appeal being allowed, it would be difficult
for the non-applicant/Insurance Company to recover the amount.
.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30%
of the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
of
alongwith up-to-date interest, in favour of applicant/respondent No.
3, Sunila Devi, strictly as per her share, after proper verification and
rt
identification by remitting the same to her saving bank account,
detail whereof has been given in Para-5 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, applicant/respondent No. 3, will have to refund the amount,
so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.10099 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 4, Shakila, for
release of award amount of compensation, as per her share, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, she is in dire need of money and
as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court, which
may take some time for its disposal, her prayer for release of the
awarded amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court may be accepted and the amount, as prayed
for, may be ordered to be released in her favour.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company has opposed the prayer made in the application on the
.
ground that in the event of appeal being allowed, it would be difficult
for the non-applicant/Insurance Company to recover the amount.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
of
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30%
of the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
rt
alongwith up-to-date interest, in favour of applicant/respondent No.
4, Shakila, strictly as per her share, after proper verification and
identification by remitting the same to her saving bank account,
detail whereof has been given in Para-5 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, applicant/respondent No. 4, will have to refund the amount,
so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.10127 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 2, Ramesh Chand,
for release of award amount of compensation, as per his share, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, he is suffering from arthritis due
to which, he is in dire need of money and as the main appeal is
pending adjudication before this Court, which may take some time
for its disposal, his prayer for release of the awarded amount of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court may
be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be ordered to be
.
released in his favour.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company has opposed the prayer made in the application on the
ground that in the event of appeal being allowed, it would be difficult
of
for the non-applicant/Insurance Company to recover the amount.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
rt
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30%
of the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
alongwith up-to-date interest, in favour of applicant/respondent No.
2, Ramesh Chand, strictly as per his share, after proper verification
and identification by remitting the same to his saving bank account,
detail whereof has been given in Para-5 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, applicant/respondent No. 2, will have to refund the amount,
so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors. vs. Madan Lal & another
CMP No.7722 of 2026 in RFA No.52 of 2028
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.7722 of 2026
of
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, namely, Madan
rt
Lal and Nisha Ram, for release of award amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in their favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicants.
Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that he
doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He further
stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
28.11.2025 by this Court and an SLP filed against the aforesaid
judgment stands dismissed, the same has attained finality, he has
no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
applicants, namely, Madan Lal and Nisha Ram, as per their
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the
same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof have been
.
mentioned in Para-5 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
of
May 07, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors. vs. Balbir Singh
CMP No.7720 of 2026 in RFA No.91 of 2018
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.7720 of 2026
of
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicant/respondent Balbir Singh, for release of
rt
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in his favour, as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly
supported with the affidavit of the applicant.
Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that he
doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He further
stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
28.11.2025 by this Court and an SLP filed against the aforesaid
judgment stands dismissed, the same has attained finality, he has
no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
applicant, Balbir Singh, after proper verification and identification,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
by remitting the same to his saving bank account, detail whereof
has been mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Minakshi Devi vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
CMP No.7141 of 2026 in COPC No.1365 of 2025
.
07.05.2026 Present: Ms. Sarita, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rajput,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
CMP No.7141 of 2026
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
rt
record office order dated 24.02.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that in compliance of orders dated 17.12.2025 &
18.12.2025, passed by this Court and as per Govt. letter dated
30.12.2025, in COPC No.1391/2025, titled as Parmanand vs.
State of H.P. and COPC No.1365/2025, titled as Minakshi Devi
vs. State of H.P., the petitioner is allowed higher pay scale of
Rs.41600/- after two years of regular service subject to final
outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder
Singh and any other legal remedies.
Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is
required to be passed in the present application and the same is
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sant Ram Thakur & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
RFA No. 226 of 2014
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pranjal
of
Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate,
for respondents No.3(a), 3(b), 4(a) & 4(b).
rt Heard in part. List for continuation on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Manjeet Singh Vs. LAC & Anr. a/w connected matter
.
RFA Nos. 84 & 88 of 2015
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate,
for the appellant(s) in both the appeals.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Heard in part. List for continuation on 28.05.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Babu Ram vs. the Land Acquisition Collector
.
RFA No.318 of 2015
07.05.2026 Present: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
of
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
None for respondents No. 3 & 4.
rt At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Amisha vs. Dr. Abhishek Jai & Ors.
COPC No.559 of 2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No. 1 & 3/State.
Mr.Abhey Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Pawnish
Kumar Shukla, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
rt
Additional Advocate General and Mr.Abhey Kaushal, Advocate,
appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective
respondents. They pray for and are granted one week’s time to
file reply(ies).
As prayed, list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Prittma Devi and another vs. Pradeep Kumar and
others alongwith connected matter
.
FAO Nos. 287 & 288 of 2024
FAO No. 287 of 2024
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya and Mr. Tarun Mehta, Advocates, for
the appellants.
Respondent No.1, already ex parte.
of
Mr. B.R. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 & 4.
FAO No. 288 of 2024
rt Mr. Ajay Sipahiya and Mr. Tarun Mehta, Advocates, for
the appellants.
Mr. B.R. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
list both the appeals for final hearing at the stage of admission on
24.06.2025.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Jai Chand & Ors. vs. Gaurav Dwivedi & Ors.
COPC No.523 of 2025
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Reeta Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr.
Shashi Shirshoo, Central Government Standing
Counsel, for the respondents.
of
Counter to the supplementary affidavit, is stated to
have been re-filed on 06.05.2026, however, the same is not on
rt
record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record, if in order.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file rejoinder to the reply.
As prayed, list on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
OICL vs. Partap Chand and Ors.
FAO No.02/2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mukul Chaudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3
of
& 4.
rt Admit. Call for the records.
List for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Roshan Lal & Ors.
RFA No.65 of 2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
RFA No.65 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt CMP No.9912 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 28.03.2026,
passed by learned Additional District Judge-1, Una, District Una,
H.P in case titled Roshan Lal & Ors. vs. Land Acquisition
Collector, H.P. & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of
the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Prem Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.66 of 2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Nalneesh, Advocate vice Mr. Hamender Singh
of
Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
rt Let notice be issued to respondent No.4, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Neelam Minhas vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.456 of 2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
of
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted
rt
two weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 25.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Caspian Pharmaceuticals vs. Amardeep Singh Bhatia & Ors.
COPC No.459 of 2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Ms. Tejaswini Yadav, Advocate (through V.C) along
with Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of
India with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.2 & 3/State.
rt Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Let notice be issued to respondent No.5, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
Learned DSGI, prays for and is granted six weeks’
time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 22.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Lakesh Chandel vs. Ashish Kohli
COPC No.460 of 2026
.
07.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
of
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted
rt
two weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 25.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Durga Ram (deceased) through LRs. & Ors. vs.
The Principal Secretary (Power) and others.
.
CMP No.9656 of 2026 in RFA No.1 of 2023
06.05.2026 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Applicants/respondents No.23 and 28, namely Shri
Ram Swaroop and Shri Vijay Kumar, are present in
person.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 & 3/State.
rt Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for non-
applicants/respondent No.2 & 4/HPPCL.
CMP No.9656 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by applicants/respondents No.23 and 28, namely, Ram
Swaroop and Vijay Kumar, respectively, for release of the awarded
amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicants, they require money for discharging
their liabilities as they had taken various loans from their relatives.
Therefore, it is prayed that entire awarded amount of compensation
alongwith up-to-date interest, falling in their respective shares, be
released in their favour. The application is duly supported with the
affidavits of the applicants.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondents No.2
and 4/HPPCL submitted that he does not want to file any reply to the
application and has no objection in case the amount is released in
favour of the applicants as no appeal has been preferred against the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
judgment dated 02.01.2023 passed by this Court and the same has
attained finality.
.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavits of applicants
and also in view of the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has
attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release
of
the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest,
falling in the respective shares of applicants/respondents No.23 and
rt
28, namely, Ram Swaroop and Vijay Kumar, which is lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and
identification by remitting the same to their respective bank accounts,
details whereof have been given in para-10 of the application.
The application stands disposed of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Shyam Lal Gautam vs. LAC & Anr.
RFA No.213 of 2017
.
06.05.2026 Present: Mr.B.S. Attri, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
May 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Mahinder Lal vs. GM, Ranjeet Sagar Dam & Ors.
a/w connected matters
.
RFA No.214 of 2017 a/w RFAs No.374, 375/2018 & 270/2019
06.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s).
Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the
rt
appellant(s), list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Babu Ram Sharma vs. Abhishek Jain and Ors.
COPC No.918 of 2024
.
06.05.2026 Present: Mr. Surender K. Sharma and Mr. Paresh Sharma,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate General,
list on 02.06.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Renukaji Dam Project vs. Deep Ram a/w
connected matters.
.
RFA No.325, 347 of 2018 and RFA No.50 of 2020
RFA No.325 of 2018
06.05.2026 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 5 and 6(i) to 6(iv).
of
RFA No.347 of 2018
rt Mr. Vikas Mishra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
RFA No.59 of 2020
Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Officer, HPPWD & anr. vs.
Hari Singh & Ors.
.
RFA No.179 of 2017
06.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Richa Mishra vs. C. Paulrasu & another
COPC No.880 of 2025
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Both the respondents present in person with Mr. B.N.
Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General.
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
of
an application for tendering unconditional apology on behalf of
respondents No.1&2, has been filed in the Registry of this Court
rt
on 30.04.2026, however, the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
Learned Additional Advocate General, further
submits that vide Notification dated 02.05.2026, the promotion
orders with respect to the Agriculture Development Officers, who
had been promoted vide Department’s Notification Agr.-A-
B(9)1/2023-Part-II, dated 22.07.2025, have also been withdrawn
with immediate effect.
Now, list the present petition for consideration on
12.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
M/s Regent Energy Ltd. vs. NIAC Ltd. & Anr.
Civil Suit No.27 of 2016
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Anubhav Kohli, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Vaidya,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the defendants.
of
OMP No.899 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the plaintiff , prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is pre-occupied
in another Court.
As prayed, list on 28.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Lal Chand Negi vs. Avinash Negi & anr.
COPC No.561 of 2024
.
05.05.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that
of
counter to communication dated 15.12.2025, has been filed in
the Registry a week back, however the same is not on record.
rt
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Brig Brijesh Virmani (Retd.) vs. Suryavir Singh
RFA No.120/2025
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Atrul Jhingan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No. 30996 of 2025
of
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicants/respondents, prays for adjournment on the ground that
rt
arguing counsel is not available today.
As prayed, list this application for consideration after
two weeks.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority vs. Shakuntla
Devi (deceased) through her LRs. & ors.
.
RFA No.363 of 2012
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c).
of
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Shivom Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3(a)
to 3(c), 4,7,8(a) to 8(e).
rt Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.9/State.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, states
that an application for deletion of name of respondent No.6,
has been filed in the Registry on 04.05.2026, however, the
same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and
place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list next week.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority & another vs.
Pritam Singh @ Pritem & Ors. a/w connected matters
.
RFA No.4092 of 2013 a/w RFA Nos.4090, 4091 of 2013, 219 of
2014 & 263 of 2015
RFA No.4092 of 2013
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
of
Mr. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
rt for respondent No.2/State.
RFA No. 4091 of 2013
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
2 and 4.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.5/State.
RFA No. 4092 of 2013
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
2 and 3(a).
None for respondent No. 3(b).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/ State.
RFA No. 219 of 2014
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.3/State.
.
RFA No. 263 of 2015
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.3/State.
rtRFA No.4092 of 2013
Learned vice counsel for the appellants, states
that an application for deletion of name of respondent
No.3(a), has been filed in the Registry on 04.05.2026,
however, the same is not on record. Registry is directed to
trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list next week.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Som Dutt & Ors.
RFA No.02/2015 a/w RFA No.92 of 2015 &
.
C.O. No.50/2019
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/non-cross-objectors in both appeals
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4/cross-objectors in both appeals.
of
At the request of leaned Additional Advocate
General, list for consideration after four weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Momina vs. Mahanti Devi & another
CMP No.4547 of 2016 in FAO No.440 of 2014
.
05.05.2026 Present: Ms. Amish, Advocate vice Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate,
for the applicant/appellant.
CMP No.4547 of 2016
As per report of the Registry, PF for the service of
of
respondent No.2, has been filed.
Therefore, let notice be issued to respondent No.2,
rt
returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunita Devi & Ors.
FAO No.18 of 2024
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Bhawna Dhiman, Advocate vice Ms. Komal
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No1,2,4 & 5.
Name of respondent No.3, stands deleted.
of
Mr. Narender K. Reddy, Advocate, for Respondents
No.7(a) to 7(c) and respondent No.9.
rt Learned counsel for the appellant, states that two
applications for substituted service of respondent No.6 as well as
respondent No.10, have been filed in the Registry, however, the
same are not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the
same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Rachel Leigh Chand & Ors. vs. Dinesh Chand
Civil Suit No.34 of 2024
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Rohit Shyam, Advocate, for the defendant.
The report of learned Mediator, is still awaited.
of
However, it has been pointed out by learned counsel for the parties
that the mediation has failed.
rtNow, list the OMP No.605 of 2025 for consideration
after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sudesh Kumari vs. Suraj Thakur & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1394 of 2024
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Abhidha Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate vice Mr Azmat Hayat
Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, is stated to have expired.
of
Ms. Sangeeta Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Tomar,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rtLet record of the learned tribunal below be called for.
Now, list the case for consideration on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Jagdish Tomar vs. Assistant Conservator of Forest & Ors.
FAO No.261 of 2025
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr Avinash Gupta, Advocate (through V.C), for
respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
of
proforma respondents No.6 to 9.
rt CMP No.9729 & CMP(M) No.663 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
CMP No.23458 of 2026
As prayed, list for consideration after three weeks.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. M/s Bhardwaj Industry Nangal
CMP(M) No.1579 of 2025
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
of
General, two weeks’ further time, is granted to take steps for the
service of respondent, failing which, the present appeal shall be
dismissed for want of prosecution.
rt
As prayed for, list on 21.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Minu Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.2280 of 2025
.
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays
of
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to take steps for the
service of respondent No.3 as well as for representation of
respondent No.2, who is minor.
rt
As prayed for, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mohan &
Ors. a/w connected matters
.
FAO No.352 of 2024 a/w FAO No.44 of 2024 & FAO
No.141 of 2025
FAO No.352 of 2024
05.05.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rtRespondents No. 5 to 7, already ex parte.
FAO No.44 of 2024
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
FAO No.141 of 2025
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
FAO No.352 of 2024 a/w FAO No.44 of 2024 & FAO
No.141 of 2025
At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant,
states that name of respondent No.5 in FAO No.141 of 2025,
may be deleted from the array of respondents, as he being not a
necessary party.
Therefore, in view of the statement of learned
counsel for the appellant, name of respondent No.5, is ordered
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
to be deleted from the array of the parties, subject to all just
exceptions. Amended memo of parties be filed before the next
.
date.
Now list all the appeals for final disposal at the
admission stage on 15.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
May 05, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. Nipun Jindal & another
COPC No.1395 of 2025
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Virender S. Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No. 9164 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the copy of judgment passed in CWP
rt
No.3050 of 2014, is ordered to be taken on record.
Application stands disposed of.
COPC No.1395 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents,
list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Sneh Love Care Rehabilitation & Welfare Society
vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
FAO No.14 of 2026
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. I.R. Narwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that he is not feeling well today.
rt As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Beasa Devi vs. Om Prakash
RFA No.27 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with ms. Rupali,
Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Banta,Advocate, for
the respondent.
of
CMP No.5693 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent,
rt
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar vs. Devesh Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.88 of 2026.
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr. Aakash Thakur, Advocates,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication da ted 02.05.2026, wherein it has been
stated that in the year 2005, the post of Class-IV on compassionate
rt
grounds was being filled on daily wage basis.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, states that counter
to the compliance, has been filed in the Registry on 30.04.2026,
however, the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace
and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 11.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar Sharma & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.93 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
of
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply/to seek
instructions.
rt As prayed, list on 21.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.398 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Priyanka Kumari & Ors. vs. Ashish Kohli
COPC No.399 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Manjit Singh & Ors. vs. Ashish Kohli
COPC No.400 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Prakash Chand & Ors. vs. Ashish Kohli
COPC No.414 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Surjit Kumar & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
COPC No.411 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Ms. Nandita, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Amin Chand vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.407 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Narinder Singh vs. M.Sudha Devi & another
COPC No.404 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Suman Kumar & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.13 of 2025
.
04.05.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellants.
As per report of the Registry, PF has been filed on
29.04.2026.. Therefore, let notice be issued to the respondents,
of
returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Lata Devi & Ors. vs. Chet Ram & anr.
FAO(MVA) No.68 of 2025
.
04.05.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
As per report of the Registry, steps for the service of
respondents have been taken. Therefore, let notice be issued to
of
the respondents, returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
M/s Acme Escora Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pratap Singh & Ors.
Civil Suit No.18 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
OMP No.239 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents/defendants,
of
returnable for the date already given in the main suit, i.e.
04.06.2026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
rt In the meantime, respondents/defendants are
restrained from encumbering, alienating, transferring, creating
third party interest over the suit property till the next date of
hearing, subject to compliance of Order 39 Rule 3 CPC.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Anand Kumar & Ors. vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.626 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Asha Dev & Ors.
CMP(M) No.627 of 2026
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram vs. Jatin Lal and Ors.
COPC No.1092 of 2025
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through V.C), for the
petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Respondents No.1 to 3, are present in person.
rtPursuant to order passed by this Court on the
previous date, respondents No.1 to 3, namely, Jatin Lal, Vishwa
Mohan Dev and Varsha Chaudhary, are present in person.
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
respondents intend to file a review petition before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India. Therefore, at his request, list the
present petition on 22.06.2026. However, the respondents are
not directed to remain present on the aforesaid date.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Satpal & Anr. vs. Niranjan Singh
COPC No.607 of 2025
.
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Joginder Singh &
Ors.
.
FAO No.59 of 2026
04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO No.59 of 2026 & CMP No.5792 of 2026
of
As per report of the Registry, an explanation has
been received from learned Presiding Judge. Let the same be
rt
placed on record.
Let copy of explanation received from the learned
Presiding Judge, be supplied to leaned counsel for the appellant
within a period of two days by the Registry, on payment of usual
charges.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file response to the explanation filed
on behalf of the learned Presiding Judge.
As per report of the Registry, PF of the service of the
respondents, has been filed only on 28.04.2026. Therefore, let
notice be issued to the respondents, returnable for 18.06.2026.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
May 04, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Man Chand vs. Divisional Commissioner, Mandi & Ors.
CWP No.5163 of 2025
.
30.04.2026 Present: Ms.Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Ms.
Seema Sharma, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy
Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant
Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3/State.
CMP No.7409 of 2026
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the present writ petition, is hereby
rt
condoned. Application stands disposed of.
CWP No.5163 of 2025
At this stage, notice is only confined to respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1
to 3/State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list after four weeks before the appropriate
Bench.
CMP No.7408 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/petitioner is exempted from filing
translated copy of Hindi vernacular of Annexures P-1 to P-7. However,
learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner undertakes to file the same
as and when occasion arises.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Binta Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
Execution Petition No.678 of 2026
.
30.04.2026 Present: Mr. M.A.Safee, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Ms. Seema Sharma, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan,
Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chaudhary,
Assistant Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents /State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit. List thereafter before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Manohar Singh vs. HPTDCL & another
Execution Petition No.696 of 2026
.
30.04.2026 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
Issue notice. Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate,
of
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents. She prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file
rt
compliance affidavit. List thereafter before the appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram vs. HPTDCL & another
Execution Petition No.698 of 2026
.
30.04.2026 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
Issue notice. Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate,
of
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents. She prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file
rt
compliance affidavit. List thereafter before the appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Prince Bansal vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
Execution Petition No.702 of 2026
.
30.04.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Ms. Seema Sharma, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan,
Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chaudhary,
Assistant Advocate General, for the
of
respondents/State.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents /State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit. List thereafter before the
appropriate Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Vinay Kumar vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No.6251 of 2026
.
30.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Bhan
Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Ms. Seema Sharma, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan,
Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chaudhary,
Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to
of
4/State.
Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
/State Election Commission, H.P.
rt
Learned Additional Advocate General, states that
instruction, have been filed in the Registry, however, the same
are not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the
same on record, if in order.
Learned counsel for the State Election Commission,
H.P., has filed reply in the open Court today. Let the same be
placed on record.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026 before the appropriate
Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Madira Wine Traders vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No.6435 of 2026
.
30.04.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Ms. Seema Sharma, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan,
Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Chaudhary,
Assistant Advocate General, for the
of
State/respondents.
CWP No.6435 of 2026
rtIssue notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
three days’ time to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 05.05.2026 before the appropriate
Bench.
CMP No.9237 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
List alongwith main petition.
In the meantime, operation and implementation of
the letters dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) and impugned
order dated 18.04.2026 (Annexure P-6), are ordered to be stayed
till the next date of hearing.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Regional Manager, HRTC & Anr. vs. Anuradha &
another
.
CMP No.8457 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.465 of 2012
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.8457 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 1, Anuradha, for
rt
release of award amount of compensation, as per her share, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
stated that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He
further stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
31.05.2013 by this Court and no appeal has been preferred
against the said judgment by either of the parties, the same has
attained finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
applicant/respondent No. 1, Anuradha, as per her share, after
proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to her
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
saving bank account, as per her share, detail whereof has been
mentioned in Para-8 of the application.
.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
Keshav Dutt Shreedhar vs. Nishant Sharma
Civil Suit No.3 of 2024
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
OMP No.1270 of 2025
of
Vide separate order of even date, the present
application filed by the applicant/plaintiff for striking out
appropriate paragraphs in the written statement filed by the non-
rt
applicant/defendant, is allowed. Application stands disposed of.
Civil Suit No.3 of 2024
The non-applicant/defendant is directed to file
amended written statement within a period of two weeks in terms
of the order passed in OMP No.1270 of 2025.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:29 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Megha Kulkarni & Ors.
FAO No.32 of 2025
.
29.04.2026 Present: Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhinav Kainthla, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3, already ex parte.
of
CMP No.3839 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 1, Megha Kulkarni,
rt
for release of award amount of compensation, along with up-to-date
interest, in her favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court.
As per the applicant, she is in dire need of money to
meet out essential expenses including medial expenses that has
already been spent on her treatment and as the main appeal is
pending adjudication before this Court, which may take some time
for its disposal, her prayer for release of award amount of
compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court may
be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be ordered to be
released in her favour.
Reply on behalf of the non-applicant/Insurance
Company, has been filed, wherein, it has been stated that the
present application is not maintainable on the ground that learned
Tribunal below has erroneously passed impugned award by treating
alleged temporary disability as permanent disability and also
committed serious error by not considering the income in true
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
perspective. It has further been stated that the applicant has not
mentioned the necessity/need for money. Learned counsel for the
.
non-applicant/appellant has further opposed the prayer made in the
application on the ground that that in case, amount as prayed, is
released to the applicant, great prejudice would be caused to the
non-applicant/appellant and also in the event of appeal being
of
allowed, it would be difficult for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company to recover the amount.
rt Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, as the applicant has spent about Rs. 20 lac on her
treatment, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release
Rs.20 lac out of the awarded amount, lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court, in favour of applicant/respondent No. 1,
Megha Kulkarni, as per her share, after proper verification and
identification by remitting the same to her saving bank account,
detail whereof has been given in Para-5 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, applicant/respondent No. 1, Megha Kulkarni, will have to
refund the amount, so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of HP & ors. Vs. Tej Singh & ors. a/w
connected matters
.
RFA Nop.13 of 2018 a/w RFAs No.201, 309/2017, RFA
Nos. 32 & 33 of 2018 & CMP(M) No.1053 of 2017
29.04.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the appellants/State in all the appeals and for the
applicants/appellants in CMP(M) No.1053 of 2017.
Mr. Upinder Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. H.S. Rana,
of
Advocate, for the respective respondents in all the
appeal, except respondents No. 5(a)(i) to 5(a)(iii),
5(b), (c) and 10 in RFA No.13 of 2018 and for non-
applicants No.1 to 11 in CMP(M) No.1053 of 2017.
rt Respondent No.12(a) in CMP(M) No.1053 of 2017
already ex-parte.
Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
RFA No.13 of 2018
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.5(d). List thereafter alongwith
the connected appeals.
CMP(M) Nos.1053 of 2017
Learned vice counsel for respondents No.1 to 11,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ further time to file reply. List
thereafter alongwith the connected matters.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and Ors. vs. Sunita and Ors.
RFA No.298 of 2019
.
29.04.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for
respondents No.1,2, 3(i) to 3(iv) and 4 to 7.
Ms. Pritiksha Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
of
No.3(v), 5(a), 5(d),6(a) to 6(e) & 6(g).
Learned Deputy Advocate General, submits that an
rt
application for bringing on record the legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.6(f), has been filed on 20.04.2026,
however the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace
and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 22.05.2026.
In the meantime, steps for representation of
respondents No.5(b) & 5(c), who are minors, be also taken.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Hira Nand Sharma vs. Vivek Kumar & another
Civil Suit No.77 of 2022
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.H.C. Sharma,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.1406 of 2025
of
At the request of learned counsel for non-
applicants/defendants, list for consideration on 15.05.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Kanu Priya Thapar & Anr. vs. Vikrant Thakur & Ors.
Civil Suit No.4 of 2023
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Ajeet Singh Pal, Advocate, for the defendants.
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs, prays for and is
of
granted four weeks’ time to file replication. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Vandana Devi
and others alongwith connected matter.
.
FAO No.148 of 2024 a/w FAO No.147 of 2024
FAO No.148 of 2024
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate,
for respondent No.1.
of
Respondent No.3, already ex parte.
FAO No.147 of 2024
rt Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate,
for respondents No.1 & 2(i).
Respondent No.4, already ex parte.
RFA No.148 of 2024
On persuasive request made by learned counsel for the
appellant, two days’ further time is granted to file process fee and to
deposit publication charges for the service of respondent No.2.
On doing the needful within two days, list the matter
before Additional Registrar(J) on 04.05.2026, for passing further orders
with respect to the service of respondent No.2 through publication.
However, it is made clear that if the steps are not taken
within the stipulated period, then the appeal shall be dismissed for
want of prosecution against respondent No.2 without any further
reference to the Court.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Shyam Singh vs. Battan Singh and Ors.
FAO No.200 of 2024
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sbhubham Ghai, Advocate vice Mr. Hemant Vaid,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Ridhima, Advocate vice Mr. Manish Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 5.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for respondents o.3(i) to
3(vii).
Ms. Ranjana, Advoate vice Mr. Rajesh Kashyap,
rt advocate, for respondent No.4.
CMP No.9046 of 2024
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
prays for adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not
available.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
UIIC Ltd. vs. Anoop Vaidya & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.265 of 2024
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr.Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
CMP No.8901 of 2026
rt Let notice be issued to proposed LRs of deceased
respondent No.5, as mentioned in Para-5, of the application,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Balbir Singh Kataik vs. State of H.P.
Civil Suit No.34 of 2025
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
the defendant/State.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for adjournment
of
to justify the maintainability of the suit.
rt As prayed, list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Pradeep Kumar & anr. vs. Sandeep Kumar & Ors.
Civil Suit No.53 of 2025
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Jagmohan Chandel, Advocate, for defendants
No.1 & 3.
Mr. Abhey Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for defendant No.2.
of
Learned vice counsel for defendant No.2, prays for and
rt
is granted two weeks’ further time to remove the objections, by way
of last opportunity.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
In the meantime,reply to OMP No.92 of 2026, be also
filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Urmila Devi & another
.
FAO No.326 of 2025
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr.Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
Mr.Surya Bhan, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt As per report of the Registry, PF for the service of
respondent No.2, has been filed.
Therefore, let notice be issued to respondent No.2,
returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Bharat Bhushan vs. HDFC ERGO & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.75 of 2026
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Y.K. Thakur and Mr. Ritik Prashar, Advocates, for
the appellant.
None for respondent No.1, though served.
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashist, Advocate, for respondents No.2
to 4.
of
FAO(MVA) No.75 of 2026
rt As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.1, has been received back duly served, however,
there is no representation on it’s behalf. Hence, it is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Let fresh post admission notice be issued to
respondent No.5, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps
within a period of three days. List thereafter.
CMP No.6082 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/respondents
No.2 to 4, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Dr. Vijay Prasher & Ors. vs. Amarjeet K. Sharma
CMP No.28186 of 2025 in COPC No.948 of 2024
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the
applicants/petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners, prays
of
for and is granted two weeks’ time to file counter to the
instructions dated 19.02.2026.
rt As prayed, list on 18.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Tarsem Singh & Ors.
Civil Suit No.02 of 2026
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Surya Bhan, Advocate vice Mr. Athrav Sharma,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendants No.1 & 7, already ex parte.
Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumar,
Advocate, for defendants No.2 to 6.
of
Civil Suit No.2 of 2026
rt Written statement on behalf of defendants No.2 to 6,
stands filed.
Learned vice counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and
is granted four weeks’ time to file replication. List thereafter.
OMP No.09 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/contesting
defendants, states that reply has been filed in the Registry on
16.04.2026, however, the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
Interim order to continue.
OMP No.267 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Maghi Ram
RFA No.15 of 2026
.
29.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file an application for
extension of time to deposit the amount.
rt As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Lata Devi & Ors. vs. Chet Ram & anr.
FAO(MVA) No.68 of 2025
.
29.04.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Learned counsel for the appellants, submits that steps
for the service of respondents have been taken on 08.04.2026,
of
however, the report of the Registry is otherwise. Therefore, Registry
is directed to make a report in this Respect. Learned counsel, is
also directed to follow up with the Registry.
rt List on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 29, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Pawan Dhiman vs. Gaurav Prashar
Civil Suit No.13/2025
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Banta,Advocate, for the defendant.
As per report of learned Mediator, the parties have
of
prayed more time, as there is possibility of amicable settlement inter
se them.
rt Therefore, in view of the report of learned Mediator, he
is permitted to continue with the mediation proceedings.
Now list the case on 30.06.2026, to await the report of
learned Mediator.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Surinder Kumar Sharma vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.589 of 2024
.
28.04.2026 Present: Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas
Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
CWP No.2108/23, is still pending consideration before a
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
rt Therefore, at his request, list the present petition after
six weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Pawana Devi & Ors.
FAO No.313 of 2025
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Bhan
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Abhilasha Kaundal, Advocate, for respondents
No.2(i) to 2(iii).
of
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Jamalta,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt CMP No.6833 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 1, Pawna Devi, for
release of 50% of the award amount of compensation as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, she is in dire need of money and
as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court, which
may take some time for its disposal, her prayer for release of 50%
of the awarded amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court may be accepted and the amount, as prayed
for, may be ordered to be released in her favour.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/Assurance
Company has opposed the prayer made in the application on the
ground that in the event of appeal being allowed, it would be difficult
for the non-applicant/Insurance Company to recover the amount.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30%
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
of the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
alongwith up-to-date interest, in favour of applicant/respondent No.
.
1, as per her share, after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to her saving bank account, detail whereof has
been given in the copy of passbook annexed with the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
of
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being
allowed, applicant/respondent No. 1, will have to refund the amount,
rt
so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Mamta & another vs. Ashok Kumar
Civil Suit No.69 of 2024
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through video
conferencing) and Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, for
the plaintiff.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Bhan Singh, Advocate, for the defendant.
of
OMP No.1386 of 2025
Arguments heard. Order reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Shashi Bala & Ors. vs. Shilpa & Ors.
FAO(MV) No.208 of 2024
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondent No.1, already ex parte.
None for respondent No.2.
Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K.
of
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Sangeeta Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Tomar,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rt CMP No.7372 of 2026
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and respondent No.1, is ordered to
be served through affixation, on her last known address.
Now, list the case before the Additional Registrar
(Judicial) on 04.05.2026, for passing further orders regarding
service of respondent No. 1 through affixation.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sandeep Kumar vs. Nisha Kumari & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.15 of 2025
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Vandana Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder
Saklani, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, for respondents
No.5 to 10.
of
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.11.
rt CMP No.28852 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list for consideration on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC & another vs. Desh Raj & Ors.
RFA No.76 of 2025
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents, states that
of
Cross Objections have been filed in the Registry on 17.11.2025,
however, the same are not on record. Registry is directed to
rt
trace and place the same on record, if in order.
List as and when the Cross Objections are available
on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Munish Mahajan (deceased) through
his LRs and others.
.
FAO(MVA) No.320 of 2025
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Pritam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c).
of
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
On persuasive request made by learned counsel for
rt
the appellant, two weeks’ further time, is granted to take steps for
the service of respondent No.3, by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Meera Devi & ors. vs. Krishna Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1910 of 2025
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Pritam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta,Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
5.
Respondent No.6, already ex parte.
of
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
rtCMP(M) No.1910 of 2025
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the contesting respondents and have no objection, in
case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the
applicant/appellant, the same is allowed and delay of 4 days in
filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No._____of 2026 & CMP No.____ of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates,
appear and waive service of post admission notice on behalf of
the respective respondents.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Let separate notice be issued to respondent No.6,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
.
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & another vs. Teku @ Tikam Ram &
another
.
CMP(M) No.643 of 2026
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the applicants/State.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
None for respondents No.2(a) to 2(f).
rt CMP(M) No.643 of 2026
As per report of the Registry, notices issued to 2(a) to
2(f), have been received back duly served, however, there is no
representation on their behalf. Hence, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the contesting respondent and has no objection, in case, the
same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of Er. Anil
Kumar, Superintending Engineer, 1 st Circle, HPPWD Mandi, the same
is allowed and delay of 141 days in filing the present appeal is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, appears and waives service
of post admission notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.2(a) to
2(f), returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
CMP No._________ of 2026
of
Be registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
rt
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 20.04.2024,
passed by learned Additional District Judge, Mandi, District
Mandi, H.P. in case titled as Teku alias Tikam Ram & Ors. vs.
State of H.P. & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of
the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
HP Beverages Ltd. vs. M/s Shoolini Associates & another
CMP(M) No.279 of 2026
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3.
Respondent No.5, present in person.
of
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3.
Respondent No.5, Ajay Rathore, who is present in
person, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to engage counsel
on his behalf.
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, has filed memo of
appearance on behalf of respondent No.6. He prays for and is granted
two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid
respondent.
As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
respondents No.1,2 & 4, have been received back unserved for want
of correct addresses.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to furnish correct addresses of aforesaid
respondents No.1,2 & 4.
As prayed, list on 14.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
TATA AIG GIC Ltd. & another vs. Satya Devi & another
CMP No.805 of 2026 in FAO No.158 of 2024
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants.
Ms. Tamanna Rana, Advocate, for the
applicants/respndents.
of
CMP No.805 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-
rt
applicants/appellants, prays for adjournment on the ground that
original counsel is not available today.
As prayed, list for consideration on 18.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kaushalys Devi & Ors.
CMP No.8463 of 2026 in FAO No.371 of 2015
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 4.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.5
& 6.
of
CMP No.8463 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
which is duly supported with an affidavit of Rajesh Kumar,
Incharge, TP Hub, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Timber
House, Shimla, the same is allowed and excess amount
deposited by the applicant/Insurance Company, in the Registry of
this Court alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be refunded
to it after proper verification and identification by remitting the
same to its bank account, detail whereof has been given in
prayer clause of the application.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sunita Devi & ors. vs. Khem Dass & Ors. a/w
connected matter.
.
FAO No.160 of 2016 with FAO No.161 of 2016
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s)
in both appeals.
Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2, in both appeals.
of
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.3, in both
appeals.
rt CMP No.8464 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for non-
applicant/respondent No.3, prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 18.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Krishna @ Rekha
RFA No.146 of 2021 a/w C.O.No.5 of 2024
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/non-cross objector.
Mr. Mohinder Verma,Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.8705 of 2026
of
For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. Application stands disposed of.
rt RFA No.146 of 2021 a/w C.O.No.5 of 2024
List for final hearing in the month of May, 2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. vs. S.K. Vij
RFA No.6 of 2021
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Banta,Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.8717 of 2026
of
For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. Application stands disposed of.
rt RFA No.6 of 2021
List for final hearing on 16.06.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Seema & Ors.
CMP No.8728 of 2026 in RFA No.476 of 2015
.
28.04.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
non-applicants/appellants/State.
