23 April vs State Of Uttarakhand & Anr on 23 April, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

23 April vs State Of Uttarakhand & Anr on 23 April, 2025

Author: Vivek Bharti Sharma

Bench: Vivek Bharti Sharma

                                                                   2025:UHC:3038



HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
         Criminal Misc Application No. 464 of 2024
                                23 April, 2025



Visarat alias Bisarat & Ors.                                    --Petitioners
                                      Versus

State Of Uttarakhand & Anr.                                    --Respondents

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Shakib Husain, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy A.G. with Mr. Akshay Latwal, A.G.A. for the State.
Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate for respondent no.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Oral)

By means of present petition, petitioners seek to
quash the charge-sheet and the cognizance orders dated
10.02.2023 and 03.05.2023 passed by A.C.J.M., Roorkee,
District Haridwar as well as the entire proceedings of
S.T. No.44 of 2023 “State vs. Bisarat” and S.T. No.83 of 2023
“State vs. Azam and another” (leading S.T. No.53 of 2023),
under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506, 34 of IPC, in view of the
compromise arrived at between the parties.

2. In view of the fact that a Compounding Application
was filed by the parties before this Court, this Court, vide order
dated 09.04.2025, had directed the parties to appear before the
Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar to get their statements recorded and
to verify the compromise deed.

3. Pursuant to such order, Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar
has submitted report dated 15.04.2025 which indicates that the

1
2025:UHC:3038
parties have settled the dispute amicably and have also verified
the contents of the compromise.

4. In view of the above, Compounding Application IA
No.1/2024 is allowed. As a consequence thereof, impugned
charge-sheet and the cognizance orders dated 10.02.2023 and
03.05.2023 passed by A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Haridwar as
well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No.44 of 2023 “State vs.
Bisarat” and S.T. No.83 of 2023 “State vs. Azam and another“

(leading S.T. No.53 of 2023) under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506,
34 of IPC, are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

5. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of, on the
basis of compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties.

(Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.)
23.04.2025
Rajni

RAJINI
Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48448ac3701
a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d01342,
postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,

GUSAIN
serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4DF4FC80
D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A158A0A878BD8,
cn=RAJINI GUSAIN
Date: 2025.04.24 17:32:58 +05’30’

2