Mathi Venkata Lakshmi vs Pushadapu Sambasiva Rao on 20 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    The defendants 7 and 8 in the suit filed the above revision against the
    order dated 08.07.2025 in I.A.No.58 of 2025 in O.S.No.14 of 2014 on the file
    of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Repalle.

    SPONSORED

    2. The parties to this revision are referred to as per their array in the suit.

    3. The plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.14 of 2014 on the file of the Civil Judge
    (Senior Division), Repalle, against 10 defendants, seeking partition of the
    plaint schedule properties.

    4. For a better understanding of pleadings, it is necessary to draw a
    genealogy of the parties.

    Page 6 of 15

    5. (a) In the plaint, it was pleaded that the sons of late P. Tataiah jointly
    purchased Ac.1.53 cents of dry land in D.No.191/1 of Nagaram village under a
    registered document No.971 of 1924 dated 25.11.1924. The said Ramaiah
    and his 3 brothers partitioned their properties, and in the partition, Ramaiah
    got Ac.0.38¾ cents towards his share. The said Ramaiah was blessed with 3
    sons, namely, Tataiah, Subrahmanyam and Venkateswarlu.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here