Name of respondent No.1, stands deleted.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No.8728 of 2026
rt Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to seek instructions/to file reply.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Surender Chauhan (deceased) through
his LRs.
.
RFA No.09 of 2024
28.04.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
of
CMP No.8733 of 2026
rt The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed by the applicant/respondents No. 2, Priyal, for release
of awarded amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, stated that she
doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application and has no
objection, in case, the prayer made in the application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release
50% of the compensation amount, in favour of the
applicant/respondent No.2, Priyal, along with up-to-date interest,
strictly as per her share, which is lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court, after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to her saving bank account, detail whereof
has been given in para-8 of the application. However, It is made
clear that release of award amount shall be subject to final
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicant/respondent No.2, Priyal, will have to refund the amount,
.
so released, with interest @ 6% per annum.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
General Manager Northern Railways vs. Aman Kumar & Ors.
CMP No.8730 of 2026 in RFA No.362 of 2015
.
28.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 4.
Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for
of
respondents No.5 & 6/State.
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, prays
for and is granted two week’s time to seek instructions in the
matter as there is a mistake in the memo of the parties.
As prayed, list on 20.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Parvesh Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar
COPC No.363 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ravinder Paul vs. Rakesh Kanwar
COPC No.367 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Jeewan Lal vs. Rakesh Kanwar
COPC No.369 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar & Anr. vs. Ashish Kohli
COPC No.373 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent.
rt He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sanjay Kumar Ratna vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr.
COPC No.372 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rocky, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Vikrant vs. Devesh Kumar and Ors.
COPC No.371 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Yashwant vs. Devesh Kumar and Ors.
COPC No.370 of 2025
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
rt
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Vishal Agarwal vs. Paramjeet Singh & Ors.
Civil Suit No.63 of 2023
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.223 of 2026
of
The present application has been filed by the
applicants/defendants, for issuing clarification of stay order dated
rt
27.12.2023, which was confirmed vide order dated 22.10.2024.
It has been mentioned in the application that while
making entry of the status quo order, the concerned Patwari has
also included the remaining portion of land comprised in Khasra
No.441, 457, 458, 459, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470,
491, 492 & 493, situated at Mohal Badri Nagar, Tehsil Ponta
Sahib, District Sirmaur, as a part of suit property, whereas, the
said khasra numbers are not the subject matter of the suit or for
the stay application.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff,
submits that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application
and has no objection, in case, the remaining portion of the land
comprised in all the Khasra Numbers mentioned in the
application except Khasra No.457, is excluded from the suit land.
Therefore, in view of the submissions made in the
application and also in view of the no objection by the learned
counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff, the present application is
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
allowed and stay order dated 27.12.2023, which was confirmed
vide order dated 22.10.2024, is clarified to the extent that stay
.
order is only confined with respect to the suit land comprised in
Khasra Numbers as mentioned in Schedule-A & Schedule-B of
the plaint and stay application and not with respect to Khasra
Nos.441, 458, 459, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 491,
of
492, 493, Mohal Badri Nagar,Tehsil Ponta Sahb,District Sirmaur,
which is not a subject matter of dispute.
rt Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Satpal & Anr. vs. Niranjan Singh
COPC No.607 of 2025
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Rita Ravi vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr.
COPC No.843 of 2025
.
27.04.2026 Present: Ms. Dhanwanti, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
of
record instructions along with Office Order dated 21.04.2026.
rt Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that arrears as well as interest, have not been
released as per judgment under reference.
In view of the above, learned Additional Advocate
General, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to seek
further instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 29.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Tejinder Singh and other vs. Govinder Singh and another
RFA No.36 of 2026
.
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms.Sanjivini
Sood and Mr. Aakash Thakur, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for Caveator/
respondent No.1.
of
Caveat Petition No.125 of 2026
rt Discharged.
RFA No.36 of 2026
Issue notice. Mr.Deepak Gupta, Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
Let separate notice be issued to respondent No.2,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
Learned counsel for the appellants, submits that
copy of grounds of appeal, shall be supplied to learned counsel
for respondent No.1 during the course of the day.
CMP No.8735 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
Learned counsel for non-applicant/respondent No.1,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
In the meantime, operation and execution of the
judgment and decree dated 16.03.2026, passed by Additional
District Judge(1), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. in Civil Suit No.41
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
of 1997, titled as Sardar Govinder Singh vs. Sardar Tejinder
Singh & Ors., shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.
.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
CEO-cum-Secretary vs. Gurbaksh Singh (deceased) through
his LR & Ors.
.
RFA No.342 of 2007
27.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Roop Lal
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(a), 2 to 5.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.6 to 8/State.
Mr.Gaurav Thakur, Advocate,for proposed
respondents No.9 to 11.
rt
CMP No.6322 of 2024
Learned counsel for respondents No.1(a), 2 to 5,
submits that reply to the application has been filed in the
Registry, however, the same has been returned alongwith certain
objections. He undertakes to remove the same within a period of
one week.
List as and when the aforesaid reply is taken on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ravi Inder Singh vs. State of H.P. a/w
connected matter.
RFA No. 72 of 2005 a/w RFA Nos. 126, 139, 333,
.
334 and 335 of 2005
RFA No.72 of 2005
25.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for
respondents No. 1 and 2/State.
of
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Garima Kuthiala, Advocate (through V.C) and Ms.
rt Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 3.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhijeet Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.4, 5 and 7(a) to 7(e).
Mr. Pawanish Kumar Shukla, Advocate, for
respondents No. 6(a) and 6(b).
RFA No.126 of 2005
Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for
respondents No. 1 and 2.
RFA No.139 of 2005
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Garima Kuthiala, Advocate (through V.C) and Ms.
Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for
respondents No. 1 to 3/State.
Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhijeet Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.5 and 6.
Mr. Pawanish Kumar Shukla, Advocate, for
respondents No.7(a) and 7(b).
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
RFA No.333 of 2005
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the
.
appellant.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhijeet Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2,4(a) to 4(e).
Mr. Pawanish Kumar Shukla, Advocate, for
respondents No.3(a) and 3(b).
of
Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
rtMr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Garima Kuthiala, Advocate (through V.C) and Ms.
Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.6.
RFA No.334 of 2005
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Garima Kuthiala, Advocate (through V.C) and Ms.
Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
RFA No.335 of 2005
Mr.B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the
appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Garima Kuthiala, Advocate (through V.C) and Ms.
Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC vs. Bachittar Singh (deceased) through his LRs and Ors.
RFA No.342 of 2007
.
25.04.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellant.
Mr. Ridhi Verma, Advocate vice Mr.Ajay
Chandel,Advocate, for respondents No.13,14 & 16.
Respondents No.2(a) to 2(e), 3, 4(a) to 4(d), 5(a),
of
5(b), 6 to 12, 17(a) to 17(c), 18(a) to 18(c), 19 to 22,
23(a) to 23(d), 24(a) to 24(d), 25 to 36, 37(a) to
37(c), 38 & 39, already ex parte.
rt Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.342 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Amit Patial vs. Ashish Kumar Kohli
COPC No.1501 of 2025
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr.Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. B.N.
Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 23.04.2026 along with office order
dated 10.09.2025, wherein, it has been stated that judgment under
rt
reference has been duly complied with.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner,
submits that the judgment in question, has not been complied with
in its letter and spirit.
In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned
counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Advocate General,
prays for and is granted, two week’s time to file fresh compliance
report.
As prayed, list on 13.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
God Grace Foundation vs. Chief Executive Officer & Ors.
FAO No.15 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the appellant, submits that
affidavit in terms of the order dated 01.04.2026, has been filed in
the Registry on 17.04.2026, however, the same is not on record.
rt
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order. List the case as and when the aforesaid affidavit is taken on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar vs. Devesh Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.88 of 2026.
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Prem Chand Verma, Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr.
Aakash Thakur, Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
compliance affidavit has been filed in the Registry, however, the
same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the
rt
same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Meera Walia vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.63 of 2026.
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that the
respondents intend to file a review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India against the judgment dated 26.11.2025,
titled as State of H.P. vs. LT. General (Retd.) B.S. Thakur & Ors.
Therefore, at his request, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Man Singh vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.74 of 2026.
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that the
respondents intend to file a review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India against the judgment dated 26.11.2025,
titled as State of H.P. vs. LT. General (Retd.) B.S. Thakur & Ors.
Therefore, at his request, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Mohan Lal Chauhan vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.73 of 2026.
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that the
respondents intend to file a review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India against the judgment dated 26.11.2025,
titled as State of H.P. vs. LT. General (Retd.) B.S. Thakur & Ors.
Therefore, at his request, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Major General DVS Rana (Retd.) vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
COPC No.72 of 2026.
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that the
respondents intend to file a review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India against the judgment dated 26.11.2025,
titled as State of H.P. vs. LT. General (Retd.) B.S. Thakur & Ors.
Therefore, at his request, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Pradeep Singh Chauhan vs. Sanjay Gupta & Ors.
COPC No.111 of 2026.
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that the
respondents intend to file a review petition before the Hon’ble
rt
Supreme Court of India against the judgment dated 26.11.2025,
titled as State of H.P. vs. LT. General (Retd.) B.S. Thakur & Ors.
Therefore, at his request, list on 26.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Nand Kishore & anr. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors.
along with connected matter
.
FAO Nos. 250 & 545 of 2016
FAO No.250 of 2016
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Nimish Gupta,Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
of
2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rtFAO No.545 of 2016
Mr. Nimish Gupta,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
None for proforma respondent No.4.
FAO Nos. 250 & 545 of 2016
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Babu Ram and Ors.
RFA No.158 of 2019
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 15.05.2026.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sr. Executive Engineer & Anr. vs. Gopal Sigh & Ors.
RFA No.279 of 2019
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2,4 to 8 & 10 to 13.
of
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr.
rt
Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, henceforth.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & another vs. Dulo Ram(deceased)
through LRs a/w connected matter
.
RFAs No.380 & 381 of 2008
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State in both the appeals.
Respondents already ex parte in RFA No.380 of
2008.
of
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for proposed LRs
No.1(a) to 1(d) in RFA No.381 of 2008.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Ms. Sudha Devi & another
COPC No.243 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
the respondents.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on
of
record communication dated 22.04.2026. He prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to comply with the judgment under
rt
reference in its letter and spirit.
As prayed, list on 29.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
M/s Shree Shree Dudra Stone Crusher vs. Deepak Kumar &
Ors.
.
Civil Suit No.62 of 2024
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Dixit,
Advocate, for the defendants.
of
On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues
are framed:
rt 1. Whether defendants No.1 to 8, or any of them,
have been illegally and without any authority of
law interfering in the installation and operation ofthe plaintiff’s stone crusher and/or obstructing the
plaintiff’s mining operations over the leased areas
as described in the plaint.?…OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of
permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the
defendants No.1 to 8, their agents, employees, orany person acting on their behalf from interfering
in the installation and operation of the stonecrusher and mining operations of the plaintiff over
the suit land? …OPP.
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of
mandatory injunction directing defendants No.1 to
8 to forthwith desist from obstructing or otherwise
interfering with the plaintiff’s right to install and
operate the stone crusher and carry out mining
activities over the leased areas? …OPP
4. Whether the recovery of damages claimed by the
plaintiff to the tune of Rs.1,15,00,000/-(Rupees
One Crore Fifteen Lakhs only) from defendants
No.1 to 8, on account of illegal interference and
obstruction in the installation and operation of the
stone crusher and mining operations, is legally
tenable? …OPP::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
5. Whether the suit is not maintainable, as
alleged? …OPD.
6. Whether the plaintiff is estopped by his act and
conduct from filing the present suit against the
defendants? …OPD
7. Whether the suit deserves to be dismissed, as the
plaintiff has not come with clean hands before this
Court? …OPD.
of
8. Whether the plaintiff has no cause of action to file
the present suit against the defendants? …OPD.
rt 9. Relief.
Issues have been read over and explained to the
parties. No other issue arises nor claimed.
Process Fee, list of witnesses and additional
documents, if any, be filed by the parties within a period of two
weeks and thereafter, list the case before the Additional Registrar
(Judicial) for fixing date for the evidence of the plaintiff.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Baljit Kaur & Ors. vs. Dr. M. Sudha Devi & Another
COPC No.337 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Ms Aanchal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents.
rt He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 08.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Abhishek vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.354 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Monisha vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.353 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Rajneesh & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.349 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sumati Kumari vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.348 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Kartar Chand vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.345 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
.
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Anita Devi vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Another
COPC No.343 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nitish, Advocate vice Mr. Sourav Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three
weeks’ time to file reply/to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 15.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Anand Moudgil vs. Sanjay Gupta and Ors.
COPC No.397 of 2026
.
24.04.2026 Present: Petitioner Anand Moudgi, present in person (through
Video Conferencing).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents and stated that copy of the paper book
has not been supplied. Therefore, petitioner is directed to supply
complete copy of paper book within a period of one week though
ordinary process as well as through e-mail.
As prayed, list on 19.05.2026.
In the meantime, reply, as prayed, be also filed by
the respondents/State.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Rajesh Sood vs. Sarita Sood
FAO No.4218 of 2013
.
23.04.2026 Present: Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellant stated at Bar that
of
the present appeal has been rendered infructuous as decree of
divorce has been passed by the Court of Principal Judge, Family
rt
Court (Hqs), South West District Dwarka, Delhi, on 11.10.2022,
by way of mutual consent of the parties and the marriage
between the parties has been dissolved.
Therefore, in view of the above, the present appeal
is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & anr. vs. Dulo Ram (deceased)
through LRs a/w connected matter.
.
RFAs No.380 & 381 of 2008
23.04.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State in both the appeals.
Respondents already ex parte in RFA No.380 of
2008.
of
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for proposed LRs
No.1(a) to 1(d) in RFA No.381 of 2008.
Heard in part. For further arguments, list on
rt
24.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sarita vs. OIC Ltd and another
FAO No.4066 of 2013
.
23.04.2026 Present: Appellant present in person with Mr. Anand Sharma,
Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Shubham Negi, Assistant Manager, Legal Hub
Oriental Insurance Tutikandi, Shimla, for Respondent
No.1, present in person with Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate.
of
None for respondent No.2.
rt Learned counsel for the parties, jointly stated that
there is no possibility of amicable settlement inter se parties.
Now, list the case for final hearing on 30.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Kapoor Singh & Ors.
RFA No.159 of 2015
.
23.04.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State
Mr. Akshay Katoch, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,3(a) to 3(c), 4 & 5.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General,
list on 04.05.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Anand Mehta & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.499/2015 a/w RFA No.228 of 2016
23.04.2026 Present: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arsh
Chauhan and Ms. Priti Steta, Advocates, for the
appellants in RFA No.499/2015 and for the
respondents in RFA No.228/2016.
of
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents in RFA No.499/2015 and for the
appellants in RFA No.228 of 2016.
rtArguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Bhawani Dutt vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
RFA No.57/2016 a/w RFA No.136 of 2016
23.04.2026 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s) in
both the appeals.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondents No.1,2 & 4/State.
of
Mr. Vidhant Ranta, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.3/NTPC.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for respondent
No.3, list on 15.05.2025.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Gajjan Singh & Ors.
.
RFA No.129/2016 a/w Cross-Objection
No.10/2022
23.04.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil
Dixit, Advocate, for the respondents/cross-objectors.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. vs. Sulekha and others
CMP No.7858 of 2026 in FAO No.297 of 2016
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.7859 of 2026
of
The present application under Order 32, read with
Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the applicant/respondent No. 2,
rt
Ritik Kumar, for discharging his natural guardian i.e. his mother
Sulekha, as he has attained the age of majority.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicant/respondent No. 2, Ritik Kumar,
has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from his Matriculation
Examination Certificate, copy whereof annexed with the application as
well as his affidavit annexed therewith, the present application is
allowed and his mother Sulekha, respondent No.1, is ordered to be
discharged from his guardianship; and he is permitted to pursue his
case in his own capacity.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.7858 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicant/respondent No.2, Ritik Kumar, for release
of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, in his favour, as per his
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
share, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application
is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant.
.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
stated that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He
further stated that since vide judgment dated 30.11.2021, the
present appeal is dismissed by this Court and no further appeal or
of
challenge has ever been preferred against the said judgment, the
same has attained finality, he has no objection in case the prayer
rt
made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment dated 30.11.2021,
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
the applicant Ritik Kumar, as per his share, after proper verification
and identification, by remitting the same to his saving bank account,
detail whereof has been mentioned in Para-5 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Anup Ram (deceased) through his Lrd.vs. Kamla Devi & Ors.
CMP No.4200 of 2026 in FAO No.118 of 2014
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Urvija Gupta, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/respondent.
of
CMP No.4200 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicant/appellant, Kuldeep Kumar alias Kuldeep
rt
Chand, for release and remittance of the amount deposited by the
applicants in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicants, the appeal filed by them, was
allowed vide judgment dated 25.11.2025 and the impugned award
passed by learned tribunal below, was modified to the extent that
amount of compensation, so awarded, would not be paid by the
owner and driver of the offending vehicle, but would be paid by the
respondent/non-applicant No.5, i.e. Insurance Company. It is
further averred by the applicants that since the appeal has been
decided on 25.11.2025 and the same has attained finality, the
present application may be allowed and the amount deposited by
them in the Registry of this Court, be remitted to the saving bank
account of the applicant Kuldeep Chand alias Kuldeep Kumar. The
application is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant/respondent and has not objection, in case, the prayer
made in the application is allowed.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
.
applicant Kuldeep Chand alias Kuldeep Kumar coupled with the
fact that the judgment dated 25.11.2025, passed by this Court has
attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to remit
the amount so deposited by the applicants in the Registry of this
of
Court in favour of the applicant, Kuldeep Chand alias Kuldeep
Kumar, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the
rt
same to his saving bank account, detail whereof has been
mentioned in Para-5 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Sanjay and others
CMP No.3754 of 2026 in RFA No.369 of 2019
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
of
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/respondent No.3.
CMP No.3754 of 2026
rtThe instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicant/respondent No.3, Ganga Devi, for
release of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, in her
favour, as per her share, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant.
No reply has been filed by the applicants/appellants
despite various opportunities granted, hence, right to file the same
stands closed. Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that
order dated 17.11.2025, passed by this Court, has not been
assailed by the State before any Court and the same has attained
finality.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the order passed by this Court
has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to
release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the applicant,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ganga Devi, as per her share, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to her saving bank account,
.
detail whereof has been mentioned in Para-7 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
HP State Agriculture Marketing Board and Anr. vs.
Rai Singh Diwan (deceased) through his LRs & Ors.
.
RFA No.94 of 2025
22.04.2026 Present: Ms. Meenakshi Sharma and Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma,
Advocates, for the appellants.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
rt respondents No. 4 to 6/State.
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Jamalta,
Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP No.3680 of 2026
The instant application has been filed on behalf of
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, namely, Murat Singh, Prem Singh
and Divender Singh, for release of award amount in their favour, as per
their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicants, they are in need of the decretal
amount so that they may be able to utilize the same for development
of the property in suit as they are already suffering huge and
irreparable loss on account of loss caused by the non-applicants to
their land; and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this
Court, which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for
release of amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court. may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
Reply to the application stands filed, wherein, non-
applicants/appellants, have opposed the application on the ground
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
that if the amount, as prayed, is released in favour of the
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, it would be difficult for them to
.
recover the same in the event of appeal being allowed, which would
result into the multiplicity of litigation between the parties. Hence,
prayer for dismissal of the application has been made.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
of
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of all the
applicants and also in view of the fact that the appeal may take
rt
sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release 25% each of the award amount of
compensation in favour of applicants/respondent No.1 to 3, namely,
Murat Singh, Prem Singh and Divender Singh, after proper verification
and identification by remitting the same to their saving bank accounts,
detail whereof has been given copies of bank accounts of each of the
applicants attached with the application as Anexure A-1 to A-3.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
namely, Murat Singh, Prem Singh and Divender Singh, will have to
refund the amount, so released, with interest.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs. Mast
Ram (deceased) through his LRs & another
.
CMP No.6147 of 2026 in RFA No.228 of 2013
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
rt respondent No.2/State.
CMP No.6147 of 2026
At the request of learned counsel for the applicant,
list on 30.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Chain Singh & Ors.
CMP(M)No.189 of 2026
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr.Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Ms.Richa,
of
Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No.189 of 2026
rt
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the respondents and have no objection, in case, the same is
allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of Ajay Kumar
Sharma, presently posted as Superintending Engineer, HPPWD 3 rd
Circle, Solan, District Solan, H.P., the same is allowed and delay of
103 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Ms. Richa, Advocate, appears and waives service of post
admission notice on behalf of the respondents.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
.
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 02.05.2025,
passed by learned Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Authority (Additional District Judge-1), Solan,
District Solan, H.P. in Reference Petition No.19-S/4 of 2023(17)
of
(CIS Registration No.42/2017), titled as Chain Singh and others
vs. State of H.P. & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency
rt
of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Amar Singh & anr.
CMP(M)No.140 of 2026
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr.Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Ms.Richa,
of
Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No.140 of 2026
rt
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the respondents and have no objection, in case, the same is
allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of Ajay Kumar
Sharma, presently posted as Superintending Engineer, HPPWD 3 rd
Circle, Solan, District Solan, H.P., the same is allowed and delay of
103 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Ms. Richa, Advocate, appears and waives service of post
admission notice on behalf of the respondents.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
.
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 02.05.2025,
passed by learned Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Authority (Additional District Judge-1), Solan,
District Solan, H.P. in Reference Petition No.20-S/4 of 2023(17)
of
(CIS Registration No.43/2017), titled as Amar Singh and another
vs. State of H.P. & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency
rt
of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sarla Kumari vs. Sameer Ratogi & Another
COPC No.682 of 2025
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr.Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC vs. Pratap Singh a/w connected matter
RFA No.20 of 2016 a/w RFA No.215 of 2016
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellant in RFA No.20 of 2016 and for the respondent
in RFA No.215 of 2016.
of
Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent in
RFA No.20/2016 and for the appellant in RA
No.215/2016.
rt CMP No.7992 of 2026
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted one week’s time to seek instructions/to file reply.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
LAC vs. Pratap Singh a/w connected matter
RFA No.20 of 2016 a/w RFA No.215 of 2016
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellant in RFA No.20 of 2016 and for the respondent
in RFA No.215 of 2016.
of
Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent in
RFA No.20/2016 and for the appellant in RA
No.215/2016.
rt CMP No.7992 of 2026
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted one week’s time to seek instructions/to file reply.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Mahalaxmi Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs. Drompti Devi and
Ors.
.
FAO (FC)No.368 of 2024
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Respondent No.4, already ex parte.
of
None for respondent No.5.
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, prays for
and is granted two weeks’ further time to file Power of Attorney,
by way of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Vipul Sood vs. Kumbh Dass & Ors.
FAO No.42 of 2025
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran,
Advocate,for the appellant.
Mr. Saurav Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sarthak
Mehta,Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Respondents No.4(a) to 4(c), already ex parte.
of
As prayed, list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs.Ajay Thakur & Ors.
FAO No.293 of 2025
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1 to 3, already ex parte.
Admit. Call for the records.
of
Let post admission notice be issued to respondents
No.1 to 3, returnable with six weeks, on taking steps within a period
of three days. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Satish Kumar Tomar vs. Ritesh Chauhan & Ors.
COPC No.1376 of 2025
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Chauhan,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr.Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents/State.
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, submits that
rt
counter affidavit has been filed, however the same is not on record.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order.
List as and when the counter affidavit, is placed on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Hari Mohan & Ors.
FAO No.54 of 2026
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr.Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Ms.Richa,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondent No.6, though served.
of
FAO No.54 of 2026
rt As per report of the Registry, respondent No.6, has
been duly served, however, there is no representation on her
behalf. Hence, she is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Notice issued to respondent No.5, is still awaited. Be
awaited for a further period of four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.4605 of 2026
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
Interim to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Anoop Jain vs. M/s Olina Professional Cosmetics Pvt.
Ltd a/w connected matter.
.
Civil Suit No.19 of 2014 a/w Civil Suit No.45 of 2014
Civil suit No.19 of 2014
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Alvin Messey,
Advocate, for the defendant.
of
Civil Suit No.45 of 2014
Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Alvin Messey,
rt Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.1460 of 2025 in Civil Suit No.19 of 2014
The present application under Order VIII, Rule 1A(3)
read with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the
defendant/counter-claimant to place on record original invoices.
It has been mentioned in the application that the
defendant had already placed copies of invoices showing
purchase of new Moulds from various suppliers. However, due to
oversight during the course of recording of examination-in-chief
of DW-1, the said witness forgot to keep original invoices with
him, as a result of which, the said invoices were marked.
Therefore, it is prayed that the defendant may be permitted to
place on record the original invoices so that the said document
may be given Exhibit Mark.
Reply to the application has been filed by the
plaintiff/non-applicant, wherein averments made in the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
application have been denied and it has been stated that if the
applicant/defendant is permitted to place on record the
.
documents in question at this belated stage, it would be in
violation of Order 13 rule 1CPC and also it would be prejudicial
to the interest of non-applicant/plaintiff.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also
of
gone through the record of the case.
rt Since, it is not in dispute that the photocopies of
original invoices, which the defendant wants to produce on
record, are already on record, therefore, no prejudice is going to
be caused to the non-applicant/plaintiff, if the present application
is allowed.
Accordingly, in view of the above, the present
application is allowed and defendant/counter-claimant, is
permitted to produce the original invoices on record, as
mentioned in this application, subject to the cost of Rs.20,000/-,
out of which, Rs.10,000/- shall be deposited with ‘Chief Justice
Disaster Relief Fund, 2025’ and remaining amount of
Rs.10,000/-, shall be paid to the non-applicant/plaintiff.
Application stands disposed of.
OMP No.1280 of 2025 in Civil Suit No.19 of 2014
Heard in part.
At this stage, learned counsel for the
applicant/defendant, prays for adjournment.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
As prayed for, list this application for further
arguments on 21.05.2026.
.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Surinder Pal Singh vs. Puspa & Ors.
RFA No. 346 of 2005
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate vice Mr. M.L. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Mr. R.K.Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.9.
of
Respondents No.7(b)(i) & 7(c)(i), already ex parte.
At the request of learned vice counsel for
rt
respondents No.1 to 6, list for final hearing on 19.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Kamini Abluwalia & another vs. Devi Saran & Ors.
Civil Suit No.41 of 2020
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Lalit K. Sehgal, Advocate, for defendants No.1 & 2.
Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
of
Replication stands filed.
Now list the case for admission/denial of documents
before Additional Registrar (J) after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ankush Dass Sood vs. Arvind Sood and others
Civil Suit No.18 of 2021
.
22.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocates, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Ms. Sukriti Parmar, Advocate vice Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal,
of
Advocate, for proforma defendants No.4 to 7, 10 & 12.
Proforma defendants No.8,9 & 11 are ex parte.
rt OMP No. 957 of 2024
As prayed for, list for consideration after two weeks.
Civil Suit No.18 of 2021
Further two weeks’ time, as prayed, is granted to file
written statement on behalf of defendant No.2. List thereafter.
Counter Claim No.78 of 2024
Learned counsel for the plaintiff/non-counter-
claimant, states that written statement has been filed on
31.05.2025, however the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 22, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram (deceased) through his LRs vs. Ram Kali & Ors.
FAO No.4221 of 2013
.
18.04.2026 Present: Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Names of respondents No.1,6 & 7, stand deleted.
Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 3.
of
Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. H.S. Rana,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rt Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
At the request of learned counsel for respondent
No.5, list on 06.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Laxmi Pradhan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No.2028 of 2011
.
18.04.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
rt As prayed, list on 25.04.2026 before the appropriate
Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Deep Lal vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CWP No.1675 of 2012
.
18.04.2026 Present: Ms. Geetanjali, Advocate vice Mr. Virender Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.4
of
to 60.
None for respondents No.67 & 68.
rt As prayed, list on 25.04.2026 before the appropriate
Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
M/s Federal Mogul Bearing India Ltd. vs. Santosh Dutta a/w
connected matter.
.
CWP No.3885/2012 a/w CWPs No.4084 & 9215 of 2012
18.04.2026 Present: Ms. Kanchan, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul Mahajan,
Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.3885/2012
and for the respondent in CWP Nos.4084 & 9215 of
2012.
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Nishant Khidtta,
of
Advocate, for the respondent in CWP No.3885/2012
and for the petitioner in CWP Nos.4084 & 9215 of
2012.
rt As prayed, list on 25.04.2026 before the appropriate
Bench.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Vijay Thakur & another vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.4093 of 2013
.
18.04.2026 Present: Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.1/State.
of
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rtCMP No.17437 of 2023
The present application under Section 151 of CPC,
has been filed on behalf of respondent No.2, on the ground that
the appellants have filed a single appeal, i.e. the present appeal
against the award passed in three different Land Reference
Petition Nos. 67 of 2008, 68 of 2008 and 76 of 2008. Therefore,
a single appeal filed against the award passed in aforesaid three
different reference petitions, is not maintainable and same is
liable to the dismissed.
In reply, a specific stand has been taken by the non-
applicants/appellants that the present appeal is preferred only
against the Land Reference Petition No.68 of 2008 and no
reference has been made in the grounds of appeal regarding the
award passed in Reference Petition Nos. 67 of 2008 & 76 of
2008.
Hence, in view of the reply filed by the non-
applicants/appellants, the present appeal is treated as the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
appeal filed against the Land Reference Petition No. 68 of 2008.
Application is disposed of accordingly.
.
RFA No.4093 of 2013
As prayed, list for final hearing on 25.04.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 18, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Atin Bansal vs. Dharam Puri & Ors.
FAO No.4134 of 2013
.
18.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Trigun Singh,
Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Munish Kumar and Ms. Raksha Thakur,
Advocates vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for
of
respondent No.6.
rt Mr. Trigun Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of the appellant and stated that Power of Attorney,
shall be filed during the course of the day.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ranto Devi vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
COPC No.43 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Tarun Garla,Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 16.04.2026, wherein, it has been
stated that an SLP has already been filed in similar matter, i.e. in
CWP No.2274 of 2021, titled Satya Devi vs. State of H.P.
Therefore, at the request of learned Additional
Advocate General, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sunny Kumar vs. Amarjeet K.Sharma
COPC No.59 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
rt
record communication dated 10.04.2026 alongwith Office Order
of even date, wherein, it has been stated that judgment passed
by this Court in CWP No.8243 of 2023, titled Sunny Kumar vs.
State of H.P. & others, stands duly complied with in its letter and
spirit.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 27.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Reena Dogra vs. Dr.Sita Thakur & Ors.
CMP No.2997 of 2026 in COPC No.1397 of 2025
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ankush
Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,
Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 16.04.2026 alongwith Duty Certificate
rt
(Annexure A-1).
Since Duty Certificate has been issued to the petitioner,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw the present application.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Subhadra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.474 of 2015
.
17.04.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Suneel Awasthy, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Mr. Ravinder Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
of
Respondent No.5, already ex parte.
rtHeard in part. For continuation, list on 28.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Upinder Kumar & Ors.
FAO No.22 of 2014
.
17.04.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate,
of
for respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1, submits that
rt
an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC, has been filed in
the Registry on 16.04.2026, however, the same is not on record.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order.
As prayed, list on 28.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Dr. Aniketa Sharma vs. State Information Commissioner & Ors.
CWP No.5190 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.P.S Dhaulta, Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocates
General and Mr. Skinder Bhushan, Deputy Advocate
General, for respondents No.1 & 2/State.
CMP No.7447 of 2026
of
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed and delay in refiling the present writ petition, is hereby condoned.
rt
Application stands disposed of.
CWP No.5190 of 2026 & CMP No.7445 of 2026
Issue notice. Mr. Y.P.S Dhaulta, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Issue separate notice to respondents No.3 to 7, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of one week.
List thereafter before the appropriate Bench alongwith CWP
No.17351 of 2025.
CMP No.7446 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/petitioner is exempted from filing
translated copy of Annexures P-6, P-7 & P-8. However, learned counsel
for the applicant/petitioner undertakes to file the same as and when
occasion arises.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
The New Indis Assurance Company Ltd.vs.
Ram Dassi & Ors. a/w connected matter
.
FAO(WCA) No.499 of 2016 a/w FAO No.509 of 2016
FAO (WCA) No.499 of 2016
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for the appellant.
of
Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
rtRespondent No.3, already ex parte.
FAO No.509 of 2016
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 to 4, already ex parte.
FAO(WCA) No.499 of 2016 a/w FAO No.509 of
2016
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellant(s), list on 22.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Rishupal alias Mani vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.449 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
HC Mehar Chand, PS. Haroli, District Una, H.P.,
present with record.
rtArguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Beli Ram
RFA No.375 of 2019
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ankush
Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,
Deputy Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for proposed LRs No.1(a) & 1(b).
of
CMP No.7420 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the factum of death of respondent No.1(a), is
ordered to be taken on record. Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) Nos.2060 & 2061 of 2025
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of proposed respondent No.1(a). List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
M/s JPHCP vs. Narotam Singh & Ors.
RFA No.130 of 2018
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Nand Lal Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2(b) to 2(d).
Name of respondent No.2(a), already stands deleted.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Kumar
of
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ankush
Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,
Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No.3 &
rt 4/State.
CMP No.27321 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays for
and is granted three weeks’ further time to file rejoinder as well as
fresh correct amended memo of parties. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sulekha Devi & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.19 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant, submits that steps
for the service of respondents, have been taken on 16.04.2026.
of
Registry is directed to make a report in this respect.
As prayed, list on 24.04.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.45 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Hemant K. Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar,Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays for
of
and is granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.5. List thereafter.
rt In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 4, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Rajeev Bazwaria & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & another
CMP(M) No.247 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ankush
Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,
Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file reply. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
CMD, SJVNL & anr. vs. Piru Ram & Anr.
CMP(M)No.160 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant
K. Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Praveenhasta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
CMP(M)No.160 of 2026
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
rt
behalf of the contesting respondent No.1 and has no objection, in
case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of Vipul Thakur,
Deputy General Manager (HR)SJVNL,Limited, Sunni Dam Hydro
Electric Project Sunni, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, the same is
allowed and delay of 59 days in filing the present appeal is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Praveenhasta, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.2, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondent No.1, be also filed.
.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
of
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 28.08.2025,
passed by learned Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and
rt
Resettlement Authority, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, District
Shimla in case titled Piru Ram vs. The CMD, SJVNL & Ors., shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
CMD, SJVNL & anr. vs. Shobha Ram & Anr.
CMP(M)No.162 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant
K. Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Praveenhasta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
CMP(M)No.162 of 2026
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
rt
behalf of the contesting respondent No.1 and has no objection, in
case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of Vipul Thakur,
Deputy General Manager (HR)SJVNL,Limited, Sunni Dam Hydro
Electric Project Sunni, Tehsil Sunni, District Shimla, the same is
allowed and delay of 61 days in filing the present appeal is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Praveenhasta, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.2, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondent No.1, be also filed.
.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
of
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 28.08.2025,
passed by learned Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and
rt
Resettlement Authority, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, District
Shimla in case titled Shobha Ram vs. The CMD, SJVNL & Ors.,
shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
NIAC Limited vs. Tripta Devi & ors.
FAO No.221 of 2023
.
17.04.2026 Present: Ms. Mamta Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr.Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
CMP No.3798 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and the order dated 09.01.2026, is corrected to the
extent that in place of words “release 30% of the award amount”, be
read as “release 30% of the awarded amount from the share of the
applicant/respondent No.2, Aarushi Chadda.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar vs. Rawther Dawood Nazeem & Ors.
CMP No.4735 of 2026 in COPC No.1307 of 2025
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Pranav Kumar Kaushal, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ankush
Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,
Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
CMP No.4735 of 2026
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 13.04.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that in compliance of order passed by this Court in COPC
No.1307/2025( in CWP No.15943/2025) and the subsequent
clarification received from the Government, the Department has
granted the higher pay scale upon completion of two years of regular
service as a Clerk to the official pursuant to Rule 7(A) of the Himachal
Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2022, subject to the final
outcome of LPA-71/2026-State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Sunil Kumar; and
other legal recourse as available to the Department vide order
No.FDS-H(B)-2-1/20201695-1705, dated 10.04.2026.
Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is
required to be passed in the present application and the same is
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sohan Lal Sharma vs. Naresh Singh Thakur
FAO No.314 of 2025
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.R. Verma,Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
of
after two weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ranjit Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh & Ors.
