Ravindra Meena S/O Madan Lal Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

    Ravindra Meena S/O Madan Lal Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 July, 2026

    [2026:RJ-JP:28448]
    
            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                        BENCH AT JAIPUR
    
            S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.2410/2023
          CNR: RJHC020313642023 | URN: CRLMP / 4476U / 2023
    
    Ravindra Meena S/o Madan Lal Meena, Resident Of Near Buchi
    Sati Mandar, Ward No. 17, Ringas, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
                                                                          ----Petitioner
                                          Versus
    1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
    2.       Victim
                                                                       ----Respondents

    For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar
    For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Chouhdary, GA-cum-AAG
    Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
    Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri

    JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

    SPONSORED

    Order

    23/07/2026

    1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in

    pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in

    the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

    (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided

    on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in

    various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal

    revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as

    a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder,

    rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained

    stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time.

    2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High

    Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long,

    (Uploaded on 27/07/2026 at 04:19:14 PM)
    (Downloaded on 27/07/2026 at 05:54:32 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:28448] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2410/2023]

    on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring

    the hearings to subsequent dates.

    3. The instant criminal misc. petition has bee preferred with a

    prayer to quash the impugned FIR No.95/2023 registered at the

    Police Station Ringas, District Sikar for the offences punishable

    under Section 365, 376D, 504, 506, 323, 341 & 34 IPC.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

    has not committed any forceful act against the prosecutrix, in fact

    she herself visited with the petitioner at various places like

    Krishana Hotel and these facts are clear from the record of the

    CCTV footage of the said hotel. Learned counsel submits that,

    under these circumstances, the prosecutrix was a consenting

    party, but later on she concocted a false story to implicate the

    petitioner in the impugned FIR. Hence, interference of this Court is

    warranted.

    5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer

    made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that

    after investigation, the Police has submitted charge-sheet against

    the petitioner for the offences under Sections 365 & 376 IPC by

    finding a prima facie case against him in the month of September,

    2023. Hence, interference of this Court is not warranted and the

    instant petition is liable to be rejected.

    6. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and

    perused the material available on record.

    7. Perusal of the allegations levelled in the impugned FIR

    reveals commission of cognizable offence and the correctness of

    the allegations cannot be examined by this Court while exercising

    inherent powers contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court

    (Uploaded on 27/07/2026 at 04:19:14 PM)
    (Downloaded on 27/07/2026 at 05:54:32 PM)
    [2026:RJ-JP:28448] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2410/2023]

    cannot conduct fishing and roving enquiry to find out the truth

    behind the allegations levelled against the petitioner. Certainly,

    this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer, who has

    already found prima facie case against the petitioner and

    therefore, charge-sheet has been submitted against him.

    8. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case,

    this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant

    criminal misc. petition granting liberty to the petitioner to take all

    available defences, which have been taken before this Court at the

    appropriate stage of the trial before the Trial Court.

    9. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands

    disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if

    any, also stand disposed of.

    (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

    8/Karan

    (Uploaded on 27/07/2026 at 04:19:14 PM)
    (Downloaded on 27/07/2026 at 05:54:32 PM)

    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here