Ukhc010126142026 vs State Of Uttarakhand on 21 July, 2026

    0
    4
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    Ukhc010126142026 vs State Of Uttarakhand on 21 July, 2026

    Author: Rakesh Thapliyal

    Bench: Rakesh Thapliyal

                                                                 UKHC010126142026
    
    
    
                                                                         2026:UHC:6152
                  Office Notes,
                 reports, orders
                 or proceedings
    SL.
          Date    or directions                COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
    No.
                 and Registrar's
                   order with
                   Signatures
                                   C528/1560/2026
                                   With
                                   IA 1/2026 (For Compounding Application)
    
    
                                   Vinod Chaurasiya
                                                                         --Applicant
                                                     Versus
                                   State Of Uttarakhand
                                                                       --Respondent
    
                                   Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
    

    1. Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for the
    applicant.

    2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A.
    with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for
    the State.

    SPONSORED

    3. Mr. Chandramauli Shah, learned counsel for
    the respondent.

    4. The instant petition is moved by the present
    applicant ‘Vinod Chaurasiya S/o Jeet Lal
    Chaurasiya along with the compounding
    application for quashing of proceeding of
    Criminal Case No. 723 of 2018 ‘State vs. Vinod
    Chaurasiya
    ‘ pending in the court of Additional
    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vikas Nagar, District
    Dehradun, wherein, the present applicant is
    summoned to face the trial for the offences
    punishable under sections 498A, 323, 504 of IPC
    r/w section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act
    arising out of Case Crime No. 61 of 2017.

    5. The applicant is present in court and the
    respondent/complainant joined the proceeding
    through V.C. and both of them are identified by
    their respective counsel.

    6. It is submitted in the compounding
    application that the dispute in between the parties
    is due the matrimonial discord, which has now
    been settled by both the parties and the divorce
    petition is already filed, which is pending for
    consideration. It is submitted that both the parties
    UKHC010126142026

    2026:UHC:6152
    have settled their matrimonial dispute, therefore,
    the proceedings be dropped.

    7. The complainant also submits that she do
    not want to pursue the proceeding.

    8. Learned State counsel have not objected on
    this since the parties have settled their
    matrimonial dispute and a divorce petition is filed
    by way of mutual consent, therefore, there is no
    useful purpose to continue the proceeding.

    9. After hearing the submission of learned
    counsel for the parties and taking into
    consideration that the parties have settled their
    matrimonial dispute, therefore, there is no useful
    purpose to continue the proceeding.

    10. In such view of the matter the present
    application as well as the compounding
    application are allowed and the entire proceeding
    of Criminal Case No. 723 of 2018 ‘State vs. Vinod
    Chaurasiya
    ‘ pending in the court of Additional
    Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vikas Nagar, District
    Dehradun, is hereby quashed.

    (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
    21.07.2026
    PR



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here