COPC No.12 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
As prayed, list along with CWPOA No.2610 of 2020,
after obtaining necessary approval from Hon’ble the Chief
rt
Justice.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Start a Fresh Drug Counseling and Rehabilitation
Centre vs. State of H.P.
.
FAO No.206 of 2025
17.04.2026 Present: Ms. Kalpana Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Jyotirmay
Bhatt, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
of
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today due to some personal difficulty.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Roshan Lal & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.3 of 2026
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.1.
of
Mr Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondents No.2 to 4.
rt Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4, stated that
reply has been filed on 16.04.2026, however, the same is not on
record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record,
if in order.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 08.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar Mahant vs. Dassi Devi & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.180 of 2025
.
17.04.2026 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 5.
Mr. Rohan Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for respondent No.6.
of
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
rt Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5,
stands filed.
Learned vice counsel for respondent No.6, submits
that Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent, has been
filed, however, the same is not on record. Learned counsel is
directed to follow up with the Registry in this respect.
Learned counsel for respondent No.7, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney on behalf of
aforesaid respondent. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamla Devi
(deceased) through LRs and others
.
FAO No.358 of 2016
16.04.2026 Present: Mr. Gunjan Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Shilpa Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1(i) and 1(ii), already ex parte.
Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to
of
4.
None for respondent No.5.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Shyam Lal Gautam vs. LAC & Anr.
RFA No.213 of 2017
.
16.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashish Vema, Advocate vice Mr.B.S. Attri,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents/State.
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Dev Kala vs. Ashish Singhmar
COPC No.248 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 27.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Bhagesh Dutt Sharma vs. Amarjeet K. Sharma
COPC No.250 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Dr. Lalit K.
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 27.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Ravi Dutt vs. R.D. Nazeem & Ors.
COPC No.253 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for all the
of
respondents except respondent No.3.
Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate vice Mr. Raman
rt Jamalta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General and Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, appear
and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective
respondents. They prays for and are granted three weeks’ time
to file reply/compliance report.
As prayed, list on 05.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Amit Kumar vs. Sanjay Kaushik
COPC No.256 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Ms.Shikha Rajta, Advocate vice Mr. Prem P.
Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 27.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Rajesh & Ors.
RFA No.92 of 2015
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Anshul Gandhi,Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
of
Advocate, for respondents No.1,2, 5(a) to 9, 13, 14, 15,
18, 19, 20, 21(a).
None for respondents No.3,4 and 6(c).
rt Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondent No.6(b).
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents
No.3,4 and 6(c), despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Learned counsel for respondent No.6(b), states that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent shall be filed
during the course of the day.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted three weeks’ further time to take steps for the service of
respondents No.11,12, 16(b) to 16(d).
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Executive Engineer & Ors. vs. Kedar Nath and another
RFA No.355 of 2015
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurav
Upadhayay, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. O.C. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Srishti Negi, Advocate as Legal Aid Counsel, for
of
LRs of deceased respondent No.2.
CMP(M) Nos.2011 & 2012 of 2025
rt Three weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to file
reply(ies). List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Manni Ram (deceased)
through LRs & anr. a/w connected matter
.
RFA No.177 of 2019 a/w CWP No.3730 of 2019
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State in RFA No.177/2019 and for
respondents No.1 & 2 in CWP No.3730/2019.
of
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)
to 1(e) and respondent No.2 in RFA No.177/2019 and
for respondent No.3 in CWP No.3730/2019.
rt Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.3730/2019.
CWP No.3730 of 2019
Learned Additional Advocate General as well as
learned counsel for respondent No.3, pray for and are granted
three weeks’ time to file reply(ies). List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
M/s Deventure Hotel and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs.
UOI & Ors.
.
Civil Suit No.23 of 2023
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for
defendant No.1.
of
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for defendants No.2
& 3.
rtMr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archana
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for defendants No. 5
& 6 /State.
Learned counsel for the parties, pray for and are
granted four weeks’ further time to explore the possibility of
amicable settlement inter se parties with respect to the application
filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Vishal Agarwal vs. Paramjeet Singh & Ors.
Civil Suit No.63 of 2023
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.223 of 2026
of
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of non-applicant/plaintiff.
rtLearned vice counsel for the applicants/defendants,
prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not
available today.
As prayed, list on 27.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Sewa Singh & Ors. vs. Gurdev Kaur & Ors.
RFA No.36 of 2024
.
10.04.2026 Present: Ms. Pratiksha Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sanket
Sankhyan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents
No.1, 2(i) to 2(vi), 3(i) to 3(iii), 4 & 5.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.6(i)
of
to 6(vi), 6(viii) & 6(x).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
rt Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.7/State.
Learned vice counsel for the appellants, prays for and
is granted three weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of respondent No.3(i). List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Collector, LAC & Anr. vs. Ran Singh & Ors.
RFA No.104 of 2025
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State.
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) & 3, already ex parte.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to furnish correct address of
rt
respondent No.2. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Rama Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1613 of 2025
.
10.04.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Dhanwanti,Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Surya Chauhan,Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Respondent No.6, already ex parte.
CMP(M) No.1613 of 2025
rt No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the contesting respondents and have no objection, in case,
the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the aPuja
Tapwal, Incharge Legal Hub, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., the
same is allowed and delay of 210 days in filing the present appeal is
hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Ms. Dhanwanti and Mr. Surya Chauhan , Advocates,
appear and waive service of post admission notice on behalf respective
respondents.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:30 :::CIS
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.6, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
.
thereafter.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
of
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 23.11.2024,
rt
passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-(III), District
Shimla, H.P in case titled Rama Devi & Ors. vs. Atima Kapila &
Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present
appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC HPPWD & Anr. vs. Mohar Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1693 of 2025
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
applicants/State.
Mr. Rishab Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Sarthak
of
Mehta,Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4 & 6.
CMP(M) Nos.508 & 509 of 2026
rt Let notice be issued to the proposed LRs of deceased
respondent No.5, returnable within six weeks, on taking steps
within a period of three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
The Managing Director vs. Sarita Jaswal & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1712 of 2025
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Arun Jangra, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2.
Mr. Sambhav Bhasin and Ms. Shruti Dubey, Advocates,
for respondent No.3.
of
CMP(M) No.1712 of 2025
rt No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the contesting respondents and have no objection, in case,
the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the applicant-
Inder Mohan Sharma, Depot Manager-cum-General Manager, Punjab
Roadways, Nangal, Punjab, the same is allowed and delay of 46 days
in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Ashwani Dhiman and Mr. Sambhav Bhasin ,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
behalf respective respondents.
CMP No._________ of 2026
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
.
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 21.04.2025,
passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-(III), District
Shimla, H.P in case titled Sarita Jaswal & another vs. Managing
Director & another, shall remain stayed during the pendency of the
of
present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
rt Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Indra Rathour vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
CMP No.24793 of 2025 in COPC No.912 of 2025
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Virbahadur
Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
of
respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
rt CMP No.24793 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/petitioner,
fairly submits that order dated 28.08.2025, stands duly complied
with and he doesn’t intend to press the present application.
Accordingly, in view of the above, the present
application is dismissed, as not pressed and the present matter
is closed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Shiv Pratap Giri & another vs. Chanderbhan &
others
.
CS No.113 of 2022
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. N.K. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman Sood,
Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate for defendant No.2.
of
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for defendants No.3 to 7.
rtOMP Nos.233 and 234 of 2026.
Learned counsel for defendant No.1, has stated that
plaintiff No.2, has expired in the month of December, 2025.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the plaintiffs,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take consequential
steps on account of death of aforesaid plaintiff No.2. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC vs. Kumari Dolma & Ors.
CMP No.4919 of 2026 in RFA No.35 of 2015
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archana Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the
of
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.4919 of 2026
rtThe instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 to 4, namely, Dolma,
Nandini, Shehnaaz and Kamla, for release of award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest in their favour, as per their shares, as
lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly
supported with the affidavits of the applicants.
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed
on record instructions received from the Executive Engineer, Jal
Shakti Division, Shahnahar Project Division Badukhar, wherein, it
has been stated that the main appeal stands finally decided
by this Court on 13th July, 2023 and as no appeal has been
preferred against the said judgment by either of the parties,
the same has attained finality, the department has no
objection in case the amount deposited in the Registry of this
Court, is released in favour of the applicants.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
.
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
applicants, namely, Dolma, Nandini, Shehnaaz and Kamla, after
proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their
of
saving bank accounts, as per their shares, details whereof have
been mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
rtThe application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ishwar Dass vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
CMP No.4856 of 2026 in COPC No.1387 of 2025.
.
10.04.2026 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents/State.
CMP No.4856 of 2026
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record Office Order dated 09.04.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that judgment dated 30.07.2025, passed by this Court
in CWP No.12395of 2025, titled Ishwar Dass vs. State of H.P. &
Anr., has been duly complied with.
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/petitioner,
acknowledges the factum of compliance of the order.
Therefore, no further order is required to be passed in
the present application and the same is dismissed as having been
rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rajesh Singh vs. Dr. Gopal Beri
CMP No.5545 of 2025 in COPC No.1400 of 2025.
.
10.04.2026 Present: Ms. Ritu, Advocate vice Ms. Anita Devi, Advocate, for
the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
CMP No. 5545 of 2025
rt Learned vice counsel for the applicant/petitioner,
fairly submits that order dated 18.12.2025, stands duly complied
with and she doesn’t intend to press the present application.
Accordingly, in view of the above, the present
application is dismissed, as not pressed and the present matter
is closed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Minakshi Devi vs. Rakesh Kanwar and others
CMP No.6945 of 2026 in COPC No.1552 of 2025.
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
CMP No.6945 of 2026
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record Office Order dated 18.02.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that judgment dated 14.07.2025, passed by this Court
in CWP No.11239 of 2025, titled Minakshi Devi vs. State of H.P.
& Ors., has been duly complied with.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, acknowledges the
fact of compliance of the order.
Therefore, no further order is required to be passed in
the present application and the same is dismissed as having been
rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Company vs. Surinder Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.414 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rajiv Kumar vs. Suresh Kumar & Anr.
CMP(M) No.416 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Manjeet Singh & Anr. vs. Reeta Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.417 of 2026
.
10.04.2026 Present: Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 10, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
HLAC vs. Rupinder Singh
CMP No. 6830 of 2026 in RFA No.150 of 2015
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Virender Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the
of
respondent.
CMP No. 6830 of 2026
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 27.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Hom Chand vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
CMP No. 4858 of 2026 in COPC No.1396 of 2025
.
09.04.2026 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents.
CMP No. 4858 of 2026
rt
Learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that
order dated 18.12.2025, stands duly complied with and she
doesn’t intend to press the present application.
Accordingly, in view of the above, the present
application is dismissed, as not pressed and the present matter is
closed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors vs. Gita Ram
CMP No.32672/2025 in RFA No.232 of 2017
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
of
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.32672 /2025
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicant/respondent Gita Ram, for release of
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in his favour, as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly
supported with the affidavit of the applicant.
Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that
he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He further
stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
09.09.2025 by this Court and an SLP filed against the aforesaid
judgment stands dismissed vide order dated 20.03.2026, the
same has attained finality, he has no objection in case the prayer
made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
applicant, Gita Ram, after proper verification and identification, by
remitting the same to his saving bank account, detail whereof has
.
been mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors vs. Hari Singh & Ors.
CMP No.32948/2025 in RFA No.230 of 2017
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
of
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.32948/2025
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 to 7, namely,
Narender Singh, Kanta Devi, Gopal Thakur, Nikhil Thakur, Radha
Devi, Prem Singh, Nisha Devi, Meera Devi and Tarawati, for
release of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in their
favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of
the applicants.
Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that
he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He further
stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
09.09.2025 by this Court and an SLP filed against the aforesaid
judgment stands dismissed, the same has attained finality, he has
no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
.
applicants, namely, Narender Singh, Kanta Devi, Gopal Thakur,
Nikhil Thakur, Radha Devi, Prem Singh, Nisha Devi, Meera Devi
and Tarawati, after proper verification and identification, by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, as per their
of
shares, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-4 of the
application.
rt The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors vs. Tara Chand & Ors.
CMP No.32693/2025 in RFA No.229 of 2017
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
of
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.32693/2025
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed by the applicants/respondents, namely, Tara Chand,
Roop Singh, Inder Singh, Pratap Singh and Nirmla, for release of
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in their favour, as per
their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The
application is duly supported with the affidavits of the applicants.
Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that
he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He further
stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
09.09.2025 by this Court and an SLP filed against the aforesaid
judgment stands dismissed, the same has attained finality, he has
no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this
Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of
justice to release the award amount alongwith up-to-date interest
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
applicants, namely, Tara Chand, Roop Singh, Inder Singh, Pratap
Singh and Nirmla, after proper verification and identification, by
.
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts,as per their
shares, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-5 of the
application.
The application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Sangat Ram and another
RFA No.404 of 2019
.
09.04.2026 Present: Ms. Sugandh Verma, Advocate vice Ms. Shreya
Chauhan,Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for proposed LRs No.1(a) &
1(b).
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
rtSingh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.2/State.
CMP(M) Nos.1406 & 1407 of 2025
The instant applications under Order 22, Rules, 4 &
9 of CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, have been filed by
the applicant/appellant for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased respondent, Sangat Ram, who has
expired on 11.11.2023, after setting aside the abatement, if any.
As per the applicant, deceased respondent, Sangat
Ram has expired on 11.11.2023, leaving behind his legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-3 of the application.
However, the delay in filing the application as occurred is neither
willful nor intentional, but due to the reasons, which were beyond
the control of the applicant, as such, the same deserves to be
condoned and since right to sue always survives in favour of the
legal representatives of deceased respondent, Sangat Ram,
there is no impediment in bringing on record the aforesaid legal
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
heirs and as such, the present application deserves to be
allowed.
.
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
behalf of the non-applicants/respondents and have no objection,
in case the same are allowed.
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that the
of
delay, as occurred, was beyond the control of the applicant and
has been sufficiently explained in the application, the same is
rt
hereby condoned.
As right to sue still survives in favour of the legal
representatives of deceased respondent, Sangat Ram, the legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-3 of the application, are
ordered to be brought on record. Amended memo of parties filed
along with applications, is ordered to be taken on record.
The applications stand disposed of.
RFA No.404 of 2019
Since the appeal stands already admitted, list for
final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Kalyan Singh and another vs. Daya Ram and another
CMP(M) No.1679 of 2025
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Respondent No.1, already ex parte.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
CMP(M) No.1679 of 2025
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
rt
behalf of the contesting respondent and has no objection, in case, the
same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the applicant-
Kalyan Singh, the same is allowed and delay of 298 days in filing the
present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, appears and waives service
of post admission notice on behalf respondent No.2.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.1, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Renuka Dam Project & Ors. vs. Kalyan Singh and Ors.
CMPs No.30168 & 30171 of 2025 in RFA No.137 of 2018
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Suraj Sharma,Advocate vice Mr. Yashveer Singh
Rathore, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for proposed LRs
No.1(i) to 1(v) and respondents No.1 to 12, 16, 17 &
19 to 21.
of
Respondent No.13, already ex parte.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
rtKumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.23/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the non-
applicants/appellants, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Happy Kumar vs. Narender Pal Singh
CMP No.31000/2025 in COPC No.968 of 2025
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
rtLearned Additional Advocate General, submits that
respondent/Department intends to file an LPA against the
judgment passed by this Court and has requested that the
present matter may be taken up after two weeks. Prayer allowed.
As prayed, list on 05.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Lal Chand Negi vs. Avinash Negi & anr.
COPC No.561 of 2024
.
09.04.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ further time to file counter to communication
dated 15.12.2025.
As prayed, list on 05.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Maghi Ram
RFA No.15 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the
of
respondent.
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted one week’s time to file an application for extension of
time to deposit the amount.
As prayed, list on 29.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC & Anr. vs. Ram Pal & Anr.
RFA No.16 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.1 and respondents No.2(a) to 2(e).
rtLearned counsel for respondents No.2(a) to 2(e),
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file Power of
Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents. List thereafter
before Additional Registrar(J).
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Shiva Deva vs. Usha Devi & others
CMP(M) No.144 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sevedaman Rathore, Advocate, for the
applicant/appllant.
Mr. Dipankar Bagga, Advocate, vice Mr. Animesh
Pathak, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rt Respondent No.5, already ex parte.
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.
Respondent No.6, is unserved for want of correct
address.
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ time to furnish correct address of
respondent No.6. List thereafter.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney(s), on behalf of
respondents No.3 & 7, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Sunil Sanyal vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.445 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file status report.
rt As prayed, list on 30.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rishupal alias Mani vs. State of H.P.
.
Cr.MP(M) No.449 of 2026
09.04.2026 Present: Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
HC Jasbir Singh, PS. Haroli, District Una, H.P.
rtStatus report stands filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to go through the same.
As prayed, list for consideration on 17.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Gian Singh & Anr. vs. Abhishek Jain and Anr.
COPC No.856 of 2024
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. H.K.S. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
On persuasive request made by learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, one week’s further time is granted to file reply
to the contempt petition, failing which, respondent No.1, is
directed to remain present in person.
As prayed, list on 23.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Lekh Ram and others
FAO(MVA) No.351 of 2025
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
of
Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
FAO(MVA) No.351 of 2025
rt As per report of the Registry, respondent No.1, has
been duly served, however, there is no representation on his
behalf. Hence, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan and Mr. Vishwajeet Singh,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
behalf of the respective respondents.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.1,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney(s) on behalf of
respondents No.2 & 3, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Hari Devi & Anr.
FAO(MVA) No.342 of 2025
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
FAO(MVA) No.342 of 2025
of
Admit. Call for the records.
Let post admission notice be issued to
respondents No.1 & 2, returnable within six weeks, on taking
rt
steps within a period of three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Kauran Devi vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.1306 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
rt
is granted three weeks’ further time to file reply/to seek
instructions.
As prayed, list on 06.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar Sharma & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.93 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
rt
is granted three weeks’ further time to file reply/to seek
instructions.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Mahinder Singh & Ors. vs. Ashish Kohli
COPC No.126 of 2026
.
09.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
rt
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply/to seek
instructions.
As prayed, list on 30.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Sukhdev & Ors. vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & another
COPC No.392 of 2025
.
08.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
As prayed, list after four weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Jagan Nath (deceased) through LRs vs. Ex. Sub. Jagdish
Chand (deceased) through LRs & Anr.
.
FAO No.248 of 2016
08.04.2026 Present: Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
As prayed, list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Prem Singh vs. Raj Kumar
RFA No.270 of 2013
.
08.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respodent.
As prayed, list on 11.05.2026.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Suneel Kumar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.
RFA No.4022 of 2013
.
08.04.2026 Present: Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Shashi
Kiran, Advocate, for appellants No.22 & 23.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
of
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
rtrespondent No.2/State.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Kanchan Devi & Ors.
FAO No.74 of 2015
.
08.04.2026 Present: Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. H.S. Rana,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Respondents No.3 & 4, already ex parte.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Neeraj Kumar vs. Devesh Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.211 of 2026
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Susheel Kumar vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.212 of 2026
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Manish Kumar & anr. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.213 of 2026
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ranjeet Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar & anr.
COPC No.215 of 2026
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunita Devi & Ors.
FAO No.18 of 2024
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Bhawna Dhiman, Advocate vice Ms. Komal
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No1,2,4 & 5.
Name of respondent No.3, stands deleted.
of
Mr. Narender K. Reddy, Advocate, for Respondents
No.7(a) to 7(c) and respondent No.9.
rt Steps for the service of respondent No.6, are stated to
have been taken on 26.11.2024. Registry is directed to report in
this respect.
As prayed, list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Nirmal Malakar v. La Risa Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Civil Suit No.33 of 2024
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aditi
Rana, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Mohinder Vema and Mr. Sumit Sharma,Advocates,
for the defendants.
of
OMPs No.1084, 1092 & 1633 of 2025
As prayed, list on 22.04.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mohan &
Ors. a/w connected matters
.
FAO No.352 of 2024 a/w FAO No.44 of 2024 & FAO
No.141 of 2025
FAO No.352 of 2024
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rt Respondents No. 5 to 7, already ex parte.
FAO No.44 of 2024
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
FAO No.141 of 2025
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Gaurav
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
CMP No.18 of 2026 in FAO No.352 of 2024
Reply stands filed.
At the request of Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned vice
counsel, list for consideration on 05.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Dheeraj Vashisht and others vs. Abhishek Vashisht and
others
.
Civil suit No.25 of 2025
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to
4.
of
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for defendants
No.5 to 7.
rt OMP No181 of 2026
Learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs, seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the present application.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
OMP No.182 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/defendants are exempted from
filing English translation of the vernacular documents in question.
However, learned counsel for the applicants/defendants undertakes
to file the same as and when occasion arises.
Application stands disposed of.
OMP No.183 of 2026
Since written statement on behalf of defendants No.5
to 7, stands already filed, no further order is required to be passed
in the present application and accordingly, the same is dismissed,
as having been rendered infructuous.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Civil suit No.25 of 2025
Written statements by all the defendants, stand filed.
.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file replication(s). List thereafter.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Madan Lal and others vs. M/s Sharma Ayurved Private Ltd
and others.
.
Civil suit No.30 of 2025
07.04.2026 Present: Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Mr. Shreyak Sharda, Advocate, for defendants No.3
& 4.
of
Mr. Vikram Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.5 &
6.
rt OMP No.133 of 2026
Since written statement on behalf of defendants No.3 &
4, stands already filed, no further order is required to be passed in
the present application and accordingly, the same is dismissed, as
having been rendered infructuous.
OMP No.134 of 2026
Since written statement on behalf of defendants No.5 &
6, stands already filed, no further order is required to be passed in
the present application and accordingly, the same is dismissed, as
having been rendered infructuous.
OMP Nos.130 & 131 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/plaintiffs, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nitin Kumar & Ors.
FAO No.103 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Joginder Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit
Dogra,Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
of
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.2/State.
rt Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Shivani, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
None for respondent No.5.
CMP No. 6815/2026
The present application, under Order 5, Rule 20, read
with Section 151 CPC has been filed by the applicant for substituted
service of respondents No. 6 &7, by way of affixation.
The perusal of the record reveals that many attempts
have been made for the service of respondents No. 6 &7, however,
they could not be served through ordinary process and it appears
that they are intentionally and deliberately keeping out of the way
for the purpose of avoiding service. Hence, in view of the averments
made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of
the applicant, the same is allowed and respondents No. 6 &7, are
ordered to be served by way of affixation on their last known
address.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Let process fee be filed by the applicant within two
days. Thereafter, the case be listed before the Additional Registrar
.
(Judicial) for further orders regarding service of respondents No. 6
&7, by way of affixation.
The application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Randhir Singh and another vs. Karam Chand
FAO No.274 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate vice Mr. Rakesh
Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.30590 of 2025
of
Learned vice counsel for the respondent, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply to the application.
rt
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
National Insurance Company vs. Santu Devi
FAO (MVA) No.299 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Ms. Shruti Dubey, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika, Advocate vice Mr. Varun Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
of
granted two weeks’ further time to take steps for the service of
respondent No.1. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ghanshyam Dass (deceased) through LRs & Anr. vs.
Mahendra Singh Chawla & Ors.
.
RFA No.240 of 2016
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sanjivini
Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondent No.1, is stated to have expired.
Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.2
of
& 3.
Name of respondents No.4 & 6, stands deleted.
rtNone for respondents No.5(a), 5(b), 7,9 & 10.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, prays for
adjournment on the ground that his record is not complete.
As prayed for, list for final hearing on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Kanchan and others
CMP(M) No.331 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Rehman Tulla, Advocate vice Mr. Devender K.
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2 &
LRs No.3(a) & 3(b).
of
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rtRespondent No.5, already ex parte.
None for respondent No.6.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP(M) Nos.1795 & 331 of 2025
As prayed, list on 20.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Beas Valley Power Corporation vs. Kiran Sharma & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1535 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit, Advocate vice Mr. Dhananjay Sharma,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Suneel Awasthy, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Respondents No.4 & 5, already ex parte.
of
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt CMP(M) No.1535 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel Ms.
Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate, is not available due to ailment
of her mother.
As prayed, list on 04.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rakesh Chand vs. HRTC & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1553 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate for
respondents No.1 to 3.
of
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List
rt
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Shanta Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1621 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 3.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
None for respondent No.4.
rt Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of respondent No.4 on 10.03.2026, however, today
name of Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, has not been reflected in the
cause list.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Ajay
Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.4, in the cause list,
henceforth.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Deep Ram & Ors.
CMP(M) No.2041 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 &
3.
of
Mr. Prikshit Rathore, Advocate vice Ms. Shweta
Parashar, Advocate, has put in appearance
rt on behalf of
respondent No.1 on 12.03.2026, however, today name of Ms.
Shweta Parashar, Advocate, has not been reflected in the cause
list.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Ms.
Shweta Parashar, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in the cause
list, henceforth.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Abhishek Sharma vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.3065 of 2025
.
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent /State.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
list on 23.04.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
General Manager,Northern Railway vs. Rakesh Kumar &
anr.
.
CMP No. 30855 of 2025 in RFA No.87 of 2021
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel , for the
non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
rtNegi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.2/State.
CMP No. 30855 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for respondent No.1, prays
for and is granted three weeks’ further time to place on record
calculations, in terms of the previous order. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Kamla Devi & Ors.
CMP Nos. 6683/2026 & 32600/2026 in FAO
.
No.308 of 2012
07.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Dr. Lalit K.
Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for
applicant/respondent No.4.
of
CMP No. 6683/2026
rt The present application under Order 32 Rule 12,
read with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the
applicant/respondent No. 4, Alisha, for discharging her natural
guardian i.e. her mother Promila, as she has attained the age
of majority.
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the present application and has no objection, in case,
the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicant/respondent No. 4, Alisha,
has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from her
School Leaving Certificate, copy whereof annexed with the
application as well as her affidavit annexed therewith, the
present application is allowed and her mother Promila,
respondent No.3, is ordered to be discharged from her
guardianship; and she is permitted to pursue her case in her
own capacity.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.32600 of 2025
.
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent No.4, Alisha, for
release of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in her
favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The
of
application is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant.
rt Learned counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the application. He further stated that since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 22.08.2014 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
the applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed
by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-
to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of the applicant, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to her saving bank
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
account, detail whereof has been mentioned in Para-5 of the
application.
.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 07, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.
.
FAO No.89 of 2011
06.04.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.6228 of 2026
of
At the request of learned counsel for the applicants,
list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
M/s Krishna Jewellers & Ors. vs. M/s Satya Jewellers & anr.
RFA No.347 of 2014
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Harshit Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Heard in part. For continuity, list 21.04.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Kamal Singh Dhaulta vs. CBI a/w connected matters
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015 a/w Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
.
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2015
of
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
rt Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
Ms. Pritika, Advocate vice Mr. Bhairav
Gupta,Advocate, for the appellants in all the appeals.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
appellant(s) in Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 and 12 of 2015, list all these
appeals on 11.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Gagan Garg vs. National Insurance Company Ltd.
a/w connected matter
.
FAO No.256 of 2020 a/w FAO No.179 of 2015
FAO No.256 of 2020
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
of
Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for
rt respondents No.2,3 & 5.
FAO No.179 of 2015
Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for
respondents No.2,3 & 5.
CMP No.8307 of 2023 in FAO No.256 of 2020
At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, list
on 05.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Rahul & Ors.
RFA N.234 of 2016 with RFA No.69 of 2016
.
RFA No.234 of 2016
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the appellants.
of
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
RFA No.69 of 2016
rt Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents
No.1 to 4.
Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Imran Khan,
Advocate, for respondent No.5.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to proforma
respondent No.4, has been received back duly served, however,
there is no representation on her behalf. Hence, she is ordered to
be proceeded against ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants
in RFA No.69 of 2016, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
M/s Tangnu Romal Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. vs.
Hiu Nath & Ors.
.
RFA No.393 of 2017
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Surjit Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Anuj Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
of
Mr. Udit Shourya Kaushik, Advocate as Legal Aid
Counsel, for respondents No.4 & 5.
rt Mr. Udit Shourya Kaushik, Advocate, has filed
memo of appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 & 5. He
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney
as well as to complete his brief. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Babu Ram Sharma vs. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.918 of 2024
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list
rt
after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Renukaji Dam Project & Ors. vs. Budh Ram (deceased)
through LRs. & Ors.
.
CMP(M) Nos.2056 & 2057/2025, CMPs No.29199 & 29200/2025
in RFA No.294/2018
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Digvinay Singh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr.
Yashveer Singh Rathore,Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Sunny Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. R.K. Bansal,
of
Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
rt CMP(M) Nos.2056 & 2057/2025, CMPs No.29199
& 29200/2025
At this stage, learned vice counsel, for the
applicants/respondents, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw
all the applications.
Accordingly, in view of the above, all the applications
are dismissed as withdrawn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Suman Devi & another
FAO No.169 of 2014
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Oshin Anand Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.S.
Chandel,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj
Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.6236 of 2026
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for the
applicant/appellant, list on 24.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs. Mast
Ram (deceased) through his LRs & Anr.
.
CMP No.6200 of 2026 in RFA No.374 of 2012
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel , for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
rt Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.2/State.
CMP No.6200 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent No.1(e) Rakesh
Kumar, for release of award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest in his favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, for the non-
applicant/appellant stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the application. He further stated that since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 14.06.2023 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
.
the applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed
by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-
of
to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of applicant Rakesh Kumar, after proper
verification and identification, by remitting the same to his
rt
saving bank account, detail whereof has been mentioned in
Para-2 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.
.
FAO No.89 of 2011
06.04.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.6228 of 2026
of
The present application under Order 32 Rule 12,
read with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the
rt
applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, namely, Prikshit and
Shagun, for discharging their natural guardian i.e.their father
Sanjeev Kumar, as they have attained the age of majority.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3,
namely, Prikshit and Shagun have now attained the age of
majority, as is evident from their Matriculation Examination
Certificates, copies whereof annexed with the application as
well as their affidavits annexed therewith, the present
application is allowed and their father Sanjeev Kumar,
respondent No.1, is ordered to be discharged from their
guardianship; and they are permitted to pursue their case in
their own capacity.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
.
CMP No.6227 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.2 and 3,
namely, Prikshit and Shagun, for release of award amount
of
alongwith up-to-date interest in their favour, as per their
shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The
rt
application is duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants.
Learned counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the application. He further stated that since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 12.08.2016 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavits
of the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in
the interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith
up-to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Court in favour of the applicants, namely, Prikshit and
Shagun, after proper verification and identification, by
.
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts,as per their
shares, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-7 of
the application.
of
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.6229 of 2026
rt At this stage, applicants/respondents are exempted
from filing English typed version of Annexure A-1.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Mali and ors.
FAO No.348 of 2024
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Oshin Anand Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.S.
Chandel,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tarun Garla, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Aafreen Kaushal, Advocate vice Ms. Anuja Mehta,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.6235 of 2026
rt At the request of learned vice counsel for the
applicant/appellant, list on 24.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs.
Mast Ram (deceased) through his LRs &
Anr.
.
CMP No.6147 of 2026 in RFA No.228 of 2013
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel , for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
rtThakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.2/State.
CMP No.6147 of 2026
At the request of learned counsel for the applicant,
list on 22.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs.
Khuda Baksh (deceased) through his LRs &
Anr.
.
CMP No.6198 of 2026 in RFA No.940 of 2012
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel , for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
rt Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.2/State.
CMP No.6198 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent No.1(a) Mehar
Deen, for release of award amount alongwith up-to-date
interest in his favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, for the non-
applicant/appellant stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the application. He further stated that since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 09.12.2024 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
the applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed
of
by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-
to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
rt
Court in favour of applicant Mehar Deen, after proper
verification and identification, by remitting the same to his
saving bank account, detail whereof has been mentioned in
Para-2 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Tarsem Singh & Ors.
Civil Suit No.03 of 2026
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendants No.1 & 5, already ex parte.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, for defendant No.3.
of
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
defendant No.6, has been received back duly served, however,
rt
there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, he is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps on
account of death of defendants No.2 & 4. List thereafter.
In the meantime, written statement, as prayed, be also
filed on behalf of defendant No.3.
Interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Juneja vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.321 of 2026
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bhairav
Gupta and Ms. Swati Sharma, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Inspector Yadav Chand, C.B.I, Bharari, present with
record.
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted one day’s further time to produce entire medical record of
the petitioner.
As prayed, list on 07.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Amar Nath (deceased) through his LRs vs. State
of H.P. a/w connected matters.
.
RFA No.79 of 2010 a/w RFA Nos.80 to 82 and 120
to 123 of 2010.
RFA Nos. 79 to 82 of 2010
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant(s) in all appeals.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
rtNegi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents
No.1 to 3/State in all appeals.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondent No.4 in all appeals.
RFA Nos. 120 to 123 of 2010
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for appellants No.1
to 3/State in all appeals.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Mr. Bhupender Singh
Kanwar and Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocates, for the
respective respondents in all appeals.
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
HPSEBL vs. Govind Singh Pathania
RFA No.408 of 2014
.
06.04.2026 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Vandna Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
CMP No.3895 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply/seek
rt
instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Jasvir Singh vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.1439 of 2025
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
HC Mehar Chand, P.S. Haroli, District Una, H.P.
present with record.
rt Heard for some time.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
list for continuation on 17.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Anjali Bhalla & others
Civil Suit No.1 of 2026
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendants No.2,3,4(a) to 4(c) & 5, already ex parte.
Mr. Somesh Raj, Advocate, for defendant No.6.
of
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for defendant No.7.
rt Civil Suit No.1 of 2026 & OMP No.07 of 2026
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
defendant No.1, is still awaited.
Let fresh notice be issued to defendant No.1,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
two days.
Learned counsel for contesting defendants No.6 &
7, pray for and are granted four weeks’ further time to file written
statements to the present suit as well as replies to OMP No.7 of
2026. List thereafter.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Tarsem Singh & others
Civil Suit No.2 of 2026
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendants No.1 & 7, already ex parte.
Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumar,
Advocate, for defendants No.2 to 6.
of
Civil Suit No.2 of 2026 & OMP No.09 of 2026
rt Learned vice counsel for defendants No.2 to 6,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file written
statement to the present suit as well as reply to OMP No.9 of
2026. List thereafter.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Devinder Sharma vs. Sudha Devi & Ors.
COPC No.734 of 2025
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
No rejoinder is intended to be filed.
rt At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Kaushalya Devi vs. LAC (Railways) & Ors.
CMP(M) No.2219 of 2025
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
of
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Senior Panel Counsel, for
rt respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for respondent No.3, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply, by way of last
opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs.
Dharam Pal and another
.
FAO (ECA) No.262 of 2025
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
CMP No.6183 of 2026
rt No reply to the application is intended to be filed.
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and ex parte order dated
03.03.2026, passed against respondent No.2, is set aside and he
is directed to join the present proceedings, henceforth.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.262 of 2025
Admitted on the following substantial questions of
law:-
“1. Whether the learned Commissioner below has
power to review/modify the award after passing of
the same?
2. Whether the appellant being insurer is liable to pay
penalty and the learned Commissioner below has
erred in directing appellant alongwith respondent
No.2 to pay the penalty @ 50% of the amount of
compensation?
3. Whether the appellant being insurer is liable to pay
interest for the fault of the respondent/petitioner
when he has not led any evidence for about 2-3
years?
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
4. Whether the learned Commissioner below has erred
in misconstruing and misinterpreting the facts,
provisions of law applicable to the present case?”
.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan and Mr. Mehar Chand,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
behalf of the respective respondents.
of
List for final hearing in due course.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Sumitra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.321 of 2025
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ravi Patial, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr.Gaurav Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr.Rajesh K.
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt FAO No.321 of 2025
Learned counsel for respondent No.5, submits that
Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent has been
filed, however the same is not on record. Learned counsel to
follow up with the Registry in this respect.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
CMP No.4696 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply, by
way of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Usha Thakur & Ors.
FAO No.329 of 2025
.
06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Admit. Call for the records.
rt List for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rajeshwar Singh Guleria vs.Amar Singh & Ors.
C.S. No.46 of 2023
.
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Nimish Gupta,Advocate, for defendants No.1 to
8.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for defendants No.9 to 12/State.
rt On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues
are framed:
1. Whether the plaintiff is the lawful lessee of the
private land comprising Khasra No.1256/746measuring 0-36-05 hectares situated at Mohal
Jatehar, Mauza Jalari, Tehsil & District Kangra,
H.P. and has been validly granted a mining
lease/quarry over Baner Khad (Khart) comprisingKhasra Nos. 1245 & 890, measuring 2-36-37
hectares in Mohal Kharti, Maira Mauza Nandrool,Khart, Tehsil & District Kangra, H.P.?…OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiff has obtained all statutory
permission, approvals, Letter of Intent dated
15.12.2018, Lease Deed dated 07.08.2019,
Provisional Registration Certificate, Consent to
Establish/Operate, for installation and operation of
the stone crusher as well as mining activities on
the suit land? …OPP.
3. Whether defendants No.1 to 8 (or any of them)
have any right, title, interest, jurisdiction or legal
authority to interfere in the plaintiff’s lawful mining
operations and/or installation of the stone crusher
on the suit land? …OPP
4. Whether defendants No.1 to 8 have illegally,
unauthorizedly and without any authority of law
obstructed, interfered with and stopped the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
plaintiff’s mining operations and installation of the
stone crusher since December 2020/July 2023, as
alleged in the plaint? …OPP
.
5. Whether on account of the illegal interference by
defendants No.1 to 8 (particularly defendants
No.1 & 8), the plaintiff has suffered monetary
loss/damages to the tune of Rs.1,15,00,000/-
(Rupees One Crore Fifteen Lakhs only) and is
entitled to a decree for recovery of the said
of
damages? …OPP
6. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of
rt permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory
injunction restraining defendants No.1 to 8, their
agents, employees, representatives or any other
person acting on their behalf from interfering in
any manner whatsoever with the installation and
operation of the plaintiff’s stone crusher and
mining activities over the suit land? …OPP
7. Whether the suit is not maintainable in its present
form or is barred by any law? …OPD.
8. Whether the plaintiff has suppressed material
facts and has not approached this Court with
clean hands, particularly with regard to the
objections raised by the concerned Gram
Panchayat(s) an the Site Appraisal Committee
proceedings? …OPD.
9. Whether the defendants were justified in raising
objections and/or taking steps in the interest of
the village /community to prevent
unscientific/illegal mining activities and
environmental degradation in the area? OPD
10. Relief.
Issues have been read over and explained to the
parties. No other issue arises nor claimed.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Process Fee, list of witnesses and additional
documents, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks and
.
thereafter, list the case before the Additional Registrar (Judicial) for
fixing date for the evidence of the plaintiff.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Pratap Singh vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.40 of 2026
.
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Nikhil Katwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
rt
record instructions dated 01.04.2026.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks time to
seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 20.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Beant Singh vs. Balwant Singh & Ors.
CMP No.4104 of 2026 in FAO No.84 of 2005
.
02.04.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur and Mr. Anirudh Sharma,
Advocates, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.4104 of 2026
of
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent Beant Singh for
rt
release of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in his
favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The
application is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant.
Learned counsel for the non-
applicants/respondents stated that he doesn’t intend to file
any reply to the application. He further stated that since the
main appeal stands finally decided on 07.04.2009 by this
Court and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
the applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed
by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of applicant Beant Singh, after proper
.
verification and identification, by remitting the same to his
saving bank account, detail whereof has been mentioned in
copy of pass book (Annexure A-1) annexed with the
of
application.
The application stands disposed of.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Sher Singh Dod vs. Rakesh Kanwar and another
CMP No.5757 of 2026 in COPC No.1131 of 2025
.
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
CMP No.5757 of 2026
rt Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Shanti Devi & Ors.
CMP No.6066 of 2026 in FAO No.485 of 2016
.
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
CMP No.6066 of 2026
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 & 2
namely Shanti Devi and Ran Singh, for release of remaining
compensation amount alongwith up-to-date interest in their
favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court. The application is duly supported with the
affidavits of the applicants.
No reply to the application is intended to be filed
on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant and learned counsel
for the aforesaid non-applicant, stated that since the matter
stands compromised by the National Lok Adalat, he has no
objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of the
applicants coupled with the fact that the matter stands
compromised by the National Lok Adalat, this Court finds it in
the interest of justice to release the remaining amount of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court in favour of applicants/respondents
.
No.1 & 2, namely, Shanti Devi and Ran Singh, strictly as per
their shares, after proper verification and identification, by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details
of
whereof have been mentioned in Para-4 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Shyam Singh Katoch vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors.
COPC No.31 of 2024
.
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
CMP No. 6063 of 2026
rt No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
respondents/State.
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and Sh. Dinesh Kumar Kapila,
Chief General Manager, National Bank for Agriculture & Rural
Development, Regional Office, is ordered to be impleaded as
respondent No.4/contemnor.
Application stands disposed of.
COPC No.31 of 2024
Let notice be issued to newly added respondent
No.4/contemnor, returnable within three weeks, on taking steps
during the course of the day.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Brig Brijesh Virmani (Retd.) vs. Suryavir Singh
RFA No.120/2025
.
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Atrul Jhingan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No. 30996 of 2025
of
Reply stands filed.
No rejoinder is intended to be filed on behalf of the
rt
applicant/appellant.
At the request of learned counsel for the non-
applicants/respondents, list this application for consideration after
three weeks.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
The Recovery Village Drug Counseling & Rehabilitation
Centre vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
FAO No.155 of 2025
02.04.2026 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
CMP No. 22199 of 2025
rt Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder. List
thereafter.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Col. Vishwanath Singh Rana vs.Col. Pushpinder Singh Rana
FAO No.156 of 2025
.
02.04.2026 Present: Ms. Aashima Kalra, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr.
Amrick Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Heard. Admit.
List for final hearing in due course.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Sheela Devi & Ors.
.
FAO No.318 of 2025
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 5.
Respondents No.6 & 7, already ex parte.
of
rt Admit. Call for the records.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate, appears and waives
services of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No.1
to 5.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.6 & 7,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Urmila Devi & another
.
FAO No.326 of 2025
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Shivani Tegta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
Mr.Tarun Brakta, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt Learned counsel for respondent No.1, submits that
Power of Attorney has been filed today itself.
Learned counsel for respondent No.3, also submits
that Power of attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondent has been
filed on 10.03.2026.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post Admission Notice.
Ms. Shivani Tegta and Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
behalf of the respective respondents.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.2,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Sneh Love Care Rehabilitation & Welfare
Society vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
FAO No.14 of 2026
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, Advocate vice Mr. I.R. Narwal, Advocate,
for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
of
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to seek instructions in the matter.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
HPSEB & Ors. vs. Murat Singh (deceased)
through LRs.
.
CMP No. 3038 of 2026 in RFA No.8 of 2017
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Digvinay Singh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr.
Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr.Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Today the case is listed under the head “speaking to
minutes”
rt
As per report of the Registry, LRs of of respondentNo.1, have not been brought on record.
Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to take steps for
bringing on record of LRs of deceased respondent No.1. List
thereafter.
In the meantime, Registry is directed not to release
the amount to any of the applicants till further orders.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Renuka Ji Dam Project & Ors. vs. Baldev & Ors.
.
CMP No.4311 of 2026 of 2025 in RFA No.243 of
2018
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/respondents.
of
Today the case is listed under the head “speaking to
minutes” rt As regards order dated 17.03.2026, in Para-3 of the
order, it has been inadvertently mentioned that the award has
attained finality as till date no appeal has been preferred against
the judgment passed by this Court, where as this Court has not
yet decided the case and passed any judgment.
As the appeal is still pending before this court,
hence, order dated 17.03.2026, is modified to the extent that
instead of full amount, 50% of the amount along with up-to-date
interest, is ordered to be released in favour of the
applicant/respondent No.8(a), Kalavati @ Durma Devi, as per
share of deceased respondent No.8, Sahibo Devi, being her sole
legal heir.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Nipun Kumar
.
CMP No.5551 of 2025 in COPC No.852 of 2025
02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Issue Notice. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. He has
also placed on record communication dated 01.04.2026, wherein,
rt
it has been stated that entire payments have been made to the
petitioner.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the
applicant/petitioner, submits hat he does not intend to press the
present application, at this stage. Accordingly, the present
application is dismissed as not pressed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Joginder Singh &
Ors.
.
FAO No.59 of 2026
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO No.59 of 2026 & CMP No.5792 of 2026
of
Heard. From the perusal of the impugned award
rt
dated 11.12.2025, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal-1, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., passed in MACT Petition
No.13 of 2025, prima facie reveals that findings given by the
learned Presiding Judge, are without framing of any issues and
without recording evidence of any of the parties. He has adopted
the novel procedure in deciding the claim petition, which is totally
unknown to the law.
In the grounds of appeal, it has been stated by the
appellant that even Assurance company was not allowed to file
its reply to the claim petition and in CMP No.5792 of 2026 also, it
has been stated that no concession was given on behalf of the
appellant/assurance company for decision of the claim petition
and despite that, learned Presiding Judge has observed in Para-
3 of the award that respondent No.3/ Insurance Company stated
at Bar that it is ready to pay the amount of medical bills and
compensation for pain and sufferings caused to the petitioner.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Therefore, let explanation be called for from the
learned Presiding Judge as to why, he has adopted such a novel
.
procedure in deciding the claim petition without framing of issues
and without recording evidence of any of the parties, which prima
facie caused serious prejudice to the appellant/assurance
company. The said explanation must reach before this Court
of
before the next date of hearing.
rtLet notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
for 04.05.2025, on taking steps within a period of three days.
CMP No.5791 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 11.12.2025,
passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-1, Kullu,
District Kullu, H.P in case titled Sh. Joginder Singh vs. Sh. Desh
Raj & others, shall remain stayed during the pendency of the
present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Saurav Mehta & Ors.
FAO No.60 of 2026
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO No.60 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt CMP No.5803 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned award dated 12.12.2025,
passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kinnaur at
Rampur Bushahr, H.P. in case titled Sh. Saurav Mehta vs. Sh.
Shashi Kumar & others, shall remain stayed during the pendency
of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Tapender Kumar vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
COPC No.165 of 2026
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Baldev Sharma vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
COPC No.167 of 2026
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Baldev Singh vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
COPC No.166 of 2026
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar vs. Abhishek Trivedi
COPC No.171 of 2026
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. H.R.Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.
Ankush Thakur, Ms. Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder
Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rawal Variety Construction Ltd. & Ors. vs. Rakesh Kumar
RFA No.17 of 2023 a/w C.O. No.12 of 2023
.
RFA No.17 of 2023
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
C.O. No.12 of 2023
rt Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the cross-objector.
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
RFA No.17 of 2023 a/w C.O. No.12 of 2023
learned counsel for respondent No.1/ cross-objector,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 06.05.2026.
In the meantime, learned counsel for respondent
No.1/cross-objector, undertakes that he will not press execution
petition, which is listed before the trial court on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Nand Kishore & anr. vs. Nirmala Devi & Ors.
along with connected matter
.
FAO Nos. 250 & 545 of 2016
FAO No.250 of 2016
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish
of
Gupta,Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
rt FAO No.545 of 2016
Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish
Gupta,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
None for proforma respondent No.4.
FAO Nos. 250 & 545 of 2016
Heard further.
At the request of learned counsel for respondent
No.3, list for continuation on 24.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.241/2015
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu and
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents/State.
rt Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
GM NR vs. Rattan Chand (deceased) through LRs & Ors. a/w
connected matter.
.
RFA No.266/2014 a/w RFA No.322/2015
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Gaurav Sigh Damseth,Advocate vice Mr. Bharat
Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the appellant(s)
in both the appeals.
Respondent No.1, is stated to have expired.
of
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3 in RFA
No.266 of 2014 and for respondents No.2,4 & 5, in
rt RFA No.322 of 2015.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu and
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State in both the appeals.
CMP(M) Nos.1996 & 1997 of 2025 in RFA No.322 of
2015
As prayed for, list on 23.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Sahi Ram a/w connected matter
RFA No.486/2015 a/w RFA No.372/2016
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu and
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for all the respondents
of
except respondents No.1 & 3.
rt RFA No.486/2015 & RFA No.372/2016
As per report of the Registry, an application for bringing
on record the LRs of deceased respondent No.1, is lying under
objection. Learned Deputy Advocate General undertakes to remove
the same within a period of one week.
List the case as and when the objection are removed.
CMP(M) Nos.320 & 321 of 2026 in RFA No.372 of
2016
Let notice be issued to the legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.3, as mentioned in Para-5 of the
application, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Savita Verma vs. The Senior Manager, UCO Bank & Ors.
Civil Suit No.3 of 2022
.
01.04.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Jitender Pal Ranote, Advocate, for the defendant.
Civil Suit No.3 of 2022
of
Replication has not been filed despite the fact that on
the last date of hearing last and final opportunity was granted to file
the same. Hence, right of the plaintiff to file the same stands
closed.
rt
OMP No.485 of 2022
Heard in part. List for continuation on 06.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
April 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Balbir Singh Kataik vs. State of H.P.
Civil Suit No.34 of 2025
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
the defendant/State.
of
It appears from the memo of parties that the present
rt
suit for damages and malicious prosecution, has been filed by the
plaintiff against State of H.P. through Secretary (Home), H.P.
Secretariat, Chotha Shimla, Shimla without arraying any person in
the individual capacity.
Therefore, learned counsel for the plaintiff to justify the
maintainability of the suit by the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 29.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Deepika Jain & Anr.
FAO(MVA) No.294 of 2025
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1, submits that
of
Power of Attorney, has been refiled after removing the objections
today itself.
rt As per report of the Registry, steps for the service of
respondent No.2, has been taken, but Correct Address has not
been filed.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, submits that
correct address of respondent No.2, has been filed on 30.03.2026.
Let report be called from the Registry in this respect.
List on 06.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Jai Kishan vs. Mansa Ram & Ors.
CMP(M) No.429 of 2025
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents, states that reply
of
shall be filed during the course of the day.
rt List the case as and when the aforesaid reply is taken
on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar Verma vs. Shashi Kala & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1340 of 2025
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. K.S. Kanwar,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Respondents No.6 & 7, already ex parte.
rt Learned vice counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file Power of Attorney
on their behalf. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
M/s Vivek Enterprises vs. Rattanjeet Singh
(deceased) through his LRs & Ors.
.
CMP(M) No.2430 of 2025
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma and Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocates,
for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a),1(b) & 2.
of
Respondent No.3, already ex parte.
CMP(M) No.2430 of 2025
rt Reply to the application has been filed, wherein,
averments made in the same are totally denied and it has been prayed
that the present application may be dismissed with cost.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 18 days in filing the present appeal is
hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______ of 2026
Be registered.
Admit. Call for the records.
Post admission notice.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, appears and waives
service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents
No.1(a),1(b) & 2.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.3,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within three days. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Indra Rathour vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
CMP No.24793 of 2025 in COPC No.912 of 2025
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Virbahadur
Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General , for
respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
rt Learned vice counsel for the applicant/petitioner, prays
for and is granted one week’s further time to seek instructions in
the matter.
As prayed, list on 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Murari Lal vs. Abid Hussain & Ors.
CMP No.31332 of 2025 in COPC No.469 of 2024
.
31.03.2026 Present: Ms. Dhanwanti Devi, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.31332 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the respondent, submits that
reply shall be filed during the course of the day.
rt Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
SJPNL vs. Deep Ram (deceased) though his LRs & Ors.
CMP No.25181 of 2025 in RFA No.154 of 2018
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate, for applicants/respondents
No.1(i) and 2 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
of
Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
rt respondents No.5 & 6/State.
CMP No. 5942 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
CMP No.25181 of 2025
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Surat Ram & ors.
RFA No.4 of 2026
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
the appellant/State.
of
Mr. Vijay Mokta, Advocate vice Mr. Surinder
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
rt Steps for the service of respondents No.2 to 7, have
not been taken, as yet.
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to do the needful.
As prayed, list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh vs. Sukhwinder Singh Sukhu
Civil Suit No.31 of 2024
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Navlesh
Verma,Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.169 of 2026
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply. List
rt
thereafter.
OMP No.170 of 2026
At this stage, applicant/defendant is exempted from
filing English translation of the vernacular documents in question.
However, learned counsel for the applicant/defendant undertakes to
file the same as and when occasion arises.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Jalam Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP No.887 of 2026 in RFA No.22 of 2016
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Bala Nand Mehta,Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and
of
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
the applicants/respondents.
rt Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list on 17.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Arvind Kumar & Ors.
FAO No.220 of 2024
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3, already ex parte.
of
CMP No.2727 of 2026
The instant application has been filed on behalf of
applicant/respondent No.1, Arvind Kumar, for release of 50% of
rt
awarded amount in his favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court.
As per the applicant, he is in dire need of money due to
damage caused to his house and as the main appeal is pending
adjudication before this Court, which may take some time for its
disposal, his prayer for release of amount of compensation, as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court may be accepted and the
amount, as prayed for, may be ordered to be released in his favour.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, submits
that he does not intend to file any reply to the application, but has
opposed the application on the ground that if the amount, as prayed,
is released in favour of the applicant/respondent No.1, it would be
difficult for him to recover the same in the event of appeal being
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the application has been
made.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
applicant/respondent No.1, Arvind Kumar and also in view of the fact
that the appeal may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication,
.
this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 20% of the
awarded amount of compensation in favour of applicant/respondent
No.1, Arvind Kumar, after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to his saving bank account, detail whereof has
of
been given in Para-4 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
rt
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicant/respondent No.1, Arvind Kumar, will have to refund the
amount, so released, with interest.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Soma Devi & Ors.
FAO No.497 of 2015
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Heard further. For continuation, list on 17.04.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Sumit Kumar vs. Rajinder Kumar & Ors. a/w
connected matter
.
FAO Nos. 156 & 134 of 2015
FAO No.156 of 2015
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
of
None for respondent No.3.
FAO No.134 of 2015
rtMr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
None for respondent No.3.
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondent
No.3, despite repeated calls, it is ordered to be proceeded against
ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Kawaljeet Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
.
RFA No.56 of 2016
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu and
of
Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
rtCMP No.118 of 2026
Learned Deputy Advocate General, On
instructions, submits that the award passed by learned
District Judge (Forest)in Ref. Petition No.36-S/4 of
2012/08, titled as Shri Jai Chand vs. State of H.P. & Ors.,
has not been assailed by either of the parties, as such, the
same has attained finality
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and
also gone through the material available on record.
In view of the avements made in the application,
the same is allowed and award No.04/2007, dated
15.10.2007, passed by land Acquisition Collector/respondent
No.3 as well as copy of judgment dated 02.04.2014, passed
by learned District Judge (Forest) in Ref. Petition No.36-S/4
of 2012/08, titled as Shri Jai Chand vs. State of H.P. &
Ors.(Annexure A-2), are ordered to be placed on record.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.56 of 2016
.
As prayed, List for final hearing on 22.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
of
March 31, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Gajjan Singh & Ors.
.
RFA No.129/2016 a/w Cross-Objection
No.10/2022
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General
with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jai
of
Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents/cross-objectors.
rtAs prayed, list on 23.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Saina Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.179 of 2016
.
31.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate
General, for the respondents/State.
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate
of
General, list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 31, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Mahinder Singh & another vs. Devi Ram & Ors.
RFA No.111 of 2015
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Parveen Kumar Chandel,Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 & 3.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
appellants, list after three weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
GM, Northern Railway vs. Subhash Chander & anr.
RFA No.08/2015 a/w CO. 84/2016
.
30.03.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
of
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.2/State.
rt CMP No.8171 of 2023
No reply to the application has been filed till date
despite repeated opportunities granted in this respect. Hence, right
to file the same stands closed.
Now list the present application for consideration on
17.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Brij Lal vs. LAC & Ors. a/w connected matters
RFA No.421 of 2015 a/w RFA Nos. 424 to 440 of
.
2012, 131 and 132 of 2016
RFA Nos. 421 of 2015, 131 and 132 of 2016
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.1/State.
rtMr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
RFA Nos. 424 to 440 of 2012,
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, list
on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Jaswant Singh vs. Dalip Chand & Ors.a/w connected matter
RFA No.497 of 2015 a/wRFA No.498 of 2015 &
.
RFA No.83 of 2017
30.03.2026 Present: Mr.Avinash Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s) in
RFA Nos.497 & 498 of 2015.
Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Garima
Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii) in
RFA No.498 of 2017.
of
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1
in RFA Nos. 497 of 2015 & 83 of 2017
rt Learned vice counsel for respondents No.1(i) to
1(iii) in RFA No.498 of 2017, prays for adjournment on the ground
that arguing counsel is pre-occupied in another Court.
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Ravinder Singh & Ors.
RFA No.35 of 2016
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
Mr.Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Cross Objection No.45 of 2018
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
rtAdvocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/Non-objectors.
Mr.Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents/cross-objectors.
Heard in part.
At the request of learned counsel for the
respondents, list for continuation on 24.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Beasa Devi vs. Om Prakash
RFA No.27 of 2026
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
RFA No.27 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
of
within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
rtCMP No.5693 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meantime, the execution of the impugned
judgment and decree dated 03.01.2026, passed by learned District
Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. in case titled Om Prakash vs.
Smt. Beasa Devi, shall remain stayed till the next date of
hearing.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Vaneet Khanna & Ors.
.
FAO No.263 of 2024
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Learned vice counsel for the appellants, submits
of
that an appropriate application for service of respondents No.1 to
3, has been filed in the Registry on 28.03.2026, however, the same
is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same
rt
on record, if in order.
List the case as and when the aforesaid
application is taken on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Gurwinder Singh vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.467 of 2026
.
30.03.2026 Present: Ms. Kanta Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
rt
notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and
is granted two days’ time to file status report/to seek
instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Mamta & Anr. vs. Ashok Kumar
Civil Suit No.69 of 2024
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through Video
Conferencing), for the plaintiff.
Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for the defendant.
of
OMP No.1386 of 2025
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
applicant/defendant, list the present application for consideration on
rt
28.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Shashi Bala & Ors. vs. Shilpa & Ors.
FAO No.208 of 2024
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondent No.1, already ex parte.
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
of
No.3.
Ms. Sangeeta Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Anil Tomar,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rt Learned counsel for the appellants, submits that steps
for the service of respondent No.3, has been taken on 24.03.2026.
Registry is directed to make a report in this respect.
As prayed, list on 06.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:31 :::CIS
Narayan Dass Mahant vs. Lekh Ram & another
CMP(M) No.1376 of 2024
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
Rejoinder stands filed.
rt Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, prays for
and is granted two weeks’ further time to seek instructions in the
matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ranjit Singh vs. Amarjeet Singh & Ors.
COPC No.12 of 2025
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to place on record attendance certificate,
rt
appointment letter and salary certificate of the petitioner.
As prayed, list on 17.04.2026.
However, it is made clear that if the aforesaid
documents are not filed within the stipulated period, then the
adverse order shall follow.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Satish Kumar Tomar vs. Ritesh Chauhan & Ors.
COPC No.1376 of 2025
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Reply/compliance report stands filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
rt
granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Harpreet Singh vs. C. Paulrasu and Ors.
COPC No.1503 of 2025
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Navneet Kumar Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondents No.1 & 2/State.
of
Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned Additional Advocate General as well as
rt
learned counsel for respondent No.3, pray for and are granted four
weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sh. Rajender Kumar vs. Onkar Chand Sharma & Anr.
COPC No.1549 of 2025
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr.Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Reply stands filed.
rt Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Pankaj Kumar Singh vs. Madhu Chaudhary & Anr.
COPC No.04 of 2026
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shivang Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents, submits that
of
reply has been filed in the Registry today, however, the same is not
on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record, if in order.
rt As prayed, list on 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ravinder Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr.
COPC No.06 of 2026
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file a detailed reply.
rt As prayed, list on 21.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Virender vs. Union Ban of India & Ors.
C.S. No.59 of 2024
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
of
Advocates General, for defendant No.5/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the plaintiff,
rt
list the case for framing of issues after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ghanshyam Garg vs. Ajay Verma.
Civil Suit No. 73 of 2024
.
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, submits that an
application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, has been filed in the
of
Registry on 23.02.2026, however, the same is not on record.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
rt
order. List the case as and when the aforesaid application is taken
on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Randhawa Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. M/s
Ropways and Rapid Transport & Anr.
.
C.S. No.05 of 2023
30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Dixit,
Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr. Ankush Thakur, Ms.
Archna Negi and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for defendant No.2/State.
rt Learned counsel for the private parties, jointly
state that there are chances of amicable settlement inter se
parties. Therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the
the matter is referred to mediation and
parties,
Mr.N.K.Sood, learned Senior Advocate, is appointed as
Mediator to mediate between the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties are directed to
appear before the learned Mediator today itself at 1:00 PM
in the main Mediation Center, H.P. High Court, who is
requested to submit his report within a period of six weeks
thereafter.
List this case before this Court on 28.05.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 30, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kamal Kumar vs. The Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
FAO No.71 of 2014
.
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. R.K.Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Chandan Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Pavinder, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
None for respondent No.3.
rtArguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sarita vs. OIC Ltd and another
FAO No.4066 of 2013
.
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rahul, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for
rt
respondent No.1, list on 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Juneja vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.321 of 2026
.
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bhairav
Gupta and Ms. Swati Sharma, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Inspector Yadav Chand, C.B.I, Bharari, present with
record.
rt Status report stands filed.
Learned Additional Advocate General is directed to
produce entire medical record of the petitioner, on the next date of
hearing.
As prayed, list on 06.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Deepak & Ors.
FAO Nos. 4176 & 4020 of 2013
.
FAO No.4176 of 2013
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
rt FAO No.4020 of 2013
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for the appellant in FAO No.4020 of
2013, states that an application for placing on record the additional
documents has been filed on 23.03.2026, however the same is not
on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record, if in order.
List the case as and when the aforesaid application is
taken on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Nirmal Malakar v. La Risa Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Civil Suit No.33 of 2024
.
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aditi
Rana, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Mohinder Vema and Mr. Sumit Sharma,Advocates,
for the defendants.
of
OMPs No.1084, 1092 & 1633 of 2025
As prayed, list on 07.04.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Shree Shree Dudra Stone Crusher vs. Deepak Kumar &
Ors.
.
Civil Suit No.62 of 2024
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the defendants.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
of
list for framing of issues after two weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Vaneet Khanna & Ors.
.
FAO No.263 of 2024
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
On persuasive request made by learned counsel for
the appellant, three days’ time, is granted to move an appropriate
application for service of respondents No.1 to 3.
rt As prayed, list on 30.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Balak Ram vs. Leela Devi a/w connected matters
.
FAO No.372 of 2024 with FAO Nos. 33 and 35 of 2025
FAO No.372 of 2024
24.03.2026 Present: Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate vice Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rupinder Singh Minhas, Advocate, for respondents
of
No.1 and 3 & 7.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
rtMr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.
FAO No.33 of 2025
Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate vice Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rupinder Singh Minhas, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 and 3 & 7.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.
FAO No.35 of 2025
Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate vice Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rupinder Singh Minhas, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 and 3 & 7.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.
CMP(M) No.354 of 2026 in FAO No.372 of 2024
Let notice be issued to legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.2, as mentioned in Para-4 of the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
application, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days. List thereafter.
.
CMP(M) No.353 of 2026 in FAO No.35 of 2025
Let notice be issued to legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.2, as mentioned in Para-4 of the
application, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
of
period of three days. List thereafter.
CMP(M) No.351 of 2026 in FAO No.33 of 2025
rt Let notice be issued to legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.2, as mentioned in Para-4 of the
application, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a
period of three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Gurdial Singh (deceased) through his LRs vs.
Amit Sahni & Ors.
.
RFA No.901 of 2012
23.03.2026 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Beli Ram Tegta (deceased) through his LRs vs.
State of H.P.& Ors.
.
RFA No.11 of 2016
23.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr.Ranvir Chauhan,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
rt
appellants, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Soma Devi & Ors.
FAO No.497 of 2015
.
23.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 31.03.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 23, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. & anr. vs. Dulo Ram (deceased)
through LRs a/w connected matter.
.
RFAs No.380 & 381 of 2008
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State in both the appeals.
of
Respondents already ex parte in RFA No.380 of
2008.
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for proposed LRs
No.1(a) to 1(d) in RFA No.381 of 2008.
rt
CMP(M) Nos.2206 & 2207 of 2025 in RFA No.381 of
2025
The instant applications under Order 22, Rules, 1,3,9 &
11 read with Section 151 of CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation
Act, have been filed by the applicants/appellants for bringing on
record the legal representatives of deceased respondent, Budhi
Singh, who has expired on 28.09.2016, after setting aside the
abatement, if any.
As per the applicants, deceased respondent, Budhi
Singh has expired on 28.09.2016, leaving behind his legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-5 of the application.
However, the delay in filing the application as occurred is neither
willful nor intentional, but due to the reasons, which were beyond
the control of the applicants, as such, the same deserves to be
condoned and since right to sue always survives in favour of the
legal representatives of deceased respondent, Budhi Singh, there is
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
no impediment in bringing on record the aforesaid legal heirs and as
such, the present application deserves to be allowed.
.
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
behalf of the non-applicants/respondents and have no objection, in
case the same are allowed.
Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that the
of
delay, as occurred, was beyond the control of the applicants and
has been sufficiently explained in the application, the same is
rt
hereby condoned.
As right to sue still survives in favour of the legal
representatives of deceased respondent, Budhi Singh, the legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-5 of the application, are
ordered to be brought on record. Amended memo of parties filed
along with applications, is ordered to be taken on record.
The applications stand disposed of.
RFAs No.380 & 381 of 2008
Since both the appeals pertain to the year 2008, list for
final hearing as per their turn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
District Collector Mandi vs. Ved Vatti & another
RFA No.4106 of 2013
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the appellant.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rathore,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rtArguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Bidhi Chand Sharma vs. Prakash Chand a/w connected matter
RFAs No.85 & 135 of 2015
.
RFA No.85 of 2015
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Himalvi,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
RFA No.135 of 2015
Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Himalvi,
rtAdvocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel for respondent in RFA No.85 of
2015, prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel
is not available today due to bereavement in his family.
As prayed, list on 28.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sajad Akhater vs. Rafiq Mohd. and others
FAO No.102 of 2015
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
Mr. Saurav Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
At the request of learned vice counsel for respondent
No.3, list on 16.04.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sumit Kumar vs. Rajinder Kumar & Ors. a/w
connected matter
.
FAO Nos. 156 & 134 of 2015
FAO No.156 of 2015
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
of
Ms. Vanshika Bagga, Advocate vice Mr. J.S. Bagga,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
FAO No.134 of 2015
rt Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Ms. Vanshika Bagga, Advocate vice Mr. J.S. Bagga,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
At the request of learned vice counsel for respondent
No.3, list on 23.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Kapoor Singh & Ors.
RFA No.159 of 2015
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General , for the
appellants/State
Mr. Akshay Katoch, Advocate, for respondents
of
No.1,3(a) to 3(c), 4 & 5.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General,
rt
list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamla Devi
(deceased) through LRs and others
.
FAO No.358 of 2016
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Gunjan Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Shilpa Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondents No.1(i) and 1(ii), already ex parte.
Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
of
Ms. Manisha Thamta, Advocate vice Mr. Prashant
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
rt At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list on 16.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar Sharma vs. Shisham Devi & Ors.
FAO No.534 of 2016
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rohit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. V.S. Rathour,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. I.S.
Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Respondent No.6, already ex parte.
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Singh
Kashyap, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
rt
At the request of learned vice counsel for the
respondents, list after three weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
GM Northern Railway vs. Mehar Singh and Ors.
RFA No. 66 of 2021
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumar
Suri, Advocate, for respondents No1, 2(a) to 2(c),
3,4,6,8,9,11 to 13 & 17.
of
Respondents No.5(a) to 5(e), 10(a) to 10(c), 15(a) to
15(c) and 16(a), already ex parte.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
rt Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General , for
respondents No.20 & 21/State.
Consequential steps on account of death of respondent
No.14, respondent No.18 and respondents No.19(a) to 19(d), have
not been taken.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to do the needful.
However, it is made clear that if the steps are not
taken within the aforesaid period of two weeks, then the
appeal shall be dismissed for want of prosecution.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Swati Storewel Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Research
Development Corporation & Ors.
.
RFA No.281 of 2005
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3 (a) already ex parte.
of
Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate (through V.C) with Mr.
Aryan Manta, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Navneet
Gupta,Resolution Professional.
rt CMP No.4961 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Indra Rathour vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
CMP No.24793 of 2025 in COPC No.912 of 2025
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Virbahadur
Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General , for
respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record instructions dated 19.03.2026 along with Office Order of
even date.
At this stage, learned vice counsel for the
applicant/petitioner, prays for and is granted one week’s time to
seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Murat Singh vs. Harish Gajju
COPC No.114 of 2026
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.
of
Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on
record communication dated 19.03.2026, wherein, it has been
stated that the recommendations of the Staff Selection Authority,
rt
duly approved by the Board of Directors of HP SARDB vide
Resolution No.1, Dated 18.03.2026, have been examined in this
office and accordingly approval is hereby accorded under the
provisions of Rule 56(3) of the Himachal Pradesh Cooperative
Societies Rules, 1971, to the promotions recommended by the Staff
Selection Authority for the aforesaid cadre posts.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner,
submits that promotion order has not been issued as yet, which is to
be issued by Managing Director of the concerned bank. He further
submits that petitioner is going to be superannuated on 31.03.2026.
Therefore, respondent is directed to issue promotion
order to the petitioner by 23.03.2026, in accordance with law, failing
which, Managing Director of the respondent-bank, shall remain
present before this Court, on the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 23.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Gopal Krishan & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors.
RFA No.232 of 2014
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General , for the
respondents No. 1 to 3/State.
of
Mr. Abhinav Mehta, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt CMP No.3994 of 2026
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and the name of appellant
No.3(c) late Chudamani, is ordered to be deleted from the
array of the parties subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.232 of 2014
Amended memo of parties stands already filed,
which is ordered to be taken on record.
Since, the present appeal stands already admitted,
list for final hearing as per its turn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Bidhi Chand (deceased) through LRs vs. Vashno devi & ors.
FAO No.277 of 2016
.
20.03.2026 Present: Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. Rupinder Sharma Thakur, Advocate, for
respondents No.4(a)(i) t 4(a)(iv).
of
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt Proposed LRs No.4(c)(i) to 4(c)(iii) and 4(e)(i) to 4(e)
(ii) already ex parte.
CMP No.15795/2021, CMP(M) Nos.1367, 1368 of
2022, CMP Nos.11019 & 11018 of 2023 a/w C.O
No.125 of 2016 & FAO No.277 of 2016
List all these applications for consideration along
with main appeal for final hearing 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 20, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
MD. HPPC Ltd. vs. Dharminder Singh & Ors.
RFA No.453 of 2015
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 5.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
of
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent
rtNo. 6/State.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for applicants in CMP No.27788
of 2025.
CMP No.27788 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted one week’s further time to file reply or to
seek instructions in the matter, failing which, Managing Director,
H.P. Power Corporation Ltd., shall remain present in person
before this Court, on the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 30.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kamli & Ors. vs. Boby Chauhan & Ors.
CMP No.30612 of 2025 in FAO No.50 of 2024
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Jai Dev, Advocate, for non-applicant/respondent
No.1.
Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate,for non-
of
applicant/respondent No.2.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder
rt Pathania, Advocate, for non-applicant/respondent
No.3.
CMP No.30612 of 2025
Learned counsel for the respective non-
applicants/respondents, pray for and are granted three weeks’
time to seek instructions in the matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kamli & Ors. vs. Boby Chauhan & Ors.
CMP No.30614 of 2025 in FAO No.51 of 2024
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Jai Dev, Advocate, for non-applicant/respondent
No.1.
Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate,for non-
of
applicant/respondent No.2.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder
rt Pathania, Advocate, for non-applicant/respondent
No.3.
CMP No.30614 of 2025
Learned counsel for the respective non-
applicants/respondents, pray for and are granted three weeks’
time to seek instructions in the matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Naresh Chauhan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP (M)No. 283 of 2026
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents
of
No.1,2 & 5/State.
Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1,2 & 5 and
respondents No.3 & 4, respectively.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.6,7 &
8, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, replies, if any, by appearing
respondents be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Naresh Chauhan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP (M)No. 281 of 2026
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents
of
No.1,2 & 5/State.
Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1,2 & 5 and
respondents No.3 & 4, respectively.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.6,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, replies, if any, by appearing
respondents be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Naresh Chauhan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP (M)No. 282 of 2026
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents
of
No.1,2 & 5/State.
Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1,2 & 5 and
respondents No.3 & 4, respectively.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.6 & 7,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, replies, if any, by appearing
respondents be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Naresh Chauhan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP (M)No. 284 of 2026
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents
of
No.1 & 2/State.
Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rt Issue notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and
respondents No.3 & 4, respectively.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.5(a) to
5(c), returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period
of three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, replies, if any, by appearing
respondents be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Naresh Chauhan vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP (M)No. 285 of 2026
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents
of
No.1,2 & 5/State.
Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1,2 & 5 and
respondents No.3 & 4, respectively.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.6,
returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, replies, if any, by appearing
respondents be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
HPSEB & Ors. vs. Murat Singh (deceased) through LRs.
CMP No. 3038 of 2026 in RFA No.8 of 2017
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr.Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No. 3038 of 2026
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
rt
has been filed by the applicants/respondents/legal heirs of
deceased respondent Murat Singh, namely, Ram Pyari,
Guddi, Sarita, Sandipna, Romita and Vanshika, for release of
award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in their favour, as
per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants/respondents.
Learned counsel for the non-
applicants/appellants, stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the application. He further stated that since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 28.12.2019 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavits
.
of the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in
the interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith
of
up-to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of applicants/respondents/Legal heirs of
deceased respondent Murat Singh, namely, Ram Pyari,
rt
Guddi, Sarita, Sandipna, Romita and Vanshika, strictly as per
their shares, after proper verification and identification, by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details
whereof have been mentioned in para-1 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC HPSEBL & Anr. vs. Kalam Singh & Ors.
CMP No. 3041 of 2026 in RFA No.39 of 2017
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr.Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted one week’s further time to file reply.
rtAs prayed, list on 30.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Manjeet Singh vs. Ashish Kumar
CMP No. 4546 of 2025 in Contempt Petition No.1202 of 2025
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vijay Singh Bhatia, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
of
applicant/respondent.
rtLearned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Suni Ram & Ors.
CMP Nos.4568 & 4570 of 2026 in RFA No.140 of 2015
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the
of
applicants/respondents.
rt CMP No.4568 of 2026
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted ten days’ time to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 01.04.2026.
CMP No.4570 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/respondents are exempted
from filing translation of the Vernacular documents in question.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Secretary HPSEBL & Anr. vs. Kaushalya Devi & Ors.
FAO No.121 of 2025
.
19.03.2026 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Rana, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 4.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
of
No.6(a) to 6(e).
rt CMP No.4569 of 2026
At the request of learned counsel for the
applicant/respondents No.1 to 4, list the present application after
two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Vandana & Ors.
FAO No.351 of 2024
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5.
of
CMP No.4575 of 2026
Now list the case before Additional Registrar (J), for
rt
passing appropriate orders in the present application after two
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Hari Mohan & Ors.
FAO No.54 of 2026
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO No.54 of 2026
Keeping objections No.1 & 2, raised by the Registry
of
open, let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable for
22.04.2026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
rt CMP No.4605 of 2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meantime, further proceedings pending
before the Court of learned District Judge, Solan, District
Solan, H.P. in case No.67-S/1 of 2023/19, titled as Balbir
vs. Hari Mohan, shall remain stayed till the next date of
hearing.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar vs. Satish Kumar and another
FAO No.254 of 2025
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr.Amit Dhumal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
rtMr. Tarun K. Sharma and Mr. Amit Dhumal,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
behalf of the respective respondents.
List for final hearing in due course.
Call for the records.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Sumitra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.321 of 2025
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ravi Patial,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr.Gaurav Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Mr.Rajesh K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.
rt FAO No.321 of 2025
Learned counsel for the respondents, state that
Power of Attorneys on behalf of the respective respondents have
been filed on 18.03.2026.
As prayed, list on 06.04.2026.
CMP No.4696 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply.
List for consideration along with main appeal.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
The Executive Officer & Anr. vs. Bintu Ram & Ors.
FAO (MVA) No.338 of 2025
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr.Ashish Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Admit.
rtPost Admission Notice.
Mr. Arun Kumar and Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocates,
appear and waive service of post admission notice on behalf of
the respective respondents.
List for final hearing in due course.
Call for the records.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
The Executive Officer & Anr. vs. Bintu Ram & Ors.
FAO (MVA) No.339 of 2025
.
19.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr.Ashish Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Admit.
rtPost Admission Notice.
Mr. Arun Kumar and Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocates,
appear and waive service of post admission notice on behalf of
the respective respondents.
List for final hearing in due course.
Call for the records.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 19, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Sunshine Remedies Pvt. Ltd. vs. Satnam Singh
Civil Suit No.41 of 2024
.
18.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.1430 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for adjournment.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s MS Infratech vs. Kamladitya Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Civil Suit No.57 of 2024
.
18.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr.Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Government Standing
of
Counsel, for defendant No.3.
rt On the pleadings of the parties, the following issues
are framed:
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of the
suit amount or any other amount? …OPP.
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest, if
any? …OPP.
3. Whether the plaintiff has concealed material facts
from this Court? …OPD No.1
4. Whether defendant No.1, was always ready and
willing to perform his part of the contract, as
alleged? …OPD No.1.
5. Whether this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain
the present suit ? …OPD No.1.
6. Whether the plaintiff has no cause of action to file
the present suit? …OPD Nos.2 & 3.
7. Whether the suit filed by the plaintiff is not within
limitation? …OPD Nos.2 & 3.
8. Whether the suit filed by the plaintiff is not
maintainable against defendants No.2 & 3 as
there exists no privity of contract between plaintiff
and defendants No.2 & 3? …OPD Nos.2 & 3.
9. Relief.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
.
Issues have been read over and explained to the
parties. No other issue arises nor claimed.
Process Fee, list of witnesses and additional
documents, if any, be filed within a period of 15 days and thereafter,
of
list the case before the Additional Registrar (Judicial) on
08.04.2026, for fixing date for the evidence of the plaintiff.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
HPSEBL vs. Bhajan Dass and another
CMP No.25745 & 25746 of 2025 in RFA No.116 of 2011
.
18.03.2026 Present: Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocate vice Mr. Dhananjay
Sharma,Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Ms. Mamta Bhatwan, Advocate vice Mr. B.N.
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/claimants.
of
Today the case is listed under the head “speaking to
minutes”
rtAs regards order dated October 30, 2025, the same is
modified to the extent that the entire awarded amount of
compensation, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court, be released in favour of
applicants/respondents No.1(a) to 1(i) instead of
applicants/respondents No.1(a) and 1 (i); and also, the date as
mentioned in first page of the said order-sheet, be read over as
30.10.2025 instead of 29.11.2024.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 18, 2026
(reena)::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Jhanshi Devi & Ors.
CMP No.4070 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.495 of 2010
.
18.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 5.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.6 & 7.
of
CMP No. 4070 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application,
which is duly supported with an affidavit of Mohit Yadav, Assistant
Manager, T.P Hub, National Insurance Company Ltd. Divisional
Office Himland Hotel, Circular Road, Shimla, the same is
allowed and excess amount deposited by the
applicant/Assurance Company, in the Registry of this Court
alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be refunded to it after
proper verification and identification by remitting the same to its
bank account, details whereof have been given in para-5 of the
application.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Deep Chand Sharma vs. Roshan Lal alias Daulat Ram & Ors.
a/w connected matter
.
FAO No.230 of 2010 a/w FAO No.231 of 2010
18.03.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant(s) in
both the appeals.
Name of respondent No.1, stands already deleted.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi
of
Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.2 in both the
appeals.
rt None for respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for the appellant(s), submits that
two separate applications have been filed in both the appeals
today for effecting service of respondent No.3 through affixation,
however the same are not on record.
Now list the case as and when both the applications
are placed on refcord.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Anjana vs. Jamail Singh alias Jaila & Ors.
FAO No.461 of 2015
.
18.03.2026 Present: Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Hamanshu Kapila, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Shanti Swaroop,Advocate, for proposed LR
No.2(i).
of
CMP(M) Nos.1245 & 1246 of 2025
rt Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, states
that steps for service of proposed LRs No.2(ii) to 2(iv) of
deceased respondent No.2, shall be taken during the course of
the day and has also prayed for issuance of dasti summons.
Therefore, let aforesaid proposed LRs No.2(ii) to
2(iv), be served through dasti process, returnable for 20.04.2026,
on taking steps during the course of the day. Dasti summons be
handed over to learned counsel for the applicant/appellant on
usual terms. However, It is made clear that if the steps are not
taken during the course of the day, both the applications shall be
dismissed for want of prosecution.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 18, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kaushalya Thakur vs. LAC & Ors.
RFA No.289 of 2016
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents
of
No.1 & 3/State.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt Let record of land Acquisition Collector (Civil), Shimla,
be called for.
List on 20.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Shyam Lal & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors. a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.373 pf 2016 a/w RFA No.212 of 2016
17.03.2026 Present: Ms. Ritta Goswami, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rekha
Thakur and Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocates, for the
appellants except deceased appellant No.1 in both the
appeals.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State in both appeals.
rt
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General,
list on 08.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kamal Singh Dhaulta vs. CBI a/w connected matters
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015 a/w Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
.
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
of
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2015
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
rt Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bhairav
Gupta,Advocate, for the appellants in all the appeals.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant(s)
in Cr. Appeal Nos.8 and 12 of 2015, list all these appeal on
06.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Savitra Devi & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.149 of 2024
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Dinesh Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondent No.5.
of
FAO(MVA) No.149 of 2024
rt Since this Court doesn’t have the roster to hear the
present appeal, list for final hearing as per its turn.
CMP No.105 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted 10 days’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 06.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ranto Devi vs. Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma
Contempt Petition No.43 of 2026
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
rt
record communication dated 11.03.2026, wherein it has been
mentioned that services of the petitioner have been withdrawn
because of the stay granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
SLP(C ) No.20496/2024, filed by the State. However, he fairly
submits that order dated 04.10.2024, Annexure C-1, has not
been stayed. Therefore, respondent is directed to file detailed
reply alongwith his affidavit as well as to produce entire record,
on the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 24.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Pardeep Singh Chauhan vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
Contempt Petition No.111 of 2026
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondents/State.
rtIssue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
one week’s time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 25.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition vs. Kahan Chand & Ors.
RFA No.401 of 2019
.
17.03.2026 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate vice Mr. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj and Ms. Manjit Kaur,
Advocates, for respondents No.1, 2(a), 2(b),2(c), 2(d)
& 2(e), 3(a), 3(b) & proposed LRs of 3(c), 4 to 6.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
rt Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.7 /State.
CMP(M) Nos.1266, 1267, 1268 & 1269 of 2025
Ms. Manjit Kaur, Advocate, has put in appearance on
behalf of respondents No.2(c), 2(d), 2(e) & proposed LRs of
respondent No.3(c). She prays for and is granted two weeks’ time
to file Power of attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents as well
as reply to the present applications. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Savita Verma vs. The Senior Manager, UCO Bank & Ors.
Civil Suit No.3 of 2022
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mukul Sood ,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rajul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Jitender Pal
Ranote, Advocate, for the defendant.
of
Civil Suit No.3 of 2022 & OMP No.485 of 2022
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file replication to the
rt
present suit as well as rejoinder to OMP No.485 of 2022. However,
it is made clear that if the aforesaid replication as well as rejoinder
are not filed within on or before the next date of hearing, then right
to file the same shall stand closed without any further reference to
the Court.
As prayed, list on 01.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ram Dhan & Ors. vs. Roop Lal & Ors.
RFA No.50 of 2024
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. George, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Mr. J.K. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.4,5,6,
LRs. of respondent No.8 and respondent No.9.
rt CMP No. 76 of 2026 and CMP(M) Nos.2 & 3 of
2026
At this stage, learned counsel for the
applicants/appellants, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw
the present applications with liberty to file afresh.
Accordingly, the present applications are dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
CMP No.2970 of 20262026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ram Dhan & Ors. vs. Roop Lal & Ors.
RFA No.52 of 2024
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. George, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the respondent
No.1/State.
of
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
rt Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Mayank Verma, Advocates, for
respondents No.4 to 6, LRs. No.8(i) to 8(iv) of
deceased respondent No.8 and respondent No.9.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.12 & 13.
CMP No.4365 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Hem Chand vs. Hans Raj
Civil Suit No.70 of 2024
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jitender Verma and Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocates, for the plaintiff.
Mr.R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms.Sanjeevani
Sood and Mr. Aakash Thakur, Advocates, for the
defendant.
of
Learned counsel for the parties, jointly state that
pleadings in this case, are complete.
rt Now list the case for admission/denial of
documents before Additional Registrar (J) on 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh vs. Narinder Singh & another
Civil Suit No.33 of 2025
.
17.03.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta,Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.998 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the defendants, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply.
rt Civil Suit No.33 of 2025
As per report of the Registry, written statement is
still lying under objection. Learned counsel for the defendants
undertakes to remove the same within a period of three days.
At this stage, learned counsel for the parties jointly
state that since the present matter pertains to a family dispute
amongst the brothers, it can be referred to mediation.
Therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
the matter is referred to mediation and Mr. G.D. Verma,
learned Senior Advocate is appointed as Mediator to
mediate between the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties are directed to
appear before the learned Mediator today itself at 1:00 PM
in the main Mediation Center, H.P. High Court, who is
requested to submit his report within a period of six weeks
thereafter.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
List this case before this Court on 29.04.2026.
.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 17, 2026
(reena)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Bhagwant Singh & another vs. Honey alias Pranav & another
FAO No.200 of 2023
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondents.
CMP No.3840 of 2026
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
submits that reply shall be filed during the course of the day.
rt As prayed, list this application for consideration on
31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Company vs. Upasana & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.257 of 2025
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondents.
Cross Objection No.2 of 2026 &
FAO(MVA) No.257 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the appellant, submits that steps
for the service of respondents No.4 & 5, have been taken on
rt
05.03.2026. Therefore, let notice be issued to aforesaid
respondents, returnable within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No. 3206/2026 in Cross Objection No.2/ 2026
The application is disposed of with a direction to
the applicants/cross-objectors to file certified copy of the
impugned award dated 31.08.2023 in case titled Smt.
Upasna and Ors. vs. Sh. Bhagat Singh & Ors., within a
period of four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Vijender Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1060 of 2025
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
General, for the
Negi, Deputy Advocates
applicant/State.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondents.
of
Learned vice counsel for the respondents, prays for
and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply as well as Power
rt
of Attorney, by way of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Ors. vs. Rajesh Kumar
CMP(M) No.1931 of 2025
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
General, for the
Negi, Deputy Advocates
applicants/State.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent,
list for consideration on 18.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Ors. vs. Chet Ram
CMP(M) No.1991 of 2025
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
General, for the
Negi, Deputy Advocates
applicants/State.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent,
list for consideration on 18.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.vs. Shakti Devi & Anr.
FAO No.345 of 2024
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondents.
CMP No.25424 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply.
rt
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Surender Kumar vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.258 of 2026
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Sharma,
Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
of
respondent/State.
Inspector Yadav Chand, I.O. P.S. CBI, Bharari,Crime,
present in person with record.
rt
Status report stands filed.
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted one week’s time to go through the
same.
As prayed, list on 23.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Jalam Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP No.887 of 2026 in RFA No.22 of 2016
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, Advcate vice Mr. Bala Nand
Mehta,Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
of
applicants/respondents.
As prayed, list for consideration on 31.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Beant Singh vs. Balwant Singh & Ors.
CMP No.4104 of 2026 in FAO No.218 of 2024
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondents.
As prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kamla Devi vs. Ramesh Chand and another
FAO No.218 of 2024
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondents.
CMP No.4222 of 2026
of
Since this Court doesn’t have the roster to hear the
present appeal, therefore, no order can be passed in the present
application and the same is dismissed, at this stage.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs.Bhagat Ram & Ors.
CMP No.32871 of 2025 in RFA No.38 of 2016
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the non-
applicants/appellants/State.
Mr.Amrit, proxy counsel, the applicants/respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 03.03.2026, wherein, it has been
rt
mentioned that an SLP has been filed against the judgment passed
by this Court before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Therefore, list this application for consideration after six
weeks a/w RFA No.471 of 2015.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Har Krishan Singh Thakur vs. National Rural Health Mission &
Ors.
.
FAO No.340 of 2024
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
of
No.1/State.
Respondents No.2 & 4, already ex parte.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, respondent No.3.
rt
As jointly prayed, list for hearing on admission after two
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Arti Sharma vs. Belu Ram (deceased) through his LRs.
RFA No.89 of 2025
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after two
of
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
rt
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs.
Dharam Pal and another
.
FAO No.262 of 2025
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, respondent No.2.
As jointly prayed, list for hearing on admission after two
of
weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Santosh Devi & Ors.
.
FAO(MVA) No.296 of 2025
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the appellant.
Ms. Shine Sehgal, proxy counsel, respondents No.1 to
6.
As jointly prayed, list for hearing on admission after two
of
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt
March 16, 2026
Judge
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Rakesh Kanwar and Another
COPC No.1436 of 2025
.
16.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amrit, proxy counsel, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record communication dated 11.03.2026, wherein, it has been
rt
mentioned that the respondents intend to file an SLP before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Therefore, list the matter for consideration after four
weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 16, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Balwant Singh vs. Roj Ali and others a/w connected matter
FAO No.599 of 2016 a/w FAO No.218 of 2016
.
FAO No.599 of 2016
Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for the appellant
13.03.2026 Present:
Mr. Vishal Thakur, proxy counsel, for respondent No.1
and respondent No.3.
of
FAO No.218 of 2016Mr. Vishal Thakur, proxy counsel, for the appellant and
rt respondent No.3.
Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for respondent
No.1.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list both the appeals for final hearing after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
JudgeMarch 13, 2026
(reena)::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Chief Executive Officer vs. Shepu & ors.
RFA No.82 of 2025
.
13.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Vishal Thakur, proxy counsel, for respondents No.1
& 5 and respondents No.6(a) to 6(c) &6(e) to 6(g).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondents No. 2 to 4/State.
Respondent No.6(d), already ex parte.
rt
At the joint request of learned counsel for the private
respondents, list for hearing on admission after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Amitesh Sharma & Ors. vs. Sh. Sandeep Kadam Vasant &
another
.
COPC No.722 of 2025
13.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for the
petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
of
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, prays for and is
rt
granted four weeks’ further time to file counter-affidavit.
As prayed, list on 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Jhanshi Devi & Ors.
CMP No.4070 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.495 of 2010
.
13.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Registry is directed to make a report “as to
rt
whether there is any excess amount deposited by the
appellant”. Thereafter, list this application for consideration on
18.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Pawan Kumar vs. K.K. Pant and others
COPC No.846 of 2025
.
13.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
rt
granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kauran Devi and Anr. vs. Rakesh Kanwar & Ors.
COPC No.1306 of 2025
.
13.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, proxy counsel, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for
rt
and is granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 13, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar vs. Kumad Singh &Anr.
COPC No.52 of 2026
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Upinder Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
rt
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Rajneesh vs. Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.87 of 2026
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
rt
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
COPC No.88 of 2026
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr. Aakash Thakur,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
rt
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Tek Chand vs. Rakesh Kanwar & another
COPC No.90 of 2026
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
rt
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Heera Singh vs. Er. Anuj Sharma
COPC No.91 of 2026
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of
rt
notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file compliance affidavit.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Nivedita Sood vs. Maya Kirti & Ors.
Civil Suit No.6 of 2015
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for defendants No.1(a) to 1(c), 2 &
5.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Sood, Advocate, for defendants No.8 to 10.
of
Civil Suit No.6 of 2015
rt Despite repeated opportunities, plaintiffs have failed to
lead their evidence. On persuasive request made by learned
counsel for the plaintiffs, one more, but last opportunity is granted to
the plaintiffs to lead their evidence. However, it is made clear that no
further opportunity shall be granted to the plaintiffs in this respect
and if , they fail to produce their evidence on the date to be fixed by
Additional Registrar (J), then the suit will be dismissed for want of
prosecution. The plaintiffs shall bring their entire evidence at their
own responsibility.
List before Additional Registrar (J) for fixing the date of
evidence of plaintiffs on 19.03.2026.
OMP No.114 of 2016
In view of the aforesaid order, the present application
is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC HPSEB Ltd. & Anr. vs. Goverdhan Singh &
Ors. a/w connected matter
.
RFA No.176 of 2017 a/w RFA No.66 of 2022
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Aman Hansretta, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2(a) to 2(e) and 3 to 10.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
rtNegi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent
No.11/State.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Sugandh Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.12.
Learned counsel for respondents No.1,2(a) to 2(e)
and 3 to 10, prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to
file Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No. 2(a) to 2(e)
and 6(a) to 6(e), by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 01.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company vs. Fulan Devi
FAO(WA) No.58 of 2013
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Aman Hansretta, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(i) to 1(v) and 2(i) to 2(v).
Respondent No.3, already ex parte.
of
Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rt CMP No.2609 of 2019
Learned counsel for respondents No.1(i) to 1(v) and
2(i) to 2(v), submits that Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.2(a) & 2(b), has been filed on 29.12.2025,
however, the same is not on record. Learned counsel is directed
to follow up with the Registry in this respect.
Corrected amended memo of parties has also not
been filed. Let the same be filed before the next date.
As prayed, list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Deventure Hotel and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.
Civil Suit No.23 of 2023
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Brakta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for
defendant No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for defendants No.2
of
& 3.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
rtMr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for defendants No. 5
& 6 /State.
Learned counsel for the parties, pray for and are
granted four weeks’ further time to explore the possibility of
amicable settlement inter se parties with respect to the application
filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.
As prayed, list on 10.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Ranjan Verma & Ors. vs. UOI & Ors.
Civil Suit No.55 of 2024
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for
defendant No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
of
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for defendant
No.2 /State.
rt Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.3.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate,
for defendant No.4.
At the joint request of leaned counsel for the parties,
list for framing of issues after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Narinder Singh
& Ors.
.
FAO No.101 of 2025
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arvind Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
Ms. Samriti, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh Verma,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt CMP(M) Nos.2384 & 2385 of 2025
Let notice be issued to proposed LRs of deceased
respondent No.5, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps
within a period of three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kamal Kishore vs. Mamta & Ors.
FAO No.110 of 2025
.
12.03.2026 Present: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Upinder Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Surender K.
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Respondent No.6, already ex parte.
of
CMP No.3920 of 2026
rt Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicants/respondents, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to
file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Surinder Singh vs. LAC a/w connected matters
RFA No.3 of 2012 with RFA Nos.622, 623 and 624
.
of 2011 a/w cross-objections No.1000 to 1003 of
2012
12.03.2026 Present: Mr.V.S. Chauhan,Senior Advocate with Ms. Bhavani
Negi, Advocate, for the appellant in RFA No.3 of
2012.
Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr.
of
Aditya Chouhan, Advocate and Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for the appellant(s) in RFA Nos.622 to 624
of 2011.
rtMr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents /State.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet
Singh Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.2/Cross-
Objector, in all the appeals.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Yashpreet Singh
FAO No.349 of 2024
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Dikkan Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Admit.
List for final hearing in due course.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sarita vs. OIC Ltd and another
FAO No.4066 of 2013
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rahul, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
rt
list on 24.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Bimla Devi & Anr. vs. Naveen Kumar & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No. 287 of 2025
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr.Suneet Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Yuyutsu
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
Steps for the service of respondent No.1, have not
been taken despite repeated opportunities. On the persuasive
rt
request made by learned counsel for the appellants, two weeks’
further time, is granted to do the needful.
However, it is made clear that if the steps for the
service of aforesaid respondent, have not been taken within the
stipulated period, then the present appeal will be dismissed for
want of prosecution against respondent No.1.
As prayed, list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs. Kanchan and others
CMP(M) No.331 of 2025
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
None for respondents No.1 & 2 & LRs No.3(a) &
3(b).
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
of
Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Respondent No.5, already ex parte.
rt None for respondent No.6.
Ms. Nisha, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP(M) No1795 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
submits that amended memo of parties has been filed on
10.03.2026, however, the same is not on record. Registry is
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sandeepak Guleria vs. Roop Lal & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1849 of 2025
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rocky, Advocate vice Mr. Surender Verma,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Aafreen Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Gurmeet
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Shruti Dubey, Advocate vice Mr. Sambhav
of
Bhasin, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
rt
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
submits that two applications have been filed on 11.03.2026,
however, the same are not on record. Registry is directed to trace
and place the same on record, if in order.
List as and when both the applications are placed on
record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Yash Pal & another vs. Satya Devi
RFA No.103 of 2025
.
12.03.2026 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Mohinder
Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.27574 of 2025
of
Reply stands filed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/respondent, prays
rt
for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder.
As prayed, list on 22.04.2026.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
CMP No.3878 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicants/appellants, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time
to file reply.
List for consideration on the date fixed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Yash Pal & another vs. Satya Devi
RFA No.103 of 2025
.
12.03.2026 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Mohinder
Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.27574 of 2025
of
Reply stands filed.
Learned counsel for the applicant/respondent, prays
rt
for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder.
As prayed, list on 22.04.2026.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
CMP No.3878 of 2026
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicants/appellants, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time
to file reply.
List for consideration on the date fixed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Manish Thakur vs. Vijayndra Singh
Civil Suit No.12 of 2024
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
of
list the case before National Lok Adalat to be held on
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
rt
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Kantho Devi & Anr. vs. Balwant Singh & Ors.
CMP(M) No.224 of 2026
.
12.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
CMP No.3611 of 2026
As per report of the Registry, there is a delay of
of
about 51 days in refiling the present appeal.
rt Heard.
In view of the averments made in the present
application, the same is allowed and delay of 51 days in refiling
the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.224 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 12, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Prem Pal & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors.
RFA No.4080 of 2013
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
list on 02.04.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Pradeep K. Sharma alongwth connected
matter.
.
FAO No.4204 of 2013 a/w FAO No.4209 of 2013
FAO No.4204 of 2013
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sarthak Upadhyay, Advocate vice Mr.Deepak
Gupta,Advocate, for the appellant.
of
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
rt Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for respondents No.2 &
3.
FAO No.4209 of 2013
Mr. Sarthak Upadhyay, Advocate vice Mr.Deepak
Gupta,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is pre-occupied
in another Court.
As prayed, list on 18.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Mathu Ram & Ors.
RFA No.02/2015 a/w C.O. No.50/2019
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/non-cross-objectors.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4/cross-objectors.
CMP No.16923 of 2025
of
At the request of leaned Deputy Advocate General, list
for consideration after four weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Anr. vs. Arun & Anr.
RFA No.281 of 2016
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. Mukesh Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Learned vice counsel for the respondent, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available due
to ailment of his father.
rt As prayed, list on 16.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Hira Singh a/w connected matters.
RFA No.47 of 2029 a/w RFA Nos.16,17 & 48 of 2019
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellant/State in RFA Nos.47 & 49 of 2019 and for
respondent(s)/State in RFA Nos.16 & 17 of 2019
Mr. K.S. Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent(s) in RFA Nos. 47 & 48 of
2019 and for the appellant(s) in RFA Nos.16 & 17 of
of
2019.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Usha vs. Chiterlekha & Ors.
FAO No.33 of 2024
.
11.03.2026 Present: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. O.C. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
of
adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar Gupta vs. Satish Kumar & Ors.
Civil Suit No.74 of 2024
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 30.03.2026.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition HPPWD & Ors. vs. Gian & Ors.
CMP(M) No.2187 of 2025
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan,Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants/appellants.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.2, has been received back duly served, however,
of
there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, he is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
rt Notice issued to respondent No.1, has been received
back unserved as he is reported to have died.
Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate
General, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take
consequential steps on account of death of aforesaid respondent
No.1.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Vivek Enterprises vs. Rattanjeet Singh
(deceased) through his LRs & Ors.
.
CMP(M) No.2430 of 2025
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a),1(b) & 2.
of
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.3, has been received back duly served, however,
rt
there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, he is ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of respondents No.1(a),1(b) & 2 and submits that Power
of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents, shall be filed during
the course of the day. He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time
to file reply.
As prayed, list on 31.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Satya Pal
RFA No.51 of 2025
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Pradeep
of
Verma, Advocate, for the applicants in CMP
No.29531/2025.
rt CMP No.29531 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-
applicants/appellants.
Reply on behalf of non-applicant/respondent No.1,
stands filed.
Learned vice counsel for the applicants, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors vs. Hari Singh & Ors.
CMP No.32948/2025 in RFA No.230 of 2017
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Today also, learned Deputy Advocate General, has
placed on record communication dated 10.03.2026, wherein, it has
been submitted that an SLP has been filed against the impugned
rt
judgment passed by this Court. However, learned Deputy
Advocate General, is not in a position to inform this Court about
the latest status of the SLP, which has been filed. He prays for and
is granted four weeks’ time to inform about the latest status of the
SLP.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors vs. Gita Ram
CMP No.32672/2025 in RFA No.232 of 2017
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
applicant/respondent.
of
Today also, learned Deputy Advocate General, has
placed on record communication dated 10.03.2026, wherein, it has
been submitted that an SLP has been filed against the impugned
rt
judgment passed by this Court. However, learned Deputy
Advocate General, is not in a position to inform this Court about
the latest status of the SLP, which has been filed. He prays for and
is granted four weeks’ time to inform about the latest status of the
SLP.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Ors vs. Tata Chand & Ors.
CMP No.32693/2025 in RFA No.229 of 2017
.
11.03.2026 Present: Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Today also, learned Deputy Advocate General, has
placed on record communication dated 10.03.2026, wherein, it has
been submitted that an SLP has been filed against the impugned
rt
judgment passed by this Court. However, learned Deputy
Advocate General, is not in a position to inform this Court about
the latest status of the SLP, which has been filed. He prays for and
is granted four weeks’ time to inform about the latest status of the
SLP.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 11, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Leela Devi & Ors.
FAO No.314 of 2025
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Pritam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 3.
Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate vice Mr. G.R.Palsra,
Advocate, for respondents No.4(i)(a) to 4(i)(c), 4(ii) to
of
4(vii).
None for respondent No.4(viii).
rt As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
respondent No.4(viii), has been received back duly served,
however, there is no representation on her behalf. Hence, she is
ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-
“1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case
when the employer has specifically pleaded and
proved on record that deceased employee wasbeing paid Rs.4500/- per month as wages, Ld.
Commissioner has committed illegality andirregularity in taking the monthly wages of Rs.8000/-
per month for calculation of compensation and that
too without adhering to Section 4(a) of the Act
without taking 50% of the amount of the monthly
wages?
2. Whether the learned Commissioner has erred and
committed error by applying the relevant factor of
194.64 for the age group of 36 years while the
deceased was aged about 37 years at the time of
his death and relevant factor to this age group was
192.14 and the impugned order for payment of
compensation on this count deserves to be
interfered with by this Court?
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
3. Whether the learned Commissioner was legally
justified in ordering the payment of penalty of 50%
of the compensation amount upon the.
appellant/Insurance Company instead upon the
employer in violation of Section 4(A) (3)(b) of the
Act and that too before ordering for payment of
penalty without issuing any notice as required underthe Act?”
Post Admission Notice.
of
Mr. Devender K. Sharma and Mr. Manjeet Singh,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
rt
behalf of the respective respondents.
Separate notice be issued to respondent No.4(viii),
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three
days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Akshay Kumar Goel vs. Vijay Bank & Ors.
Civil Suit No.39 of 2023
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. George, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for defendants No.1 &
2.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for defendant No.3/State.
of
At the request of leaned counsel for defendants
rt
No.1 & 2, list for framing of issues after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Juneja vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.321 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, learned
of
Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of
notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and
rt
is granted two weeks’ time to file status report.
List on 24.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Suman Devi & another
FAO No.169 of 2014
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Prittam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj
Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
rt
list the case before National Lok Adalat to be held on
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mali & Ors.
FAO No.348 of 2024
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Prittam Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr.Tek Chand, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
list the case before National Lok Adalat to be held on
rt
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Mohan Bati & Ors. vs. Gurmukh Singh & another
FAO No.35 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raghav Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within six
weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Vandna Sharma & another vs. Nand Lal & another
FAO No.36 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Ms.Rajni Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr.Mukesh Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within six
weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Shamsher Singh (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
vs. Ram Murti & Ors.
.
RFA No.152 of 2010
09.03.2026 Present: Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No.1 & 2.
Respondents No.4,6 to 9, already ex parte.
of
CMPs No.3482 & 3483 of 2026
Since none has appeared on behalf of the
rt
applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, despite repeated calls, in the
interest of justice, list for consideration after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kamal Kumar & Ors.
FAO No. 123 of 2024.
.
09.03.2026. Present: Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.2 & 3.
of
Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Anuj Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
rtCMP No.28699 of 2025
As prayed, list on 01.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
M/s Jaiprakash Associates Limited vs. Sunder Ram & another
RFA No.71 of 2017
.
09.03.2026 Present: None for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.2.
Mr. Anil Kumar God, Advocate, for the
of
respondent/Ultra Tech.
rt CMP(M) No.215 of 2026
Since none has appeared on behalf of the non-
applicant/appellant as well as applicant/respondent No.1 despite
repeated calls, in the interest of justice, list next week.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Dawa Ram
RFA No.170 of 2007
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Divya Raj Singh,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
of
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is pre-occupied
in another Court.
rt As prayed, list on 23.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Nank Chand & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.4207 of 2013
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta and Mr.Amit Himalvi, Advocates, for the
appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh,Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Raj Mohammad Khan vs. Anupama Jain & Ors. a/w
connected matters
.
Civil Suit No.106 of 2021 a/w Civil Suits No.44 & 45 of 2024.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Prem Chand Verma, Mr. Varun Thakur and Mr.
Aakash Thakur, Advocates, for the plaintiff in Civil Suit
No.106/2021 and for defendant No.2 in Civil Suit No.45
of 2024.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the plaintiff(s) in
of
Civil Suit No.44 & 45 of 2024 an for defendant No.4 in
Civil Suit No.106 of 2021.
Mr. Vaibhav Chauhan, Advocate vice Ms. Shradha
rt Karol, Advocate for defendants No.1 to 3 in Civil Suit
No.106/2021 and for defendants No.1(a) to 1(c) in Civil
Suit No.44/2024.
OMP No.526 of 2021 in Civil Suit No.44/2024 & OMP
No.762/2021 in Civil Suit No.45 of 2024
Heard for some time.
At the request of learned counsel for the non-
applicants/plaintiffs, list for continuation on 24.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. M/s Neeru Photostate & General
Stationery Suppliers
.
RFA No.06 of 2026
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
CMP(M) No.228 of 2026
Since the present appeal has been preferred within the
of
period of limitation, no further order is required to be passed in the
present application and the same is dismissed as having been
rt
rendered infructuous.
RFA No.06 of 2026
Issue notice to the respondent, returnable within six
weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
CMP No.3678 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of the impugned judgment and decree dated
02.08.2025, passed by learned District Judge, Kullu, District Kullu,
H.P. in case titled M/s Neeru Photostat & General Stationary
Suppliers vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., shall remain
stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Preeto Devi & Ors. vs. Shobhit Saini & Ors.
FAO No.34 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for the appellants.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within six
weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Mahinder Pal vs. Nawang Tenpa & Ors.
FAO No.37 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shivang Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable within six
weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
of
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Sansar Chand vs. Sudha Devi & Ors.
Contempt Petition No.62 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
rt
two weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 25.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Meera Walia vs. Sanjay Gupta & another
Contempt Petition No.63 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
two weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 25.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Veena Kumari vs. Ashish Kohli
Contempt Petition No.64 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
rt
two weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 25.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Dr. Shomin Dhiman vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
Contempt Petition No.70 of 2026
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
of
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted
rt
two weeks’ time to file compliance report.
As prayed, list on 25.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority vs. Shakuntla
Devi (deceased) through her LRs. & ors.
.
RFA No.363 of 2012
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vishwakirti Singh, Advocate vice Ms. Reeta
Hingmang, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c).
of
Ms. Srishti Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Anirudh Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.3(a) to 3(c), 4,7,8(a) to
rt8(e).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.9/State.
Consequential steps on account of death of
respondent No.6, have not been taken as yet.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to do the needful, by way of last
opportunity.
As prayed, list on 30.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority & another vs.
Pritam Singh @ Pritem & Ors. a/w connected matters
.
RFA No.4092 of 2013 a/w RFA Nos.4090, 4091 of 2013, 219 of
2014 & 263 of 2015
RFA No.4092 of 2013
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/State.
rt RFA No. 4091 of 2013
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
2 and 4.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.5/State.
RFA No. 4092 of 2013
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
2 and 3(a).
None for respondent No. 3(b).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/ State.
RFA No. 219 of 2014
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1
and 2.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.3/State.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
RFA No. 263 of 2015
Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.
.
Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General,
for respondent No.3/State.
of
RFA No.4092 of 2013
Consequential steps on account of death of
rt
respondent No.3(a), have not been taken as yet.
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to do the needful, by way
of law opportunity.
As prayed, list on 30.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Atul Kmar Aggarwal (deceased) through his LRs and others vs.
Ram Saran Dass and others
.
Civil Suit No.50 of 2014
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi and Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocates,
for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for defendants
No.1,4,5,9 & 10 and proposed LRs No.3(a) to 3(c).
of
Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate, for defendant No.11.
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.17(i).
rtMr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for defendants
No.17(ii) to 17(v).
Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for defendant
No.17(vi).
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for defendants No.19 &
23.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for defendants No.20 & 21.
OMP(M) No.223 of 2025
The instant application under Order 22, Rule 4 read
with Rule 9 of CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, has been
filed by the applicants/plaintiffs for bringing on record the legal
representatives of deceased defendant No.3, Rakesh Kumar, who
has expired on 15.11.2024, after setting aside the abatement, if any.
As per the applicants, deceased defendant No.3,
Rakesh Kumar has expired on 15.11.2024, leaving behind his legal
representatives, as mentioned in Para-3 of the application.
However, the delay in filing the application as occurred is neither
willful nor intentional, but due to the reasons, which were beyond
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
the control of the applicants, as such, the same deserves to be
condoned and since right to sue always survives in favour of the
.
legal representatives of deceased defendant No.3, Rakesh Kumar,
there is no impediment in bringing on record the aforesaid legal
heirs and as such, the present application deserves to be allowed.
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
of
behalf of the non-applicants/respondents and have no objection, in
case the same are allowed.
rt Heard. Taking into consideration the fact that the
delay, as occurred, was beyond the control of the applicants and
has been sufficiently explained in the application, the same is
hereby condoned.
As right to sue still survives in favour of the legal
representatives of deceased defendant No.3, Rakesh Kumar, the
legal representatives, as mentioned in Para-3 of the application,
are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
Civil Suit No.50 of 2014
Learned counsel for the plaintiffs, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to file amended memo of parties.
As prayed, list on 18.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
GM Northern Railway vs. Pritam Kumar @ Prem
Kumar & Ors.a/w connected matters.
.
RFA No. 60/2014 a/w RFA No. 116/2014 and
Cross Objections No. 64/2014 & 03/2025
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant(s), in both the appeals.
Respondent No. 1 is stated to have expired.
of
Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for respondents No.
2(a), 2(b), 2(c)(i) to 2(c) (iii) in both the appeals.
rt Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.3/State.
Correct addresses of respondents No.1(a) & 1(b)
have not been furnished despite repeated opportunities granted
in this respect. One more, but last opportunity of two weeks, as
prayed, is granted to do the needful. However, it is made clear
that if the correct addresses of aforesaid respondents, are not
furnished within the stipulated period, then adverse order will be
passed against the appellants.
As prayed, list on 24.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:32 :::CIS
Dila Ram & Ors. vs. NTPC Ltd. & Ors.
RFA No. 295 of 2016
.
09.03.2026 Present: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ansuhl Gandhi,Advocate vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Ms.
of
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.2/State.
rt Learned counsel for the appellants stated at bar that
an application for bringing on record the LRs of deceased
appellants No.1 & 3, shall be filed during the course of the day. List
as and when the aforesaid application is placed on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
State of H.P. & another vs. Bhagwati Devi (deceased)
through her LRs.
.
RFA No. 106 of 2021
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arun
of
Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1(b) to 1(d).
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to
rt
respondents No.1(a), has been received back duly served,
however, there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, he is
ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel for respondents
No.1(b) to 1(d), list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ashish Gupta vs. Neha
Civil Suit No.36 of 2023
.
09.03.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, submits that the
of
replication has been filed on 02.03.2026, however the same is not
on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on
record, if in order.
rt List as and when replication is placed on record.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Partap Singh & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors.
RFA No.50 of 2017
.
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Dibender Ghosh,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellants, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Mangat Ram vs. State of H.P. & Another
RFA No.121 of 2017
.
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
As prayed, list on 18.03.2026 along with
of
RFA No.217 of 2017.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition & Anr. vs. Beli Ram & another
RFA No.149 of 2017
.
07.03.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for respondent No.2/State.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Tenzin vs. Collector, Land Acquisition & Ors.
RFA No.180 of 2017
.
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant ,
of
list after three weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Dila Ram & Ors.
RFA No.225 of 2017
.
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3 & 5.
of
As prayed, list after four weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Amar Nath (deceased) through his LRs vs. State of H.P. a/w
connected matters.
.
RFA No.79 of 2010 a/w RFA Nos.80 to 82 and 120
to 123 of 2010.
RFA Nos. 79 to 82 of 2010
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant(s) in all appeals.
of
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
rtNegi, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents
No.1 to 3/State in all appeals.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondent No.4 in all appeals.
RFA Nos. 120 to 123 of 2010
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General, for appellants No.1
to 3/State in all appeals.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Mr. Bhupender Singh
Kanwar and Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocates, for the
respective respondents in all appeals.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Shiv Charan vs. State of H.P. & Another
FAO No.149 of 2013
.
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rasina & Ors.
FAO No.50 of 2013
.
07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Kulwant Chauhan,Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate vice Mr. Nand Lal Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.4(a) to 4(d).
of
Learned vice counsel for respondents No.4(a) to 4(d),
prays for and is granted one week’s further time to file Power of
rt
Attorney on their behalf. However, it is made clear that if the Power
of Attorney on behalf of respondents No.4(a) to 4(d) is not filed on
or before the next date of hearing, then matter shall be heard finally
in the absence of the same as the matter pertains to the year 2013.
As prayed, list on 17.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. vs. Dinesh Kumari & Ors.
FAO No.240 of 2016
.
06.03.2026 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Rana, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
At the request of learned counsel for respondents
No.1 & 2, list for final hearing as per its turn.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kalgi Ram & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.20 of 2021
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the
respondents/State.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
list after two weeks.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NIC Ltd.vs.Mamta Devi & Ors.
CMP No.32651 of 2025 in FAO No.370 of 2014
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate, with Mr.
Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Today the case is listed under the head “speaking to
minutes”
rt It has been reported by the Registry that the amount of
compensation is lying deposited before the Court of learned Civil
Judge (Jr. Division)-cum-JMIC, Hamirpur, H.P. Therefore, the order
dated 26.02.2026, is modified to the extent that the amount of
compensation as lying deposited before the aforesaid Court, be
released in favour of the applicant/respondent No.2, as per his
share in the total awarded amount of compensation.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Savitri Devi vs. Shriram General Insurance Company & Ors.
FAO (MVA)No.423 of 2014
.
06.03.2026 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 & 3.
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of the
appellants and as the present appeal stands already admitted, in
the interest of justice, list for final hearing as per its turn.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar Kalia vs. Mukesh Kumar and another
FAO No.395 of 2016
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder Pathania,
Advocate, for respondent No.2
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondent
No.1, despite repeated calls, he is ordered to be proceeded against
rt
ex parte.
As, the present appeal stands already admitted, list for
final hearing as per its turn.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Usha Devi and others vs. Sandeep Kumar @ Sunil Kumar
and others
.
FAO No.482 of 2016
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder Pathania,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Since, the present appeal stands already admitted, list
for final hearing as per its turn.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Usha Devi and others vs. Sandeep Kumar @ Sunil Kumar
and others
.
FAO No.482 of 2016
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondents No.1 & 2, already ex parte.
Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder Pathania,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Since, the present appeal stands already admitted, list
for final hearing as per its turn.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Vinay Bhushan vs. Vishal Rana
Civil Suit No.98 of 2021
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 3.
Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish Gupta,
Advocate, for defendants No.4 to 8.
of
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for defendant No.9.
rt Learned counsel for the contesting parties, pray for
and are granted three weeks’ time to seek instructions in the matter,
in terms of the previous order.
As prayed, list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Start a Fresh Drug Counseling and
Rehabilitation Centre vs. State of H.P.
.
FAO No.206 of 2025
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vidish
Chauhan,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms.
Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the
of
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant,
rt
list on 25.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NICL vs. Smt. Sheela Devi & Ors.
FAO No.321 of 2016
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.1 to 3.
Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5.
of
Learned vice counsel for respondents No.4 & 5,
stated at bar that respondent No.4, has died.
rt Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
appellant, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take
consequential steps on account of death of aforesaid respondent
No.4. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Devmani & Ors. vs. Jagdish Singh and Ors.
FAO No.344 of 2016
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
list the case before the National Lok Adalat to be held on
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
rt
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Shri Ram General Insurance Company vs.
Sanjay Pal & Ors.
.
FAO No.364 of 2016
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Respondent No.3, stands already deleted.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
rt
list the case before the National Lok Adalat to be held on
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Prakash Chand & Ors.
.
FAO No.489 of 2016
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms.Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashista, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
list the case before the National Lok Adalat to be held on
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
rt
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Shakuntla Devi
FAO No.182 of 2024 & CO. No.12 of 2022
.
06.03.2026 Present: Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Bhupinder Pathania,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3, proceeded ex parte vide order
dated 04.7.2025.
of
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,
list the case before the National Lok Adalat to be held on
rt
14.03.2026, on which date, the parties are directed to remain
present in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company vs. Nagina & Ors.
FAO No.24 of 2013
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh
Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondent No.5.
of
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 10.03.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company vs. Gurdassi & Ors.
FAO No.76 of 2013
.
06.03.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
None for respondents No.4 to 8.
of
List the case before Additional Registrar (J) on
09.03.2026, who will give the report “as to whether, service of all
rt
the respondents in the matter is complete or not and also
whether they are being represented or they have been
proceeded against ex parte?”.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Secretary HPPWD & Ors. vs. Durgi Devi & another
CMP(M) No.2253 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the appellants/State.
Mr. Devender Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 & 2.
of
CMP(M) No.2253 of 2025
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
rt
behalf of the respondents and they have no objection, in case,
the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the Er.
Anil Kumar, the same is allowed and delay of 17 days in filing the
present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.________of 2026
Be registered.
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
Mr. Devender Kumar Sharma, Advocate, appears and
waives service of post admission notice on behalf of both the
respondents.
List for final hearing in due course.
Call for the records.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
CMP No.______ of 2026
.
Be registered.
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
of
today, the execution of award dated 07.07.2025, passed by the
learned Additional District Judge, Sundernagar, District Mandi,
rt
H.P. in case titled Durgi Devi & another vs. The Secretary
HPPWD & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the
present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Sandeep Parmar vs. Gami Mohd. & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1705 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 8.
None for respondents No.9 & 10.
of
Ms. Mamta Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.11.
CMP(M) No.1705 of 2025
rtSince none has appeared on behalf of respondents
No. 9 & 10 despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be proceeded
against ex parte
Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 8,
is stated to have been filed, however, the same is not on record.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order.
No reply to the application is intended to be filed on
behalf of the contesting respondents and they have no objection,
in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the
applicant Sandeep Parmar, the same is allowed and delay of 30
days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.________of 2026
Be registered.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Admit.
Post Admission Notice.
.
Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan and Ms. Mamta Devi,
Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on
behalf respondent No.1 to 8 and respondent No.11, respectively.
List for final hearing in due course.
of
CMP No.______ of 2026
rt Be registered.
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 03.03.2025, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-I, Paonta Sahib, District
Sirmaur, H.P. in case titled Gami Mohd. & Ors. vs. Sandeep
Parmar & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the
present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Dev Kumar vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.5 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for respondents No.1 to 3/State.
of
RFA No.5 of 2026
Admit.
rt Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Separate notice be issued to proforma respondent
No.4, returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Bishan Dass & Anr.
FAO(MVA) No.18 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MVA) No.18 of 2026
Admit.
of
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
rt
thereafter.
CMP No.2809 of 2026
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 03.11.2025, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur,
H.P. in case titled Bishan Dass vs. Sanjay Kumar & another,
shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sulekha Devi & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.19 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MVA) No.19 of 2026 & CMP No.2812 of 2026
Admit.
of
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt
CMP No.2811 of 2026
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 16.10.2025, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sundernagar, District
Mandi, H.P. in case titled Sulekha Devi & Others vs. Jai Pal &
others, shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present
appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Chandrawati vs. HRTC through its MD & others
FAO No.23 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for respondents No.1 to 3/State.
of
FAO No.23 of 2026
rt Admit.
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.4 & 5,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three
days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Nisha Dogra & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.28 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO(MVA) No.28 of 2026
Admit.
of
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
rt
thereafter.
CMP No.2963 of 2026
Heard.
Subject to deposit of the entire award amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 20.11.2025, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kangra at Dharamshala ,
District Kangra, H.P. in case titled Nisha Dogra & others vs.
Onkar Singh & others, shall remain stayed during the pendency of
the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Saurav Thakur vs. Ramesh Chand & Ors.
FAO No.30 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Admit.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Sunny Kumar vs. Amarjeet K. Sharma
COPC No.59 of 2026
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Anushul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the respondents.
of
CMP No.3276 of 2026
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
rt
allowed and delay in refiling the present contempt petition, is hereby
condoned. Application stands disposed of.
COPC No.59 of 2026
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned
Additional Advocate General, prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file compliance report/reply.
As prayed, list on 23.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kamla Devi (deceased) vs. Arvind Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.494 of 2012
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ajeet Singh Pal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Udit Shourya Kaushik, Advocate vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to file fresh Power of Attorney on
behalf of respondents No.1 to 6, by way of last opportunity. List
rt
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Keshav Dutt Shreedhar vs. Nishant Sharma
Civil Suit No.3 of 2024
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant Nishant Sharma, present in person through
Video Conferencing.
of
OMP No.1270 of 2025
As prayed, list for consideration on 13.03.2026.
rtOMP No.1364 of 2025
Affidavit of Ms. Shine, Advocate, is stated to have
been filed on 03.03.2026, however the same is not on record.
Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in
order.
As prayed, list for consideration on 13.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Anita Devi & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.170 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arvind Sharma,Advocate, for respondents N.1 to 3.
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for respondents
No.4 & 5.
of
CMPs No.30827 & 30215 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, prays
rt
for and is granted 10 days’ further time to file reply(ies).
As prayed, list on 17.03.2025.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondent No.5, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kamlesh Kumar Bansal & Anr. vs. Pratibha Kaushik & Ors.
Civil Suit No.34 of 2023
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr.Rajnish Maniktala,Senior Advocate withMr. Dinkar
Bhaskar, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran,
Advocate, for defendants No.2 & 3.
of
OMP No.78 of 2026
Let notice be issued to proposed defendants, as
rt
mentioned in Para-14 of the application, returnable within four
weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
In the meantime,reply on behalf of defendants, be also
filed.
OMP No.1320 of 2025
Reply on behalf of defendant No.1, already stands
filed.
Learned counsel for defendants No.2 & 3, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
OMP No.79 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/plaintiffs are exempted from
filing translated copy of of documents in question. However, the
same be filed in due course of time, if necessity arises to do the
same.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Anr. vs.Santu @ Sant Ram
CMP(M) No.1349 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the applicants /State.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for proposed LRs No.1(b)
& 1(c).
of
Proposed LRs No.1(a) & 1(d) to 1(g), already ex parte.
rt CMP Nos.2237 & 2238 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel for proposed LRs
No.1(b) & 1(c), list the present matter a/w RFA No.97 of 2025.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition & Anr. vs.Santu @ Sant Ram
CMP(M) No.1357 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the applicants /State.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for proposed LRs No.1(b)
& 1(c).
of
Proposed LRs No.1(a) & 1(d) to 1(g), already ex parte.
rt CMP Nos.2235 & 2236 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel for proposed LRs
No.1(b) & 1(c), list the present matter a/w RFA No.97 of 2025.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Vishavdeep @ Vishwadeep & Aala vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.1786 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Kiran Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Rakesh
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the respondent /State.
of
ASI Bhavdev, P.S. Manali, District Kullu, H.P. present
along with records.
rt Today also, learned vice counsel for the petitioner,
prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not
available today.
As prayed, list on 23.03.2026.
However, it is made clear, no further adjournment
shall be granted on the next date and the application shall be
heard finally.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Abhishek Sharma vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.3065 of 2025
.
05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Parth Sagar, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma and Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the respondent /State.
of
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
rt
today.
As prayed, list on 24.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Collector, LAC & Ors. vs. Ram Lal
CMP(M) No.166 of 2026
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the applicants /State.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Collector, LAC & Ors. vs. Narayan Singh
CMP(M) No.168 of 2026
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the applicants /State.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Anil Kumar & another.
CMP No.26210 of 2025 in FAO No.444 of 2014
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP No.26210 of 2025
of
Heard. Having regard to averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and factum of death of
respondent No.2, is ordered to be taken on record.
rt Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.444 of 2014
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to take steps for bringing on record the
LRs of deceased respondent No.2. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Santi Devi(deceased) her LRs & Ors.
CMP No.448 of 2026 in RFA No.488 of 2015
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the non-applicants /State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General while placing
on record communication dated 25.02.2026, submits that order
rt
dated 27.05.2025, passed by this Court, has been assailed by
way of filing the SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
In this view of the matter, the consideration of the
matter is deferred for a period of eight weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Nikku Ram & Ors.
CMP No.449 of 2026 in RFA No.471 of 2015
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the non-applicants /State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
order dated 27.05.2025, passed by this Court, has been assailed
rt
by way of filing the SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India.
In this view of the matter, the consideration of the
matter is deferred for a period of eight weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Mahender Pal vs. JCC Bank
Cr. Revision No.677 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
of
Advocates General,for respondent No. 2 /State.
Cr.MP No.659 of 2026
rtNo reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants/respondents.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and one week’s further time, as prayed, is
granted to the petitioner to comply with the order dated
19.11.2025, passed in Cr.MP(M) No.2545 of 2025.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr. Revision No.677 of 2025
As prayed for, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Subhadra Devi & Ors.
FAO No.474 of 2015
.
03.03.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Suneel Awasthy, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Mr. K.R. Kashyap, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
Respondent No.5, already ex parte.
CMP No.1325 of 2026
rtHeard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
FAO No.474 of 2015
List for final hearing on 12.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company vs. Vidya Devi & Ors.
CMP No.2902 of 2026 in FAO (MVA) No.43 of 2014
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
CMP No.2902 of 2026
of
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent No.1, Vidya Devi,
rt
for release of entire compensation amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in her favour, as per her share, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported
with the affidavit of the applicant.
No reply to the application is intended to be filed
on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant and learned counsel
for the aforesaid non-applicant, stated that since the main
appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn on 13.12.2025 by the
National Lok Adalat, he has no objection in case the prayer
made in the application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the main appeal stands
dismissed as withdrawn on 13.12.2025 by the National Lok
Adalat, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the
entire amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court in favour of
applicant/respondent No.1, Vidya Devi, strictly as per her
.
share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting
the same to her saving bank account, detail whereof has been
mentioned in Para-5 of the application.
of
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Shanti Devi & Ors.
CMP No.2909 of 2026 in FAO No.485 of 2016
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
of
CMP No.2909 of 2026
rt Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, which
is duly supported with an affidavit of Sunita Devi, Assistant
Manager, The National Insurance Company, Divisional Office,
Himland Hotel, Shimla, the same is allowed and excess amount
deposited by the applicant/Insurance Company, in the Registry of
this Court alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be refunded
to it, in terms of the order passed by the National Lok Adalat on
13.12.2025.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The General Manager Renuka Ji & Ors. vs. Hari Singh & Ors.
CMPs No.3160 & 3161 of 2026 in RFA No104 of 2019.
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vikas Mishra,Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the
applicants/proposed respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for respondents No. 2 & 3/State.
rt CMPs No.3160 & 3161 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted two weeks time to seek instructions in
the matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Surinder Singh vs. Neelam & Ors.
FAO No.273 of 2024
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Dixit,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Respondents No.2 & 3, already ex parte.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list for final disposal at admission stage on 25.03.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Chief Executive Officer vs. Shepu & ors.
RFA No.82 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Shubham Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 5.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
of
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for respondents No. 2 to 4/State.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ashok Kumar,
rt Advocate, for respondents No.6(a) to 6(c) &6(e) to
6(g).
Respondent No.6(d), already ex parte.
Learned counsel for respondents No.6(a) to 6(c) &
6(e) to 6(g), submits that Power of attorney on behalf of respondent
No.6(g), has already been filed and. Power of attorney on behalf of
respondents No.6(a) to 6(c) & 6(e) & 6(f), shall be filed during the
course of the day.
Now list the case before Additional Registrar (J) on
10.03.2026 with respect to the service of all respondents.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Gian Chand vs. Rajeev Sharma, Secretary & Ors.
COPC No.1075 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.Vikas Rathore,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the respondent/State.
of
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Learned counsel for respondent No.5, has placed on
rt
record pension payment order-cum- commutation payment
order and submits that order passed by this Court, has been duly
complied with.
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner,
acknowledges the fact of compliance of the order.
Therefore, no further order is required to be passed
in the present petition and the same is dismissed as having
been rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram vs. Jatin Lal and Ors.
COPC No.1092 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through V.C), for the
petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for respondents No.1 & 2/State.
of
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned Additional Advocate General, submits that
rt
reply filed on behalf of respondent No.1, shall be adopted by
respondent No.2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.3, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply, by way of last
opportunity.
As prayed, list on 19.03.2026.
It is made clear that if the reply is not filed by
respondent No.3, on or before the aforesaid date, she is directed
to remain present before this Court in person on the date fixed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. Nipun Jindal & another
COPC No.1395 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Virender S. Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents, states that
order dated 27.08.2025, passed by this Court stands duly
of
complied with. However, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that aforesaid order has been partly complied with as
rt
interest has been given only @7.1% instead of @9%.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the
respondents, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to take
instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 18.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Renu Bala and another vs. Dr.Abhishek Jain and others.
COPC No.1459 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Mr. Parshant Manhans, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General,for the respondents/State
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply/instructions.
As prayed, list on 20.03.2026.
rt
However, it is made clear that if the reply/instruction
is not filed on the next date of hearing, all the respondents shall
appear before this Court in person.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Chandni Pandey & Ors. Ram Kishan &Anr.
CMP(M) No.2042 of 2025
.
03.03.2026 Present: Ms. Pallavi, Advocate vice Mr. Ashwani Kaundal,
Advocate, for the appellants.
As per report of the Registry, steps for the service of
respondents have been taken on 27.02.2026. Therefore, let
of
notice be issued to the respondents, returnable within six weeks.
List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 03, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ram Dhan & Ors. vs. Roop Lal & Ors.
RFA No.52 of 2024
.
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. George and Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocates,
for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the respondent
of
No.1/State.
None for respondents No.2 & 3.
rt Mr. J.K. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 6,
LRs. No.8(i) to 8(iv) of deceased respondent No.8 and
respondent No.9.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.12 & 13.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
list on 17.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ram Dhan & Ors. vs. Roop Lal & Ors.
RFA No.50 of 2024
.
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. George and Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocates,
for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Mr. J.K. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.4,5,6,
LR of 8 and respondent No.9.
rt At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
list on 17.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Tara Devi vs.Sanjay Pathania (deceased) through LRs. &Anr.
CMP(M) No.1475 of 2025
.
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c).
Mr. Pawan Gautam,Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents, pray for and
are granted four weeks’ time to file replies as well as Power of
rt
Attorneys. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
vs.Mahinder Singh & Anr.
.
CMP(M) No.1749 of 2025
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, submits
that respondent No.2 has filed an appeal against the same
rt
award, which is registered as FAO No.209 of 2025.
Therefore, list the present appeal along with
aforesaid FAO No.209 of 2025 after two weeks.
In the meantime, steps for the service of respondents
No.2 & 3, be also taken.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
LAC vs.M/s Shabri Craft & Anr.
RFA No.79 of 2025 a/w Cross-Objections No.26 of 2025
.
02.03.2026 Present: Ms.Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1/Cross-
Objector.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
of
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the respondent
No.2/State.
rt CMP No.30791 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
submits that reply has been filed on 25.02.2026, however, the
same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place
the same on record, if in order. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Secretary (IPH)& Ors. vs. Mangal Devi (died & deleted)& Ors.
CMP No.612 of 2026 in RFA No.233 of 2017
.
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar
Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush
Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna
Negi, Deputy Advocates General,for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate vice Mr. Parv Sharma,
of
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6(b).
CMP No.612 of 2026
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on
record instructions dated 26.02.2026, wherein it has been stated
that appellant-Department is in the process to file SLP before the
Hon’ble Apex Court.
In view of the above, list this application for
consideration after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Mohan &
Ors. a/w connected matters
.
FAO No.352 of 2024 a/w FAO No.44 of 2024 & FAO
No.141 of 2025
FAO No.352 of 2024
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.3
& 4.
rt Respondents No. 5 to 7, already ex parte.
FAO No.44 of 2024
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
FAO No.141 of 2025
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.3
& 4.
CMP No.18 of 2026 in FAO No.352 of 2024
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 18.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Sita Ram Sharma vs. Nipun Jindal & Ors.
COPC No.24 of 2026
.
02.03.2026 Present: Ms. Deepmala Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashista, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that order
of
dated 31.12.2024, stands duly complied with.
Therefore, no further order is required to be passed
rt
in the present petition and the same is dismissed as having
been rendered infructuous.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Sarveen Chaudhary vs. Vijay Singh and others
Civil Suit No.63 of 2020
.
02.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan
Singh Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Azmad Hayat Khan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for defendants No.2 to
5.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list for framing of issues on 12.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
March 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Laiq Ram & Ors. vs. LAC a/w connected matter
RFA No.215 of 2014 a/w RFA No.319 of 2014
.
RFA No.215 of 2014
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Parikshit, Advocate vice Mr. I.S. Chandel,
Advocate, for the appellants except appellant No.30.
Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for appellant No.30.
of
Mr. Bhupender Gupta,Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.
rtRFA No.319 of 2014
Mr. Bhupender Gupta,Senior Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Parikshit, Advocate vice Mr. I.S. Chandel,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel for the appellants in RFA No.215
of 2014 as well as for the respondent in RFA No.319 of 2014, prays
for adjournment on the ground that original counsel is not available
today as he has recently undergone surgery.
As prayed, list on 07.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh Chauhan vs. Dewan Parivahan & Ors.
FAO No.4048 of 2013
.
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 02.03.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Matten Pillai Gudja vs. Dot Ram & Ors. a/w connected matter
FAO No.4080 of 2013 a/w connected matter.
.
FAO No.4080 of 2013 a/w FAO No.12 of 2014
FAO No.4080 of 2013
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
of
Mr. Praneet Gupta,Advocate, for respondent No.3.
FAO No.12 of 2014
rtMr. Praneet Gupta,Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Bansi Ram & Ors.
RFA No.384 of 2014
.
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), already ex parte.
of
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to
4.
rtHeard in part. For continuation, list on 07.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kamal Singh Dhaulta vs. CBI a/w connected matters
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015 a/w Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
.
Cr. Appeal No.23 of 2015
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
of
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2015
Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
rt Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
Cr. Appeal Nos.5,8,11 & 12 of 2015
Ms. Swati Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Bhairav
Gupta,Advocate, for the appellants in all the appeals.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, CGC, for the respondent/CBI.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent-
CBI, list on 07.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar vs. State of H.P. & another
RFA No.241 of 2015
.
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
on 17.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Vijayandra Singh & Anr.
RFA No.257 of 2015
.
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
Mr. Arjun K. Lall,Advocate, for the respondents.
of
Learned counsel for the respondents, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list on 03.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Hans Raj & another vs. Shyam Lal & Ors.
RFA No.269 of 2003
.
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Taun
Bragta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Names of respondents No.1 & 5, stand deleted.
Ms. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.4
& 6.
of
Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, for respondents No.9
& 10.
rt At the request of learned counsel for the contesting
respondents, list for final hearing after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Sawant Singh Kochhar & Ors. vs. Jasbir Kaur Kochhar &
Ors.
.
FAO No.417 of 2006
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev
Sood,Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)
to 1(d).
of
Mr. Y.P. Sood,Advocate, for respondents No.3(a) &
3(b).
Mr.Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate, for respondent
rt No.3(c).
Learned vice counsel for the appellants, prays for
adjournment on the ground that he has not prepared the case today.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ranjeet Singh vs. Collector LAC & another
RFA No.594 of 2012
.
28.02.2026 Present: Appeal against appellants No.1 & 2, stands already
abated.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for appellants No.3 & 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
of
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
rt Heard in part. For continuation, list on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Gurdial Singh (deceased) through his LRs vs.
Amit Sahni & Ors.
.
RFA No.901 of 2012
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties
of
list after two weeks.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company vs. Nagina & Ors.
FAO No.24 of 2013
.
28.02.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel has gone out of
station to get his father medically checked up.
rt As prayed, list on 06.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company vs. Gurdassi & Ors.
FAO No.76 of 2013
.
28.02.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel has gone out of
station to get his father medically checked up.
rtAs prayed, list on 06.03.2026.
In the meantime, Registry is directed to report “as to
whether, service of all the respondents in the matter is complete or
not?”.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company vs. Gurdassi & Ors.
FAO No.76 of 2013
.
28.02.2026 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 ro
3.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel has gone out of
station to get his father medically checked up.
rtAs prayed, list on 06.03.2026.
In the meantime, Registry is directed to report “as to
whether, service of all the respondents in the matter is complete or
not?”.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Poonam Devi vs. Surjeet Singh
FAO No.85 of 2013
.
28.02.2026 Present: Mr. Verender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ganesh
Barowalia, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2, already ex parte.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today.
rt
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 28, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ram Pyari vs. Balbir Singh & Anr.
CMP(M) No.795 of 2025
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Varun Rana,Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Choudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Praneet Gupta,Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
At the request of learned counsel for the
applicant/appellant, list for consideration on 02.04.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
HPSEB Ltd. vs. M/s Dev Alloys
Civil Suit No.34 of 2014
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.
Mr. Arsh Matloita, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
OMP No.908 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, prays for
rt
adjournment.
As prayed, list for consideration on 18.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Manjeet & Ors. vs. HRTC & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1090 of 2025
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Ms. Manisha Kumari,Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, prays
for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file rejoinder, by way
rt
of last opportunity. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kamlesh Kumar Bansal & Anr. vs. Pratibja
Civil Suit No.34 of 2023
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 3.
of
OMP No.1320 of 2025
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, prays for
rt
adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not available
today.
As prayed, list on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and Ors. vs. M/s Bhardwaj Industry
Nangal
.
CMP(M) No.1579 of 2025
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the applicants/State.
of
Again steps for the service of sole respondent, have
not been taken despite last opportunity granted in this respect.
On the persuasive request made by learned Additional Advocate
rt
General, four weeks’ further time, is granted to do the needful.
As prayed, list on 01.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd vs.
Kaushlaya Devi and others
.
CMP(M) No.2040 of 2025
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 4.
of
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, submits
that Power of Attorney on behalf of aforesaid respondents, has
been filed on 09.01.2026, however the same is not on record.
rt
Learned counsel for aforesaid respondents, is directed to follow
up with the Registry in this respect.
Learned counsel for the appellant, submits that
address of respondent No.5, which has been mentioned in memo
of parties, is the correct address of aforesaid respondent and
appropriate attempts have not been made by the process serving
agency to serve him.
Therefore, let fresh notice be issued to respondent
No.5, on the address mentioned in the memo of parties,
returnable within four weeks, on filing process fee within three
days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Surender Kumar Negi vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.258 of 2026
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent /State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, learned
Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of
rt
notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and
is granted two weeks’ time to file status report.
List on 16.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Hukmi Ram & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.286 of 2017
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Mahesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur and Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents /State.
of
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for
adjournment on the ground that original counsel Mr. Mahesh
rt
Sharma, Advocate, is suffering from medical problem due to
which, he is not available today.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Asha Sharma & Ors.
FAO(MVA No.120 of 2015
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.31223 of 2025
of
The instant application under Order 23 Rule 1
read with Section 151 of CPC has been filed by the
applicant/appellant, seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the
rt
present appeal. The application is duly supported with the
affidavit of Mr. Chandan Goel, Advocate.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in
the application, which is duly supported with the affidavit of Mr.
Chandan Goel, Advocate, the same is allowed and the
applicant/appellant is permitted to withdraw the present
appeal.
Accordingly, in view of the above, the present
appeal is dismissed, as withdrawn, so also, the pending
application(s), if any.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Commandant 70 RCC (GREF) vs. Kiran Bala & Ors.
CMP No.32438 of 2025 in FAO No.503 of 2015
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Rajeev Sharma,
Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4.
of
CMP No.32438 of 2025
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 to 4,
rt
namely, Kiran Bala, Chamari Devi, Preeti Thakur & Vanshu, for
release of entire compensation amount alongwith up-to-date
interest in their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported
with the affidavits of all the applicants.
Learned DSGI, has placed on record ‘No
Objection Certificate’ received from Ltd. Col. Tejas Shivaji More
OC 70 RCC (GREF) and submits that he has no objection in
case the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
alongwith up-to-date interest is released in favour of aforesaid
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4 and also in view of the fact
that no appeal has been preferred against the judgment
passed by this Court on 30.10.2025 by either of the parties and
now the same has attained finality.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in
the application, which is duly supported with the affidavits of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment dated
30.10.2025, passed by this Court has attained finalityy, the
.
same is allowed and the entire amount lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered
to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No.1 to 4,
of
namely, Kiran Bala, Chamari Devi, Preeti Thakur & Vanshu,
strictly as per their respective shares, after proper verification
and identification, by remitting the same to their bank
rt
accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-3 of
the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Tarsem Singh & others
Civil Suit No.2 of 2026
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for defendants No.1 & 7 though duly served.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, for defendants No.2 to
6.
of
Civil Suit No.2 of 2026 & OMP No.09 of 2026
rt As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
defendants No.1 & 7, have been received back duly served,
however, there is no representation on their behalf. Hence, they are
ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Learned counsel for defendants No.2 to 6, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file written statement to the
present suit as well as reply to OMP No.9 of 2026.
As prayed, list on 06.04.2026.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Anjali Bhalla & others
Civil Suit No.1 of 2026
.
27.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for defendants No.2,3,4(a) to 4(c) & 5 though
duly served.
Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.6.
of
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for defendant No.7.
rtCivil Suit No.1 of 2026 & OMP No.07 of 2026
As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
defendants No.2,3,4(a) to 4(c) & 5, have been received back duly
served, however, there is no representation on their behalf. Hence,
they are ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Notice issued to defendant No.1, is awaited. Be
awaited for a further period of four weeks.
Learned counsel for defendants No.6 & 7, pray for
and are granted four weeks’ time to file written statements to the
present suit as well as replies to OMP No.7 of 2026.
As prayed, list on 06.04.2026.
In the meantime, interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 27, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
M/s Randhawa Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs.
M/s Ropways and Rapid Transport & Anr.
.
C.S. No.05 of 2023
26.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Dixit,
Advocate, for defendant No.1.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General with
Mr. Ankush Thakur and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu,
Deputy Advocates General, for defendant No.2/State.
rtOMP No.1379 of 2025
Arguments heard. Order reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Nikku Ram vs. Neelam Kumari
FAO No. 80 of 2013
.
26.02.2026 Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Gautam, Advocate vice Mr. Dinesh
Bhanot, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for
adjournment on the ground that the father of original counsel Mr.
rt
Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, is admitted at PGI, Chandigarh.
Therefore, at his request, list the case after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Deepak & Ors.
FAO Nos. 4176 & 4020 of 2013
.
FAO No.4176 of 2013
26.02.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
rtFAO No.4020 of 2013
Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Heard in part. For continuation, list on 03.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Nank Chand & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.4207 of 2013
.
26.02.2026 Present: Mr.Amit Himalvi, Advocate vice Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh,Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for an
adjournment.
rtAs prayed, list on 02.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Girja Thakur vs. NIC Ltd. & Anr. a/w connected matter
FAO No.188 of 2025 a/w FAO No.322 of 2023
.
FAO No.188 of 2025
26.02.2026 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai and Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocates, for
the appellant.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
FAO No.322 of 2023
rtMr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajiv Rai and Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocates, for
respondent No.2.
FAO No.188 of 2025 & FAO No.322 of 2023
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 26, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
M/s Swati Storewel Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Research
Development Corporation & Ors.
.
RFA No.281 of 2005
25.02.2026 Present: Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondents No.2 & 3 (a) already ex parte.
of
Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate (through V.C) with Mr.
Aryan Manta, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Navneet
Gupta,Resolution Professional.
rt Mr. Aryan Manta, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of Mr. Navneet Gupta,Resolution Professional. He
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file an appropriate
application as well as Power of Attorney on his behalf.
As prayed, list on 20.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Pankaj Kumar Singh vs. Madhu Chaudhary & anr.
COPC No.04 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Aruna Chauhan,Advocate, for the respondents.
Issue notice. Ms. Aruna Chauhan, Advocate, appears
of
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. She
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply/ to seek
instructions in the matter.
rt As prayed, list on 11.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kiran Badur vs. Sumitra Devi & Ors.
CMP No.1618 of 2026 in FAO No.11 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Let notice be issued to the non-applicants/respondents,
returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three
of
days. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kalpana & Ors. vs. Abhishek Jain & Ors.
COPC No.15 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Mr. Chander Shekhar Thakur Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents /State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
rt
of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to
file reply/ to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 11.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Abhinay Sharma & Ors.
FAO No.16 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
FAO No.16 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days. List
thereafter.
rt CMP No.2696 of 2026
Heard. Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 25.10.2025, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sarkaghat District Mandi,
H.P. in case titled Abhinay Sharma vs. Sushant Pal & Ors., shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Bhag Chand & Ors. vs. CDPO & Anr.
FAO(ECA) No.17 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Mr. Rohan Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of two days. List
of
thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Shangrash Samithi & Ors. vs. Raj Kumar & Ors.
COPC No.23 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Amrinder
Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj
Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with
Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.4 to 8/State.
of
COPC No.23 of 2026
rt Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of respondents No.4 to 8.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.1 to 3 &
9, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within a period of
two days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, reply/instructions, as prayed, be
filed/obtained by the appearing respondents.
CMP No.1527 of 2026
At this stage, applicants/petitioners are exempted
from filing English translation of documents in question.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Sita Ram Sharma vs. Nipun Jindal & Ors.
COPC No.24 of 2026
.
25.02.2026 Present: Ms. Deepmala Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms.Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashista, Advocate, for the respondents.
Issue notice. Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, learned vice
of
counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents and
has filed memo of appearance on their behalf. She has also
rt
placed on record communication dated 24.02.2026 and stated that
order dated 31.12.2024, stands duly complied with.
Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner,
prays for and is granted two days’ time to seek instructions in the
matter.
As prayed, list on 28.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ankush Dass Sood vs. Arvind Sood and others
Civil Suit No.18 of 2021
.
25.02.2026 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta and Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocates, for
the plaintiffs.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
of
Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for proforma
defendants No.4 to 7, 10 & 12.
Proforma defendants No.8,9 & 11 are ex parte.
rt OMP Nos.1059 & 957 of 2024
Learned counsel for the Non-applicants/plaintiffs as
well as non-applicants/defendants No.1 & 2, submit that replies
could not be filed due to winter vacations. Therefore, in the
interest of justice and as a matter of sheer indulgence, one more,
but last opportunity of two weeks’ as prayed, is granted to the
non-applicants to file their replies.
However, it is made clear that, if the replies are not
filed on or before th next date of hearing, the right to file the
same shall stands closed without any further reference to the
Court.
Civil Suit No.18 of 2021
As per report of the Registry, written statement filed on
behalf of defendant No.1, is lying under objection. Learned counsel
for aforesaid defendant undertakes to remove the same within a
period of two weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Learned counsel for defendants No.4 to 7, 10 & 12,
stated at bar that he doesn’t want to file any written statement on
.
behalf of aforesaid defendants.
As, prayed, now list the case after two weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
of
Judge
February 25, 2026
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Amitesh Sharma & Ors. vs. Sh. Sandeep Kadam Vasant &
another
.
COPC No.722 of 2025
24.02.2026 Present: Mr.Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
Learned counsel for the petitioners, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file counter-affidavit.
rt As prayed, list on 13.03.2026.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Onkar
Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioners in place of Mr. Kush
Sharma, Advocate, henceforth.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Rajeshwar Singh Guleria vs.Amar Singh & Ors.
C.S. No.46 of 2023
.
24.02.2026 Present: Mr.Aditya Chauhan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish
Gupta,Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 8.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
of
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for defendants No.9 to 12/State.
rt At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list the case for framing of issues on 11.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NIA vs. Pratibha Kapoor and another
FAO No.282 of 2025
.
24.02.2026 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents, prays for
of
adjournment.
As prayed, list on 12.03.2026
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
February 24, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
.
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
General Manager Renukaji Project & Ors. vs.
Yogeshwar Singh & Ors.
.
RFA No.76 of 2018
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Sugandh Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.4/State.
rt CMP No.1359 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted six weeks’ time to seek instructions in
the matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
The Secretary, Rural Development & Anr. vs. Milkhi Ram & Anr.
FAO(ECA) No.64 of 2023
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
of
CMP No.28305 of 2025
rtLearned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted six weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
IFFCO-TOKIO Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Gian Singh & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.266 of 2021
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Piyush Verma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
CMP No.32647 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
rt
prays for and is granted six weeks’ time to file reply. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Rubia @ Rubina and
another
.
CMP(M) No.46 of 2026
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
of
within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of five days.
List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Roshani Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.44 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of five days.
of
List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Anjali Bhalla and others
Civil Suit No.1 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
OMP No.7 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the non-applicants/respondents,
of
returnable within six weeks.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026, the date already fixed.
rt In the meantime, the parties are directed to maintain
status quo qua nature and possession of the suit property till the
next date of hearing, subject to compliance of
order 39 Rule 3 CPC.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Tarsem Singh and others
Civil Suit No.2 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
OMP No.9 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the non-applicants/respondents,
of
returnable within six weeks.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026, the date already fixed.
rt In the meantime, the parties are directed to maintain
status quo qua nature and possession of the suit property till the
next date of hearing, subject to compliance of
order 39 Rule 3 CPC.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Ritu Bhalla vs. Tarsem Singh and others
Civil Suit No.3 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
OMP No.11 of 2026
Let notice be issued to the non-applicants/respondents,
of
returnable within six weeks.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026, the date already fixed.
rt In the meantime, the parties are directed to maintain
status quo qua nature and possession of the suit property till the
next date of hearing, subject to compliance of
order 39 Rule 3 CPC.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Maya Ram vs. Nishant Guleria
Cr.MP No.237 of 2026 in Cr. Revision No.179 of 2021
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.
Cr.MP No.237 of 2026
of
The present application has been filed by the
applicant/petitioner for staying further proceedings in Cr.MA
No.329 of 2021, titled Maya Ram vs. Nishant Guleria, before the
rt
learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No.2, Sundernagar,
District Mandi, H.P.
It has been averred in the application that after
dismissal of the criminal revision petition, the trial court has initiated
proceedings under Section 441 of Cr.P.C and has issued non-
bailable warrants against the present applicant/petitioner. It has
further been averred in the application that the matter has been
amicably settled between the parties and the applicant has paid
entire amount to the respondent and the respondent has also
agreed for compounding the offence committed by the
applicant/petitioner.
Therefore, in view of the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with affidavit of the
applicant/petitioner, further proceedings pending before learned
Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No.2, Sundernagar, District
Mandi H.P. In Cr.MA No.329 of 2021, titled Maya Ram vs. Nishant
Guleria, shall remain stayed and non-bailable warrants issued
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
against the applicant/petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance, till
further orders.
.
List on 28.02.2026, the date already fixed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Nirjal Attri vs. Rajay Shakti
Cr.MP No.277 of 2026 in Cr. Revision No.128 of 2021
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Tejinder Singh, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
None for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.277 of 2026
of
Heard. No case has been made out by the
applicant/petitioner for exempting him from depositing the
compounding fee as directed by this Court vide judgment dated
rt
23.05.2025.
Hence, the present application is dismissed being
devoid of any merits and disposed of accordingly.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Roshani Devi & Ors. vs. Shyam Hetta & Anr. along with connected
matter
.
FAO(MVA) No.16 of 2025 & FAO (MVA) No.337 of 2024
FAO(MVA) No.16 of 2025
09.01.2026 Present: Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate vice Mr. H.K.S Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Reeta Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Amit Himalvi,Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
FAO (MVA) No.337 of 2024
Mr. Amit Himalvi,Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate vice Mr. H.K.S Thakur,
rt Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Reeta Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP No.447 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.337 of 2024
The instant application has been filed on behalf of
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4 & 6, namely, Roshani Devi, Divya
Chauhan, Dipti Chauhan, Sejal Chauhan & Munjli Devi, for release of
awarded amount in their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported with
affidavits of all the applicants.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release of
amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
Reply to the application stands filed. However, learned
counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has opposed the application
on the ground that if the amount, as prayed, is released in favour of
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
the aforesaid applicants/respondents No.1 to 4 & 6, it would be
difficult for it to recover the same in the event of appeal being
.
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the application has been
made.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
of
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4 & 6 and also in view of the fact that
rt
the appeal may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this
Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of the
awarded amount of compensation in favour of applicants/respondents
No.1 to 4 & 6, namely, Roshani Devi, Divya Chauhan, Dipti Chauhan,
Sejal Chauhan & Munjli Devi alongwith up-to-date interest, as per
their respective shares after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof have
been given in Para-7 of all the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4 & 6, namely, Roshani Devi, Divya
Chauhan, Dipti Chauhan, Sejal Chauhan & Munjli Devi, will have to
refund the amount, so released in their favour, with interest.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NIAC Ltd. vs. Vinya Kumari & Ors.
FAO No.66 of 2024
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. B.S. Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
None for respondent No.3.
of
CMP No.14147 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file reply.
rt As prayed, list for consideration on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Appeal (C-SB) No.11 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
Cr. Appeal (C-SB) No.11 of 2026
Admit. Call for the records.
Cr.MP No.235 of 2026
rt
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 16.01.2026 before learned Vacations
Judge.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Appeal (C-SB) No.12 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
Cr. Appeal (C-SB) No.12 of 2026
Admit. Call for the records.
Cr.MP No.236 of 2026
rt
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for and is
granted one week’s time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 16.01.2026 before learned Vacations
Judge.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Dayawanti & Ors.
FAO No.310 of 2025
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
6.
Ms. Bharti Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
of
Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate vice Mr. H.K.S. Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.8 & 9.
rtCMP No.1440 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 of CPC, has
been filed on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3, for modification of
order dated 26.11.2025, passed by this court in CMP No.27912 of
2025.
Heard.
Since two Insurance Companies have been fastened
with the liability to pay award amount to respondents No.1 to 6 in
equal proportions and only the present appellant, i.e. National
Insurance Company, had preferred the appeal against the award
dated 29.08.2025 and other Insurance Company, which has been
arrayed as respondent No.10, had not preferred any appeal,
therefore, order dated 26.11.2025, is modified only to the extent
that the operation and execution of impugned award dated
29.08.2025, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II,
Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. in Claim Petition No.26 of 2021, shall
remain stayed only qua the present appellant, i.e. National
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Insurance Company Limited and not qua respondent No.10, i.e.
HDFC, Ergo General Insurance Company Limited.
.
The claimants are at liberty to get the judgment of
learned tribunal below executed in accordance with law against
HDFC, Ergo General Insurance Company Limited.
Application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
rt Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Tripta Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
CMP No.1265 of 2026 in CWP No.20582 of 2025
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/
petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
of
CMP No.1265 of 2026
Issue notice. Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy
rt
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of the respondents/State. He prays for and is granted two weeks’
time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 23.01.2026, before learned Vacation
Judge.
In the meantime, respondents are directed to keep one
post of the Ward Sister vacant. The respondents are also directed
to take joining of the petitioner as Ward Sister at S.L.B.S.G.M.C,
Nerchowk, Mandi, H.P.
However, it is made clear that the joining of the
petitioner as Ward Sister on the present place of posting, shall not
create any right in her favour and the same shall not come in the
way of the respondents in deciding the representation as ordered
by this Court on December, 24, 2025.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Juneja vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.78 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Swati
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted
one week’s time to file status report.
List on 16.01.2026 before learned Vacation
Judge.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
NTPC, Koldam vs. Bindra Devi & another
CMP No.699 of 2026 in RFA N.637 of 2011
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Ms. Rinki Kashmiri,
Advocate, for the non-applicant/ appellant.
Mr. Rohit Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.699 of 2026
of
The present application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC
has been filed by the legal representatives of deceased
rt
applicant/respondent No.1, Bindra Devi, who has died on
12.04.2020, for their impleadment in her place. The application is
duly supported with the affidavit of LR Kamlesh Kumar.
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/appellant
submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present
application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.
Heard. Since respondent No.1, Bindra Devi, has
expired on 12.04.2020, as is evident from the death certificate,
annexed with the application and on the basis of Will, applicants as
mentioned in Para-1 of the application, are his legal heirs, which fact
is also evident from the legal heir certificate Annexure-A, annexed
with the application, the present application is allowed and applicants
as mentioned in Para-2 of the application, are ordered to be
substituted in place of respondent No.1, Bindra Devi, whose name is
otherwise ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties.
Amened memo of parties filed with the application, is ordered to be
placed on record.
Application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
CMP No.702 of 2026
The instant application has been filed by the
.
applicants/respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), namely Kamlesh
Kumar Sen, Dalbir Singh Sen, Suresh Kumar Sen & Omkar
Singh Sen, for release of award amount alongwith up-to-date
of
interest in their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court.
Learned vice counsel for the non-
rt
applicant/appellant stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply to the application. He further stated that since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 28.06.2017 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavits
of the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in
the interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith
up-to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of applicants/respondents No.1(a) to 1(d),
namely Kamlesh Kumar Sen, Dalbir Singh Sen, Suresh
Kumar Sen & Omkar Singh Sen, strictly as per their shares,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
after proper verification and identification, by remitting the
same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof have
.
been mentioned in copies of pass books, attached with the
application as (Annexure R-1, colly).
The application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Juneja vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.78 of 2026
.
09.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Swati
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
Issue notice. Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
rt
behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted
one week’s time to file status report.
List on 16.01.2026 before learned Vacation
Judge.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 09, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Banno & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.353 of 2024
.
08.01.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Respondent No.6, already ex parte.
Mr. Karan Sadyal, Advocate vice Mr. Divya Raj Singh,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP Nos. 32036, 32034, 30869,32038 & 32037 of 2025
rt The instant applications have been filed on behalf of
applicants/respondents No.1 to 5, namely, Banno, Nimmu, Sameena,
Musa & Haseena Begum, for release of awarded amount in their
favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. The applications are duly supported with affidavits of all the
applicants.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release of
amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
behalf of the non-applicant/appellant. However, learned counsel for
the non-applicant/appellant has opposed the applications on the
ground that if the amount, as prayed, is released in favour of the
applicants/respondents No. 1 to 5, it would be difficult for it to recover
the same in the event of appeal being allowed, which would result
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
into the multiplicity of litigation between the parties. Hence, prayer for
dismissal of the application has been made.
.
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of
applicants/respondents No.1 to 5, namely, Banno, Nimmu, Sameena,
Musa & Haseena Begum and also in view of the fact that the appeal
of
may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this Court finds
it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of the awarded amount
rt
of compensation in favour of applicants/respondents No.1 to 5,
namely, Banno, Nimmu, Sameena, Musa & Haseena Begum
alongwith up-to-date interest, as per their respective shares after
proper verification and identification by remitting the same to their
saving bank accounts, details whereof have been given in Para-4 of
all the applications.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicants/respondents No.1 to 5, namely, Banno, Nimmu, Sameena,
Musa & Haseena Begum, will have to refund the amount, so released
in their favour, with interest.
Applications stand disposed of..
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Lal Dei & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.272 of 2024
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
of
CMP Nos. 32058, 30618, 30620 & 30616 of 2025
The instant applications have been filed on behalf of
applicants/respondents No.1,3, 4 & 5, namely, Lal Dei, Nand Lal,
rt
Chaman Lal & Manisha, for release of awarded amount in their favour,
as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
The applications are duly supported with affidavits of all the
applicants.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release of
amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
No reply to the applications is intended to be filed on
behalf of the non-applicant/appellant. However, learned counsel for
the non-applicant/appellant has opposed the applications on the
ground that if the amount, as prayed, is released in favour of the
applicants/respondents No. 1, 3, 4 & 5, it would be difficult for it to
recover the same in the event of appeal being allowed, which would
result into the multiplicity of litigation between the parties. Hence,
prayer for dismissal of the application has been made.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of
.
applicants/respondents No.1,3, 4 & 5, namely, Lal Dei, Nand Lal,
Chaman Lal & Manisha and also in view of the fact that the appeal
may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this Court finds
it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of the awarded amount
of
of compensation in favour of applicants/respondents No.
applicants/respondents No.1,3, 4 & 5, namely, Lal Dei, Nand Lal,
rt
Chaman Lal & Manisha alongwith up-to-date interest, as per their
respective shares after proper verification and identification by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof have
been given in Para-4 of all the applications.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed, a
applicants/respondents No.1,3, 4 & 5, namely, Lal Dei, Nand Lal,
Chaman Lal & Manisha, will have to refund the amount, so released in
their favour, with interest.
Applications stand disposed of..
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Haminder Kumar @ Mohinder Singh and others
.
FAO(MVA) No.36 of 2020
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2
& 3.
of
Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
Respondent No.1, is stated to have expired.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, prays for and
is granted four weeks’ further time to take consequential steps
on account of death of respondent No.1, by way of last
opportunity.
As prayed, list on 23.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Pushpa Devi vs. Secretary, H.P.PWD & Others
Civil Suit No.51 of 2023
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for defendants No.1 to 3.
of
Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
OMP No. 18 of 2026
rt Since written statement on behalf of defendant No.4,
has already been filed, the present application is dismissed as
having been rendered infructuous.
Civil Suit No.51 of 2023
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, stated that replications
to written statements filed on behalf of the defendants, have been
filed on 05.01.2026, however, the same are not on record. Registry
is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
List for admission/denial of documents before
Additional Registrar (J), on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Premium Acres Infratech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Devi Lal Banga
Civil Suit No.08 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Kumar,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Trigun Singh, Advocate, for the defendant No.1.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
of
OMP Nos. 1521 & 1522 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/plaintiff, prays
rt
for and is granted six weeks’ further time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 26.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh vs. Narinder Singh & another
Civil Suit No.33 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Paresh Sharma, Advocate, for the defendants.
Civil Suit No.33 of 2025
of
Learned counsel for the defendants, submits that
written statement has been filed on 07.01.2026, however, the same
is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same
rt
on record, if in order.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, prays for and is
granted six weeks’ time to file replication.
OMP No.998 of 2025
Learned counsel for the respondents/defendants, prays
for and is granted six weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026.
Interim order to continue.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Amar Singh & Anr. vs. Brahmi Devi & Ors.
FAO No.65 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.4.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Amrick Singh,
Advocate, for respondents No.6(a) & 6(b).
of
Notice issued to respondent No.4, has been received
duly served, however, there is no representation on his behalf.
rt
Hence, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Notice issued to respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(c), 3 to 5,
has been received back unserved for want of correct address.
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted six weeks’ time to furnish correct addresses of aforesaid
respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(c), 3 to 5.
As prayed, list on 02.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Kanika vs. Vijay Kumar & Ors.
CMP(M) No.501 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Ms. Preeti, Advocate vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon
Verma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
As prayed, list for consideration after ensuing winter
vacations.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
vs.Mahinder Singh & Anr.
.
CMP(M) No.1749 of 2025
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to take steps for
rt
the service of respondents No.2 & 3, by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 28.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Vishvdeep @ Vishwadeep @ Aala vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.1786 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
HC Naresh Kumar, P.S. Manali, District Kullu, present
with record.
rt Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays that the
present bail application may be listed after ensuing winter
vacations.
Therefore, at his request, list on 23.02.2026.
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Tata AIG General Insurance Company Ltd vs.
Kaushlaya Devi and others
.
CMP(M) No.2040 of 2025
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 4.
of
On the last date of hearing, the presence of Mr.
Balwinder Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, has been
rt
wrongly marked. Today, Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, has filed
memo of appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4.
Notice issued to respondent No.5, has been received
back unserved.
Let fresh notice be issued to aforesaid respondent
No.5, returnable for 27.02.2026, on taking steps within a period of
three days.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 4, be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Bharat Kumar vs. M/s Jai Maa Koyala Tractors
Cr.MP(M) No.2589 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Vikay Mokta, Advocate vice Mr. Vijay Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner, stated
that the process of amicable settlement is still going on.
rt As prayed, list on 26.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Anjana vs. Sushil Kumar and another
Cr.MP No.5191 of 2024 in Cr. Appeal No.29 of 2022
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Harsh, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate,
for the respondents.
Cr.MP No.5843 of 2025
of
Heard.
No case for earlier hearing is made out. Hence,
rt
the present application is dismissed and disposed of accordingly.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Royal Sundram Alliance Insurance vs. Kalpana Kumari & Ors.
CMP No.22564/2025 in FAO(MVA) No.238 of 2021
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Ms. Manisha Sharma, Advocate, for
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3.
of
CMP No.22564 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel for the
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, list for consideration on
rt
09.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Liberty General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs. Nagindra & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.57 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5(a) to 5(c).
of
FAO(MVA) No.57 of 2025
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents
rt
No.5(a) to 5(c) despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
CMP No.28814 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, prays for and is granted four weeks’ further
time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:33 :::CIS
Liberty General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs. Sharmila & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.58 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5(a) to 5(c).
of
FAO(MVA) No.58 of 2025
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents
rt
No.5(a) to 5(c) despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
CMP No.28815 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, prays for and is granted four weeks’ further
time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Liberty General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs. Suresh & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.60 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5(a) to 5(c).
of
FAO(MVA) No.60 of 2025
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents
rt
No.5(a) to 5(c) despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
CMP No.30826 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, prays for and is granted four weeks’ further
time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Liberty General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs. Sunita & Ors.
FAO(MVA) No.61 of 2025
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5(a) to 5(c).
of
FAO(MVA) No.61 of 2025
Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents
rt
No.5(a) to 5(c) despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
CMP No.32655 of 2025
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, prays for and is granted four weeks’ further
time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Anr. vs. Rafique Mohammed & Ors.
RFA No.81 of 2015
.
08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
CMP No.32908 of 2025
of
For the reasons stated in the application, the same
is allowed and six weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
rt
the applicants/State to comply with the order dated 08.10.2025,
by way of last opportunity and as a matter of sheer indulgence.
However, it is made clear that if the amount of
compensation is not deposited during the aforesaid period,
interim order dated 08.10.2025, shall stand vacated without
any further reference to this Court.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 08, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P.& Ors. vs. Vijayandra Singh & Anr.
RFA No.257 of 2015
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
Mr. R.L. Sood,Senior Advocate with Mr. Vidur Kapur
and Aakash Thakur, Advocates, for the respondents.
of
Learned Deputy Advocate General, prays for
adjournment on the ground that the present case is to be argued
rt
by learned Advocate General, who is pre-occupied in another
Court.
As prayed, list on 08.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Kanhaiya Lal vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Appeal (C-SB) No.73/2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/ State.
of
Cr.MP No.5292 of 2025
rt Reply stands filed.
Learned vice counsel for the applicant/appellant,
prays that the matter may be taken after ensuing winter
vacations as original counsel is not available.
As prayed, list on 11.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Anil Kumar alias Tinku vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Appeal (C-SB) No.89/2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/ State.
of
Cr.MP No.5762 of 2025
rt Learned Deputy Advocate General, stated that
reply shall be filed during the course of the day. Registry is
directed to place on record the same, if in order.
As prayed, list for consideration on 08.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Ram Chand vs. Mahinder Singh and others
FAO(ECA) No.209 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Fresh steps for the service of respondents No.1 to
3, have not been taken.
of
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to
do the needful during the course of the day.
rt On doing the needful during the course of the day,
let notice be issued to aforesaid respondents, returnable within
eight weeks. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Abhimanyu vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
FAO No.253 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Ms. Chetna Thapan, Advocate vice Mr. Saurav
Rattan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Viraj Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
Fresh steps for the service of respondent No.2,
have not been taken.
rt Learned vice counsel for the appellant, undertakes
to do the needful within a period of two days.
On doing the needful within the stipulated period,
let notice be issued to respondent No.2, returnable within eight
weeks.
However, it is made clear that if the steps are not
taken within the stipulated period, then the present appeal
shall be dismissed for want of prosecution against respondent
No.2 without any further reference to the Court.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Praveen & Another vs. Rishabh Sharma & Ors.
CMP(M) No.329 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar,Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
None for respondents No.3 to 5.
of
Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to take steps
rt
for the service of respondent No.1, by way of last opportunity.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Poonam vs. Uco Bank
Cr. Revision No.636 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.144 of 2026
of
For the reasons stated in the application, the same
is allowed and six weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
rt
the petitioner to comply with the order dated 07.11.2025, passed
in Cr.MP No.4861 of 2025, by way of last opportunity and as a
matter of sheer indulgence.
However, it is made clear that if the amount of
compensation is not deposited during the aforesaid period,
interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated
07.11.2025, shall stand withdrawn without any further reference
to this Court.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr. Revision No.636 of 2025
As prayed, list on 28.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Amar Basant Raajbansh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
OMP No.1352 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate, for the
applicant/plaintiff.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/defendants.
of
HC Davinder Singh, P.S. Haroli, District Una, present
with record.
rt A report from the District Magistrate, Kangra at
Dharamshala, has been received, wherein, it has been
mentioned that the applicant/plaintiff is not an indigent person.
Learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, prays
for and is granted six weeks’ time to file objection to the report
of District Magistrate, Kangra at Dharamshala. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Jasvir Singh vs. State of H.P
Cr.MP(M) No.1439 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
of
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, prays for
adjournment on the ground that he wants to place on record
rt
some additional documents.
As prayed, list on 24.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Anr. vs. Prem Prakash & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1685 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the applicants/appellants.
Respondents No.1 to 5, already ex parte.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 03.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Prem Prakash & Anr.
CMP(M) No.1763 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 03.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Amit Chauhan
CMP(M) No.1762 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
At the request of learned Additional Advocate
General, list on 03.03.2026.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC vs. Prem Lal (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
CMP No.26170 of 2025 in RFA No.112 of 2015
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the non-
applicant/appellant/State.
Mr. Parveen Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants/
of
respondents.
rt CMP No.26170 of 2025
Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed
on record instructions dated 06.01.2026.
Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents,
prays for time to go through the same.
As prayed, list on 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Ganga Devi & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1990 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.6 & 7.
CMP(M) No.1990 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed by the non-
of
applicants/respondents.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
rt
same is allowed and delay of 54 days in refiling the present appeal is
hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of.
FAO(MVA) No.______ of 2026
Be registered.
Admit. Call for the records.
CMP No._______of 2026
Be Registered.
Heard. Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount
alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of eight weeks from
today, the execution of award dated 05.05.2025, passed by the
learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. in
case titled Smt. Ganga Devi & Ors. vs. Sh. Kuram Dutt & Ors., shall
remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Satya Pal
RFA No.51 of 2025
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the appellants/State.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate ice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondent and Mr. Mohinder Verma,
of
Advocate, for the applicants in CMP No.29531/2025.
rt CMP No.29531 of 2025
Reply(ies), as prayed, be filed within six weeks.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
General Manager Northern Railway vs. Rakesh Kumar &
another
.
CMP No.30855 of 2025 in RFA No.87 of 2021
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
non-applicant/appellant.
Mt.Tarun K. Brakta, Advocate vice Mr.Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
rtAdvocates General, for respondent No.2/State.
CMP No.30855 of 2025
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to file reply/to seek instructions in the
matter.
List n 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Kamla Devi & Ors.
CMP No.32600 of 2025 in FAO(MVA) No.308 of 2012
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rupam Chauhan, Advocate vice Dr. Lalit K.
Sharma, Advocate, for non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
CMP No.32600 of 2025
of
Learned vice counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant, prays for and is granted six weeks’ time to
rt
seek instructions in the matter. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Surinder Kumar
CMP No.32734 of 2025 in RFA No.114 of 2009
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for non-applicants/appellants.
Ms. Sangeeta Vasudeva, Advocate, for the
applicant/respondent.
of
CMP No.32734 of 2025
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent, Surinder Kumar,
for release of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in
his favour, as per his share, as lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court. The application is duly supported with the
affidavit of the applicant.
Learned Additional Advocate General, stated
that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the application. He
further stated that since the main appeal stands finally
decided on 05.12.2019 by this Court and as no appeal has
been preferred against the said judgment by either of the
parties, the same has attained finality, he has no objection in
case the prayer made in the application is allowed,
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
the applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed
by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-
to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
.
Court in favour of applicant/respondent Surinder Kumar,
strictly as per his share, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to his saving bank
of
account, detail whereof has been mentioned in para-4 of the
application.
The application stands disposed of.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Hari Singh & Ors.
CMP No.32948 of 2025 in RFA No.230 of 2017
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.32948 of 2025
rt Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on
record instructions, wherein, it has been mentioned that an SLP
filed by the State before the Hon’ble Apex Court, is pending and
the same has not been listed, as yet.
Therefore, at his request, list this application for
consideration on 11.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Tek Ram & Ors. vs. Amit Singha & Ors.
CMP No.32946 of 2025 in FAO No.3 of 2014
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for non-
applicant/respondent No.3.
CMP No.32946 of 2025
of
As prayed, list on 26.02.2025.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Tek Ram & Ors. vs. Amit Singha & Ors.
CMP No.32943 of 2025 in FAO No.2 of 2014
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for non-
applicant/respondent No.3.
CMP No.32943 of 2025
of
As prayed, list on 26.02.2025.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. Prem Singh
Cr.MP(M) No.27 of 2026
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable
for 26.02.2026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Ajaib Singh vs. Kushi Ram & Ors.
CMP(M) No.13 of 2026
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable
within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of three days.
of
List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Gagan Rukta vs. Punjab National Bank, Branch at Rohru.
Cr.MP(M) No.31 of 2026
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ankush Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr.Surender K.Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Anita
Parmar, Advocate, for the respondent.
of
Learned vice counsel for the respondent, has filed
memo of appearance on behalf of the respondent. He prays for
rt
and is granted six weeks’ time to file reply as well as Power of
Attorney.
As prayed, list on 26.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Pushap Lata vs. Prem Singh
Criminal Appeal No.380 of 2018
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.78 of 2026
of
The present application has been filed on behalf of
the applicant/appellant, wherein, it has been averred that she
rt
doesn’t want to continue with the present appeal and the same
may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
Criminal Appeal No.380 of 2018
In view of the order passed in Cr.MP No.78 of 2026,
the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Pushap Lata vs. Prem Singh
Criminal Appeal No.379 of 2018
.
07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.S. Gautam, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.77 of 2026
of
The present application has been filed on behalf of
the applicant/appellant, wherein, it has been averred that she
rt
doesn’t want to continue with the present appeal and the same
may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Heard. In view of the averments made in the
application, the same is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
Criminal Appeal No.379 of 2018
In view of the order passed in Cr.MP No.77 of 2026,
the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Meera Devi & Anr. vs. Jagdish Chand & Ors.
CMP Nos. 509 of 2026 & 32983 of 2025 in FAO No.242 of 2014
.
07.01.2026 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-applicant
respondent.
CMP Nos. 509 of 2026 & 32983 of 2025
of
The present applications under Section 151 of the
Code of rtCivil Procedure, have been maintained by
applicants/appellants No.1 & 2, i.e. Meera Devi @ Mira Devi and
Hari Krishan, for release of compensation amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court. The applications are duly supported
with the affidavits of the applicants.
Learned counsel for the non-
applicant/respondent, stated that he doesn’t intend to file any
reply on behalf of aforesaid respondent and since the main
appeal stands finally decided on 07.11.2025 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits
of the applicants coupled with the fact that the judgment
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in
the interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith
.
up-to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of applicants/appellants No.1 & 2, i.e. Meera
Devi @ Mira Devi and Hari Krishan, strictly as per their
of
shares, after proper verification and identification, by
remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details
whereof have been mentioned in para-3 of both the
rt
applications.
The applications stand disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 07, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Anu Kumar
FAO (MVA) No.28 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Priyanka, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Dhiraj K. Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
of
CMP No. 32044/2025
rt The present application under Section 151 CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 1, Anu Kumar, for
release of 50% of the award amount of compensation as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, he met with an accident and
sustained multiple injuries, due to which, he is functionally unable to
ply the vehicle and earn his livelihood as a truck driver. Further, it is
averred that he is unable to follow his day to day pursuits in life as he
suffered huge financial loss and became totally dependent upon his
family. It is also averred that he is the only bread earner and as such,
his entire family is now at the edge of starvation and as the main
appeal is pending adjudication before this Court, which may take some
time for its disposal, his prayer for release of 50% of the awarded
amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in his favour.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company has opposed the prayer made in the application on the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
ground that in the event of appeal being allowed, it would be difficult
for the non-applicant/Insurance Company to recover the amount.
.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30%
of the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
of
alongwith up-to-date interest, in favour of applicant/respondent No.
1, as per his share, after proper verification and identification by
rt
remitting the same to his saving bank account, detail whereof has
been given in para-3 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the
final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicant/respondent No. 1, will have to refund the amount, so
released, with interest @ 6% per annum. The application stands
disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Ranjana Devi & Ors.
FAO No.195 of 2024
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay
Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 6.
of
CMP No.32045 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, prays
rt
for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 02.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Anuj Sirkek vs. Neelam Devi & Ors.
CMP Nos.32059 & 32060 of 2025 in FAO No.57 of 2014
.
06.01.2026 Present: None for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 7.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, for respondent No.8.
of
CMP No.32059 of 2025
The present application under Order 32 Rule 12,
rt
read with Section 151 of CPC, has been filed by the
applicant/respondent No.5, Dinesh, for discharging his natural
guardian i.e.his mother respondent No.1, Neelma, as he has
attained the age of majority.
2. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent
No.8, submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the
present application and has no objection, in case, the same is
allowed.
3. Heard. Since applicant/respondent No.5, Dinesh
has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from his
Matriculation Examination Certificate, copy whereof annexed
with the application as Annexure A-1 as well as his affidavit
annexed therewith, the present application is allowed and his
mother Neelma, respondent No.1, is ordered to be discharged
from his guardianship; and he is permitted to pursue his case in
his own capacity.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.32060 of 2025
.
4. The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/respondent No.5, Dinesh, for
release of award amount alongwith up-to-date interest in his
of
favour, as per his share, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit
of the applicant.
rt
5. Learned counsel for the non-
applicant/respondent No.8, stated that he doesn’t intend to
file any reply on behalf of aforesaid respondent. He further
stated that since the main appeal stands finally decided on
19.12.2014 by this Court and as no appeal has been
preferred against the said judgment by either of the parties,
the same has attained finality, he has no objection in case
the prayer made in the application is allowed,
6. Heard. Having perused the averments made in
the application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
the applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed
by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the award amount alongwith up-
to-date interest as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court in favour of applicant/respondent No.5, Dinesh, strictly
as per his share, after proper verification and identification,
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
by remitting the same to his saving bank account, detail
whereof has been mentioned in para-7 of the application.
.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
of
(reena)
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. Satish Kumar & Ors.
CMP No.32984 of 2025 in FAO No.315 of 2023
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Aakash Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Shivani, Advocate vice Mr. Vikran Chandel,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 9.
Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate vice Mr. Chandan
Goel,Advocate, for respondent No.10.
of
CMP No.32984 of 2025
rt The present application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicant/appellant Vinod Kumar, for release of
the amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported with the
affidavit of the applicant.
Learned vice counsel for the non-applicant/Insurance
Company, on instructions received from the original counsel, submitted
that he has no objection in case the amount lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court alongwith up-to-date interest is released in
favour of applicant/appellant as no appeal has been preferred against
the judgment passed by this Court.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant,
coupled with the fact that no appeal has been preferred against the
judgment dated 22.12.2025, passed by this Court, the same is allowed
and the entire amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of
applicant/appellant, after proper verification and identification, by
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
remitting the same to his saving bank account, detail whereof has
been mentioned in Para-6 of the application.
.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
of
rt
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Suvarna & Ors.
FAO No.207 of 2022
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Anita, Advocate vice Ms. Anu Tui Azta,Advocate,
for respondents No.1 to 4.
Ms. Akansha Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.5 & 6.
of
CMP No.32985 of 2025
rt Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant, prays
for and is granted six weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Prem Chand Sharma vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
Cr.MP(M) No.18 of 2026
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Prantap Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.1/State.
of
Cr.MP(M) No.18 of 2026
rt Issue notice. Ms. Archna Negi, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of respondent No.1.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.2 to
5, returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
SJPNL vs. Munshi Ram & Ors.
CMP No.360 of 2026 in RFA No.51 of 2019
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate , for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
rt CMP No.360 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 7, 8, 9(c), 10, 14(a),
14(b), 14(c), 14(d) & 14(e), namely Padam Dev, Yoginder, Rajeshwari,
Vimla, Vijay, Sanjay, Ajay, Sulochana and Leela, for release of the
amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant
submitted that he has no objection in case the amount lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court alongwith up-to-date interest is released in
favour of applicants/respondents No. applicants/respondents No. 7, 8,
9(c), 10, 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(d) & 14(e), as the award has attained
finality and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed
by this Court.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavits of all the
applicants, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated
28.06.2025, passed by this Court, the same are allowed and the
.
amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court alongwith up-to-
date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of
applicants/respondents No. applicants/respondents No. 7, 8, 9(c), 10,
14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(d) & 14(e), as per their respective shares, after
of
proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their
bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Annexures A-
rt
1 to A-9 appended with the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
SJPNL vs. Munshi Ram & Ors.
CMP No.369 of 2026 in RFA No.52 of 2019
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate , for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondents/State.
rt CMP No.369 of 2026
The present application under Section 151 of CPC has
been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 7, 8, 9(c), 10, 14(a),
14(b), 14(c), 14(d) & 14(e), namely Padam Dev, Yoginder, Rajeshwari,
Vimla, Vijay, Sanjay, Ajay, Sulochana and Leela, for release of the
amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant
submitted that he has no objection in case the amount lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court alongwith up-to-date interest is released in
favour of applicants/respondents No. applicants/respondents No. 7, 8,
9(c), 10, 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(d) & 14(e), as the award has attained
finality and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed
by this Court.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the
application, which is duly supported with the affidavits of all the
applicants, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated
28.06.2025, passed by this Court, the same are allowed and the
.
amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court alongwith up-to-
date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of
applicants/respondents No. applicants/respondents No. 7, 8, 9(c), 10,
14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(d) & 14(e), as per their respective shares, after
of
proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their
bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Annexures A-
rt
1 to A-9 appended with the application.
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
The Sub Divisional Officer (Civil)-cum LAC, Kangra
vs. Naresh Kumar
.
CMP No.372 of 2026 in RFA No.128 of 2009
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the non-applicants/appellants.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sakshi,
of
Advocate, for the applicant/respondent.
CMP No.372 of 2026
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and is
granted two days’ time to seek instructions in the matter.
As prayed, list on 09.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sarla Devi & Ors. vs. Shrawan Kumar & Ors.
RFA No.122 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Ms. Sana Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Y.P. Sood,Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Caveat Petition No.552 of 2026
of
Since, Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, has appeared on
behalf of respondent No.1, the present petition stands discharged.
rtRFA No.122 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
Separate notice be issued to respondents No.2 & 3,
returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
The Renuka Ji Dam Project & Anr. vs. Anand Singh & Ors.
CMP No.373 of 2026 in RFA No.209 of 2017
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for applicants/respondents
No.1 to 3.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
of
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.4/State.
rt CMP No.373 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply/to seek instructions in
the matter.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
The Renuka Ji Dam Project & Anr. vs. Anand Singh & Ors.
CMP No.374 of 2026 in RFA No.208 of 2017
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for applicants/respondents
No.1 to 3.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
of
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondent No.4/State.
rt CMP No.374 of 2026
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants, prays
for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply/to seek instructions in
the matter.
As prayed, list on 27.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Joginder Sharma vs. M/s Goyal Plywood
Cr. Revision No. 363 of 2022
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel, for
the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
of
granted two days’ further time to furnish bail bonds as well as to
deposit the remaining amount of compensation, as a matter of sheer
rt
indulgence. However, it is made clear that no further opportunity is
granted in this respect.
As prayed, list on 09.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Raj Kumar & Ors. vs. LAC & Ors.
RFA No.62 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Advocate, for proposed LRs
of
No.4(b) to 4(f).
rt CMPs(M) No.1962 & 1963/2025
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
for consideration on 12.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Munish Mahajan (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
FAO No.320 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Ms. Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for
the appellant.
Mr. Trigun Singh and Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocates,
for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c).
As per report of the Registry, respondent No.2, has
of
refused to accept the notice. Therefore, it is presumed that
respondent No.2, has been duly served, but there is no representation
rt
on his behalf. Hence, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.
Notice issued to respondent No.3, has been received
back unserved for want of correct address. Let fresh notice be issued
to aforesaid respondent, returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps
within a period of ten days. List thereafter.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1(a) to 1(c), be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Dev vs. State Co-operative Agriculture & Rural
Development Bank Ltd.
.
Cr. Revision No.441 of 2025
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Suresh Singh Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Singh Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for and is
of
granted six weeks’ further time to deposit the remaining amount of
compensation.
rt As prayed, list on 11.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Ghanshyam Garg vs. Ajay vema.
Civil Suit No. 73 of 2024
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
At the request of learned counsel for the defendant, list
the case for for framing of issues in the month of March, 2026.
of
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
New India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Guljar& Ors.
FAO No.405 of 2014
.
06.01.2026 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate as Legal Aid Counsel, for
respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. Dhruv Kuthiala, Advocate vice Ms. Tamanna Sharma,
of
Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 7.
rt Today the case has been listed under the caption
‘speaking to minutes’.
It has been brought to the notice of this Court that
awarded amount has been deposited before the Court of learned
Commissioner under the Employee’s Compensation Act, Bilaspur, HP.
Therefore, the Court of learned Commissioner below, is
directed to release 20% of the awarded amount along with up-to-date
interest in favour of applicant/respondent No.1, Guljar, after proper
verification and identification, by remitting the same to her saving bank
account, on her furnishing details of the same before it. Ordered
accordingly.
However, it is made clear that the release of amount will
be subject to the final outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal
being allowed, applicant/respondent No.1, Guljar, will have to refund
the amount, so released in her favour, with interest @ 6% per annum.
Application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Kamal Nain vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Revision No.10 of 2026
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for the respondent.
of
Cr. Revision No.10 of 2026
Admit.
rt Post admission notice. Mr. P.K. Nadda, learned
Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the
respondent.
Let record of both the Courts below be called for.
Cr.MP No.101 of 2026
By way of instant application, the
applicant/petitioner has prayed for suspension of sentence.
Heard. Since the main petition is pending
adjudication and admitted for final hearing , it is ordered that
the substantive sentence imposed by learned Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.
vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
10.02.2020 in criminal case titled State of Himachal
Pradesh vs. Kamal Nain and further affirmed by learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.
vide judgment dated 17.11.2025 in criminal appeal titled
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Kamal Nain vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, shall remain
suspended, subject to the applicant’s furnishing personal
.
bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the trial court and also
depositing the fine amount, if not already deposited, within a
of
period of four weeks with condition that the applicant shall
appear in Court, as and when directed and shall surrender to
rt
serve out the sentence imposed, in case the revision is
ultimately dismissed.
The application stands disposed of.
Cr.MP No.100 of 2026
The application is disposed of with a direction to
the applicant to file certified copy of the judgment of trial court
dated 10.02.2020 in criminal case titled State of Himachal
Pradesh vs. Kamal Nain, within a period of six weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Ram Pyari vs. Balbir Singh & Anr.
CMP(M) No.795 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Varun
Rana,Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Choudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Praneet Gupta,Advocate, for respondent No.2.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
list after ensuing winter vacations.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Shimla Jal Prabandhan Nigam Ltd. vs. Rakesh and others.
RFA No.123 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy
Advocates General, for respondents No. 9 to 11.
of
CMP No.32966 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same
rt
is allowed and delay of 78 days in depositing the Court fee, w hich
in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby
condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.123 of 2025
Issue notice. Ms. Archna Negi, learned Deputy
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf
of respondents No. 9 to 11.
Let separate notice be issued to respondents No.1 to
8, returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of
three days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Bhaago and Ors. vs. Dhiyan Singh(deceased)
through his LRs and Ors.
.
FAO(MVA) No.354 of 2025
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Admit.
Let post admission notice be issued to the
of
respondents, returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps
within a period of three days. List thereafter.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
OICL vs. Sumitra Dass & Ors.
FAO No.305 of 2025
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.5 &
6.
As per report of the Registry, notices issued to
of
respondents No. 1 to 4 are still awaited. Be awaited for a further
period of six weeks.
rt As prayed for, list on 26.02.2026.
In the meantime, Power of Attorney on behalf of
respondents No. 5 & 6 be also filed.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. Vs. Kesro Devi & Ors.
CMP No. 28283 of 2025 in FAO No.333 of 2008
.
06.01.2026 Present: None for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents
No.1 & 2.
Learned counsel for the applicants/respondents
of
No.1 & 2, states that supplementary affidavit has been filed on
21.12.2025, however the same is not on record. Registry is
rt
directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.
As prayed, list on 09.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. Vs. Thano Devi & Ors.
CMPs No.28696 & 28697 of 2025 in FAO No.332 of 2008
.
06.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak
Gupta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
Learned vice counsel for the non-
of
applicant/appellant, prays for and is granted two days’ time to
seek instructions in the matter.
rt As prayed, list on 09.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 06, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Ram Lal & another
RFA No. 26 of 2023
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the appellants/State.
Respondent No.1, is stated to have expired.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted four weeks’ further time to comply with the order dated
rt
10.11.2025. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Satya Devi vs. Mehar Singh &another
CMP No.32057 of 2025 in FAO No.4001 of 2013
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for non-
applicant/respondent No.2.
CMP No.32057 of 2025
of
The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicant/appellant, Satya Devi, for
rt
release of entire compensation amount alongwith up-to-date
interest in her favour, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant.
No reply to the application is intended to be filed
on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent No.2 and learned
counsel for the aforesaid respondent, stated that since the
main appeal stands finally decided on 08.07.2025 by this Court
and as no appeal has been preferred against the said
judgment by either of the parties, the same has attained
finality, he has no objection in case the prayer made in the
application is allowed.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of the
applicant coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by
this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
of justice to release the entire amount of compensation
alongwith up-to-date interest, as lying deposited in the Registry
.
of this Court in favour of the applicant, Satya Devi, after
proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to
her saving bank account, detail whereof has been mentioned
of
in Para-3 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company vs. Pushpa Devi
and another
.
FAO No.229 of 2025
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Ms. Ritta Goswami, Senior Advocate with Ms. Komal
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
Mr. Loveneesh Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
CMP No. 27040 of 2025
rt The instant application has been filed on behalf of
applicant/respondent No.1, Pushpa Devi, for release of awarded
amount in her favour, as per her share, as lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court.
As per the applicant, she is in dire need of money and
as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court, which
may take some time for its disposal, her prayer for release of amount
of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, may
be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be ordered to be
released in her favour.
Reply on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant stands
filed. However, learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has
opposed the application on the ground that if the amount, as prayed,
is released in favour of the applicant/respondent No. 1, it would be
difficult for it to recover the same in the event of appeal being
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the application has been
made.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavit of
.
applicant/respondent No.1, Pushpa Devi and also in view of the fact
that the appeal may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication,
this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30% of the
awarded amount of compensation in favour of applicant/respondent
of
No.1, Pushpa Devi alongwith up-to-date interest, after proper
verification and identification by remitting the same to her saving bank
rt
account, detail whereof has been given in Para-4 of the application.
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicant/respondent No.1, Pushpa Devi, will have to refund the
amount, so released in her favour, with interest.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO No.229 of 2025
Admit. Call for the records.
List for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Karan Kumar vs. Jai Prakash (deceased) through his LRs.
Cr. Revision No.5 of 2026
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr. Revision No.5 of 2026
Issue notice to the respondents, returnable for
of
12.03.2026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
Cr.MP No.60 of 2026
rt It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner
that the matter stands compromised vide Compromise Deed,
Annexure P-3, wherein, it has been mentioned that the
petitioner has paid full and final payment of cheque amount to
the complainant.
That being so, the substantive sentence imposed
by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1,
Rohru,District Shimla H.P. vide judgment of conviction and
order of sentence dated 27.03.2024, under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act in Criminal Complaint titled as Jai
Parkash (deceased) through his LRs. vs. Karan Kumar
and further affirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. vide judgment dated 15.10.2025
in Criminal Appeal titled as Karan Kumar vs. Jai Prakash
(now deceased) through his LRs., shall remain suspended,
subject to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum
of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
satisfaction of the trial court within a period of six weeks with
condition that the applicant shall appear in Court, as and when
.
directed and shall surrender to serve out the sentence
imposed, in case the revision is ultimately dismissed.
Application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurace Co. Ltd. vs. Shyam Lal & Ors.
FAO No.84 of 2024
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Meghna Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev K.
Suri, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5.
of
CMPs No.31226, 31228 & 31564 of 2025
rtThe instant applications have been filed on behalf of
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, namely, Shayam Lal, Rahul
Chauhan and Madhu Chauhan, for release of awarded amount in their
favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court.
As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money
and as the main appeal is pending adjudication before this Court,
which may take some time for its disposal, their prayer for release of
amount of compensation, as lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court, may be accepted and the amount, as prayed for, may be
ordered to be released in their favour.
Reply on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant stands
filed. However, learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has
opposed the applications on the ground that if the amount, as prayed,
is released in favour of the applicants/respondents No. 1 to 3, it would
be difficult for it to recover the same in the event of appeal being
allowed, which would result into the multiplicity of litigation between
the parties. Hence, prayer for dismissal of the application has been
made.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of
.
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, namely, Shayam Lal, Rahul
Chauhan and Madhu Chauhan and also in view of the fact that the
appeal may take sufficiently long time for its final adjudication, this
Court finds it in the interest of justice to release 30% each of the
of
awarded amount of compensation in favour of applicants/respondents
No.1 to 3, namely, Shayam Lal, Rahul Chauhan and Madhu Chauhan
rt
alongwith up-to-date interest, after proper verification and identification
by remitting the same to their saving bank accounts, details whereof
have been given in Para-6 of the applications, subject to their
furnishing sureties within a period of one week before Registrar (J).
However, the release of amount will be subject to the final
outcome of the appeal and in the event of appeal being allowed,
applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, namely, Shayam Lal, Rahul
Chauhan and Madhu Chauhan, will have to refund the amount, so
released in their favour, with interest.
Applications stand disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
M/s Pristine Hotel and Resort vs. Suresh Bajaj
C.S No.52 of 2024
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the defendant.
On the pleadings of the parties, following issues are
of
framed:-
rt1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of
specific performance of Contract dated
01.06.2014, as prayed for? ….OPP.
2. Whether the suit is not maintainable in its
present form, as alleged? ….OPD.
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
possession of land comprised in Khata
Khatauni No.11/11, Khasra No.5, 20/2, 38/1,
79/45, 36/1, 74/16/1, 74/16/2, 56, 57, Kita-
10, total measuring 39932 Sqr. Mtr.? …OPP.
4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages of
Rs. 25,00,000/- along with interest?…OPP.
5. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of
permanent prohibitory injunction against the
defendant, as alleged? ….OPP.
6. Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of
necessary parties, as alleged?… OPD.
7. Whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred by
time? ….OPD.
8. Whether the suit of the plaintiff is bad and is
liable to be dismissed in terms of Section 69
of Indian Partnership Act and the alleged
Dissolution Deed dated 12.06.2024?….OPD.
9. Whether the suit of the plaintiff is liable to be
dismissed on the ground that plaintiff has not
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
approached this Court with clean hands and
suppressed and concealed the material facts
from this Court? …OPD.
.
10. Relief.
Issue have been read over and explained to the
parties. No other issue arises or claimed.
of
PF, list of witnesses and additional documents, if
any, be filed by the parties within a period of fifteen days and
rt
thereafter list the case on 05.03.2026 before the Additional
Registrar (Judicial) for fixing the date of evidence of the plaintiff.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railway vs. Jagdish Ram & Others
RFA No.1 of 2020
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for
the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Athrav
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1 and
respondents No.1 to 3 and 5 to 8.
of
Respondent No.4, already stands deleted.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
rt respondent No.9/State.
CMP No.32940 of 2025
The present application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents for deleting the name
of respondent No.6, Sansar Chand.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel for the non-
applicant/appellant submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply
to the present application and has no objection, in case, the same is
allowed.
Heard. Since respondent No.6, Sansar Chand has
expired on 21.10.2020, as is evident from the death certificate,
annexed with the application and on the basis of Will, applicants as
mentioned in Para-1 of the application, are his legal heirs, which fact
is also evident from the legal heir certificate Annexure-A, annexed
with the application, the present application is allowed and applicants
as mentioned in Para-1 of the application, are ordered to be
substituted in place of respondent No.6, Sansar Chand, whose name
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
is otherwise ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties.
Amened memo of parties filed with the application, is ordered to be
.
placed on record.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP No.32942 of 2020
Having regard to the averments made in the
of
application, the same is allowed and the
applicants/respondents are exempted from filing English
rt
translation of documents in question. Application stands
disposed of.
RFA No.1 of 2020
Since the appeal stands already admitted, list for final
hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sanjay Kuthiala vs. Uttam Chand Sood
CS No.87 of 1996
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Devi Singh, Advocate Vice Ms.Vandana
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for defendants
No.1(a) to 1(d) & 4.
of
Learned counsel for the parties jointly stated that the
process for amicable settlement is going on. They pray for and
rt
are granted eight weeks’ further time to resolve the dispute
amicably.
As jointly prayed, list on 02.04.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Charanjit Singh & others vs. LAC & another a/w
connected matters.
.
RFA Nos. 348 to 350 of 2014
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Paras
Dhaulta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
of
the respondents/State.
Six weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
rt
procure fresh Power of Attorney from the appellants in terms of
the order dated 14.11.2025. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh vs.State of H.P.
Cr. Revision No.23 of 2017
.
05.01.2026 Present: Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Report of the Probation Officer, District Shimla,H.P.,
has not been received. Let a reminder be issued in this respect.
rt List on 24.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sarveen Chaudhary vs. Vijay Singh and others
Civil Suit No.63 of 2020
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Azmad Hayat Khan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
None for defendants No.2 to 5.
of
At the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list for framing of issues on 02.03.2026.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Roshani Devi & Ors. vs. Shyam Hetta & Anr. along with
connected matter
.
FAO(MVA) No.16 of 2025 & FAO (MVA) No.337 of 2024
FAO(MVA) No.16 of 2025
05.01.2026 Present: Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate vice Mr. H.K.S Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Reeta Thakur,
of
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi,Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rt
FAO (MVA) No.337 of 2024
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit
Himalvi,Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate vice Mr. H.K.S Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Reeta Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP No.447 of 2026 in FAO(MVA) No.337 of 2024
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant,
prays for and is granted two days’ time to seek instructions/to file
reply.
List on 08.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Chander Kant vs. Jai Kishan & Ors.
FAO No.391 of 2014
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate vice Mr. H.S. Rana,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
of
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.2/State.
rt Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to take fresh steps for the service of
LR No.13(c).
On doing the needful within the stipulated period, let
notice be issued to LR No.13(c), returnable within six weeks. List
thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Bano & Ors.
FAO No.278 of 2025
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1,2 & 4.
Ms. Pragti, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
of
Learned counsel for the appellant, prays for and is
granted two weeks’ further time to comply with the order daed
05.12.2025. List thereafter.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD & Anr. vs. Devi Singh
CMP(M) No.1593 of 2025
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the non-applicants/State.
None for the respondent.
of
None has appeared on behalf of the respondent, as
the name of Mr. Abhiney Gupta, has not been reflected in the
rt
cause-list.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr.
Abhiney Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent, in the cause-list,
henceforth.
List after four weeks.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Prathmesh Bhai & another vs. Asha Rani & Ors.
FAO No.278 of 2021
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr.Lovneesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Shourya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Mr. Bharat Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Dr. Lalit Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
of
CMP No.28303 of 2025
rt Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants,
prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file reply.
List on 27.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Hira Nand Sharma vs. Vivek Kumar & another
Civil Suit No.77 of 2022
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr.H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Supriya Chaudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Advocate, for the defendants.
OMP No.1406 of 2025
of
Learned vice counsel for the respondents, stated that
reply shall be filed during the course of the day.
rt Rejoinder to the reply, if any, be filed within six weeks.
List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Jayant Katoch vs. Davinder Singh & Others
Civil Suit No.146 of 2022 a/w OMP(M) No.341 of 2024
.
Civil Suit No.146 of 2022
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur and Ms. Anchal Sharma,
Advocates, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for defendants No.1 &
2.
of
Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for defendants No.3 &
4.
rt OMP(M) No.341 of 2024
Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur and Ms. Anchal Sharma,
Advocates, for the applicant.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for non-
applicant/defendant No.1.
None for non-applicant/defendant No.2.
Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for non-
applicants/defendants No.3 & 4.
OMP No.906 of 2022
Learned counsel for the respondents stated at Bar that
they do not intend to file any reply to the application.
Heard. Interim order dated 22.12.2022, is made
absolute during the pendency of the present suit, however, subject
to alteration/vacation/modification on motion.
Application stands disposed of.
OMP(M) No.341 of 2024
Reply on behalf of respondent No.1, stands filed.
Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4, prays for
and is granted six weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
None has appeared on behalf of respondent No.2,
.
as the name of Mr. Hemant Thakur, has not been reflected in the
cause-list.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr.
Hemant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2 , in the cause-list,
of
henceforth.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sriram GIC Ltd. vs. Reen Devi & Ors.
FAO No.40 of 2023
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Shivani, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
Ms. Deepmala, Advocate vice Mr. Varun Chandel,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
of
Ms. Niranjana, Advocate, for respondents No.5(a)
and 5(b).
rt PF/Publication Charges have been deposited for the
service of respondent No.1.
Now list the case before Additional Registrar (J) on
07.01.2026 for passing further orders with respect to the service of
respondent No.1 through publication.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sharda Sharma vs. Dhian Singh Verma a/w
connected matter
.
Cr. Revisions No.257 & 308 of 2023
05.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel,
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Manmohan Katoch, Advocate, for the
respondent(s).
of
Learned Legal Aid Counsel, for the petitioner(s), prays
for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file certified copy of
rt
trial court judgment, as a matter of sheer indulgence and by way of
last opportunity.
However, it is made clear that if the certified copy of
trial court judgment is not filed within stipulated period, then both the
petitions shall be dismissed for want of prosecution.
As prayed, list on 26.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Keshav Dutt Shreedhar vs. Nishant Sharma
Civil Suit No.3 of 2024
.
05.01.2026 Present: Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant Nishant Sharma, present in person through
Video Conferencing.
of
OMP No.1270 of 2025
Pleadings are completed.
rt List for consideration on 05.03.2026.
OMP No.1364 of 2025
Respondent Nishant Sharma, who is present in person
through video conferencing, prays for and is granted four weeks’
time to file affidavit of Ms. Shine, Advocate, who is stated to have
appeared on 22.09.2025, before Additional Registrar(J).
List for consideration on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 05, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Ram Nath & Ors.
CMP No.28142 of 2025 in RFA No.489 of 2015
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the non-applicants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.28142 of 2025
rtThe instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 to 3, namely
Ram Nath, Sukh Ram and Sada Ram, for release of entire
compensation amount alongwith up-to-date interest in their
favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of
this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits
of all the applicants.
Despite repeated opportunities, no reply has been
filed by the non-applicants/State. At this stage, learned Deputy
Advocate General, stated that since no SLP has been filed till
date against the judgment dated 27.05.2025, passed by this
Court.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants coupled with the fact that the no SLP has been
filed against the judgment passed by this Court till date and the
same has attained finality. Hence, this Court finds it in the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
interest of justice to release the entire amount of compensation
alongwith up-to-date interest, as lying deposited in the Registry
.
of this Court in favour of all the applicants/respondents, strictly
as per their respective shares, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to their respective saving
of
bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-
6 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Nikku Ram & Ors.
CMP No.28157 of 2025 in RFA No.471 of 2015
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the non-applicants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.28157 of 2025
rtThe instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 to 5, namely
Nikku Ram, Mansa Ram, Lachmi Singh, Dasoda and Nand
Lal, for release of entire compensation amount alongwith up-
to-date interest in their favour, as per their shares, as lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly
supported with the affidavits of all the applicants.
Despite repeated opportunities, no reply has been
filed by the non-applicants/State. At this stage, learned Deputy
Advocate General, stated that since no SLP has been filed till
date against the judgment dated 27.05.2025, passed by this
Court.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants coupled with the fact that the no SLP has been
filed against the judgment passed by this Court till date and the
same has attained finality. Hence, this Court finds it in the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
interest of justice to release the entire amount of compensation
alongwith up-to-date interest, as lying deposited in the Registry
.
of this Court in favour of all the applicants/respondents, strictly
as per their respective shares, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to their respective saving
of
bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-
6 of the application.
The application stands disposed of.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Jia Lal & Ors.
CMP No.29778 of 2025 in RFA No.470 of 2015
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the non-applicants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.29778 of 2025 & CMP No.32755 of 2025
rt The instant applications under Section 151 of CPC
have been filed by the applicants/respondents No.2, 4 & 5,
namely Sada Ram, Sohan Lal and Mahinder Pal in CMP
No.29778 of 2025 and applicants/respondents No.1, 3(i) to
3(v) & 6, namely Jia Lal, Roshan Lal, Jagdish Chand, Roop
Lal, Bago Devi, Soma Devi and Premi Devi, for release of
entire compensation amount alongwith up-to-date interest in
their favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court. The applications are duly supported with
the affidavits of all the applicants.
Despite repeated opportunities, no reply has been
filed by the non-applicants/State. At this stage learned Deputy
Advocate General, stated that no SLP has been filed till date
against the judgment dated 27.05.2025, passed by this Court.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
applications, which are duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants coupled with the fact that the no SLP has been
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
filed against the judgment passed by this Court till date and the
same has attained finality, hence, this Court finds it in the
.
interest of justice to release the entire amount of compensation
alongwith up-to-date interest, as lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court in favour of all the applicants/respondents, strictly
of
as per their respective shares, after proper verification and
identification, by remitting the same to their respective saving
bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in Para-
rt
6 of CMP No.29778 of 2025 and Para-9 of CMP No.32755 of
2025.
The applications stand disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Bhagat Ram & Ors.
CMP No.32871 of 2025 in RFA No.38 of 2016
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the non-applicants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.32871 of 2025
rt Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for
and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
List on 26.02.2025.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
LAC & Ors. vs. Mahant Ram & Ors.
CMP No.28129 of 2025 in RFA No.487 of 2015
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the non-applicants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.
of
CMP No.28129 of 2025
rt The instant application under Section 151 of CPC
has been filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 & 5(a) to
5(g), namely Mahant Ram, Devinder Kumar, Dev, Kamlo,
Geeta Devi, Soma Devi, Fulla Devi, Meera Devi, Devinder
Kumar and Baldev Kumar, for release of entire compensation
amount alongwith up-to-date interest in their favour, as per
their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.
The application is duly supported with the affidavits of all the
applicants except applicants/respondents No.5(f) & 5(g).
Despite repeated opportunities, no reply has been
filed by the non-applicant/State. At this stage, learned Deputy
Advocate General, stated that no SLP has been filed till date
against the judgment dated 27.05.2025, passed by this Court.
Heard. Having perused the averments made in the
application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of all
the applicants coupled with the fact that the no SLP has been
filed against the judgment passed by this Court till date and the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
same has attained finality, hence, this Court finds it in the
interest of justice to release the entire amount of compensation
.
alongwith up-to-date interest, as lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court in favour of all the applicants/respondents except
respondents No. 5(f) & 5(g), strictly as per their respective
of
shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting
the same to their respective saving bank accounts, details
whereof have been mentioned in Para-6 of the application.
rt
The application stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
SJPNL vs. Deep Ram (deceased) though his LRs & Ors.
CMP No.25181 of 2025 in RFA No.154 of 2018
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate, for applicants/respondents
No.1(i) and 2 to 4.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
of
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondents No.5 & 6/State.
rt CMP No.25181 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel for
applicants/respondents No.1(i) and 2 to 4, list on 07.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
H.P. Roard Transport Corporation vs. Meena & Ors.
.
CMP Nos.28860, 28861, 28862 & 28863 of 2025 in
FAO No.120 of 2008
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocates, for the non-
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Navneet Kumar Bhalla, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4.
of
CMP Nos.28860, 28861, 28862 & 28863 of 2025
rt At the request of learned counsel for
applicants/respondents No.1 to 4, list on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sher Singh vs. State of H.P.& Ors.
Cr. Appeal No.13 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma,
Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur
and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates
General, for respondent No.1/State.
of
Mr. Shashi Bhushan, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 to 8.
rt Admit. Call for the records.
As per report of the Registry, Power of Attorney filed on
behalf of respondents No.2 to 8, is lying under objection. Learned
counsel for the aforesaid respondents undertakes to remove the
same within a period of one week.
As prayed, list after ensuing winter vacations.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Devi Ram & Ors. vs. State of H.P.& Ors.
RFA No.117 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma,
Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur
and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates
General, for the respondents/State.
of
Record stands received.
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for
rt
adjournment to inspect the record.
As prayed, list on 09.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Anjali Devi & Ors. vs. Tata AIG General Insurance Company
Limited along with connected matter
.
FAO (ECA) Nos.167 & 179 of 2025
FAO (ECA) No.167 of 2025
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
of
None for respondent No.2.
rt FAO (ECA) No.179 of 2025
Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
None for respondent No.4.
FAO (ECA) Nos.167 & 179 of 2025
Learned counsel for the parties, pray for and are
granted four weeks’ further time to file Power of Attorney(ies) in
terms of the previous order.
As prayed, list after ensuing winter vacations.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
National Insurance Company vs. Santu Devi
FAO (MVA) No.299 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Preetika, Advocate vice Mr. Varun Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
Learned vice counsel for respondents No.2 & 3,
of
stated that Power of Attorney by Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate,
has been filed, however, the same is not on record.
rt She is
directed to follow up with the Registry in this respect.
Notice issued to respondent No.1, has been received
back unserved for want of correct address.
Let fresh notice be issued to respondent No.1,
returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps within a period of ten
days. List thereafter.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sarita vs. OIC Ltd and another
FAO No.4066 of 2013
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rahul, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
of
Learned vice counsel for respondent No.1, submits
that original counsel is not available today due to some personal
rt
difficulty.
Therefore, at his request, list on 12.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Brij Lal vs. LAC & Ors. a/w connected matters
RFA No.421 of 2015 a/w RFA Nos. 424 to 440 of
.
2012, 131 and 132 of 2016
RFA Nos. 421 of 2015, 131 and 132 of 2016
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional Advocate General, for
of
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
rtRFA Nos. 424 to 440 of 2012,
Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Mr. P.K. Verma, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, list
on 13.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Kawaljeet Singh vs. State of H.P. & Ors.
RFA No.56 of 2016
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. P.K. Nadda, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
of
CMP No.118 of 2026
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
rt
is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.
As prayed, list on 28.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Roopi vs. NTPC Barmana & another
RFA No.126 of 2016
.
02.01.2026 Present: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Rinki Kashmiri,Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma,
Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur
and Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates
of
General, for respondent No.2/State.
rt As prayed, list after ensuing winter vacations.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Bias Dev
Cr. Appeal No.173 of 2012
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the appellant/State.
None for the respondent.
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of the respondent
despite repeated calls, list after ensuing winter vacations.
rt
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Ravinder Kumar vs. Hem Singh
Cr. Revision No.573 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Durga Singh Kainthla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sakshi,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.17 of 2026
of
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed and six weeks’ further time, as prayed, is granted to
rt
comply with the order dated 26.09.2025, passed in Cr.MP
No.4349 of 2025, by way of last opportunity and as a matter of
sheer indulgence.
However, it is made clear that if the amount of
compensation is not deposited during the aforesaid period,
interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated
26.09.2025, shall stand withdrawn.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr. Revision No.573 of 2025
As prayed, list on 05.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Abhishek Kumar vs. Sanjeev Singh
Cr. Revision No.741 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr. Revision No.741 of 2025
Issue notice to the respondent, returnable for
of
10.03.026, on taking steps within a period of three days.
Record of learned courts below be called for.
rt Cr.MP No.5928 of 2025
By way of instant application, the
applicant/petitioner has prayed for suspension of sentence.
Heard. The substantive sentence imposed by
learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jhandutta, District
Bilaspur, H.P. vide judgment of conviction dated 01.11.2022
and order of sentence dated 05.11.2022 in criminal case
titled Sanjeev Singh vs. Abhishek Kumar and further
affirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ghumarwin,
District Bilaspur, H.P. vide judgment dated 06.11.2025 in
criminal appeal titled Abhishek Kumar vs. Sanjeev Singh,
shall remain suspended, subject to the applicant’s depositing
30% of compensation amount in addition to the amount
already deposited within a period of six weeks and furnishing
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court within the
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
same period with condition that the applicant shall appear in
Court, as and when directed and shall surrender to serve out
.
the sentence imposed, in case the revision is ultimately
dismissed.
The application stands disposed of.
of
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
rt
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Abhishek Sharma vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.3065 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Harsh, Advocate vice Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Learned Additional Advocate General, prays for and
is granted one week’s time to file status report.
rt As prayed, list on 09.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Anil and others vs. Land Acquisition Collector and others
CMP(M) No.2116 of 2025
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.29683 of 2025
of
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay in refiling the present appeal is hereby
rt
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.2116 of 2025
Reply has not been filed despite opportunity granted.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal,
which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby
condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______ of 2025
Be registered.
Admit. Call for the records.
List for final hearing in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
M/s Sterling Holidays vs. M/s Kind Park Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
Civil Suit No.72 of 2016
.
02.01.2026 Present: Mr. Dev Raj, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for the defendants.
Civil Suit No.72 of 2016
of
Since none has appeared on behalf of the
defendants despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be
proceeded against ex parte.
rtOMP Nos. 1108 & 1109 of 2025
As prayed, list these applications for consideration
on 10.03.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 02, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P.& Ors. vs. Vijayandra Singh & Anr.
RFA No.257 of 2015
.
01.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. R.L. Sood,Senior Advocate with Ms. Sanjivni Sood
and Mr. Vidur Kapur, Advocates, for the respondents.
of
RFA No.257 of 2015 & CMP No.32800 of 2025
rtHeard further. List for continuation on 02.01.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Sangeet Kaur
RFA No.136of 2014 a/w C.O. No.98 of 2018
.
01.01.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the appellant/State.
Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate vice Ms. Vandana
Kuthiala,Advocate, for the respondent.
of
As prayed, list after ensuing winter vacations.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railway vs. Mohinder & ors.
RFA No.183 of 2024
.
01.01.2026 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
None for respondents o.1 to 4.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
of
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
respondents No.5 & 6 /State.
rtAs prayed, list on 25.02.2026.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sunder Singh vs. Shamsher Singh
Cr. Revision No.747 of 2024
.
01.01.2026 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent has not
of
appeared before this Court despite the fact that his application
for early hearing of the revision petition was allowed and the
case was ordered to be listed in the month of December, 2025.
rt Since none has appeared on behalf of the
respondent, list after ensuing winter vacations.
( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on – 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar vs. State of H.P.
Cr. Appeal No.283 of 2010
.
01.01.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur and Mr.
Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocates General, for
the respondent/State.
of
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
M/s Vishwakarma Tyre & Ors. vs. Indag Rubber Ltd.
RFA No.323 of 2010
.
01.01.2026 Present: Mr. Ajay K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for
of
adjournment.
As prayed, list after ensuing winter vacations.
rt ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge
January 01, 2026
(reena)
::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2026 20:37:34 :::CIS
